File

advertisement

THE RISE & DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN

INDUSTRY IN THE LATE 19 TH CENTURY

OBJECTIVE: WHAT FACTORS LED TO THE GROWTH

OF AMERICAN INDUSTRY & HOW DID

GOVERNMENT & WORKERS RESPOND TO THIS

GROWTH?

1876 CENTENNIAL

EXHIBITION

RISK TAKING &

INNOVATION

RESOURCES, TECHNOLOGY,

LABOR, COMPETITION,

PRICE

RAILROAD MOST

SIGNIFICANT

TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCE

VANDERBILT, GOULD, HILL

CONSOLIDATION & MODEL

FOR OTHER BUSINESSES

AIR-BRAKE,

REFRIGERATION

COMPETITION

MORGANIZATION

BIG BUSINESS

STEEL

ANDREW CARNEGIE

RR SPURS NEED FOR

STEEL

ARRIVED 1848 POOR

SELLS COMPANY FOR ½

BILLION 1890

VERTICAL INTEGRATION

GOSPEL OF WEALTH –

WEALTHY ARE

RESPONSIBLE TO

SOCIETY – PROVIDE

OPPORTUNITIES FOR

OTHERS

SELLS TO J.P. MORGAN,

TURNS IT INTO U.S. STEEL

– 1 ST BILLION DOLLAR

CORPORATION

1888 PROFIT 2MILL –

1900 40 MILL PRIOR TO

SALE

BLACK GOLD 1859 PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER

COMPETITION WASTEFUL

CONSOLIDATION

NECESSARY

ENTERS INDUSTRY 1863

1873 PRESIDENT

STANDARD OIL (EXXON)

HORIZONTAL

INTEGRATION

CONTROLS 90% OF OIL

REFINERIES BY 1879

CREATED TRUST 1879

1882 VIRTUALLY

ELIMINATED

COMPETITION

1900 1% OF US

COMPANIES OWNED MORE

THAN 1/3 OF INDUSTRIAL

PRODUCTION

REACTIONS & REFORMERS – FEW QUESTION

UNDERLYING VALUES OF THE MIDDLE CLASS

1879 WALT WHITMAN

1879 PROGRESS & POVERTY HENRY GEORGE

1888 LOOKING BACKWARD EDWARD BELLAMY

1889 GOSPEL OF WEALTH ANDREW CARNEGIE

1894 WEALTH AGAINST COMMONWEALTH HENRY D. LLOYD

WERE GOVERNMENT ATTEMPTS AT REGULATION

CONTRADICTORY OR SUPPORTIVE OF

GOVERNMENT CLAIMS OF LAISSEZ FAIRE

?

AS CORPORATIONS ROSE CALLS FOR REFORM & REGULATION

FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENTS STEP IN

TOP 10% OWNED 73% OF THE WEALTH IN 1890

>½ OF THE INDUSTRIAL WORKFORCE EARNED < $500

SMALL, SPECIALTY MANUFACTURING: KODAK, SINGER, EDISON

OVERALL STANDARD OF LIVING INCREASED FOR MOST IN U.S.

BUT GAP BETWEEN RICH & POOR EXPANDED

OLIGOPOLY –GOVERNMENT RUN BY SMALL GROUP OF

INDUSTRIALISTS

VERY FEW QUESTION THE PROCESS BY WHICH PEOPLE ‘MAKE

IT’ IN THE U.S. & AS A RESULT IN PRACTICE NOT MUCH WILL

CHANGE

RAILROAD CONTROL OF ECONOMY FORCES CHANGES

THE GRANGE AG-RICULTURAL

ORGANIZATION –OLIVER KELLEY

1867

MUNN V. ILLINOIS – 1877 STATE

HAS RIGHT TO REGULATE RR RATES

CIVIL RIGHTS CASES - 1883

WABASH V. ILLINOIS 1886

REVERSES MUNN – FEDS CONTROL

INTERSTATE COMMERCE

INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT 1887

I.C.COMMISSION – 1 ST FEDERAL

REGULATORY BOARD

1890 SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST ACT :

RESTORE COMPETITION -

LOOPHOLES

US V EC KNIGHT 1895

EMASCULATES SHERMAN

14 TH AMEND CONTRIBUTED MOST

TO GROWTH OF BIG BUSINESS

WORKERS RESPOND WITH LABOR UNIONS

EARLY 19 TH C. UNIONS TOO

RADICAL/FOREIGN

AS BUSINESS GROWS

UNIONS MORE ACCEPTABLE

1866 NATIONAL LABOR

UNION

1869 KNIGHTS OF LABOR –

STEPHENS & POWDERLY

HARDEST TO ORGANIZE –

INDUSTRIES W/ FOREIGN

BORN WORKERS

1886 AMERICAN

FEDERATION OF LABOR:

SAM GOMPERS – SKILLED &

WHITE MEN ONLY,

CONCRETE ECONOMIC

GAINS MORE IMPT. THAN

POL & SOC ISSUES

UNIONS FIGHT BACK - STRIKES

WILDCAT STRIKES

GREAT RAILROAD STRIKE 1877 –

WILDCAT, NATIONAL, AMERICAN

RAILWAY UNION LEADER E. DEBS

PRES. HAYES SENDS IN TROOPS

HAYMARKET STRIKE 1886 END OF

KNIGHTS OF LABOR

HOMESTEAD & COEUR d’ALENE

1892- STEEL MILLS, PINKERTON

GUARDS, NATIONAL GUARD

CALLED IN IDAHO

PULLMAN STRIKE 1894 MOST

SYSTEMATIC USE OF TROOPS

IN RE DEBS – UPHOLD USE OF

INJUNCTION

FEDERAL GOV’T INTERVENTION

BENEFITS EMPLOYERS NOT

WORKERS

Download