Evolution and Air Quality Benefits of Arizona Cleaner Burning Gasoline Essential Services Task Force January 5, 2004 Ira Domsky Deputy Director Air Quality Division Overview Gasoline properties and automobile emissions History of CBG standards Air quality benefits Gasoline Properties and Emissions Pollutants of Concern Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons – evaporative and tailpipe Oxides of Nitrogen Hazardous Air Pollutants Benzene Butadiene Aldehydes Other products of incomplete combustion Gasoline Properties and Emissions Gasoline Properties Octane or anti-knock index Volatility Distillation “curve” Oxygen Sulfur Aromatic hydrocarbons Olefins Benzene Gasoline Properties and Emissions Always regulated for driveability (poor driveability results in high emissions) Octane Volatility Distillation Regulated specifically for emissions control All the rest Evolution of CBG Standards Common theme: Many changes to gasoline standards adopted in Maricopa County have been driven by citizen lawsuits under the Clean Air Act Some changes were fostered by enlightened self-interest: Achieving attainment was good for business as well as public health Evolution of CBG Standards Why gasoline standards are attractive emission control strategies Emission reductions are relatively large Automobiles account for the majority or a plurality of pollution No changes to engines or other technology are necessary Reduces emissions for all vehicle trips Everyone who uses gasoline pays Evolution of CBG Standards Year 1988 1991 1992 1993 1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 2000 Change Pollutants CO Oxygen content increased, new RVP standards CO, HC County-wide for oxygenated fuels CO Wintertime RVP reduction CO Oxygen content increased & RVP decreased again CO Oxygenated fuels control period reduced Gov. Symington opts-in to federal RFG program HC/NOx Arizona CBG standards adopted HC/NOx Wintertime CARB 2 adopted; Area A expanded CO Summertime minimum oxygen standard repealed Oxygenated fuels adopted in nonattainment area Air Quality Benefits Cumulative Improvements Emissions Reductions (tons/day) Percent of Nonattainment Area Emissions Season Pollutant Winter Carbon Monoxide 44 6.8% Hydrocarbons 29 8.9% 7 2.1% Summer Oxides of Nitrogen Air Quality Benefits Carbon Monoxide Violations and Concentrations Maricopa County, 1984 - 2002 180 140 Number of Violations 16 150 14 133 120 12 109 Standard 100 10 80 8 60 6 37 40 4 27 18 20 2 3 2 2 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Violations 93 94 95 Second Hi 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Concentration (ppm) 160 18 Air Quality Benefits 9 0.18 8 0.16 7 0.14 Standard 6 0.12 5 0.1 4 0.08 3 0.06 2 0.04 1 0.02 0 0 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Violations 94 95 96 Second Hi 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 Concentration (ppm) Number of Violations 1-Hour Average Ozone Violations and Concentrations Maricopa County, 1984 - 2003 Air Quality Benefits Visibility Trends In the Phoenix Metropolitan Area, 1994 - 2002 100 87 Visual Range in Miles 80 64 64 49 53 39 40 68 58 55 60 64 32 31 29 31 20 18 18 18 18 1994 1995 34 33 35 19 19 21 19 2001 2002 32 20 0 1996 1997 1998 Dirtiest 20% Average 1999 2000 Cleanest 20%