Values, norms and energy use

advertisement

Norms and

Energy Use:

Transportation in Groningen

Social Norm Theory

( Cialdini, Kalgren & Reno, 1990 ) mm-dd-yy | 2

Injunctive norms: The behavior commonly

(dis)approved. (Social) Sanction, Reward

Descriptive norms: The behavior commonly displayed.

› Salience is important

› Aligned norms are stronger

Project 1

› Promoting Orderly Bike Parking in Groningen

Kaartje binnenstad

Previous Studies on Parking Problems

› 44% Sees inappropriate parking as a problem

› 67% Shopping

› 64% Park < 30 minutes

› 42% Not enough parking spaces

Making the injunctive norm salient

Prohibition sign: 37% Prescriptive sign: 60%

Making the injunctive norm salient

› How?

› Please park your bicycle within the green area 

PROPOSED FIELD EXPERIMENT

› Method:

• Pre and post intervention

• Observational

› Outcome measures:

• % Bikers conforming to parking norm

• % Bikers being socially sanctioned

Project 2: Reducing cars driving to city

Car

Public

Transit

Bike

Walk

> 10km Public

Transit

5-10km PT or bike

< 5km Bike or walk

Behavior

Segmented approach

39%

Transportation modes for 5-10 km

1%

1%

45% car public transportation bicycle walk other

14%

Social Norms

› Theoretical gaps:

• Behavior suggestions: 1 vs. 2 alternatives

• Norm effectiveness: perception vs. actual

Action Research

› 4 conditions (all groups receive information + incentive)

• Bike norm info

• Public transport norm info

• Bike + PT norm info

• Control

Action Research

› Procedure

• Telephone Survey

• Mail packages

• Outcome measures

• Telephone follow up survey

• Objective assessment

The message

(For people 5-10 km)

› Many people believe that using sustainable transportation is the right thing to do. (injunctive)

› 53% of people in your neighborhood use a bike or public transportation to go to work everyday.

(descriptive)

› Join us in making Groningen the most sustainable city in the Netherlands!

› Please use a bike or public transportation when you go to work.

Expected outcomes

› Practical

• Decrease car use in city for segmented area

› Theoretical hypotheses

• Experimental groups will reduce car use more than control

• Perception of norm may interact with reported norm

Project 3: The use of norms on testimonials

Purpose of the study: increase preference for the tram

“ Well, I think the tram is a good plan, as long as it will go past

Euroborg”

“I used the tram in Rio de

Janeiro, Brussels,

Amsterdam, and a couple of other city's. I really like it”

Which message works best?

Injunctive: The tram will be an appropriate means of

transportation

Descriptive: 60% of people traveling within Groningen will take the tram

When both norms align tram preference will increase

Which message works best… and for whom?

Target group: People working in Groningen and living outside of Groningen

Important: Identify with the individual providing the testimonial

Vs.

Identification with models will increase tram preference

K.E.Keizer@rug.nl

Thank you for your attention

mm-dd-yy | 23

Download