Qualitative Data Analysis Quantitative research Involves information or data in the form of numbers Allows us to measure or to quantify things Respondents don’t necessarily give numbers as answers - answers are analysed as numbers Good example of quantitative research is the survey Quantitative research Helps us flesh out the story and develop a deeper understanding of a topic Often contrasted to quantitative research Together they give us the ‘bigger picture’ Good examples of qualitative research are face-to-face interviews, focus groups and site visits Surveys: Questionnaires Think clearly about questions (need to constrain answers as much as possible) Make sure results will answer your research question Can use Internet for conducting surveys if need to cover wide geographic reach Face-to-face interviews Must prepare questions Good idea to record your interviews Interviews take up time, so plan for an hour or less (roughly 10 questions) Stick to your questions, but be flexible if relevant or interesting issues arise during the interview Focus groups Take time to arrange, so prepare in advance (use an intermediary to help you if you can) Who will be in your focus group? (e.g. age, gender) Size of focus group (8-10 is typical) Consider whether or not to have separate focus groups for different ages or genders (e.g. discussing sex and sexuality) Site visits and observation Site visits involve visiting an organization, community project etc Consider using a guide Observation is when you visit a location and observe what is going on, drawing your own conclusions Both facilitate making your research more relevant and concrete Case studies Method of capturing and presenting concrete details of real or fictional situations in a structured way Good for comparative analysis Participatory research Allows participation of community being researched in research process (e.g. developing research question; choosing methodology; analysing results) Good way to ensure research does not simply reinforce prejudices and presumptions of researcher Good for raising awareness in community and developing appropriate action plans Interviews Interviews Unstructured Semi-structured Structured Interviews Establish a rapport Treat interviewees with respect Think about your appearance Think about body language Maintain firm eye contact Don’t Invade their space Interviews How are you going to record Tape recorder Pen and paper Video recorder Questionnaires Questionnaires Open-ended Close-ended Combination of both Questionnaires Open-ended Slower to administer Harder to record responses Does not stifle response Answerer can raise new issues Answerer feels they can speak their mind What does a blank answer mean ???? Questionnaires Close-ended Faster to administer Easier to record responses Answerer can only give predefined answers Answerer cannot raise new issues Answerer feels constrained More likely to answer all questions (box tick) Questionnaires Self-administered Interviewer administered Questionnaires Keep questions short and simple Avoid questions with “not” Avoid questions with bias Avoid sensitive questions (ask indirectly) Types of Input Analysing data from; Interviews Open-ended questions Also (approaches you have seen previously); Laddering Card sorting Repertory grids Action Research & Participatory Action Research Action Research versus Participatory Action Research "If you want to know how things really are, just try to change them" Action Research versus Participatory Action Research Difference Or Extension? Context – Developing world issues V’s Developed world issues? What do you need? Mind Map Conversational Analysis Introduction Conversation analysis (commonly abbreviated as CA) is the study of talk in interaction. CA generally attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction, whether this is institutional (in the school, doctor's surgery, courts or elsewhere) or casual conversation. MindMap People Harvey Sacks Emanuel Schegloff Conversational Analysis Fields Practical Examples Ethnomethodology Discursive Psychology Qualitative Research Conversations between friends Relationship counselling sessions Legal hearings Ethnography Ethnography “Do you mind if I just hang around here and take note of what you’re doing?” Ethnography - background What is Anthropology? It is the comparative study of the physical and social characteristics of humanity through the examination of historical and present geographical distribution, cultural history, acculturation, and cultural relationships. Ethnography - background What is Cultural Anthropology? It is one of four fields of anthropology which has developed and promoted "culture" as a meaningful scientific concept; it is also the branch of anthropology that studies cultural variation among humans. Ethnography It is two things The fundamental research method of cultural anthropology. It is the genre of writing that presents descriptions of human social phenomena, based on fieldwork; or, the written text produced to report ethnographic research results. Ethnography Whilst living among the people, ethnographers engage in participant observation. This means that they participate, as much as possible, in local daily life (everything from important ceremonies and rituals to ordinary things like meal preparation and consumption) while also carefully observing everything they can about it. Ethnography Through this, ethnographers seek to gain what is called an emic perspective, or the native's point(s) of view without imposing their own conceptual frameworks. The emic perspective is quite different from the etic perspective which is the outsider's view on local life. Ethnography Through the participant observation method, ethnographers record detailed fieldnotes, conduct interviews based on open-ended questions, and gather whatever site documents might be available in the setting as data. This data is then recorded in the database. Ethnomethodology Ethnomethodology “The study of how people use commonsense understandings to get through everyday life ” These understandings shape our assumptions about social Interactions In a conversation between two people there are many things that are understood than are actually mentioned. Ethnomethodology What are social problems? Damaging conditions resulting in harm to people or society. Things are seen, judged, and defined to be problems, i.e. What people THINK they are. Ethnomethodology Tacit interpretation – culture, teaching, understanding, experiences. Explicit Truth – misinterpretations, misunderstanding. Ethnomethodology Example: Girl called Anna, unplanned pregnancy, 21 years old, still in school. Good or Bad? Ethnomethodology What if …….? Anna is an outstanding student, is the sole heiress to a multi-billion dollar business, has the full support of her parents, and will be finished school early into the pregnancy? Ethnomethodology Anna Anisimova Daughter of Russian metals magnate Vassily Anisimov Worth $1.3 billion Ethnomethodology We make assumptions based on our tacit interpretation of the world around us. We can apply methods to research in order to apply a “neutral” analysis to the subject. This has been done in HCI to study descriptions of how the users interact with systems, rather than what the system needed to do? Ethnomethodology – (Varieties) 1. The organization of practical actions and practical reasoning. Including 2. The organization of conversation analysis. 3. Talk-in-interaction within institutional or organizational settings. Identify interactional structures that are specific to particular settings. 4. The study of social activity. The analytic interest is in how that work is accomplished within the setting in which it is performed. 5. The haecceity of work. Just what makes an activity what it is? E.g. what makes a test a test, a competition a competition, or a definition a definition? MindMap Grounded Theory What is Grounded theory? "Grounded theory methods are a set of flexible analytic guidelines that enable researchers to focus their data collection and to build inductive middle-range theories through successive levels of data analysis and conceptual development" Charmaz, K. (2005) What is Grounded theory? The phrase "grounded theory" refers to theory that is developed inductively from a corpus of data. If done well, this means that the resulting theory at least fits one dataset perfectly. This contrasts with theory derived deductively from grand theory, without the help of data, and which could therefore turn out to fit no data at all - Steve Borgatti Grounded Theory Emphasis on empirical material as basis for conceptualization. Gathering reach empirical material from a variety of sources. Open data collection Recording data systematically the emphasis is on exploring the nuances of the data by constantly asking, 'of what is this an example?' Develop dense and grouded concepts and categories Example - Data Analysis Identify ‘critical instances’ -highlight key passages of transcripts. ‘Open coding’ - assign passages to categories (i.e. abstract conceptual labels). Work through all transcripts and collect numerous illustrative quotes to ‘saturate’ categories. ‘Axial coding’ - refine initial list of categories. Delete and amalgamate some. Make connections between the categories and define their properties e.g. context, pre-conditions. These are subcategories. ‘Selective coding’ - identify a core category and themes from which theory will derive. Research Design 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Five components of research design: A study's questions Its propositions, if any Its unit(s) of analysis The logic linking the data to the propositions The criteria for interpreting the findings Strengths and Weaknesses Suitable for diagrammatic representation? Complex terminology. Time-consuming, requires concentration but can adapt a ‘quick-and-dirty’ version. Reductionist - complexity of raw data overcome by reducing it to the status of variables. Does not lead to any surprising findings. Theory is inductively built up from data collected so cannot contain anything new. Uncovers a pre-existing reality similar to positivism / realism. Idea that there is a ‘core’ category which explains all. Issues of generalisation Narrative Inquiry Narrative Inquiry A narrative is the description of a sequence of events – a story. It is generally natural for people to remember things as a sequence of events, and to provide a cause. It can be used as a method of investigation as follows: While interviewing a person with relevant information, let the interviewee provide their information as a narrative – a story. Then analyse the story using the components of a story – such as a movie screenplay-– identify the scenario -,setting, complicating action, resolution Narrative Inquiry The resulting analysis moves towards a reduction of the narration to answer the question "what is the point of this story?" – and how does this fit into the context of the research. (Richmond, 2002) Narrative Inquiry An advantage of narrative is that it provides the information along with its context – it provides a more detailed answer to a question. Narrative Inquiry A narrative may be more effective than questionnaires. Using a questionnaire means that the investigator has predetermined the nature of what they expect to find before starting the enquiry process. Questionnaires constrain an interviewee – narrative allows them to express the story as they see it. (Snowden, 2003) Narrative Inquiry On the other hand ,there are dangers in relying on narrative. By assigning causes and connection events , people make sense of the world . The cause and connection may not be correct. Phenomenography JA, ich liebe Logical Investigations 1900 Martin Heidegger Jean-Paul Sartre Edmund Husserl Appearance + Description = Phenomenography Maurice Merleau-Ponty Da Fan Club Graphei n Phainomenon Plato or Bust Ulrich Sonnemann In other words… Phenomenography, a descriptive recording of immediate subjective experience as reported, for example, by a person under psychiatric examination, without questioning the share in such a communication of the ego. (Sonnemann, 1954 ) What's it all About? Empirical research Based on observation and experience Applied factors – Intelligence, Motivation, Effort, past and present surroundings, experiences, experiences and individual character traits Nothing taken for granted? What does it mean, that some people are better at learning than others? Why are some people better at learning than others? Content Analysis Content Analysis Content analysis is a standard methodology in the social sciences on the subject of communication content. Earl Babbie defines it as "the study of recorded human communications, such as books, web sites, paintings and laws". Content Analysis Harold Lasswell formulated the core questions of content analysis: "Who says what, to whom, why, to what extent and with what effect?". Ole Holsti (1969) offers a broad definition of content analysis as "any technique for making inferences by objectively and systematically identifying specified characteristics of messages" Content Analysis Q Methodology Q Methodology The name "Q" comes from the form of factor analysis that is used to analyze the data. Normal factor analysis, called "R method," involves finding correlations between variables (say, height and age) across a sample of subjects. Q, on the other hand, looks for correlations between subjects across a sample of variables. Q factor analysis reduces the many individual viewpoints of the subjects down to a few "factors," which represent shared ways of thinking. Knowledge Elicitation Card Sorting KA technique in which a collection of concepts (or other knowledge objects) are written on separate cards and sorted into piles by an expert in order to elicit classes based on attributes. Also enables significant elicitation of properties and dimensions Used to capture concept knowledge and tacit knowledge Use in conjunction with triadic method Can also sort objects or pictures instead of cards Repertory Grid technique KA technique used for a number of purposes: to elicit attributes for a set of concepts to rate concepts against attributes using a numerical scale uses statistical analysis to arrange and group similar concepts and attributes A useful way of capturing concept knowledge and tacit knowledge Requires special software (PC-PACK) Repertory Grid Example Laddering KA technique that involves the construction, modification and validation of trees. A valuable method for acquiring concept knowledge and, to a lesser extent, process knowledge. Can make use of various trees: concept tree composition tree attribute tree process tree decision tree cause tree Triadic Elicitation Method KA technique used to capture the way in which an expert views the concepts in a domain. Involves presenting three random concepts and asking in what way two of them are similar but different from the other one. Answer will give an attribute. A good way of acquiring tacit knowledge. Analysing Text Analysing Text Faced with the lack of organisation of data and the sheer amount of rambling can be somewhat overwhelming With the best will in the world about trying to avoid bias, when there is multiple interpretations of data, selecting the one that best matches your research question becomes very tempting. Simple Tabulation Subject Money Fame Power Social Fulfilment Other 1 15 6 4 0 1 38 2 5 3 6 5 4 27 3 1 0 3 12 21 46 ….. Total Reasons for Choosing a career Choosing categories Use ones from the literature Blame someone else / comparison Use categories connected with your research question Derive categories from data Deriving Categories Verbatim Analysis Gist Analysis Knowledge management <> Knowledge engineering <> Knowledge representation <> Knowledge reasoning “Compatible with Windows” <> “Windows-Compatible” “Compatible with Windows” == “Windows-Compatible” Superordinate Analysis Derive superclasses Windows-Compatible + Linux-Compatible => category of “Compatibility” Knowledge Representation Knowledge Representation Scripts Sets Schemata Knowledge Representation Script Theory Knowledge Representation Script Theory Schank states that memory is in the form of meaningful 'stories' (not merely inert decontextualized information) and that problem solving progressed by using 'cases' or examples stored in memory. So for example, in the 'classical' view, when we walk to the store, we accomplish this because we have access to a stored algorithm that tells us 'step one, open door, step two, step into street' and so on. In Schank's view on the other hand, we accomplish this because we have access to a stored 'schema' based on previous experience of what it is like to walk to the store, and we don't need rules to describe this. Knowledge Representation Set Theory Do we categorise based on similarities or differences ? Category – Bird Robin obvious Ostriches and penguins less features Knowledge Representation Schema Theory Bartlett arrived at the concept from studies of memory he conducted in which subjects recalled details of stories that were not actually there. He suggested that memory takes the form of schema which provide a mental framework for understanding and remembering information.