School Improvement Plan 2014-2015 2013-2014 through 2014-2015 School Improvement Plans remain in effect for two years, but a School Leadership Team may amend as often as necessary or appropriate. Draft Due: September 26, 2014 Final Copy Due: October 24, 2014 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report CEEC Contact Information School: Address: Learning Community Charlotte Engineering Early College 9000 Robert Snyder Road Charlotte, NC 28267 East Courier Number: Phone Number: 980-343-9898 Fax Number: 980-343-2517 School Website: Principal: Will Leach Learning Community Superintendent: Tonya Kales 567 http://schools.cms.k12.nc.us/ceecHS/Pages CEEC School Improvement Team Membership From GS §115C-105.27: “The principal of each school, representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants assigned to the school building, and parents of children enrolled in the school shall constitute a school improvement team to develop a school improvement plan to improve student performance. Representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants shall be elected by their respective groups by secret ballot...Parents serving on school improvement teams shall reflect the racial and socioeconomic composition of the students enrolled in that school and shall not be members of the building-level staff.” Committee Position Principal Assistant Principal Representative Teacher Representative Teacher Representative Inst. Support Representative Teacher Assistant Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Name Will Leach N/A Gayle Scott Hannah Brooks Mary Towe N/A Jamella Ewell Rachel Smith Amy Murray Email Address Date Elected Will.leach@cms.k12.nc.us Gaylem.scott@cms.k12.nc.us Hannahk.smith@cms.k12.nc.us m.towe@cms.k12.nc.us 9/12/2014 9/12/2014 9/12/2014 jamellar@msn.com rachelrx@gmail.com aemurray@carolina.rr.com 9/18/14 9/18/14 9/18/14 2 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Parent Representative Parent Representative Michael Green Valerie Edwards Mgreen3@carolina.rr.com Valerie.edwards@cms.k12.nc.us 9/18/14 9/18/14 Vision Statement District: CMS provides all students the best education available anywhere, preparing every child to lead a rich and productive life. School: Every student at CEEC will graduate ready for college, a career in engineering and life. Mission Statement District: The mission of CMS is to maximize academic achievement by every student in every school. School: To be an innovative community of learners in which all stakeholders use their minds well and care for one another. We engage in challenging, personalized academics with a commitment to continuous improvement. CEEC Shared Beliefs-Adapted from the Coalition of Essential Schools Our central intellectual purpose is helping students use their minds well. A governing practical metaphor will be “student-as-worker, teacher-as-coach” Teaching and Learning will be documented by student performance on real tasks The tone of the school will be one of trust, challenge and support An essential body of knowledge and skills will be identified for student mastery. Less is more, depth over coverage CEEC goals aply to all students CEEC will be highly personalized The principal, staff and teachers will act as generalists first and specialists second Resources will be modest and therefore positioned toward teaching and learning CEEC will emphasize democratice, fair and equitable practices 3 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report CEEC SMART Goals Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis. Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours. Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors. Achieve 80% proficiency, exceed expected growth and have no achievement gaps on the End-of Course Test in Math I and Biology in 2014-15. Students will complete two cross-curricular projects during the 2014-15 school year. 4 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report CEEC Assessment Data Snapshot Charlotte Engineering Early College The 2014-15 school year is the first year of existence for the Charlotte Engineering Early College. We serve 100 ninth grade students. For the 2014-15 school year, we will gain assessment information in the following areas: 99 students will take the Biology End-of-Course Test 44 students will take the Math I End-of-Course Test. 56 students completed Math I in middle school 100 students will take the NC Final Exam in English I 100 students will take the NC Final Exam in World History 100 students will take the NC Final Exam in Earth and Environmental Science 16 students will take the NC Final Exam in Foundations of Math 1 84 students will take the NC Final Exam in Math II 56 students will take the NC Final Exam in Math III 100 students will take the PLTW Exam in Introduction to Engineering Design 5 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report CEEC Profile In November of 2013, the Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools Board of Education approved an early college program that would be located on the campus of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. A design team make up of stakeholders from CMS, UNC Charlotte, NC New Schools, NAF and the corporate community met throughout the 2013-14 school year to plan and develop the program. The first principal was hired in March of 2014. The 9 other staff members were hired in May of 2014. One hundred students were admitted to the Charlotte Engineering Early College via the CMS Student Assignment process during the spring of 2014. Nearly 300 students applied for admission to the first cohort. CEEC will admit 100 students each year of the program for a future capacity of 500. Students will be enrolled in our program for five years. During the five-year program, students will complete 24 hours of high school credits and have the opportunity to complete 60+ hours of transferrable college credit. The program of student has a unique focus on preparing students for an engineering career. We are partnering with NC New Schools to establish school that will be used as a regional site for professional development and school reform. A team from NC New Schools provides design assistance, instructional coaching, leadership coaching and other professional development opportunities. CEEC is also in a year of planning process with the National Academy Foundation (NAF) to become an Academy of Engineering. Instructionally, we will aim to provide Project Based Learning and will follow the NC New Schools Common Instructional Framework. We will participate in a variety of field trips, internships and work-based learning to provide a well-rounded education for our students. 6 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report 2014-15 Student Demographics (as of 9/16/2014) Grade 09 Total N % N % Female 41 41.4 41 41.4 Male 58 58.6 58 58.6 Total 99 100.0 99 100.0 African American Total 48 48.5 48 48.5 American Indian Total 9 9.1 9 9.1 Asian Total 2 2.0 2 2.0 More Than One Total 13 13.1 13 13.1 White Total 27 27.3 27 27.3 Hispanic Total 20 20.2 20 20.2 Non-Hispanic Total 79 79.8 79 79.8 School Total Race Ethnicity 7 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report EC Category AIG Total 19 19.2 19 19.2 Non-EC Total 76 76.8 76 76.8 SWD Total 4 4.0 4 4.0 LEP Total 2 2.0 2 2.0 Non-LEP Total 97 98.0 97 98.0 No Total 99 100.0 99 100.0 No Total 93 93.9 93 93.9 Yes Total 6 6.1 6 6.1 LEP Status McKinney Vento 504 Plan 8 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Strategic Plan 2018: For a Better Tomorrow Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready Four focus areas: I. College- and career-readiness II. Academic growth/high academic achievement III. Access to rigor IV. Closing achievement gaps Goal 3: Cultivate partnerships with families, businesses, faith-based groups and community organizations to provide a sustainable system of support and care for each child Three focus areas: I. Family engagement II. Communication and outreach III. Partnership development Goal 5: Optimize district performance and accountability by strengthening data use, processes and systems Four focus areas: I. Effective and efficient processes and systems II. Strategic use of district resources III. Data integrity and use IV. School performance improvement Goal 2: Recruit, develop, retain and reward a premier workforce Five focus areas: I. Proactive recruitment II. Individualized professional development III. Retention/quality appraisals IV. Multiple career pathways V. Leadership development Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, cultural competency and customer service Five focus areas: I. Physical safety II. Social and emotional health III. High engagement IV. Cultural competency V. Customer service Goal 6: Inspire and nurture learning, creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship through technology and strategic school redesign Four focus areas: I. Learning everywhere, all the time II. Innovation and entrepreneurship III. Strategic school redesign IV. Innovative new schools 9 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report SMART Goal (1): Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis. Duty Free Lunch for Teachers Strategic Plan Goal: Strategic Plan Focus Area: Navigator Pathway: Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, cultural competency and customer service School Safety Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT CEEC Master Schedule Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) A component of the CEEC master Will Leach/ schedule includes a Smart Lunch. Principal Students have the opportunity to eat lunch in a teacher’s classroom and get assistance with their work. The Science and Math teachers will not host Smart Lunch every day to allow for extra planning time. The English, Social Studies and Engineering Teachers receive additional planning during the school day. A schedule has been developed to notify Students will gain access to teachers during the school day for extra academic assistance. N/A Personnel Involved All CEEC Teachers Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates Aug. 2014June 2015 10 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report students which classrooms are open each day. 11 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report SMART Goal (2): Duty Free Instructional Planning Time Strategic Plan Goal: Strategic Plan Focus Area: Navigator Pathway: Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours. Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and Cultural competence. High Engagement Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT CEEC Master Schedule Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) All teachers during the 2014Leach/Principal 15 school year at CEEC are provided at least 75 minutes of duty-free instructional planning time each day. English, SS and Engineering Teachers will have two 75 minute periods per day. Science and Math teachers will have 75 minutes each day plus at least 30 extra Master Schedule Time each day for teachers to plan engaging instruction for students. N/A Personnel Involved Leach/ Principal Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates Aug. 2014June 2015 12 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report minutes during Smart Lunch. 13 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report SMART Goal (3): Anti-Bullying / Character Education Strategic Plan Goal: Strategic Plan Focus Area: Navigator Pathway: Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors. Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and cultural competence. School Safety Enter Kindergarten ready At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Advanced Reading in K-2 Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT National data related to school culture Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) Bully Liaison / Bully-prevention Bully Prevention will be a major focus of the freshman seminar taught by our counselor each day. Towe/ Counselor Students will have access to N/A their counselor at least once per week in a classroom setting. Towe/ Counselor Aug. 2014June 2015 Character Education Character Education will be the primary focus of the counselor and CDC during the freshmen seminar block. Create a Student-of-theMonth award. Partner with the UNC Charlotte Center for STEM Towe/ Counselor Students will have weekly interaction with the counselor and CDC to discuss character education. Students will be recognized for their positive behavior. Students will have the opportunity to participate in Towe/ Counselor Aug. 2014June 2015 Osborne/CDC State 055 Funding Personnel Involved Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates Osborne/ CDC 14 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Education to participate in a service learning project on campus. School Health Team CEEC will focus on student wellness during the 201415 school year. Our seminar course that meets every day will provide a focus on mental health and coping skills during the counselor’s portion of the seminar. a service learning project on the UNC Charlotte Campus. Towe/ Counselor Students will have weekly access to their counselor who will cover a wide-range of topics related to mental health and coping skills State 055 Funding Towe/ Counselor Aug. 2014June 2015 15 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report SMART Goal (4): Strategic Plan Goal: Strategic Plan Focus Area: Navigator Pathway: Achieve 80% Proficiency, exceed expected growth and have no achievement gaps on the End-of Course Tests in Math I and Biology in 2014-15. Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready Academic growth/high academic achievement Enter Kindergarten ready At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Advanced Reading in K-2 Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT EOG Data, EVAAS Data Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) The use of the quarterly assessment data will allow us to modify instruction and provide opportunities for remediation/enrichment. State 055 Funding Develop quarterly assessments Leach/Principal using School Net in Math I and Biology. Attend School Net Training provided by CMS Develop quarterly assessments in the Fall for Math I Develop quarterly assessments in the Spring for Biology Use EVAAS, EOG and other Leach/Principal data to target specific groups of students to provide instruction Personnel Involved Leach/ Principal Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates Sept. 2014June 2015 Scott/Math Teacher Brooks/ Biology Teacher Providing time outside of the classroom will enhance student learning. State 055 Funding Leach/ Principal Oct. 2014June 2015 16 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report outside of the regular classroom. EVAAS Data provided to teachers SMART Lunch and Seminar Time will be utilized to provide enrichment opportunities. Create a 90 Day Instructional Plan for the selected group of students. Schedule a Foundations of Math I Course for students needing extra time to master the Math I curriculum. Utilize EVAAS and EOG Info to create Foundations Course. Use a proven pacing guide to ensure content is cohesive. Implement a Standards-Based Grading Plan in Math I and Biology to ensure that mastery in reached on all objectives. Work with staff to develop and implement a standards-based, mastery grading plan to be implemented in all courses. Scott/Math Teacher Brooks/ Biology Teacher Leach/Principal Foundation of Math I allows for 180 days of instruction and will build a solid foundation. State 055 Funding Leach/ Principal June 2014Sept. 2014 Leach/Principal Standards-Based Grading provided the framework so that students master course objectives. State 055 Funding Leach/ Principal Sept. 2014June 2015 17 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Develop processes and procedures for using the assessment information to reteach standards not mastered. Visit other schools that utilize a standards-based grading system learn best practices. Provide common planning and release time for the Math I and Biology Teacher to plan and share best practices. Schedule 3rd Block planning for Math I and Biology Teacher. Provide release days during the school year for planning, assessment creation and data review. Explore the possibility of extended employment during the summer of 2015 for extended planning and data review. Leach/Principal Common planning, release time and summer planning will allow for collaboration and sharing of best practices. State 055 Funding Leach/ Principal Scott/Math Teacher August 2014August 2015 Brooks/ Biology Teacher 18 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report SMART Goal (5): Strategic Plan Goal: Students will complete two cross-curricular projects during the 2014-15 school year. Goal 6: Recruit, develop, retain and reward a premier workforce Strategic Plan Focus Area: Navigator Pathway: Individualized professional development Enter Kindergarten ready At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Advanced Reading in K-2 Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT PDP Information, Higher Order Thinking Research Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) Utilize the NC New Schools Instructional Coach to deliver preliminary professional development related to ProjectBased Learning. Meetings will occur during her regularly scheduled visits Provide CEU credit for teachers completing the Project-Based Learning Training. Leach/ Principal Teachers will receive the training needed to implement Project-Based Learning in their classrooms. Student engagement will increase. State 055 Funding via NC New Schools Contract Personnel Involved All CEEC Staff Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates Oct. 2014June 2015 Leslie Eaves, NC New School Coach 19 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Attended professional Leach/Principal development offered by The Buck Institute, a nationally recognized leader in ProjectBased Learning, during the 2014-15 school year. Research when training is being offered by The Buck Institute. Use 055 funds and utilize a “Train-the-Trainer” model at CEEC. Purchase Project-Based Learning Resources for all teachers. Plan and Implement two cross- Howard/Lead curricular projects during the Teacher spring semester. Lead Teacher will facilitate, with the assistance from our NC New Schools Instructional Coach, the plans for two crosscurricular projects. Schedule release time for teachers to plan and develop a performance rubric. Project-Based Learning has been is a research-based, proven method to increase student engagement and higher order thinking skills. State 055 Funding All CEEC Staff Jan. 2015June 2015 Project-Based Learning has been is a research-based, proven method to increase student engagement and higher order thinking skills. State 055 Funding All CEEC Staff Jan. 2015June 2015 20 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Mastery Grading Procedures Plan – Required for All Schools Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready. Strategic Plan Focus Area: Academic growth/high academic achievement At/Above Grade Level in At/Above Grade Level in Navigator Pathway: Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 Reading/Writing Grade 3 Reading/Writing Grade 7 At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam Prior EOG Data, EVAAS Data, School Net Formative Data Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person Evidence of Success Funding (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated cost / source) 1. Common assessments Pre- and post- assessments Leach/Principal Completed pre and post assessments for Math I and Biology and baseline EOC scores. Leach/Principal Utilize the DDI Process and use assessment data to create and implement plan for remediation and intervention in Math I and Biology. Standards-Based, mastery grading plan will allow students multiple created in School Net aligned to objectives. Develop quarterly formative assessments in Math I and Biology. 2. Data disaggregation Process of monitoring student Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT achievement by objective in order to facilitate remediation/intervention plans (i.e. RTI) Use daily and quarterly formative assessment data to provide remediation and Personnel Involved Timeline School Funds for materials (if needed) Leach Scott Brooks Howard Oct. 2014June 2015 School funds for materials (if needed) Leach Scott Brooks Howard Oct. 2014June 2015 (Start—End) Interim Dates 21 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report intervention for all students. Implement school-wide standards-based grading plan. 3. Flexible grouping Process of grouping students according to academic need by objective Use School Net assessment information throughout the school year to group students in Math I and Biology according to mastery. opportunities to master content. Leach/Principal Use information gained from data disaggregation to form flexible groups in Math I and Biology. School funds for materials (if needed) Leach Scott Brooks Howard Oct. 2014June 2015 22 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Mastery Grading Procedures Plan – Required for All Schools Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready. Strategic Plan Focus Area: Academic growth/high academic achievement At/Above Grade Level in At/Above Grade Level in Navigator Pathway: Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 Reading/Writing Grade 3 Reading/Writing Grade 7 Strategic Plan Goal: At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Data Used: Students will have additional opportunities to master content. School funds for materials (if needed) All CEEC Staff Sept. 2014Oct. 2015 Leach/Principal Students will be held accountable for completing all assigned work. Our grading plan has expectations for late and make-up work. N/A All CEEC Staff Sept. 2014Oct. 2015 Leach/Principal Grading Plan lists requirements for posting grades. Power School access provided to all N/A All CEEC Staff Sept. 2014Oct. 2015 holding students accountable for completing assignments Expectations listed in school grading plan. 6. Grade reporting Set expectations for the timeliness of recording grades in PowerSchool (initial grades and final grades after retest if Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT Leach/Principal accountable for learning via reteaching, re-assessment and assigning a final value (i.e. 84%) Standards Based Grading is being implemented for the 2014-15 school year. 5. Late and make-up work School expectations for Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam Prior EOG Data, EVAAS Data, School Net Formative Data 4. Additional learning opportunities Process of holding students Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 23 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report applicable) parents. Grades will be posted and updated at least once per week. Charlotte Engineering Early College Grading Plan 2014-15 Guiding Principles: 1. The purpose of grading is to assess students’ mastery of content, skills and learning. 2. Each teacher must use Power School and record grades at least once per week. 3. Students must follow school late work and make up work procedures. These procedures will be aligned to the CMS Board Policy IKB-R: a. A student who misses homework assignments and other assignments or due dates because of absences, whether excused or unexcused, must be allowed to make up the work. Arrangements for completing the work should be made within five school days of the student’s return to school. Arrangements should include a schedule for completion of the work. The student must initiate the contact with the teacher. b. In all circumstances, homework and other assignments should be accepted, even when turned in after the designated due. Credit for late work shall be awarded according to the following guidelines: i. If the student was present in class on the due date, the work may be given less credit; ii. If the student was not present in class on the due date because of an excused or code zero absence, full credit must shall be given for the completed work; 24 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report iii. If the student was not present in class on the due date because of an unexcused absence, the work may be given less credit. These procedures should be communicated clearly to students, parents, and all other school stakeholders. 4. Provide students with an opportunity to remediate and then demonstrate “proficiency” by retaking any formal assessment scoring below an 84%. 2 retakes should be provided. If 84% mastery is reached, a student will not be allowed to retake/redo the assessment. 5. Graded assignments should be aligned with content standards. Providing students extra credit or grades for bringing in canned goods, classroom materials, parent signatures do not support student mastery of learning principles. 6. Assign projects that do not place an undue burden on students/families with limited financial resources (i.e., use of computer at home and costly materials for projects). 7. Follow consequences for “cheating” as outlined in the CMS Code of Conduct. 8. Do not use grades in the form of punitive manner to address misbehavior. 9. Teachers should use pre and post assessments aligned with each standard (formal and informal). 10. Teachers should develop a process to monitor student achievement by standard in order to facilitate remediation/intervention plans. 11. Teachers should develop a process of grouping students according to academic need by standard. Standards-Based Grading Standards Based Grading (SBG): A grading philosophy used to accurately reflect student understanding of the content. It’s a “measuring stick of learning”. These measurements are then based on standards. Standards are the ideas that you expect students to understand. Standards for courses are outlined in the Common Core and NC Essential Standards form the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Student grades are based on performance of each standard/concept. These measurements allow students, teachers, and parents to know the particular areas where improvement is needed. 7 Reasons for Standards-Based Grading 1. Grades should have meaning. 2. We need to challenge the Status Quo 25 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. We can control grading practices Standards-Based Grading reduces meaningless paperwork It helps teachers adjust instruction It teaches what quality looks like. It’s a Launchpad for other education reforms. ASCD Standards-based grading uses a 4-point scale. It’s important not to think about percentages. The numbers are meant to represent the different level of mastery, not a percentage of total points. A variety of different rubrics and assessments will be utilized based on the content standard. CEEC Levels of Mastery Rubric Level 4-Distinguished The student has completed proficient work on all course standards and advanced work on some standards. Level 3-Mastery The student has completed proficient work on all course standards. Level 2-Developing The student has completed proficient work on the most important standards, although not on all standards. Level 1-Beginning The student has completed proficient work on at least one-half of the course standards and is missing some important standards. Level 0-No Basis 26 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report The student has completed proficient work on fewer than one-half of the standards. Power School Input Levels of Mastery must be used to input letter grades in Power School. The following scale will be used to estimate grade calculations in Power School. Extra credit and work may be used to increase the numerical score. Assisting other students with skill mastery may also count at extra credit. Level 4=96-A (Extra Points will be assigned for students helping other students achieve mastery.) Level 3=89-B Level 2=84-C Level 1=74-D Level 0=60-F 27 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Percentage Breakdown: Class work/Informal Assessments/Homework Formal Assessments 30% of quarter grade 70% of quarter grade Class work must include a variety of assignments such as warm-ups, notebook checks, group work, homework, in-class tasks, and class participation. Formal assessments must include a variety of assignments such as unit tests, major quizzes, comprehensive writing assignments, and projects. **Teachers must maintain a minimum of 16 class work/informal/homework grades per quarter for classes that meet daily. **Teachers must maintain a minimum of 4 formal assessment grades per quarter for classes that meet daily. A. Final Exams will count as 25% of a student’s grade. Final exams include NC Final Exams, End-of-Course Tests and CTE Exams. 28 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Homework is an important teaching and learning strategy. A. Guidelines for Teachers 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Homework is defined as any school work that is required to be done outside of the regular instructional day, and includes assignments of short term and long term duration. Homework assessment and grading procedures must be clearly defined at the beginning of a course and communicated to students and parents. Grades for homework should have a limited effect in determining a student’s final grade. Each homework assignment should have clearly stated purposes and be an extension of class work. Homework should be age appropriate in terms of content, activities, and length of assignment. See Section D below for recommendations of average homework times. Homework should be assigned with awareness of the home resources available to a student and the family. All completed homework should be evaluated and returned to the student within a reasonable length of time. Homework should not be assigned without adequate student preparation. Homework shall not be assigned for disciplinary purposes. A student who misses homework assignments or other assignments or due dates because of absences, whether excused or unexcused, must be allowed to make up the work. Arrangements for completing the work should be made within five school days of the student’s return to school. Arrangements should include a schedule for completion of the work. a. For high school students, the student must initiate the contact with the teacher. In all circumstances, homework and other assignments should be accepted, even when turned in after the designated due date. Credit for late work shall be awarded according to the following guidelines: a. If the student was present in class on the due date, the work may be given less credit; b. If the student was not present in class on the due date because of an excused or code zero absence, full credit shall be given for the completed work; c. If the student was not present in class on the due date because of an unexcused absence, the work may be given less credit. 29 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report B. Responsibilities of Students 1. 2. 3. 4. C. A student should ask questions in class if unsure of an assignment. A student should complete homework in as neat and accurate a manner as possible. A student should schedule study time so that projects and long term assignments are planned and completed over a period of time. A student should copy and take home assignments. Promotion of Parent Involvement Teachers should encourage parents to support their student’s homework by taking the following actions: 1. 2. 3. 4. D. Promote a positive attitude toward homework. Provide a consistent time and a suitable place for study. Make resource materials available whenever possible. Communicate to the teacher special circumstances that may affect the child’s ability to complete assignments. Average Homework Time Average homework times are suggested total time recommendations only and are not meant to be minimum or maximum times. The time varies with the subject area, content matter, teacher, the student’s ability, and the complexity of the assigned task. High School: 120-150 minutes per night (30 minutes per subject) E. When an Exceptional Children student requires homework modifications as determined through the Individual Education Program (IEP) team process, these modifications must be included in the student’s IEP and communicated to the student, parent(s)/guardians, and teachers. 30 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report CEEC- 600 Waiver Requests Request for Waiver 1. Insert the waivers you are requesting 2. Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size (grades 4-12) [required for all schools with grades 4-12] Please identify the law, regulation or policy from which you are seeking an exemption. 115C-301 (c and d) Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size [required for all schools with grades 4-12] 3. Please state how the waiver will be used. Class size will be adjusted to address student individual instructional needs through flexible grouping of students in the most effective utilization of teaching teams. Maximum teaching load will be used to allow teachers in specific areas of the curriculum to teach students designated for specific skill needs and to address the large number of students requesting elective classes. 4. Please state how the waiver will promote achievement of performance goals. This waiver will allow more flexibility in grouping students to meet their abilities and needs and thus should enhance their achievement on the performance goals. 31 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Approval of Plan-Signatures on File Committee Position Principal Assistant Principal Representative Teacher Representative Teacher Representative Inst. Support Representative Teacher Assistant Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Name Signature Date Will Leach N/A Hannah Brooks Gayle Scott Mary Towe N/A Michael Green Jamella Ewell Rachel Smith Amy Murray Valerie Edwards 32 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Quarter 2 Review Committee Position Name Signature Date Principal Assistant Principal Representative Teacher Representative Inst. Support Representative Teacher Assistant Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative 33 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Quarter 3 Review Committee Position Name Signature Date Principal Assistant Principal Representative Teacher Representative Inst. Support Representative Teacher Assistant Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative 34 2014-2015 CEEC School Improvement Plan Report Quarter 4 Review Committee Position Name Signature Date Principal Assistant Principal Representative Teacher Representative Inst. Support Representative Teacher Assistant Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative Parent Representative 35