Central America JIPS Technical Mission Debrief

advertisement
Informing solutions together
JIPS TECHNICAL MISSION TO
CENTRAL AMERICA
General Debrief
Ivan Cardona, IM Manager/Profiling Advisor
Geneva, 29th April 2014
Informing solutions together
Agenda
1.
Background and context
2.
JIPS involvement in the region
3.
Technical Mission
– Objectives
– Main activities
– Outputs
4.
Recommended next steps
5.
Continued support (JIPS and others)
Informing solutions together
Agenda
1.
Background and context
2.
JIPS Involvement in the region
3.
Technical Mission
– Objectives
– Main activities
– Outputs
4.
Preliminary profiling results
5.
Continued support (JIPS and others)
Informing solutions together
• Historical migration flows of different motives / nature (economic,
family (UASC), human trafficking)
Informing solutions together
• Intensification of security crises in the region over the last decade, mainly
due to expansion of gangs and organized crime activities.
Informing solutions together
• Similar trend observed in asylum seekers from the region in the same period
Informing solutions together
NTCA Population Deported and Returned from United States and Mexico: 2011 – 2012 - 2013
46% increased between 2011 and 2013
More than 185,000 in 2013, 60% from
EE.UU. (by air) and 40% from México (by
land)
Most are nationals from Guatemala, but
Honduras reports the highest increase (70%)
Sources:
El Salvador: Dirección General de Migración y Extranjería
Guatemala: Dirección General de Migración
Honduras: Centro de Atención al Migrante Retornado
Informing solutions together
Preliminary Activities
 Guidance Note on Asylum Seeking Applications Related to Gangs
 Initial Diagnosis (CIDEHUM, 2012)
 Country of Origin Papers
 Coordination mechanism / partnerships at regional and national level
 Network with local and regional organizations
 Coordination with other international organizations
Informing solutions together
Agenda
1.
Background and context
2.
JIPS Involvement in the region
3.
Technical Mission
– Objectives
– Main activities
– Outputs
4.
Recommended next steps
5.
Continued support (JIPS and others)
Informing solutions together
Support Request
•
•
Who? Jun/13 request led by UNHCR’s Central America Regional Office, in coordination /
collaboration with:

Regional organisations (SICA)

Governments (Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Interior, Migration Boards)

Human rights institutions (Ministries, Ombudsman Offices)

National implementing partners (NGOs, HS, PMH, etc.)

Universities and research centres (UNAH, IUDPAS, UCA)

Other UN agencies and INGOs: ICRC and Save the Children (ECHO Funds), OCHA (REDLAC), NRC (ACAPS
secondary data review) + Others
What? Information gathering activities to assess the magnitude, patterns and trends of
displacement generated by transnational organized crime (TOC) and other situations of violence
(OSV) in NTCA
Informing solutions together
•
Why? Awareness raising and advocacy on humanitarian impact of security crises to inform
(national, regional and international) policy development
•
How? Mix of secondary data review and analysis and primary data collection

Characterization of returned/deported population (3 countries)

Profiling of internal displacement populations (Honduras)

Monitoring systems / networks (Guatemala and Honduras)
•
When? July/13 to Dec/14
•
Funds? ECHO + UNHCR
•
JIPS? Technical and coordination guidance of activities, through a mix of remote and field-based
support

Harmonization of regional studies (methodologies, reports)

Secondary data review and statistical analysis in Honduras

Design of snapshot profiling exercise in Honduras
Informing solutions together
JIPS First Mission
•
1 week during October 2013, with the following objectives / activities:

Review of existing/available information

Engagement / discussions with relevant stakeholders

Roadmap for 2014 (regional studies, snapshot profiling)
•
Clear desirability and feasibility of profiling activities in the region, particularly in Honduras, due
to coordination platform (Inter-institutional Commission)
•
Recommendations

Complete a full review and analysis of secondary data available related to forced displacement

Organize an inter-agency workshop to present and analyse the findings

Based on such findings, discuss objectives and methodology for a snapshot profiling exercise in Honduras
Informing solutions together
JIPS Second Mission
•
2 weeks during March/April 2014, based in Tegucigalpa (Honduras)
•
Main objectives:
•

Facilitate the dissemination and analysis of findings from the initial secondary review

Set-up the main elements for the planning and design of a snapshot profiling exercise in Honduras
Main activities :

Facilitation of a technical regional workshop

Facilitation of an inter-institutional workshop in Honduras

Joint development of an initial concept note for the Honduras profiling exercise

Meetings with key actors to discuss specific collaboration for profiling
Informing solutions together
1)
Facilitation of a technical regional workshop
 Researchers in charge of the different studies in the 3 countries, plus experts working in
related activities in Mexico and EE.UU.
 Comparison of conceptual frameworks/definitions, methodologies and preliminary results
 Identification of common challenges and limitations of existing data
 Recommendations towards standardization of terminology and analysis
 Identified need to produce a comparative analysis report
 Interest to promote future exchange of information, discussions (CoP)
Informing solutions together
 Direct evidence of external migration due to violence/insecurity, but potentially underestimated
 Need to complement with correlations analysis (links migration/criminality)
Reasons for migration
Honduras
R e gis te rs
Guatemala
%
R e gis te rs
El Salvador
%
R e gis te rs
T otal
%
Economic reasons
4226
86%
1921
89%
2260
79%
8,407
Violence related
reasons
284
6%
71
3%
327
12%
682
Social reasons
37
1%
23
1%
14
1%
74
Family reasons
180
4%
80
4%
153
5%
513
Others
145
3%
68
3%
93
3%
306
Total
4872
100%
2163
100%
2847
100%
9982
Source: Red de Documentación de las Organizaciones Defensoras de Migrantes (2013), Narrativas de la Transmigración
centroamericana en su paso por México.
Informing solutions together
 Direct evidence of internal migration due to violence/insecurity in Honduras, but potentially
underestimated
Informing solutions together
 Indirect evidence of correlation between internal migration and criminality (16% to 33%)
Informing solutions together
2)
Facilitation of an inter-institutional workshop in Honduras
 Co-hosted by M. of Human Rights and CIPRODEH, w/ support from UNHCR & ECHO
 Representatives from government agencies, CSOs, NGOs, INGOs, academics, donors
 Positive reception of the efforts to provide solid quantitative evidence on the links between
internal migration and criminality and first approximation of magnitude, and geographic
distribution
 Shared consensus on the need to collect primary data to fill the gaps of existing sources
 Buy-in and direct ownership from the Inter-institutional Commission on IDPs to led such
exercise
 General agreement on next steps and the main methodological elements.
Informing solutions together
3)
Joint development of initial concept note for Honduras profiling exercise
Main methodological elements
Objectives
- Estimate the magnitude and geographic disaggregation of internal displacement
- Understand the profiles of affected population
- Provide solid evidence to guide the work of the Inter-inst. Comm.
Target Population
- Population internally displaced
- Population in risk of displacement
- Other vulnerable neighbour population
Geographical
coverage
- Departments/municipalities most affected (expulsion and reception)
- Selected neighbourhoods within these locations
Information sources
- “Qualitative” mapping of selected municipalities
- Enumeration of selected neighbourhoods
- Sample-based household survey
Timeline and
budget
- June-Dec 2014
- USD 300.000 approx.
Limitations and
challenges
- Availability of data at local level
- Access to violence-prone areas and trust of respondents will be a key
Informing solutions together
Collaboration Platform
Inter-Inst. Commission on IDPs
- Main responsible / General coordinator
National stat. inst. (INE)
- Technical Oversee
- Methodology finalization, tools design, operational platform, analysis
JIPS
- Technical and coordination guidance
- Methodology finalization, tools design, training, analysis
Consultative Group
- Support for fundraising, awareness raising and dissemination of results
- UNHCR and others interested
Coordination Team
- Implementation of activities, admin. support, etc.
- Focal point from Commission, focal point from UNHCR, focal point from INE and lead
consultant/profiling coordinator
Operational Group
- Information sharing, access facilitation and data collection
- Local and international NGOs, religious organizations, authorities, etc.
- i.e. OCHA Humanitarian Network
Informing solutions together
Agenda
1.
Background and context
2.
JIPS Involvement in the region
3.
Technical Mission
– Objectives
– Main activities
– Outputs
4.
Recommended next steps
5.
Continued support (JIPS and others)
Informing solutions together
Next Steps
•
•
Finalization and harmonization of country-specific and regional studies

Standardization

Comparative analysis
Implementation of profiling exercise in Honduras

Fundraising support to the Commission (UNHCR for coordination team, JIPS for qualitative mapping, M. of
Human Rights for part of data collection costs, others to fill the gaps?)

Handover of methodology and tools development to INE

Coordination platform defined

Coordination team in place

Kick-start the qualitative mapping
Informing solutions together
•
•
Training and capacity building

Local expertise and capacity needs to be complemented with knowledge and training in internal
displacement (frameworks, profiling, etc)

Beyond the snapshot profiling, the objective is to build capacity at national and local level to monitor
internal displacement in the future
Continued coordination with other activities in the region

Input to ACAPS secondary data review

Input to IDMC country page and advocacy activities
Informing solutions together
Agenda
1.
Background and context
2.
JIPS Involvement in the region
3.
Technical Mission
– Objectives
– Main activities
– Outputs
4.
Recommended next steps
5.
Continued support (JIPS and others)
Informing solutions together
Continued JIPS Support
•
Remote support for the finalization of preliminary studies (April/May)
•
Support for the development/drafting of a comparative analysis (May)
•
Finalization of methodology and design of tools (May/June)
•
Identification of an appropriate Profiling Coordinator or Coordination Team (May/June)
•
Support fundraising activities (May/June)
•
Conduct additional field missions during key moments of the profiling (i.e. training, analysis), if
required by partners (June/Dec)
Informing solutions together
For more information, please visit:
http://www.jips.org/en/field-support/countryoperations/central-america/central-america-2013-14
Thank you!
Informing solutions together
Questions
Download