Recession and Restructuring in the Pittsburgh Economy Perlman Roundtable March 20, 2009 Christopher Briem Program in Urban and Regional Analysis University Center for Social and Urban Research University of Pittsburgh 121 University Place University of Pittsburgh cbriem@pitt.edu This Presentation n Legacy of Industrial Transformation n Adjustment and Change Since the 1980’s n Current Recession Impacts 2 Unemployment in the Pittsburgh Region: 1970-2004 20 15 10 5 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 3 Unemployment Rate By County Within the Pittsburgh MSA 30 25 20 Allegheny Beaver 15 Westmoreland Washington Fayette 10 5 0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 4 Unemployment Rate – Pittsburgh vs. US: 1970-2008 5 Difference Between Pittsburgh and US Unemployment Rates: 1970 - 2009 10 5 0 -5 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 6 Historical Steel Industry in Pittsburgh n Natural resource based competitive advantage n Extremely specialized industry structure n Few other ‘export’ industries in region for over a century n Historically minimal impact of international trade n and, minimal competition from other US regions n Comparable to: Ruhr Valley (Germany), Lille (France), Luxemburg….. now Harbin? 7 Scale of Economic Change in Pittsburgh n 120,000 net manufacturing employment loss between 1981-84. (~50% of all manf. jobs) n Loss concentrated in manufacturing industries. n Particular sub-regions hit even harder. n Change too fast for local industries to adjust n Significant unemployment and out-migration of workforce – especially younger workforce 8 Demographic Impact and Legacy n n n n n Net out-migration of working age population: 50,000+ per year in mid-1980’s Out-Migration was very age selective (younger left, older stayed). Region soon became one of the ‘oldest’ regions in the country. Workforce migration left region skill-deficient for new/emerging industries. Region still has a unique older demographic affecting current population trends. 9 Less Obvious Impacts of Steel Industry n Local industries had been mostly large firms n Ownership was also highly concentrated n Established supplier networks hard to break into n Result: diminished entrepreneurial activity n Still considered a local problem For more: Ben Chinitz: "Contrasts in Agglomerations: New York and Pittsburgh" American. Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 2 (May 1961): 10 Post Steel Changes: 1985-1990 n Local unemployment and rate of out-migration decreased significantly between 1985-1990 n Employment Growth in service sectors. Financial service/ education industries began to make up for manufacturing losses. n Female labor force participation increased n Rate of manufacturing job loss decreased 11 Female Labor Force Participation Rates: Pittsburgh & US - Women Aged 35-54 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 1980 1985 1990 US 1995 Pittsburgh 2000 2005 (Pittsburgh) will, however, slowly decline unless new industries employing women and those engaged in the production of consumer goods are attracted to the area. - Econometric Institute (1947) 1990’s n n n n n Manufacturing employment stabilized “Heavy” industries continuing to decline, but some success at attracting new firms (Sony Plant in Westmoreland County for example) Continuing shift of employment into service sectors National economic expansion has positive impacts, but region lagged rest of country. No “Dot.com” boom. 14 2000 - 2008 n n n n n No Dot.Com Boom No Dot.Com bust Local unemployment rate below national unemployment rate between 2001-2004. Demographic changes in region (elderly population decline, slower out-migration of working age population) Employment/Labor Force now larger than before decline in the Steel Industry Recession impacts different from the past. 15 Local Technology Development n n n n History of promoting ‘high tech’ for local economic development since 1980’s Aversion to “Smokestack Chasing” Continuing need for brownfield redevelopment throughout region Technology base built up locally by history of heavy industry. – – – Biotechnology Advanced Manufacturing Energy (including Nuclear) 16 Biotechnology/Life Sciences in Pittsburgh n History of medical technology (Jonas Salk/Polio Vaccine - 1950) n Emergence of transplant technology in 1980’s n Pittsburgh region receives large concentration of national biomedical research $ n Continuing Public/Private focus on development of biomedical firms. n Commercialization a challenge 17 Concentration of Engineering Occupations in Pittsburgh - 2004 Occupation Employment Pittsburgh US % of US Nuclear Engineers 1,340 15,870 8.4% Mining and Geological Engineers Industrial Engineers Electrical Engineers Environmental Engineers Materials Engineers Engineers, All Other Civil Engineers Mechanical Engineers Health and Safety Engineers Architects Surveyors Chemical Engineers Electronics Engineers Computer Hardware Engineers Landscape Architects Petroleum Engineers 130 2,500 1,870 620 230 1,580 2,070 2,000 170 580 310 170 790 330 nr nr 5,480 184,900 147,120 50,120 20,940 153,090 226,100 219,040 25,910 96,540 51,960 28,590 133,410 79,670 19,130 14,790 2.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 22,570 2,385,680 0.9% Total - Architecture and Engineering Occupations 18 Foreclosures – 100 Largest Metro Areas – 3Q 2007 Foreclosure rate: Pct. change 1 filing for every Properties from Q3 Total filings X households with filings 2006 Rank Area 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,116 25,708 31,661 16,595 14,948 15,479 31 33 43 48 48 48 4,409 16,079 20,664 9,367 11,482 9,241 465.3 93.4 267.9 127.4 200.3 408 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 STOCKTON, CA DETROIT/LIVONIA/DEARBORN, MI RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO, CA FORT LAUDERDALE, FL LAS VEGAS/PARADISE, NV SACRAMENTO, CA CLEVELAND/LORAIN/ELYRIA /MENTOR, OH MIAMI, FL BAKERSFIELD, CA OAKLAND, CA AKRON, OH DENVER/AURORA, CO FRESNO, CA MEMPHIS, TN PHOENIX/MESA, AZ 16,332 15,484 3,947 13,245 3,992 13,179 3,687 6,239 18,328 57 60 64 71 76 77 79 85 87 11,821 10,232 2,824 8,062 2,941 7,751 2,434 3,353 11,242 178.5 82 361.4 268.8 128 28.3 239.9 38.6 246 74 PITTSBURGH, PA 2,548 432 1,526 -28.6 100 GREENVILLE, SC 79 3,289 65 -82.319 Renewed Strength in Traditional Industries Global steel market resurgence benefiting region Global steel support industry remaining Energy prices impacting local coal industry Pittsburgh and commercial nuclear power – – – Potential new domestic sales for first time in decades China/International Sales Westinghouse expansion 20 Pittsburgh Seam Coal Price 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 4/07 6/07 8/07 10/07 12/07 2/08 4/08 6/08 8/08 10/08 12/08 2/09 21 US Steel Stock Price 2000-2009 $200 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 22 Pittsburgh Recession Impacts Foreclosures declining in Pittsburgh for last two years. (while Cleveland is ground zero for most of the foreclosure crisis). Large construction projects ongoing: NSC, Casino, Arena, PNC Tower, Children’s Hospital. Education - countercyclical industry? Health Care – less business cycle impact Finance – PNC acquisition of NatCity 23 Regional Unemployment Rates Jan 2000 – Jan 2009 Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Detroit 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Cleveland 2005 Detroit 2006 2007 2008 2009 Pittsburgh 24 Regional Unemployment Rates Jan 2000 – Jan 2009 Pittsburgh vs. Charlotte, NC 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Charlotte 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Pittsburgh 25 Pittsburgh Region Labor Force: 1970-present 1,300,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 26 Pittsburgh Region Labor Force: 1970-present 1,300,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 27 Recession and Migration: Net Migration from the Pittsburgh MSA 2001-2008 0 -2,000 -4,000 -6,000 -8,000 -10,000 -12,000 -14,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 28 Recession and Migration 29 Why is this recession different? Combination of factors inhibited predatory lending/subprime crisis here: legal precedents, institutional decisions, overall regulatory climate. Large construction projects ongoing for now. Core industries less impacted by business cycle. 30 “...the Pittsburgh region's future depends to such a major extent upon retaining and attracting highly qualified and professional and technical people and business enterprisers, who are in demand everywhere and who command a high standard of residential amenity and cultural and professional opportunities.” From: Region With a Future. Volume 3 of the Economic Study of the Pittsburgh Region. 1964. 31 32