A Visual Metaphor Magical Realism and the History of Latin America Unit Pre-Colonial Style Colonialism & The New Social Order Independence and Revolutions Social Studies Topics Themes Maya Aztecs Architecture Art Clothing Economy Government Language Religion Spanish Conquest War Cortez, Malinalli & Montezuma Pop Vuhl House of Spirits (Chapters 1-3) Malinche Social Class System Peninsulares Creoles Mestizos Columbian Exchange Catholicism Native Americans Haciendas Free Blacks Maroon Colonies Slaves Haiti House of Spirits (Chapters 4-9) Magical Realism & Frida Kahlo Mural Art & Diego Rivera Literary Devices Constant Warring States o Ethnic groups within the Mayan empire (Quiche) Importance of Storytelling prior to colonialism Masculine vs. Feminine Civilization vs. Tribal Old social class vs. New social class Assimilation vs. Revolution Latin American Short Stories House of Spirits (Chapter 10-14) Born in Blood & Fire (Excerpt) Hegemony, Marginality Identity Destabilization Transculturation Hegemony Elements of a Myth 1st person vs. 3rd person narrative Motifs Malinche: Water, Corn, Baptism, Ritual, Language, Horse o House of Spirits: Big House on the Corner (93) Theme Metaphor o Visual Metaphor o Las Casas: A Short Account Corridos & Plenas Argentina Chile Cuba Guatemala Mexico Transculturation Books Magical Realism House of Spirits (Epilogue) In Social Studies you learned about the construction of Latin American social classes and identity following the arrival of the Spanish (like a “builder”). In English you learned about important Latin American themes and artistic techniques unique to the Latin world (like a “decorator”). Purpose: For this assignment you will be answering the essential question of this class: What is Latin American identity? Using style, themes, and storytelling of Latin American writers we have studied this trimester answer this question. Goal: Using the motif from House of Spirits, the Big House on the Corner, you will be building and decorating a house in order to answer the essential question of this course. Your house will essentially become a visual metaphor that addresses the answer. Remember, a visual metaphor is a picture for one thing that is used to refer to another thing in order to show or suggest that they are similar. Mediums: Digital Tour of a House Painting Diorama Art installation Clay? Other? Tasks: Build the house. (This is like your analysis but it’s in visual form.) o Go through the list of Social Studies topic and brainstorm ways you could, metaphorically, build those attributes into the house. For example, how would Aztec culture would be represented in this house? Maybe they are represented by being the “side garage”. Or maybe it’s built with weird mythical creatures coming off the side. Decorate the house. (This is like your analysis but it’s in visual form.) o Go through the list of Language arts themes and literary devices and brainstorm ways you could, metaphorically, build those attributes into the house. For example, many of the authors we have read have a particular opinion about female vs. male roles. Maybe you represent this by an apron strangling a hammer in the kitchen. Thesis and Quotes/Evidence o o o Make sure you have your thesis that answers the essential question somewhere on your piece. Add quotes from some of the social studies book: History of Latin American: Collision of Cultures, Las Casa’s A Short Account of the destruction of the Indies, Eyewitness: Aztec Add quotes from the English books (see chart above). SS and LA should have Exceeds Standards Standard “I know/Can it well enough to “I know/Can do everything that was theirdoown rubric. make connections that weren’t taught.” taught without making mistakes” Approaching Standard Below Standard I know/Can do all the easy parts, but I don’t know/can’t do the harder parts.” “With help, I know/can do some off what was taught” IDEAS: Thesis is clear, supportable, and specific; statement is complex and thought provoking. IDEAS: Thesis is clear, supportable, and specific, though written in a simplistic style. IDEAS: Thesis almost meets the requirements, but it may be too broad/vague or too specific. SIGNIFICANCE: Answers the “So what?” and “Why is this important?” in an interesting and insightful way. SIGNIFICANCE: Vaguely answers the “So what?” and “Why is this important?” Getting there, but hard to understand; a little confusing. IDEAS: Unclear as to what the author is trying to say. Thesis _____/10 Wrote a question not a statement. Thesis has a great idea but the wording is disjointed and hard to follow. Nice idea, but it’s hard to decipher what is arguable. Thesis is not arguable, it’s simply a fact. Does not answer the prompt. Put evidence in the thesis. SIGNIFICANCE: Does not answer the “So what?” and “Why is this important?” MEANING: Explaining the significance of the evidence is achieved, thereby the student shows a complex understanding of the significance of the evidence as it relates to the thesis. (I.e. It was a fascinating metaphor for depicting the thesis.) MEANING: Explaining the meaning of the evidence is achieved, thereby the student shows SOME understanding of the importance and the significance of the evidence related to the thesis. Clear depiction of visual. Evidence _____/20 Analysis Visual_____/20 It is so broad that it barely resembles a thesis statement. QUALITY: Analysis takes creative risks with the evidence to explain possible connections, cause and effect, outcomes, conclusions, etc. Very thought provoking! Makes the reader say, “Wow, I never thought about that!” QUALITY: Analysis attempts to interpret beyond the simple implications, but the student may not be quite clear in how to do that. QUANTITY: Student has extensive evidence that incorporates a widerange of materials. QUANTITIY: Evidence is pulled from different assignments, lectures, notes and/or research. A variety of evidence is pulled from different assignments, lectures, notes, quotes, characters, plot, scenes, and conversations. Too much evidence is used; therefore the argument becomes a bit hard to follow. QUALITY: The evidence is well developed, and specific pieces of evidence are used (names, places, people, events, dates, quotes, characters, plot, scenes, conversations, etc.). It is clear the student understands their evidence in a great amount of detail. QUALITY: The evidence was not very specific and was rather simple. The student understood their evidence but not in great detail. REALTION TO THESIS: Some support for the thesis statement was given using evidence, although at times it was a somewhat difficult to make the connection. Craftsmanship _____/5 RELATION TO THESIS: Evidence was used to support the thesis and never strayed from the argument. MEANING: The student attempts to analyze the evidence for meaning as it relates to the thesis, but the visual does not seem support the thesis very well. The analysis mostly summarizes the evidence and does not explain the meaning or how it relates to the thesis. Uses similes and/or metaphors in the thesis. Could not find thesis. MEANING: There was no connection between the thesis and the visual. There is little to no analysis present. Analysis does not answer the prompt. QUALITY: Analysis merely explains the basic implications. QUANTITY: Not enough evidence was given to make a strong argument. QUANTITY: Very few pieces of evidence were given. All of the evidence seemed to be very similar and/or was used repetitively. QUALITY: Uses generalized evidence; does not develop it. QUALITY: The evidence was really brief, so brief in fact that it was not clear as to what the information was about. It was hard to decipher between evidence and analysis. RELATION TO THESIS: Uses text/historical event in support of an idea, but may not develop fully, or may use generalizations rather than specific textual/historical references. Student has attempted to use evidence that relates to the thesis; however, the evidence did not seem to apply directly. (The student could have chosen stronger evidence to support the argument.) The design and construction were somewhat planned. RELATION TO THEIS: Student has attempted to use facts and evidence that relate to topic; however, the facts did not seem to apply directly to the thesis. ACCURACY: Some of the information was inaccurate. The piece shows that the creator took great pride in his/her work. The design shows that the creator took pride in his/her work. The design looks thrown together at the last minute. The design and construction look carefully planned. The design and construction look planned. It appears that little design or planning was done. It is color, creative and shows that a lot of time was taken to create it. It took a bit of time to create. Craftsmanship is poor.