Objective: SWBAT define what a tort is and how a person may commit one
Tort is the French word for a “wrong.”
Tort law a.k.a. civil law protects a variety of injuries and provides remedies for them.
4 - 1
Objective: SWBAT define what a tort is and how a person may commit one
Under tort law, an injured party can bring a civil lawsuit to seek compensation for a wrong done to the party or the party’s property.
4 - 2
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines a tort damage, and the remedy for it.
Tort damages are monetary damages that are sought from the offending party.
They are intended to compensate the injured party for the injury suffered.
4 - 3
Tort law imposes a duty on persons and business agents not to intentionally or negligently injure others in society.
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines a tort damage, and the remedy for it.
4 - 4
Objective: SWBAT identify and explain the various types of torts
Intentional Torts
Unintentional Torts
(Negligence)
Strict Liability Torts
4 - 5
Objective: SWBAT distinguish between the different types of intentional torts
Intentional Torts:
A category of torts that requires that the defendant possessed the intent to do the act that caused the plaintiff’s injuries.
There are two categories of intentional torts:
Intentional torts against persons
Intentional torts against property
4 - 6
Objective: SWBAT distinguish between the different types of intentional torts
The law protects a person from unauthorized touching, restraint, or other contact.
The law also protects a person’s reputation and privacy.
Violations of these rights are actionable as torts.
4 - 7
Objective: SWBAT distinguish between the different types of intentional torts
Assault
The threat of immediate harm or offensive contact; or
Any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of imminent harm.
Actual physical contact is unnecessary.
4 - 8
Objective: SWBAT distinguish between the different types of intentional torts
Battery
Unauthorized and harmful or offensive physical contact with another person.
4 - 9
Objective: SWBAT identify the conditions of false imprisonment
False Imprisonment
The intentional confinement or restraint of another person without authority or justification and without that person’s consent.
4 - 10
Objective: SWBAT distinguish between the different types of intentional torts
False Imprisonment
(continued)
Merchant Protection Statutes – allow merchants to stop, detain, and investigate suspected shoplifters without being held liable for false imprisonment if:
There are reasonable grounds for the suspicion,
Suspects are detained for only a reasonable time, and
Investigations are conducted in a reasonable manner.
4 - 11
Objective: SWBAT discern between the two types of defamation of character
Defamation of Character
False statement(s) made by one person about another. The plaintiff must prove that:
The defendant made an an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff; and
The statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party.
4 - 12
Objective: SWBAT discern between the two types of character defamation
Defamation of Character
(continued)
Slander – verbal defamation of character (includes social media, which is treated as speech)
Libel – a false statement that appears in a letter, newspaper, magazine, book, photo, video, etc.
4 - 13
Objective: SWBAT recognize the concept of actual malice
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S.
Supreme Court held that public officials cannot recover for defamation unless they can prove that the defendant acted with actual malice .
4 - 14
Objective: SWBAT identify the tort of invasion of privacy
Invasion of the Right to Privacy
A tort that constitutes the violation of a person’s right to live his or her life without being subjected to unwanted and undesired publicity.
4 - 15
Objective: SWBAT identify what the tort outrage is damage, and the remedy for it.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
A tort that says a person whose extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another person is liable for that emotional distress.
4 - 16
Objective: SWBAT identify the various types of torts against one’s personal property
There are two general categories of property:
Real Property – consists of land and anything permanently attached to that land.
Personal Property – consist of things that are movable.
Automobiles
Books
Clothes
Pets
4 - 17
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines a trespass, and the different types that exist
Trespass to Land
A tort that interferes with an owner’s right to exclusive possession of land.
4 - 18
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines a trespass, and the different types that exist
Trespass to Personal Property
A tort that occurs whenever one person injures another person’s personal property; or
Interferes with that person’s enjoyment of his or her personal property.
4 - 19
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines the tort of conversion
Conversion of Personal Property
A tort that deprives a true owner of the use and enjoyment of his or her personal property by:
Taking over such property; and
Exercising ownership rights over it.
4 - 20
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines an unintentional tort, and the different types that exist
A person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions.
Forseeability test
4 - 21
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines an unintentional tort, and the different types that exist
Negligence
The omission to do something which a reasonable person would do in a given situation; or
Doing something which a prudent and reasonable person would not do.
4 - 22
Objective: SWBAT identify the elements needed to prove negligence in a civil lawsuit
To be successful in a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that:
1.
The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff
2.
3.
4.
The defendant breached the duty of care
The plaintiff suffered injury
The defendant’s negligent act caused the plaintiff’s injury
4 - 23
Objective: SWBAT identify what defines duty of care, and how the reasonable person standard applies to it.
Duty of Care – the obligation we all each other not to cause any unreasonable harm or risk of harm.
The courts apply a reasonable person standard .
Defendants with a particular expertise or competence are measured against a reasonable professional standard .
4 - 24
Objective: SWBAT identify the elements needed to prove negligence in a civil lawsuit
Breach of Duty – a failure to exercise care or to act as a reasonable person would act.
Injury to Plaintiff – the plaintiff must suffer personal injury or damage to his or her property to recover monetary damages for the defendant’s negligence.
Effect on the plaintiff’s life or profession.
4 - 25
Objective: SWBAT identify the types of causation needed to help prove negligence in a civil lawsuit
Causation – a person who commits a negligent act is not liable unless his or her act was the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.
Causation in Fact (actual cause)
Proximate Cause (legal cause)
4 - 26
Objective: SWBAT identify how causation in fact may help prove negligence in a civil lawsuit
Causation in Fact (actual cause)
The actual cause of negligence.
A person who commits a negligent act is not liable unless causation in fact can be proven.
4 - 27
Objective: SWBAT identify how proximate cause may help prove negligence in a civil lawsuit
Proximate Cause (legal cause)
Under the law, a negligent party is not necessarily liable for all damages set in motion by his or her negligent act.
The law establishes a point along the damage chain after which the negligent party is no longer legally responsible for the consequences of his or her actions.
4 - 28
The doctrine of proximate cause was defined in the Pfalsgraf v.
Long Island Railroad Company case.
4 - 29
Objective: SWBAT identify additional types of unintentional torts, and the steps needed for litigation
Negligent Infliction of Emotional
Distress
A tort that permits a person to recover for emotional distress caused by the defendant’s negligent conduct.
Professional Malpractice
The liability of a professional who breaches his or her duty of ordinary care.
4 - 30
Negligence Per Se
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Good Samaritan Laws
Dram Shop Acts
Guest Statutes
Fireman’s Rule
“Danger Invites
Rescue” Doctrine
Social Host Liability
Liability of
Landowners
Liability of Common
Carriers and
Innkeepers
4 - 31
Objective: SWBAT learn the defenses to negligence
Superseding or
Intervening
Event DEFENSES
AGAINST
NEGLIGENCE
Assumption of the Risk
Contributory
Negligence
Comparative
Negligence
4 - 32
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT identify the types of torts a business may commit
Entering certain businesses and professions without a license
Unfair competition
Price gouging
Price fixing
4 - 33
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT identify the types of torts a business may commit
Disparagement-making false derogatory statements about a competitors product in order to make yours look superior
False advertising
Intentional misrepresentation (fraud)
4 - 34
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT identify the required elements to prove fraud
The elements required to find fraud are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The wrongdoer made a false representation of material fact.
The wrongdoer had knowledge that the representation was false and intended to deceive the innocent party.
The innocent party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation.
The innocent party was injured.
4 - 35
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT identify the types of torts a business may commit
Intentional interference with contractual relations
Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
4 - 36
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT define punitive damages and explain why they are awarded
Punitive damages
Are not recoverable for breach of contract
Recoverable for certain tortious conduct
Fraud
Intentional conduct
Other egregious conduct
4 - 37
OBJECTIVE: SWBAT identify the types of situations in which a person may claim strict liability
Strict liability is liability without fault .
A participant in a covered activity will be held liable for any injuries caused by the activity even if he or she was not negligent.
4 - 38
(continued)
This doctrine holds that:
1.
There are certain activities that can place the public at risk of injury even if reasonable care is taken; and
2.
The public should have some means of compensation if such injury occurs.
4 - 39