Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Beck Hall Room 219 Steven G. Liga, MSW, LSW, LCADC, CPS, CCS Email: sliga@rci.rutgers.edu Course Overview This course is designed to take a critical, yet realistic look at policies related to alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Both regulatory and legislative policies will be discussed on the local, state, and national levels. Students will explore the process of sound policy development, learn how to impact public policy on a practical level; and craft policies of their own. Required Texts Multiple articles will be assigned. All will be posted on Sakai. Course Policies Confidentiality—Due to the organization and focus of this course, students may share their personal experiences. This information is private and should not be repeated outside of this class. Our academic environment is designed for learning, so remember to keep an open mind. Every assignment is due on the specified date listed in the syllabus. No late assignments will be accepted unless approved by the instructor in advance of the deadline. Approved late assignments will receive an automatic full grade deduction. This class depends heavily on student interaction and group learning. Students are expected to attend class regularly and participate actively. Attendance will be taken. After two absences (excused or not), each successive missed class will result in 1% being deducted from your final course grade. Students must comply with all university standards on academic conduct (see attached Statement of Academic Integrity) Cell phones must be turned off during class. Please do not subject anyone to disruptive or rude behavior, such as texting during class. Laptops are permitted for taking notes and looking up course-related material. All other uses (instant messaging, games, surfing, etc.) will result in having to turn off your computer. Second offenses will result in barring your computer from the classroom. Written assignments must cite all sources used and be submitted using 12 point font and typed SINGLE-spaced. All papers must be submitted via sakai by the beginning of class the day they due. Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Steven G. Liga Page 1 of 7 Calendar Date General Topic Specific Topic Jan 21 Course Overview Discussion of syllabus Jan 23 Define Addiction Models and Continuum of Addiction Jan 28 Define Policy Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial, plus effectiveness Last Day to Drop Course Jan 30 Impacting Policy Community Need, Stakeholders, Media Feb 4 Data School Survey, Hospital ER reporting, Crime Feb 6 Prevention Supply vs. Demand Feb11 Treatment Modalities, effectiveness Feb 13 Healthcare Reform Access, SBIRT, prevention Feb 18 The Long View Facts, Trends, Clean Indoor Air Tobacco Policy Topic Due Zero Tolerance Facts, Trends, Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Cocaine Letter to the Editor Due Harm Reduction Facts, Trends, Needle Exchange Programs Feb 20 Feb 25 Heroin Feb 27 Legalization Facts, Trends, Legalization - Medical Marijuana Marijuana Mar 4 Underage Drinking Facts, Trends, Mandatory Minimum Drinking Age Mar 6 Underage Drinking Private Property Ordinances, Marketing Mar 11 RX Drugs Facts, trends, FDA, Marketing Mar 13 Senator Vitale? Current Issues in the Legislature Mar 18 NO CLASS Spring Break Mar 20 NO CLASS Spring Break Mar 25 School Policy Rutgers Drug and Alcohol policies Mar 27 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 1 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 3 TBD Students’ Choice Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Steven G. Liga Page 2 of 7 Apr 8 TBD Students’ Choice Apr10 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 15 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 17 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 22 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 24 TBD Students’ Choice Apr 29 TBD Students’ Choice May 1 TBD Students’ Choice may 5 last day May 3-9 TBD - Final Presentations Students’ Choice White Paper Due During exam period 8-14 exams Course Assignments 1. Public Policy Debate – Pros and Cons of an Important ATOD-related Issue (40%) You and a partner will identify a current policy related to alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs. Each pair must sign up for a particular policy to be approved by the professor. No duplicates will be allowed. This can be a local, state, or national legislative or regulatory policy. I will provide you with a list of all bills introduced in the New Jersey legislature during the 2012-2013 session related to the course to get you started. You will examine the issue from both sides and be able to defend both sides of the argument. This is crucial when advancing any policy agenda; you must completely understand the opposite side. The assignment includes two papers and a presentation. a. (20%) The first assignment is to write a paper about the issue. One partner will approach the issue as a proponent of the policy. The second person will approach the issue as an opponent of the policy. In each case, provide the context for the issue (why is/was it needed?) and significant aspects of the policy (who is impacted and how?). Each paper will be graded independently. b. (20%) The second assignment is to lead a debate about the issue in class. The catch is you must argue from your partner’s perspective (the opposite position you wrote about). These debates will form the basis for the class discussions during the second half of the semester, so you must provide me with resources to post on Sakai for the class to read at least one week prior to your topic date. Two issues will be examined and debated each class. You will reserve your topic and debate date during the 5th week of class. Your papers are due on the class PRIOR to your presentation date! Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Steven G. Liga Page 3 of 7 2. Letter to the Editor (10%) Students must write a letter to the editor in support or opposition of a current or proposed public policy related to alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs. Letters should be no more than 500 words and must be based on facts corroborated by at least two published sources. Letters that are approved for submission and are actually published before the end of the semester will receive three extra credit percentage points toward your final grade. Note that since this is such a brief assignment and is worth a full 10% of your course grade, it will be graded at a very high standard. Only those recommended for publication “as is” (well-written and insightful with NO spelling or grammatical errors) will be awarded an “A”. This assignment is due February 21. 3. Legislative Event (10%) Each year, NCADD of Middlesex County, Inc. hosts a Legislative Event on a public policy related to alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs. It will be held at the Rutgers Conference Center in the format of a breakfast. It is tentatively scheduled for early April. To receive credit, students must attend the event and sign in with the instructor. Simple attendance is worth 5/10 points toward the grade. 5/10 points will be based on a single page reaction paper to the content of the event (what did you learn, what surprised you, what disappointed you, etc.). Your paper is due the class following the event. If a student is unable to attend the event, the optional trip to the statehouse in Trenton may be substituted for this requirement. Date to be determined 4. Final (15%) – White Paper: Topic of Your Choice (30%) You will develop an informative “marketing” tool called a White Paper for an original ATOD-related policy of your choice not already being covered in class. This is a doublesided single sheet paper providing all the information necessary about a particular policy to secure the support necessary to get it implemented. This is what you would provide to the media, legislators, and the public. Therefore, it must be well-researched, clear, and persuasive, as well as grammatically perfect and visually appealing. A. Policies result from an identified need. You must look at your community of choice and identify a need related to an ATOD issue that can be addressed through policy. Ask yourself: What is happening (or not happening) that needs to be addressed by a policy change or creation? What sources document this need? What type of policy is needed? What is the state of readiness in the community for your policy initiative? Who are the primary stakeholders related to the issue? a. Who will likely be on your side and why? b. Who will be against you and why? Addiction Policy Steven G. Liga 832:351:01 Page 4 of 7 c. Who may not lean either way that needs to be convinced? B. The policy itself must effectively address your identified need. Ask yourself: What do I need to do to get my initiative implemented? How do I incorporate all aspects of effective policy into this initiative? Is it practical, understandable, enforceable? What outcomes do I expect? How will I know if the policy serves its intended purpose? How will I publicize the policy? 5. Class Participation (10%) As the course design depends heavily on class participation, students will be graded on a scale of 0 to 5 for their participation. A score of 5 would require a student to clearly demonstrate that course readings were done, engage in class discussions through insightful questions, and play an active role in moving the course forward. A score of 1 would mean the professor knows the student’s name. Attendance does not count toward class participation (see attendance policy). If the professor cannot readily call your name by the end of the semester, your Class Participation grade will be zero. Note: It is impossible to get an “A” in this course without ample class participation. Optional Trip State House Tour Beverly Lynch, a veteran Trenton lobbyist for the addiction and health fields will schedule a group tour of the State House in Trenton. This will be informative and may include meetings with legislators and their aids and an opportunity to view a voting session. This tour will be scheduled for a single day and is worth three extra percentage points toward your final grade, unless a student is substituting this trip for the Legislative Event assignment (in which case it will be worth 10% of your final grade, but no extra credit will be available). A single-page reflection paper is required in order to receive full credit. Date to be determined Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Steven G. Liga Page 5 of 7 Grading Letter % Range # Explanation 4.5 4.0 3.5 Letter Equivalent 100% 95% 90% A+ A B+ 98-100+% 91-97% 88-90% B C+ C D F 81-87% 3.0 85% Good work that meets all requirements 78-80% 70-79% 60-69% <60% 2.5 2.0 1.0 0 80% 75% 65% 50% Average work that shows some promise Average work that meets minimum requirements Shows limited understanding Unacceptable Perfect Excellent Very good work A Word on Grades I love teaching, and I truly want you to LEARN, because I am passionate about what I have to offer. I have given strong recommendations to graduate school for students, who I know have truly learned and earned B's. Doing the work for a grade is a very empty way to go through school. Unfortunately, this has become the norm. Please do not let yourself fall into that trap. Learn because it is the learning that is important. I encourage each of you to “let go” of the grades, because I do not negotiate. I promise to devote considerable time to reading your work and providing comments to help you learn. Academic Misconduct: A Bloustein School Perspective Academic misconduct includes cheating, plagiarism, failure to cite sources, fabrication and falsification, stealing ideas, and deliberate slanting of research designs to achieve a pre-conceived result. We talk abut misconduct and ethical behavior in classes and expectations are set forth in student handbooks and catalogues. For example, it is presented on pages 545-547 in the New Brunswick Undergraduate Catalogue for the years 2003 through 2005 and on pages 16-18 of the Edward J. Bloustein catalogue for the years 2003 through 2005. We are not repeating that material here. Note, however, that penalties for misconduct can range from failing an assignment/exam or dismissal from the university. The Bloustein School is appending this memorandum to your course syllabus because we recently have detected obvious cases of plagiarism. We have found far fewer cases of other forms of academic misconduct, but we find several every year. It is imperative that you understand that unethical academic conduct is intolerable, and it is completely preventable. Academic misconduct almost always happens for two reasons. One is ignorance of academic rules and practices. For example, in virtually every recent plagiarism case in the School, material has been taken from an Internet site and placed in text Addiction Policy 832:351:01 Steven G. Liga Page 6 of 7 without appropriate note or attribution. You must learn the proper rules for attribution. If you are not sure, ask your instructor! If you do not know the rules that govern the use of data sets, attribution, analysis and reporting of these sets, the faculty will help you. There is no such thing as a stupid question regarding this subject. Pressure is the second common reason for academic misconduct. Students, faculty, every one of us are subject to deadline, financial, self-worth, peer, and other pressures. If you are potentially allowing pressure to drive you to misconduct, please step back and resist that urge. You can cope with pressure in a positive way by reaching out to friends, counselors, and faculty members. Within the Bloustein School community, you will find understanding people and positive direction. The Bloustein School plays an important role in the planning and public policy agenda. Our work and our students must be above reproach. Updated Addiction Policy 832:351:01 2/8/05 Steven G. Liga Page 7 of 7