Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony Topics to be Discussed Monopoly Monopoly Power Sources of Monopoly Power The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Chapter 10 Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Monopsony Monopsony Power Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Chapter 10 Slide 3 Perfect Competition Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic profits in the long run Large number of buyers and sellers Homogenous product Perfect information Firm is a price taker Chapter 10 Slide 4 Perfect Competition Market P D P S Individual Firm LMC P0 LRAC P0 D = MR = P Q0 Q q0 Q Monopoly Monopoly 1) One seller - many buyers 2) One product (no good substitutes) 3) Barriers to entry Chapter 10 Slide 6 Monopoly The monopolist is the supply-side of the market and has complete control over the amount offered for sale. Profits will be maximized at the level of output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Chapter 10 Slide 7 Monopoly Finding Marginal Revenue As the sole producer, the monopolist works with the market demand to determine output and price. Assume a firm with demand: Chapter 10 P=6-Q Slide 8 Total, Marginal, and Average Revenue Price P Quantity Q $6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Chapter 10 Total Revenue R $0 5 8 9 8 5 Marginal Revenue MR --$5 3 1 -1 -3 Average Revenue AR --$5 4 3 2 1 Slide 9 Average and Marginal Revenue $ per unit of output 7 6 5 Average Revenue (Demand) 4 3 2 Chapter 10 1 Marginal Revenue 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Output Slide 10 Monopoly Observations 1) To increase sales the price must fall 2) MR < P 3) Compared to perfect competition Chapter 10 No change in price to change sales MR = P Slide 11 Monopoly Monopolist’s Output Decision 1) Profits maximized at the output level where MR = MC 2) Cost functions are the same (Q) R(Q) C (Q) / Q R / Q C / Q 0 MC MR or MC MR Chapter 10 Slide 12 Maximizing Profit When Marginal Revenue Equals Marginal Cost The Monopolist’s Output Decision At output levels below MR = MC the decrease in revenue is greater than the decrease in cost (MR > MC). At output levels above MR = MC the increase in cost is greater than the decrease in revenue (MR < MC) Chapter 10 Slide 13 Maximizing Profit When Marginal Revenue Equals Marginal Cost $ per unit of output MC P1 P* AC P2 Lost profit D = AR MR Q1 Chapter 10 Q* Q2 Lost profit Quantity Slide 14 Monopoly The Monopolist’s Output Decision An Example Cost C (Q) 50 Q C MC 2Q Q Chapter 10 2 Slide 15 Monopoly The Monopolist’s Output Decision An Example Demand P(Q) 40 Q R(Q) P(Q)Q 40Q Q R MR 40 2Q Q Chapter 10 2 Slide 16 Monopoly The Monopolist’s Output Decision An Example MR MC or 40 2Q 2Q Q 10 When Q 10, P 30 Chapter 10 Slide 17 Monopoly The Monopolist’s Output Decision An Example By setting marginal revenue equal to marginal cost, it can be verified that profit is maximized at P = $30 and Q = 10. This can be seen graphically: Chapter 10 Slide 18 Example of Profit Maximization $ C t' 400 R 300 c’ 200 t Profits 150 100 50 0 Chapter 10 c 5 10 15 20 Quantity Slide 19 Example of Profit Maximization Observations Slope of rr’ = slope cc’ and they are parallel at 10 units 400 Profits are maximized at 10 units 300 P = $30, Q = 10, TR = P x Q = $300 AC = $15, Q = 10, TC = AC x Q = 150 Profit = TR - TC $150 = $300 - $150 C $ t' R c 200 t 150 Profits 100 50 c 0 5 10 15 20 Quantity Chapter 10 Slide 20 Example of Profit Maximization $/Q 40 MC 30 AC Profit 20 AR 15 10 MR 0 Chapter 10 5 10 15 20 Quantity Slide 21 Example of Profit Maximization Observations $/Q AC = $15, Q = 10, TC = AC x Q = 150 40 Profit = TR = TC = $300 - $150 = $150 or 30 Profit = (P - AC) x Q = ($30 - $15)(10) = $150 MC AC Profit 20 AR 15 MR 10 0 5 10 15 20 Quantity Chapter 10 Slide 22 Monopoly A Rule of Thumb for Pricing We want to translate the condition that marginal revenue should equal marginal cost into a rule of thumb that can be more easily applied in practice. This can be demonstrated using the following steps: Chapter 10 Slide 23 A Rule of Thumb for Pricing R ( PQ ) 1. MR Q Q P Q P 2. MR P Q P P Q P Q Q P 3. Ed P Q Chapter 10 Slide 24 A Rule of Thumb for Pricing 1 Q P 4. Q E P d 1 5. MR P P Ed Chapter 10 Slide 25 A Rule of Thumb for Pricing 6. is maximized @ MR MC 1 1 P P ED ED MC P 1 1 ED Chapter 10 Slide 26 A Rule of Thumb for Pricing 1 = the markup over MC as a 7. Ed percentage of price (P-MC)/P 8. The markup should equal the inverse of the elasticity of demand. Chapter 10 Slide 27 A Rule of Thumb for Pricing MC 9. P 1 1 E d Assume Ed 4 MC 9 9 P 1 1 4 Chapter 10 9 $12 .75 Slide 28 Monopoly Monopoly pricing compared to perfect competition pricing: Monopoly P > MC Perfect Competition P = MC Chapter 10 Slide 29 Monopoly Monopoly pricing compared to perfect competition pricing: The more elastic the demand the closer price is to marginal cost. If Ed is a large negative number, price is close to marginal cost and vice versa. Chapter 10 Slide 30 Astra-Merck Prices Prilosec The Monopolist’s Output Decision 1995 Price Price of Prilosec = $3.50/daily dose of Tagamet and Zantac = - $2.25/daily dose MC Chapter 10 $1.50 of Prolosec = 30 - 40 cents/daily dose Slide 31 Astra-Merck Prices Prilosec The Monopolist’s Output Decision MC .35 P 1 1 ED 1 1 1.1 MC .35 $3.89 1 .91 .09 •Price of $3.50 is consistent with “the rule of thumb pricing” Chapter 10 Slide 32 Monopoly Shifts in Demand In perfect competition, the market supply curve is determined by marginal cost. For a monopoly, output is determined by marginal cost and the shape of the demand curve. Chapter 10 Slide 33 Shift in Demand Leads to Change in Price but Same Output $/Q MC P1 P2 D2 D1 MR2 MR1 Q1= Q2 Chapter 10 Quantity Slide 34 Shift in Demand Leads to Change in Output but Same Price $/Q MC P1 = P2 D2 MR2 D1 MR1 Q1 Chapter 10 Q2 Quantity Slide 35 Monopoly Observations Shifts in demand usually cause a change in both price and quantity. A monopolistic market has no supply curve. Chapter 10 Slide 36 Monopoly Observations Monopolist may supply many different quantities at the same price. Monopolist may supply the same quantity at different prices. Chapter 10 Slide 37 Monopoly The Effect of a Tax Under monopoly price can sometimes rise by more than the amount of the tax. To determine the impact of a tax: t = specific tax MC = MC + t MR = MC + t : optimal production decision Chapter 10 Slide 38 Effect of Excise Tax on Monopolist $/Q Increase in P: P0P1 > increase in tax P1 P P0 MC + tax D = AR MC MR t Q1 Chapter 10 Q0 Quantity Slide 39 Effect of Excise Tax on Monopolist Question Suppose: Ed = -2 How much would the price change? Chapter 10 Slide 40 Effect of Excise Tax on Monopolist Answer MC P 1 1 Ed If Ed 2 P 2MC If MC increases to MC t P 2( MC t ) 2MC 2t Price increases by twice the tax. What would happen to profits? Chapter 10 Slide 41 Monopoly The Multiplant Firm Chapter 10 For many firms, production takes place in two or more different plants whose operating cost can differ. Slide 42 Monopoly The Multiplant Firm Chapter 10 Choosing total output and the output for each plant: The marginal cost in each plant should be equal. The marginal cost should equal the marginal revenue for each plant. Slide 43 Monopoly The Multiplant Firm Algebraically: Q1 & C1 Output & Cost for Plant 1 Q2 & C2 Output & Cost for Plant 2 Total Output QT Q1 Q2 Chapter 10 Slide 44 Monopoly The Multiplant Firm Algebraically: PQT C1 (Q1 ) C2 (Q2 ) ( PQT ) C1 0 Q1 Q1 Q1 Chapter 10 Slide 45 Monopoly The Multiplant Firm Algebraically: ( PQT ) C1 ( MR ) ( MC ) 0 Q1 Q1 MR MC1 Chapter 10 Slide 46 Monopoly Algebraically: MR MC1 MR MC 2 MR MC1 MC 2 Chapter 10 Slide 47 Production with Two Plants $/Q MC1 MC2 MCT P* D = AR MR* MR Q1 Chapter 10 Q2 Q3 Quantity Slide 48 Production with Two Plants Observations: 1) MCT = MC1 + MC2 $/Q MC1 MC2 2) Profit maximizing output: MCT = MR at QT and P* MR = MR* MR* = MC1 at Q1, MC* = MC2 at Q2 MC1 + MC2 = MCT, Q1 + Q2 = QT, and MR = MC1 + MC2 Chapter 10 MCT P* D = AR MR* MR Q1 Q2 Q3 Quantity Slide 49 Monopoly Power Monopoly is rare. However, a market with several firms, each facing a downward sloping demand curve will produce so that price exceeds marginal cost. Chapter 10 Slide 50 Monopoly Power Scenario: Chapter 10 Four firms with equal share (5,000) of a market for 20,000 toothbrushes at a price of $1.50. Slide 51 The Demand for Toothbrushes $/Q $/Q At a market price of $1.50, elasticity of demand is -1.5. 2.00 2.00 The demand curve for Firm A depends on how much their product differs, and how the firms compete. 1.60 1.50 1.50 1.40 Market Demand 1.00 1.00 10,000 20,000 30,000 Quantity 3,000 5,000 7,000 QA The Demand for Toothbrushes $/Q $/Q At a market price of $1.50, elasticity of demand is -1.5. 2.00 2.00 Firm A sees a much more elastic demand curve due to competition--Ed = -.6. Still Firm A has some monopoly power and charges a price which exceeds MC. 1.60 1.50 MCA 1.50 1.40 DA Market Demand 1.00 MRA 1.00 10,000 20,000 30,000 Quantity 3,000 5,000 7,000 QA Monopoly Power Measuring Monopoly Power In perfect competition: P = MR = MC Monopoly power: P > MC Chapter 10 Slide 54 Monopoly Power Lerner’s Index of Monopoly Power L = (P - MC)/P Chapter 10 The larger the value of L (between 0 and 1) the greater the monopoly power. L is expressed in terms of Ed L = (P - MC)/P = -1/Ed Ed is elasticity of demand for a firm, not the market Slide 55 Monopoly Power Monopoly power does not guarantee profits. Profit depends on average cost relative to price. Question: Chapter 10 Can you identify any difficulties in using the Lerner Index (L) for public policy? Slide 56 Monopoly Power The Rule of Thumb for Pricing MC P 1 1 Ed Chapter 10 Pricing for any firm with monopoly power If Ed is large, markup is small If Ed is small, markup is large Slide 57 Elasticity of Demand and Price Markup $/Q $/Q The more elastic is demand, the less the markup. P* MC MC P* AR P*-MC MR AR MR Q* Quantity Q* Quantity Markup Pricing: Supermarkets to Designer Jeans Supermarkets 1. Several firms 2. Similar product 3. Ed 10 for individual stores MC MC 4 .P 1.11( MC ) 1 1 .1 0.9 5. Prices set about 10 - 11% above MC. Chapter 10 Slide 59 Markup Pricing: Supermarkets to Designer Jeans Convenience Stores 1. Higher prices than supermarke ts 2. Convenienc e differenti ates them 3. Ed 5 MC MC 4.P 1.25( MC ) 1 1 5 0.8 5. Prices set about 25% above MC. Chapter 10 Slide 60 Markup Pricing: Supermarkets to Designer Jeans Convenience Stores Convenience stores have more monopoly power. Question: Chapter 10 Do convenience stores have higher profits than supermarkets? Slide 61 Markup Pricing: Supermarkets to Designer Jeans Designer Jeans Designer jeans Ed = -3 to -4 Chapter 10 Price 33 - 50% > MC MC = $12 - $18/pair Wholesale price = $18 - $27 Slide 62 The Pricing of Prerecorded Videocassettes 1985 Title 1999 Retail Price($) Purple Rain Raiders of the Lost Ark Jane Fonda Workout Title Retail Price($) $29.98 Austin Powers 24.95 A Bug’s Life 59.95 There’s Something about Mary The Empire Strikes Back 79.98 Tae-Bo Workout An Officer and a Gentleman 24.95 Lethal Weapon 4 Star Trek: The Motion Picture 24.95 Men in Black Star Wars 39.98 Armageddon $10.49 17.99 13.99 24.47 16.99 12.99 15.86 The Pricing of Prerecorded Videocassettes What Do You Think? Should producers lower the price of videocassettes to increase sales and revenue? Sources of Monopoly Power Why do some firm’s have considerable monopoly power, and others have little or none? A firm’s monopoly power is determined by the firm’s elasticity of demand. Chapter 10 Slide 65 Sources of Monopoly Power The firm’s elasticity of demand is determined by: 1) Elasticity of market demand 2) Number of firms 3) The interaction among firms Chapter 10 Slide 66 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Monopoly power results in higher prices and lower quantities. However, does monopoly power make consumers and producers in the aggregate better or worse off? Chapter 10 Slide 67 Deadweight Loss from Monopoly Power $/Q Lost Consumer Surplus Deadweight Loss Because of the higher price, consumers lose A+B and producer gains A-C. MC Pm A B C PC AR MR Qm Chapter 10 QC Quantity Slide 68 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Rent Seeking Chapter 10 Firms may spend to gain monopoly power Lobbying Advertising Building excess capacity Slide 69 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power The incentive to engage in monopoly practices is determined by the profit to be gained. The larger the transfer from consumers to the firm, the larger the social cost of monopoly. Chapter 10 Slide 70 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Example 1996 Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) successfully lobbied for regulations requiring ethanol be produced from corn Question Chapter 10 Why only corn? Slide 71 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Price Regulation Recall that in competitive markets, price regulation created a deadweight loss. Question: Chapter 10 What about a monopoly? Slide 72 Price Regulation $/Q Marginal revenue curve when price is regulated to be no higher that P1. MR MC Pm P1 P2 = P C AC P3 P4 AR Forprice output levels above Q1 , below P results If Any price is lowered to PC output 4 Ifthe leftoriginal alone, a monopolist average and inIfthe firm incurring a to loss. price is lowered P increases to its maximum 3Qoutput produces Q and charges Pm. C and m marginal revenue curves apply. decreases a shortage exists. there is noand deadweight loss. Qm Q1 Chapter 10 Q3 Qc Q’3 Quantity Slide 73 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Natural Monopoly A firm that can produce the entire output of an industry at a cost lower than what it would be if there were several firms. Chapter 10 Slide 74 Regulating the Price of a Natural Monopoly $/Q Natural monopolies occur because of extensive economies of scale Quantity Chapter 10 Slide 75 Regulating the Price of a Natural Monopoly $/Q Unregulated, the monopolist would produce Qm and charge Pm. If the price were regulate to be PC, the firm would lose money and go out of business. Pm Setting the price at Pr yields the largest possible output;excess profit is zero. AC Pr MC PC AR MR Qm Chapter 10 Qr QC Quantity Slide 76 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Regulation in Practice Chapter 10 It is very difficult to estimate the firm's cost and demand functions because they change with evolving market conditions Slide 77 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Regulation in Practice An alternative pricing technique---rate-ofreturn regulation allows the firms to set a maximum price based on the expected rate or return that the firm will earn. P = AVC + (D + T + sK)/Q, where P = price, AVC = average variable cost D = depreciation, T = taxes s = allowed rate of return, K = firm’s capital stock Chapter 10 Slide 78 The Social Costs of Monopoly Power Regulation in Practice Using this technique requires hearings to arrive at the respective figures. The hearing process creates a regulatory lag that may benefit producers (1950s & 60s) or consumers (1970s & 80s). Question Chapter 10 Who is benefiting in the 1990s? Slide 79 Monopsony A monopsony is a market in which there is a single buyer. An oligopsony is a market with only a few buyers. Monopsony power is the ability of the buyer to affect the price of the good and pay less than the price that would exist in a competitive market. Chapter 10 Slide 80 Monopsony Competitive Buyer Price taker P = Marginal expenditure = Average expenditure D = Marginal value Chapter 10 Slide 81 Competitive Buyer Compared to Competitive Seller $/Q Buyer $/Q Seller ME = AE P* MC AR = MR P* MR = MC P* = MR P* = MC ME = MV at Q* ME = P* P* = MV D = MV Q* Quantity Q* Quantity Monopsonist Buyer $/Q The market supply curve is the monopsonist’s average expenditure curve ME Monopsony •ME > P & above S S = AE Competitive •P = PC •Q = Q+C PC P*m MV Q*m Chapter 10 QC Quantity Slide 83 Monopoly and Monopsony $/Q Monopoly Note: MR = MC; AR > MC; P > MC MC P* PC AR MR Q* Chapter 10 QC Quantity Slide 84 Monopoly and Monopsony $/Q ME Monopsony Note: ME = MV; ME > AE; MV > P S = AE PC P* MV Q* Chapter 10 QC Quantity Slide 85 Monopoly and Monopsony Monopoly Monopsony MR < P ME > P P > MC P < MV Qm < QC Qm < QC Pm > PC Pm < PC Chapter 10 Slide 86 Monopsony Power A few buyers can influence price (e.g. automobile industry). Monopsony power gives them the ability to pay a price that is less than marginal value. Chapter 10 Slide 87 Monopsony Power The degree of monopsony power depends on three similar factors. 1) Elasticity of market supply Chapter 10 The less elastic the market supply, the greater the monopsony power. Slide 88 Monopsony Power The degree of monopsony power depends on three similar factors. 2) Number of buyers Chapter 10 The fewer the number of buyers, the less elastic the supply and the greater the monopsony power. Slide 89 Monopsony Power The degree of monopsony power depends on three similar factors. 3) Interaction Among Buyers Chapter 10 The less the buyers compete, the greater the monopsony power. Slide 90 Monopsony Power: Elastic versus Inelastic Supply ME $/Q $/Q MV - P* MV - P* S = AE ME S = AE P* P* MV Q* Quantity MV Q* Quantity Deadweight Loss from Monopsony Power Determining the deadweight loss in monopsony $/Q ME Change in seller’s surplus = -A-C Change in buyer’s surplus = A - B Change in welfare = -A - C + A - B = -C - B Inefficiency occurs because less is purchased Deadweight Loss S = AE PC P* A B C MV Q* Chapter 10 QC Quantity Slide 92 Monopsony Power The Social Costs of Monopsony Power Bilateral Monopoly Chapter 10 Bilateral monopoly is rare, however, markets with a small number of sellers with monopoly power selling to a market with few buyers with monopsony power is more common. Slide 93 Monopsony Power The Social Costs of Monopsony Power Question Chapter 10 In this case, what is likely to happen to price? Slide 94 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Antitrust Laws: Promote a competitive economy Rules and regulations designed to promote a competitive economy by: Chapter 10 Prohibiting actions that restrain or are likely to restrain competition Restricting the forms of market structures that are allowable Slide 95 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Sherman Act (1890) Section 1 Prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade Explicit agreement to restrict output or fix prices Implicit collusion through parallel conduct Chapter 10 Slide 96 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Examples of Illegal Combinations 1983 Six companies and six executives indicted for price of copper tubing 1996 Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) pleaded guilty to price fixing for lysine -- three sentenced to prison in 1999 Chapter 10 Slide 97 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Examples of Illegal Combinations 1999 Roche A.G., BASF A.G., Rhone-Poulenc and Takeda pleaded guilty to price fixing of vitamins -- fined more than $1 billion. Chapter 10 Slide 98 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Sherman Act (1890) Section 2 Makes it illegal to monopolize or attempt to monopolize a market and prohibits conspiracies that result in monopolization. Chapter 10 Slide 99 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Clayton Act (1914) 1) Makes it unlawful to require a buyer or lessor not to buy from a competitor 2) Prohibits predatory pricing Chapter 10 Slide 100 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Clayton Act (1914) 3) Prohibits mergers and acquisitions if they “substantially lessen competition” or “tend to create a monopoly” Chapter 10 Slide 101 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Robinson-Patman Act (1936) Chapter 10 Prohibits price discrimination if it is likely to injure the competition Slide 102 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Federal Trade Commission Act (1914, amended 1938, 1973, 1975) 1) Created the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) 2) Prohibitions against deceptive advertising, labeling, agreements with retailer to exclude competing brands Chapter 10 Slide 103 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Antitrust laws are enforced three ways: 1) Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice Chapter 10 A part of the executive branch--the administration can influence enforcement Fines levied on businesses; fines and imprisonment levied on individuals Slide 104 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Antitrust laws are enforced three ways: 2) Federal Trade Commission Chapter 10 Enforces through voluntary understanding or formal commission order Slide 105 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Antitrust laws are enforced three ways: 3) Private Proceedings Chapter 10 Lawsuits for damages Plaintiff can receive treble damages Slide 106 Limiting Market Power: The Antitrust Laws Two Examples American Airlines -- Price fixing Microsoft Chapter 10 Monopoly power Predatory actions Collusion Slide 107 Summary Market power is the ability of sellers or buyers to affect the price of a good. Market power can be in two forms: monopoly power and monopsony power. Chapter 10 Slide 108 Summary Monopoly power is determined in part by the number of firms competing in the market. Monopsony power is determined in part by the number of buyers in the market. Chapter 10 Slide 109 Summary Market power can impose costs on society. Sometimes, scale economies make pure monopoly desirable. We rely on the antitrust laws to prevent firms from obtaining excessive market power. Chapter 10 Slide 110 End of Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony