Why is power divided between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches? Origins of separation… The Constitution of the Roman Republic (509-27BCE) had a separation of powers with the ultimate source of power being the people. In the mid-300sBCE Aristotle speaks of a “mixed government” as being the best form. This combines democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy. James Madison used the term “mixed government” in the Federalist Papers. “When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty.” – Montesquieu, Spirit of Laws, 1748 Why were many colonists so adamant about a separation of powers? From what type of government had they come? Autocracy, monarchy- one person is in charge. In a monarchy, the powers to make, enforce, and judge laws were all held by the King or Queen. England did have a Parliament, but many English people did not feel as if the representatives in Parliament really represented them. When English colonists came to America in the 1600s, they had the opportunity to govern themselves in daily matters. They did not want to create the same type of government from which they had come. Separation of powers is so important that it is one of the six principles of government! Six principals: Separation of Powers- each branch has separate and unique powers Checks and Balances- each branch of government is able to check, or restrain, the power of the others Limited Government- a government that can do only what the people allow it to do Popular Sovereignty- the idea that power lies with the people Federalism- power is shared between the national government and the states Judicial Review- the Court can declare acts of either other branch to be unconstitutional Legislative Branch WHERE is it explained? Article I of the U.S. Constitution WHO is a part of it? Congress House of Representatives 435 Representatives that are divided between states based on population Senate 100 Senators = two per state WHAT do they do? Write laws Approve presidential appointees Govern Washington, D.C. And mannnnny others things about which you will read HOW do they do it? WAIT- 535 people negotiate and compromise on one law at a time?! Nope. There are committees in the House and Senate that are responsible for certain issues. Ex. Agriculture, Veteran Affairs, Homeland Security Executive Branch WHERE is it explained? Article two of the Constitution WHO is it? Not just the President. It includes the Cabinet (all of those “Secretaries”). WHAT are the President’s powers? Veto bills Serve as Commander in chief of the armed forces Make treaties with other countries Appoint heads of agencies, Supreme Court Justices and Ambassadors Many other things about which you will read Judicial Branch WHERE is it explained? Article three of the Constitution WHO is it? Nine Supreme Court Justices. Currently they are John Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Bryer, Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia WHAT do they do? Hear cases Decide if laws are constitutional Checks and Balances Another way to look at it… What did the founders have to say about the separation of powers? “The principle of the Constitution is that of a separation of legislative, Executive and Judiciary functions, except in cases specified. If this principle be not expressed in direct terms, it is clearly the spirit of the Constitution, and it ought to be so commented and acted on by every friend of free government.” – Thomas Jefferson (1797) “[T]he great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachment of the others.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787) “The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern, some of them in our country and under our own eyes.: - George Washington, Farewell Address, (1796) Let’s talk. The Constitution is vague in some descriptions of powers. How can this cause conflict between the branches? Which branch do you think is the most powerful? Why? Why did the framers believe that a separation of powers was so important? Does each branch really perform its proper function? Think about it… In a parliamentary system, like England's, the executive and legislative powers are often closely interconnected. In a presidential system, like the United States', these powers are separated. What are some of the pros and cons of each system? So what? How have we seen the separation of powers limit the power of a particular branch? Is power in the government balanced today? Does the system still function well?