The 2006 International Seminar of
E-Commerce Academic and Application Research
Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., March 1-2, 2006
The Current Situation and
Future Development of
Japanese Universities
Shigeichi HIRASAWA
Professor, Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering,
School of Science and Engineering,
Director, Media Network Center,
Waseda University
1
1.
Outlines
• Section 2. : University Ranking
• Section 3. : Problems Faced to Japanese Universities
• Section 4. : Recent Development in Japanese Universities
• Section 5. : Introduction of IT for Education
• Section 6. ：Copy Right and Privacy Protection
• Section 7. : Conclusion
2. University Ranking
2.1 Positions of Japanese Universities in the World
Table 2.1 : University ranking in the world : Gourman Report
Rank
University
1
Princeton
Paris
3
Harvard (Radcliffe)
4
Ocsford
Michigan
6
Cambridge
Yale
8
Stanford
Heidelberg
10 Momperial (first-third)
Cornell
12 Munich
California (Berkeley)
14 Lyons (first-third)
Chicago
16 Wisconsin (Madison)
17 Calfolnia (Los Angeles)
Rife (first-third)
19 Edinburgh
M.I.T.
・
・
・
101 Tokyo
Country
U. S. A.
France
U. S. A.
U. K.
U. S. A.
U. K.
U. S. A.
U. S. A.
Germany
France
U. S. A.
Germany
U. S. A.
France
U. S. A.
U. S. A.
U. S. A.
France
U. K.
U. S. A.
Japan
2
3
2.1 Positions of Japanese Universities in the World
Table 2.2 : Ranking in each research area (Referred Paper)
Physics
Computer Science
1
2
3
4
5
AT&T
Tokyo University
IBM
M.I.T.
E. O. N. R.
98,264
92,058
87,982
85,292
85,319
1
2
3
4
5
Chemistry
UC Berkeley
Kyoto University
Tokyo University
University of Texas
University of Cambridge
57,039
56,981
56,860
50,919
48,634
1
2
3
4
5
Mathematics
University of Paris 6
Stanford University
UC Berkeley
University of Minnesota
Harvard University
6,220
6,071
6,059
5,947
5,850
1
2
3
4
5
IBM
AT&T
Stanford University
M. I. T.
University of Illinois
11,781
8,451
8,051
5,768
5,753
Engineering
1
2
3
4
5
M. I. T.
UC Berkeley
NASA
University of Illinois
Stanford University
21,919
20,322
18,167
17,835
17,174
Note : Tables 2.2~2.3.10 are from the
website http://www.toshin.com.
4
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.1 : University ranking in Japan at 2005
(国家公務員1種，National government employee : Class I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
東京大学
The University of Tokyo
454
京都大学
Kyoto University
191
早稲田大学
北海道大学
Waseda University
Hokkaido University
128
74
慶應義塾大学
東北大学
九州大学
名古屋大学
大阪大学
Keio University
Tohoku University
Kyushu University
Nagoya University
Osaka University
73
59
54
47
46
東京工業大学
Tokyo Institute of Technology
45
5
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.2 : University ranking in Japan at 2002
(公認会計士試験，Certified public accountant examination)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
慶應義塾大学
早稲田大学
中央大学
東京大学
一橋大学
明治大学
神戸大学
京都大学
同志社大学
関西学院大学
Keio University
Waseda University
Chuo University
The University of Tokyo
Hitotsubashi University
Meiji University
Kobe University
Kyoto University
Doshisha University
Kwansei Gakuin University
183
140
94
75
54
39
38
37
32
28
6
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.3 : University ranking in Japan at 2002
(社長出身大学(300人以上の企業)，President's alma mater(300 employees or more))
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
慶應義塾大学
東京大学
早稲田大学
日本大学
京都大学
中央大学
明治大学
同志社大学
一橋大学
大阪大学
九州大学
東北大学
北海道大学
立教大学
法政大学
名古屋大学
神戸大学
関西学院大学
甲南大学
関西大学
Keio University
The University of Tokyo
Waseda University
Nihon University
Kyoto University
Chuo University
Meiji University
Doshisha University
Hitotsubashi University
Osaka University
Kyushu University
Tohoku University
Hokkaido University
Rikkyo University
Hosei University
Nagoya University
Kobe University
Kwansei Gakuin University
Konan University
Kansai University
916
617
589
319
298
235
201
164
134
128
125
125
123
115
100
97
95
89
86
81
7
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.4 : University ranking in Japan at 2002
(社長の出身大学（上場企業），President's alma mater(listed company))
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
慶應義塾大学
東京大学
早稲田大学
京都大学
同志社大学
日本大学
一橋大学
中央大学
東北大学
10 明治大学
11 神戸大学
12 大阪大学
関西学院大学
14
15
16
17
甲南大学
九州大学
名古屋大学
学習院大学
立教大学
立命館大学
20 東京工業大学
Keio University
The University of Tokyo
Waseda University
Kyoto University
Doshisha University
Nihon University
Hitotsubashi University
Chuo University
Tohoku University
Meiji University
Kobe University
Osaka University
Kwansei Gakuin University
Konan University
Kyushu University
Nagoya University
Gakushuin University
Rikkyo University
Ritsumeikan University
Tokyo Institute of Technology
325
238
181
113
74
58
51
49
43
41
38
35
34
32
29
27
8
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.5 : University ranking in Japan at 2003 and 2002
(社長の出身大学（外資系企業），President's alma mater(foreign company))
2003
1
2
3
4
慶應義塾大学
早稲田大学
東京大学
京都大学
日本大学
6
7
8
9
10
中央大学
上智大学
同志社大学
青山学院大学
一橋大学
Keio University
Waseda University
The University of Tokyo
Kyoto University
Nihon University
Chuo University
Sophia University
Doshisha University
Aoyama Gakuin University
Hitotsubashi University
114
82
48
30
27
24
20
19
18
2002
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
慶應義塾大学
早稲田大学
東京大学
日本大学
中央大学
京都大学
上智大学
一橋大学
同志社大学
青山学院大学
Keio University
Waseda University
The University of Tokyo
Nihon University
Chuo University
Kyoto University
Sophia University
Hitotsubashi University
Doshisha University
Aoyama Gakuin University
117
86
54
32
28
27
25
22
21
19
9
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.6 : University ranking in Japan at 2002
(国会議員の出身大学，Diet member's alma mater)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
東京大学
早稲田大学
慶應義塾大学
中央大学
京都大学
日本大学
明治大学
東北大学
法政大学
上智大学
11
一橋大学
立命館大学
The University of Tokyo
Waseda University
Keio University
Chuo University
Kyoto University
Nihon University
Meiji University
Tohoku University
Hosei University
Sophia University
Hitotsubashi University
Ritsumeikan University
144
92
56
45
30
20
17
13
11
9
10
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.7 : University ranking in Japan
(スポーツ選手の出身大学，Sports player's alma mater)
Professional baseball
1 法政大学
2 東北福祉大学
3 亜細亜大学
明治大学
5
6
7
8
青山学院大学
駒澤大学
東海大学
東洋大学
立命館大学
10 早稲田大学
Hosei University
Tohoku Fukushi University
Asia University
Meiji University
Aoyama Gakuin University
Komazawa University
Tokai University
Toyo University
Ritsumeikan University
Waseda University
20
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
Soccer (J-league)
1
2
3
4
5
6
筑波大学
駒澤大学
国士舘大学
順天堂大学
早稲田大学
中央大学
東海大学
8 青山学院大学
同志社大学
明治大学
Tsukuba University
Komazawa University
Kokushikan university
Juntendo University
Waseda University
Chuo University
Tokai University
Aoyama Gakuin University
Doshisha University
Meiji University
20
14
12
11
7
6
4
11
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.8 : University ranking in Japan at 2002
(外国人教員数，Number of foreigner teacher)
1
2
3
上智大学
立命館大学
関西外国語大学
京都大学
5
6
7
8
9
神田外語大学
東京大学
南山大学
早稲田大学
慶應義塾大学
国際基督教大学
日本大学
12 東海大学
立命館アジア太平洋大学
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
西南学院大学
東北大学
筑波大学
会津大学
福岡大学
宮崎国際大学
立教大学
Sophia University
Ritsumeikan University
Kansai University of Foreign Studies
Kyoto University
Kanda University of International Studies
The University of Tokyo
Nanzan University
Waseda University
Keio University
International Christian University
Nihon University
Tokai University
Ritsumeikan University Asia Pacific Ocean university
Seinan Gakuin University
Tohoku University
Tsukuba University
University of Aizu
Fukuoka University
Miyazaki International College
Rikkyo University
102
86
64
55
52
50
47
46
45
43
42
39
37
34
33
32
12
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.9 : University ranking in Japan in 2002
(大学院進学率（理学系），Rate of going to graduate school (science))
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
東京大学（理）
京都大学（農）
東北大学（理）
東京工業大学（理）
東北大学（農）
京都大学（理）
大阪大学（理）
東京大学（農）
北海道大学（理）
大阪市立大学（理）
広島大学（理）
神戸大学（理）
北海道大学（農）
名古屋大学（農）
名古屋大学（理）
The University of Tokyo
Kyoto University
Tohoku University
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Tohoku University
Kyoto University
Osaka University
The University of Tokyo
Hokkaido University
Osaka City University
Hiroshima University
Kobe University
Hokkaido University
Nagoya University
Nagoya University
86.90%
79.50%
78.90%
78.70%
78.50%
78.40%
72.00%
70.00%
69.40%
68.10%
66.10%
65.60%
65.00%
64.60%
63.90%
13
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
Table 2.3.10 : University ranking in Japan in 2002
(大学院進学率工学系），Rate of going to graduate school (engineering))
1
2
3
東京工業大学
大阪大学
長岡技術科学大学
豊橋技術科学大学
5
6
7
8
9
10
名古屋大学
京都大学
大阪府立大学
北海道大学
東京大学
大阪大学（基礎工）
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Osaka University
Technological University of Nagaoka
Toyohashi University of Technology
Nagoya University
Kyoto University
University of Osaka Prefecture
Hokkaido University
The University of Tokyo
Osaka University(basic worker)
81.60%
80.70%
77.80%
77.00%
76.20%
75.50%
75.50%
75.40%
75.30%
14
2.2 Positions of Japanese Universities in Japan
大学の分類，Categories of university
(1)
研究大学， Research University
(2)
専門大学， Professional University
(3)
教養大学， Liberal Arts College
私学・・・建学の精神
Private university・・・Identity
15
3. Problems Faced to Japanese Universities
(1) 少子化，Low birth rate
2007年全入時代の到来，若者の気質変化，NEETの増加
All students can enter universities in 2007. NEET.
(2) 景気低迷，Recession
大学の財政悪化（国公立大学の選択）
Financial problem of university getting worse -> National
(3) 大学の企業化，Industrialization of University
内部統制，情報開示（財政状態を含む），法遵守，意思決定シ
ステムの改善など
Open information (including finance one), etc.
16
3. Problems Faced to Japanese Universities
Table 3.1 : Comparison of universities between in Japan and in Taiwan
Japan
Taiwan
Universities Students
Universities Students
726
3508091
159
1285867
人口, Population
比率, Ratio 1)
Japan
127757000
0.02745909
Taiwan
22,710,000
0.05662118
Note :
1) Ratio = Students / Population
2) The data in Taiwan is from
“http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/p276.html”
17
3. Problems Faced to Japanese Universities
Table 3.2 : School fees in Japan
大学の種類と主要校, Type & Univ.
国立, National
(東京大学, Tokyo Univ.)
公立, Public
(横浜市立大学, Yokohama Univ.)
私立, Private
(早稲田大学, Waseda Univ.)
分野, Area
文系, Humanities
理系, Science
文系, Humanities
理系, Science
文系, Humanities
理系, Science
1)
2)
Entrance Fee
282,000
282,000
141,000
141,000
290,000
290,000
Measure : Yen
Tuition&Etc.(year)
535,800
535,800
645,000
645,000
936,000
1,405,000
Note (About Waseda Univ.) :
1) 政治経済学部, The case at School of Politics
2) 理工学部経営システム工学科, The case at Dept. Industrial and Management Systems
Engineering
18
3. Problems Faced to Japanese Universities
Finance ratio of major 9 private University (dynamic ratio)
Table 3.3 : Finance ratio
大学名
University
帰属収入 (a)
Imputed income
青山学院／Aoyama
31,290,542,453
慶応義塾／Keio
117,013,454,173
東京理科大／Tokyo Sci. 33,394,340,444
法政／Hosei
43,606,892,837
明治／Meiji
44,787,081,167
早稲田／Waseda
90,619,192,898
同志社／Doshisha
48,130,372,417
立命館／Ritsumeikan
62,223,865,393
関西学院／Kansei
26,296,253,058
教育研究経費(b)
Expense of
Education
research
10,161,393,687
50,546,323,967
11,885,641,427
11,942,566,272
14,348,425,174
32,278,306,347
14,846,237,648
21,160,965,280
8,291,471,360
（2004年度、単位：円） (In 2004, measure: Yen)
教育研究
経費比率
学生数
学生一人
(b)／(a)
順位
（人）
当たり
順位
Ratio of
Rank
Num.
(b)／(c)
Rank
Expense of
Students Per student
education
research
32.47%
5
25,658
396,032
8
43.20%
1
52,257
967,264
1
35.59%
3
18,081
657,355
2
27.39%
9
34,154
349,668
9
32.04%
6
29,808
481,362
5
35.62%
2
56,282
573,510
3
30.85%
8
36,060
411,709
6
34.01%
4
43,141
490,507
4
31.53%
7
20,174
410,998
7
19
4. Recent Developments in Japanese Universities
Trials to solve the problems discussed before.
(The case in the private universities)
5. Introduction of IT for Education
20
Design for Educational Research of the 21st Century

Major Targets





Educational system for integrated university
Strengthen the deployment for a lifetime study
Creating research development and new industry that
coordinate with the society
Reinforcement for internationalization and
computerization
Specific Plans for a Project





Rearrange the under graduate school education
Enhancement of education in graduate school
Development of open education
Development of lifetime education and distance
learning
Reorganization and activation of research system
21
5. Introduction of IT for Education
Comparison of Informationization Investment Amount (Private
Universities in Japan and Major Universities in the World)
情報化投資額の比較（日本の私立大学、世界一流大学）
Table 4.1 : An amount of investment in Japanese private universities
順位　Rank
校名 Univ. 投資額 investment (Yen)
1A
114,000
2B
104,000
3C
96,000
：
：
10 D
71,000
11 Waseda
70,000
11 E
70,000
13 F
63,000
：
：
19 G
38,000
※平均値　7.3万円
Average 73,000Yen
出典：（社）私立大学情報教育協会「平成15年度私立大学
情報化投資額調査」集計より（2004年8月発行）
Source:"An Investigation of Investment Amout of Private University
Informationization in 2003", in total Corp. of Japan Universities
Association for Computer Education (issue in August, 2004)
The rank of Waseda University is
11 (in 19 universities).
22
5. Introduction of IT for Education
Comparison of Informationization Investment Amount (Private
Universities in Japan and Major Universities in the World)
情報化投資額の比較（日本の私立大学、世界一流大学）
Table 4.2 : An amount of investment in Stanford university
Contents 項目
IT Service （Networking security, Helpdesk,・・）
Communications Services (voice,video,and datacommunications)
Stanford Data Center (hosting, operations)
Computer Resource Center (desktop and server installation,and maintenance)
Technology Training (lecture,hands-on,classroom,and web-based training)
×106円＝
÷学生数（14,454人）＝学生一人当たり
Investment
US$ 42.5
US$ 31.0
US$ 7.0
US$ 5.0
US$ 1.0
US$ 86.5
92億円
63.4357271
学生数5万人規模換算⇒ 317.2万円
出典：Stanford ITSS(Information Technology & System Support)
<Stanford University Budget Plan 2004/2005 より>
金額
million
million
million
million
million
million
23
5. Introduction of IT for Education
Comparison of Informationization Investment Amount (Private
Universities in Japan and Major Universities in the World)
Table 4.3 : An amount of investment in M. I. T
Contents 項目
Academic Computing
Administrative Computing
Client Support Services
Operations and Infrastructure
Telephony
IS&T Shared Services
Investment
US$ 4.0
US$ 8.1
US$ 6.6
US$ 13.7
US$ 4.6
US$ 1.7
US$ 38.7
×106円＝ 41億円
÷学生数（10,340人）＝学生一人当たり 39.7万円
学生数5万人規模換算⇒ 198億円
出典：MIT IS&T(Information Services and Technology)
<FY2005 Operation Plan より>
金額
million
million
million
million
million
million
million
24
5.1 The Introduction Program of IT
Programs for Computerized Promotion (2000~2002)
~ Rearranging Methods of Education (1) ~

Opening Research Education




Database of research
information
Education using on-demand
class
Joint research or class with
other university
Internationalization


Education using English
(Tutorial lessons)
CCDL (Cross-Cultural Distance
Learning) Program
An Example
25
5.1 The Introduction Program of IT
Programs for Computerized Promotion (2000~2002)
~ Rearranging Methods of Education (2) ~

From Knowledge Training to
Problem Discovery



On-demand class
Lessons using multimedia
Inquiry using BBS for active
discussions
An Example

Lifetime Study, Education for Working People

Remote learning

Education for preferred applicants and HS kids
5.1 The Introduction Program of IT
Programs for Computerized Promotion (2003~2005)
~ For Global University ~

26
Target : Creating Wisdom in Asia Pacific Region
Daily cultures methodology
 Achievement for lifetime learning
 Creating research development and new industry that
coordinate with the society
 Achievement of management structural investment

From establishment of the distance
learning to development
Coordination with
other University
Coordination with HS
Coordination with
industrial-government
(Copyright : Waseda Univ.)
Contribution to lifetime learning
System of Support and Organization for e-learning
27
School-affairs part of information (The total information plan
and adjustment)
planning division
Distance Educational
Center
[Headquarters and
centers investigation]
Media Network Center
(Systems development and
(Distance educational
maintenance)
promotion / support)
[Remote educational implementation part]
- Contents work
(copyright
Under graduate school, graduate
processing)
school, and open educational center
(Enforcement which does not incline toward a
specific faculty etc.)
Human science department
correspondence course
(Graduation only by lesson on demand is possible)
-Lesson
support
- User support
(24-hour help
desk service)
Waseda University Learning Square. Co.
Outsourcing of Support operating
Waseda University International. Co.
28
5.2 e-learning and e-school
About On-demand Classes
On-demand by going to school
On-demand by
communication system
(e-school)
Num. Full
On-demand
Num.
Hybrid Class
Num. Class
2001
7
-
926
-
2002
17
-
2,062
-
2003
45
82
12,792
40
3,045
2004
53
140
17,651
93
4,670
2005
74
291
37,529
194
6,901
Year
Num.
Students
Num.
Students
-
Opening the
e-school
In e-school, all classes by the on-demand form one
opened, and reducing the load of schooling as much as
possible, and the offer of the academic education to the
working student and those who live far from the
university is provided.
5.2 e-learning and e-school
Data of the Students in e-school
29
Entrance examination in 2005
Applicants : 290
Successful : 187
03年度～05年度入学者年代内訳
Ages 18~49 especially 30th is higher.
160
140
120
100
人数 80
60
40
20
0
Count of the Students
Others
6%
23～29
30～39
40～49
50～59
60～
年代
Unknown
12%
Clerk
36%
Disemployment
24%
Private Practice
10%
18～22
Teacher
4%
Civil Servant
8%
Type of Job (2003~2005)
Age
Age (2003~2005)
Rate of working people such as clerk
and civil servant are higher. Age of
almost all disemployment is 18~22.
5.2 e-learning and e-school
30
Advantages of e-school





Expansion of time / spatial flexibility of an
educational function
Expansion of time / spatial flexibility of the place of
the study from a student side
Improvement in the quality of the education by
exhibiting teaching materials
Realization of the individual study by BBS and the
educational instructor
A position of an educational instructor which
incentives both a living and a study for a graduate
student, is prepared
5.2 e-learning and e-school
31
Problems of e-school

Large Amount of Money for Tuition

Instruction for Various Type of Lessons, such as
Graduation Thesis

High Charge on Educational Instructor for Making
Course Material and Supervising Lessons

Promotion and Securing of Educational Instruction

Formation of Student Manners
32
5.3 Implementation of International-CommunicationSkills (CCDL)
“Earth-citizen” = “Activity with international intellectual”
By cultivation of thorough skills in international communications
Training STEP1: Tutorial English Learning Program



Acquisition of fundamental skill in communication
A lesson with small number of students (they are four students per one
tutor)
Construction of the environment "about which it cannot but speak"
STEP2: CCDL Program
 The opportunity for improving skills in international communications by
practically using common foreign languages (English, Chinese, Russian,
etc.)
 A common seminar with tie-up university in an overseas (20-nation 43
universities in 2003)
Practice
STEP3:Cyber-Lecture & -- A Cyber-Seminar
 Distance learning / common seminar which used the on-demand lesson
system and the teleconference system, and treated the more special
theme
Copyright Waseda Univ.
5.3 CCDL
STEP2:Daily of CCDL for Foreign Culture.
Exchange by the chat with
student in an overseas
college (small group)
33
With the partner of an overseas
tie-up university. One real-time
exchange implementation per
week. The contents of the dialog
are created record/summary.
(The teacher in charge checks)
Current-issues, fashion, and
lifestyle, university life, culture
and sport, education, religion,
and social tradition. To various
themes, such as a sense of
The common seminar in
the class unit by video
values. It attaches and opinions
conferencing
are exchanged.
Efforts to acquire a mutual understanding with a partner whose backgrounds differ.
Acquisition of expressing capability
The amount of average utterance
Improving (MLU: Meaning Length of Utterance)
Acquisition of a cultural understanding and
International Communication Skills
Copyright Waseda Univ.
5.3 CCDL
CCDL Results and Scale
Year
Countries Universities
Students
2001
16
30
1,585
2002
17
33
3,339
2003
20
43
3,181
2004
21
44
2,179
43
43
Countries
44
44
33
30
30
Universities
17
17
国
大学
33
1616
1717
20
20
24
21
1010
44 44
1999年
1999
2000年
2000
2001年
2001
2002年
2002
2003年
2003
2004年
2004
34
5.3 CCDL
35
CCDL Joined University List (1)
The main participating universities by 2005.
• Korea University (South Korea)
• CHURARON corn university (Thailand)
• Ehara National Universities (South Korea)
• Hanoi college of engineering (Vietnam)
• Hanyang university (South Korea)
 Beijing University (China)
• South Korean south university (South Korea)
 Qinghua University (China)
• Sungkyunkwan university (South Korea)
 Fudan university (China)
• South Seoul National University (South Korea)
 Chehiang university (China)
• Di La Salle university (Philippines)
 Metropolitan instructor university (China)
• Philippines university (Philippines)
 Hong Kong Baptist university (China)
• MARAYA university (Malaysia)
• Singapore National Universities (Singapore)
 National Taiwan Normal university
(Taiwan)
• SEAMEO RELC (Singapore)
 Tamkang university (Taiwan)
• Thammasat university (Thailand)
 Interchange Association Japanese center
(Taiwan)
 Former Tomohiro study (Taiwan)
5.3 CCDL
36
CCDL Joined University List (2)
The main participating universities by 2005.
• Negara Brunei Darussalam university
(Brunei)
• Zaid university (UAE)
• World economic university (Uzbekistan)
• Samarkand university (Uzbekistan)
• Auckland university (New Zealand)
• Waicat university(New Zealand)
• Russia and Far East and national and
synthesis universities
• (Russia)
• Monashee university (Australia)
• New South Wales university (Australia)
• Adelaide university(Australia)
• University of Utah(United States)
• Colorado university(United States)
• Orangemen university (United States)
Rafayat university (United States)
• Oregon state university (United States)
Portland state university (United States)
• University of Hawaii Hiro school (United
• States)
• University of Hawaii Manoa school (United
States)
• Nottingham (Britain)
• Torrent university (Britain)
• Edinburgh university (Britain)
• Essex university (Britain)
• Lyons university (France)
• keel university (Germany)
• Berlin and Humboldt University (German)
5.3 CCDL
37
The Data of TV Conference Connection of Joint Semester
and Tutorial in 2005. Connection from Countries
(a) First Semester
Country Connection
China
60
Australia
43
Thailand
23
Taiwan
29
Korea
19
Japan
8
Shingapore
7
Germany
5
France
1
USA
1
196
Time
95:15
64:00
50:00
43:45
29:00
10:45
10:00
5:30
3:30
1:00
312:45
(b) Second Semester
Country
China
Korea
Taiwan
Australia
Shingapore
Philippines
Germany
Canada
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Japan
Thailand
UAE
USA
Connection Time
80 134:45
46 79:15
38 51:00
23 36:15
17 24:15
12 17:15
9 13:30
3 13:30
8 12:00
8 12:00
6
9:00
5
4:45
3
4:30
2
3:00
260 415:00
(c) All Year
Country
China
Taiwan
Australia
Korea
Thailand
Shingapore
Japan
Germany
Philippines
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Canada
UAE
USA
France
Connection
140
67
66
65
28
24
14
14
12
8
8
3
3
3
1
456
Time
230:00
94:45
100:15
108:15
54:45
34:15
19:45
19:00
17:15
12:00
12:00
13:30
4:30
4:00
3:30
727:45
STEP3：Cyber Lecture & Cyber Seminar
38
Distance learning / common seminar discussing a more special topics of real-time
and both directions
A lecture on the special subject of not "English study" but the overseas first-class
professor using English is hold.
Waseda Univ.
Korea Univ. (South Korea)
Fudan Univ. (China)
It is a joint lesson with a
university two or more.
- "Symbiosis of Asia"
- "World English and
Miscommunications"
A teacher and a student
participate from each university (a
Thammasat Univ. lesson uses English).
(Thailand)
Expansion of
the number of
lectures, and
participating
university
Singapore
National
Univ.
Etc.
Copyright Waseda Univ.
5.3 CCDL
800
Tutorial
700
TV Conference
600
50
45
40
Connection Time
35
500
30
400
25
300
20
15
200
10
100
5
0
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
Year
Fig5 The usage of TV conference system
Number of connection times
Connection time
The usage of TV conference system (2002-2005)
39
6. Copyright and Privacy Protection
Handling of Contents

About management of On demand contents,
an agreement is required of between the
persons concerned (such as a university, a
teacher and a working company).

Until now at Waseda University, the following
employment is carried out by exchanging a
memorandum, etc.



Both the faculty and Waseda University hold the copyright
(property rights) of contents in lecture together.
Contents in lecture are used by lesson at Waseda University.
About using contents in lecture whose purpose is of outside
(using other than a lesson at Waseda University), agreement
of both the faculty and Waseda University is needed.
40
6. Copyright and Privacy Protection
When a Third Party’s Work is Used



In the lecture contents, when using a third party’s
work, permission of person who has a copyright is
obtained.
An application works which permits a copyright of its
owner is complicated in many cases, and hangs a
superfluous burden on a teacher.
At Waseda University, total management about
application works for permission is performed by its
on-demand lesson support section (distance learning
center). (The real work of an application is entrusted
to an associated company (Waseda University
Learning Square Co.))
41
6. Copyright and Privacy Protection
Future Subjects

Management of Lecture Contents


Use of a Third Party's Work


An application business which permits a copyright of its owner is complicated in
many cases, and requires much time. It is necessary to loosen the restriction
similar to exception regulation in order to establish and grow up e-learning
systems.
An Enlightenment to a User


Until now, although the contents of lecture were used mainly within the
university, cooperation outside the university may increase from now on, and it is
necessary to examine the new guideline which can be applicable to various cases.
Since All users, such as teachers and students, need to protect and employ a
statute and a social norm, and it is expected that the number of users increases
by leaps and bounds with a spread of e-learning, activities of enlightenment
become more important from
For conquest of the above-mentioned subject, forming the
agreement based on cooperation and the mutual understanding of
the over all society is needed.
42
6. Copyright and Privacy Protection
Privacy Protection for Students

Protection :
Address, Telephone number, ID number, also
including Exam-score which specifies an individual of
student
43
44
Conclusion


Key point :
Early Introduction and Effective Use of IT
To Solve the Problem :



Finance
Quality of education
Corresponding to various character of students