Chapter 8

advertisement

Ch 8: Profit Max Under

Perfect Competition

• Three assumptions in p.c. model:

• 1)

Price-taking : many small firms, none can affect mkt P by

 ing Q

 no mkt power. Firm can sell all it wants at mkt P so faces perfectly elastic (horizontal) product demand curve.

• 2

) Product homogeneity : each firm produces nearly identical product

 all are perfect substitutes. This assures there will be single mkt P

• 3)

Free entry and exit: assures big number of firms in industry.

More on Perfect

Competition

• Real-life examples mostly found in agriculture.

• Large # firms means 

10 – 20 firms in industry.

• P.C. model is an ideal; serves as useful starting point.

Additional assumption:

– Firms’ goal is to maximize profits

(good assumption given large # firms).

– Principal-agent problems more in news lately; to be discussed later.

– 

-max goal extends beyond P.C. market structure.

Profit Maximization

• Define profit = TR – TC

• 

(q) = R(q) – C(q), or

• 

= R – C.

• q* represents firm’s 

-max level of output.

To achieve

-max : firm picks q* where difference between

TR and TC is greatest.

• With graphs of TR and TC: max

 where have greatest vertical distance between TR and TC.

Three Curves in Figure 8.1

• TR: slope is MR

• TC: slope is MC.

•  function: see inverse U-shape: plots out vertical distance between

TR and TC.

Max

 where:

– 1) TR – TC is largest

– 2) slope TR = slope TC; or

MR = MC.

– 3) Rule for all firms (PC or not):

• pick

-max q* where MR = MC.

Review Implications of

Perfect Competition

• Keep terms straight:

– Q = market output;

– D = market demand;

– q = firm output;

– d = firm demand.

Market D is downward sloping but demand curve faced by individual firm is perfectly elastic

(horizontal).

– Interpret: firm can sell all it wants to sell at the single market price.

– In other words, its selection of q* has no impact on market price.

– So: firm demand curve is same as its

MR curve.

Further Implications of

P. C. Model

Recall under PC: firm’s demand curve is its MR curve.

• This means that P 

MR.

Profit-max rule for PC firm:

Pick

-max q* where MC = MR = P .

• Also, since P 

MR for each q, then P = MR = AR.

• Draw simple graph to see 

max q*.

FURTHER Details

• Revise rule : pick

-max q* where

MR = MC AND MC is rising.

– Recall: this rule applies to all firms, not just p.c. firms.

• Short Run profit for p.c. firm :

• P - ATC at q* = average profit per unit of q.

• Recall: 

= TR – TC; So:

• 

/q = TR/q – TC/q

Avg.

= P – ATC.

• Total

 at q* = q*

(P-ATC).

Firm’s SR

Shutdown Decision

Situation : What if, in the SR,

-max q* results in losses?

Firm must choose (1) vs (2):

• 1) Continue producing at q* and incurring the full losses.

• 2) Shutdown in SR (I.e., produce q-0) , which will reduce losses but firm still must pay FC and now have NO revenues.

SR Shutdown Rule

• At q*, firm must know::

– P,

– ATC, and

– AVC.

• Rule :

– If

 

0 in SR (so P

ATC at q*): continuing producing q* as long as

P

AVC.

– In other words: continue to produce q* as long as firm is covering operating costs.

In LR : any negative profits will cause shutdown and exit from industry. (So:

LR shutdown if P

ATC).

Exercise

• Coffee mug company: P = $8.

Currently , q = 200;

• MC = $10 = ATC.

If did have q=150, then:

• MC = $6 = AVC.

Questions : With

-max goal:

– 1. Should firm stick with q=200, reduce, or increase?

– 2. Would shut-down be better?

Competitive Firm’s

SR Supply Curve

Supply Curve : shows q produced at each possible price.

SR supply curve

: the firm’s

MC curve for all points where

MC

AVC.

– I.e., 

-max q* is where P

AVC.

• Remember “trigger” for shutdown in SR

 implies that

MC curve has an irrelevant part

(where MC

AVC).

Firm’s Response to

Price of Input

• Consider:  price input

 causes

MC at each q

 shift up to left of MC curve.

• See Figure 8.7:

– Start at P = $5 with MC

1

; so q*

= q

1

.

– Now:  price input causes

MC:

– Shifts MC up to left.

– Causes  q*.

SR Market

Supply Curve

• Shows: amount of Q the industry will produce in SR at each possible price.

• Sum SR supply curves for firms using horizontal summation.

• That is: at each possible price, sum up total quantity supplied by each firm.

• See Figure 8.9.

• (Note that we are assuming that, for each firm, as q

 es, individual MC curves no

.).

Price Elasticity of

Market Supply

• E

S

= %

Qs/1%

P

= (

Q/Q) / (

P/P).

• E

S

0 always because SMC slopes upward.

• If MC  a lot when

Q (or, costly to

Q), then E

S is low.

Extreme cases:

Perfectly inelastic S : vertical.

• When industry’s plant and equipment so fully utilized that greater output can be achieved only if new plants built.

Perfect elastic S : horizontal (MC no

 when Q

)

Producer Surplus in SR

• Concept analogous to CS.

• For rising MC: P 

MC for every unit of q except last one produced.

• For a firm (see Figure 8.11):

– For all units produced (up to q*):sum the differences between mkt P and MC of production.

– Measures area above MC schedule (S curve) and below mkt price.

LR Competitive

Equilibrium

• If each firm earns zero economic

, each firm is in LR equilibrium.

Three conditions:

– 1. All firms in industry are profitmaximizing.

– 2. No firm has incentive to enter or leave industry (due to

= 0).

– 3. P is that which equates

Q S = Q D in market.

Adjustment from SR to

LR Equilibrium

• Firm starts in SR equilibrium.

• Positive profits induce new firms to entire industry so industry S curve shifts rightward.

• This causes market P to fall.

• This causes firm’s MR line to fall, until profits = 0 again.

– Key: firms enter as long as P 

ATC

• Note: in this case, MC no shift due to constant cost assumption.

LR choice of q*:

– where LMC = P = MR = LAC.

– Key is LMC=LAC.

Economic Rent

• Economic Rent :

– Difference between what a firm is willing to pay for an input and the minimum amount necessary to buy the input.

For an industry : economic rent is same as LR producer surplus.

• For a fairly fixed factor (like land): bulk of payments for the factor is rent (so factor S curve is vertical).

• In LR in a competitive mkt: PS that firms earn for Q is the economic rent from all its scarce inputs.

• Presence of economic rent can explain why profits might persist in

LR.

Industry’s LR

Supply Curve

• Cannot just sum individual firms horizontally because as price

 es, # firms in industry

 es. Must connect the zero-profit points.

Shape of LR supply curve : depends on whether (and in what direction) the

 es in each firm’s q causes  es in input prices.

– Constant cost industry : As q and Q

, input prices no

 so firm’s MC, AVC, and ATC NO shift as q changes.

– Here, long run industry supply curve is flat (perfectly horizontal).

Example: coffee industry (land for growing coffee widely available).

Other Cost Structures

Increasing cost industry

– Example: oil industry (limited availability of easily accessible, large-volume oil fields, so to

 q, firms costs rise too).

– Result is upward-sloping long run industry supply curve.

Decreasing cost industry

– Example: automobile industry

(AC falls as industry output rises)

– Result is downward-sloping long run industry supply curve.

Exercise

• In an increasing cost industry starting in LR equilibrium:

– What is the immediate and then longrun effect of a shift to the left in market demand? Show and discuss the process of return to LR equilibrium.

• 1. Will the market price rise, fall, or stay the same?

• 2. What are the effects on the long-run market quantity and the long-run firm quantity?

• 3. What is the shape of the long-run supply curve?

• 4. What would be different if the industry were a constant cost industry? Decreasing cost industry?

Download