A Dividing Nation The United States • Tensions with Native Americans Increases • Indian Removal in the Southeast • Gaining Land Increases the Division Between North and South • Laws About Slavery Become more Strict and Severe • Economic Differences Between North and South Intensifies • Southern States Secede Tensions Between Americans and Native Americans Increased • The Oconee War • Treaty of New York • Creek War • Chief McIntosh • Treaty of Indian Springs Oconee War 1780s Fighting between Creek & GA settlers Chief McGillivray led Creeks Territorial dispute Treaty of New York Supposed to settle Oconee War McGilivray met Pres. Washington Lasted until 1812 Upper (Red) Creeks attack settlers Split Creeks: Red and White Red Creeks were defeated Lower Creek Chief Believed Creeks should sell land. Signed land away for $200,000 Deal made by McIntosh w / U.S. Sold off remaining Creek lands U.S. gave land to Georgia. Creek War Chief McInstosh 1790 1813 1825 Treaty Of 1825 Indian Springs Oconee Wars Oconee War 1780 s • CAUSES: Fighting between Creek & GA settlers Chief McGilliv -ray led Creeks Territorial dispute By 1780s Ga settlers were pushing into Creek lands west of the Oconee River. In early 1800s a lottery system is used to distribute this land. Most white settlements in Ga were east of the Oconee River. Land distributed by the Headright System. > GA settlers pushed west into Creek lands because some settlers believed the land had been ceded (or given away) by the Creeks in the 1773 Treaty of Augusta. > GA settlers resented the fact that many Creeks fought on the side of the British in the American Revolution > Creeks led raids (like the one with Chief McGillivray) against GA settlers coming into Creek territory along the Oconee. *stole horses, burned houses, captured settlers Oconee Wars & Treaty of New York Creek land ceded in 1790 – Treaty of New York Oconee River • RESOLUTION: > U.S. Pres. Washington and Creek Chief McGillivray meet. * New York – 1790 * Sign Treaty - GA Gains: 1. Creek land east of Oconee River 2. Creek are to recognize land ceded in earlier treaties. • Boundary line set by Treaty of New York ARTICLE VI. If any citizen of the United States, or other person not being an Indian, shall attempt to settle on any of the Creeks lands, such person shall forfeit the protection of the United States, and the Creeks may punish him or not, as they please. ARTICLE VII. Creeks regained land btwn. Altamaha R. and St. Mary’s R. No citizen or inhabitant of the United States shall attempt to hunt or destroy the game on the Creek lands: Nor shall any such citizen or inhabitant go into the Creek country without a passport first obtained from the Governor of some one of the United States, or the officer of the troops of the United States commanding at the nearest military post on the frontiers, or such other person as the President of the United States may, from time to time, authorize to grant the same. - Creek Gains: 1. Reserved land for Creeks between Altamaha R. and St. Mary’s R. (land once ceded to GA) 2. GA settlers restricted to settling east of boundary – could not settle west of boundary. 3. U.S. gov’t would assist Creeks with farming tools and techniques. • Outcomes / Consequences: – – Many Georgians were angry with Treaty: • Altamaha / St. Mary’s Territory goes back to Creeks • Federal (U.S.) gov’t bypasses GA gov’t to make deal. (early states’ rights issue) Ceded 1802 Both Creeks and GA settlers ignore much of the treaty. • • – Creek Lands Ceded 1794 Gen. Elijah Clarke marched his army across the Oconee River to establish the Trans-Oconee Republic (destroyed by GA militia) Edward Telfair also sought to move into Creek land to start conflict. Tensions between Creeks and Ga settlers increases because of the conflicts and the treaties. Ceded 1826 Ceded 1821 Ceded 1818 Ceded 1805 Creek War “Wagons means roads, and roads bring the white man. Then our land will be gone, and the ways of our fathers will be changed.” Fort Mims • Creek Confederacy Divided: – Lower Creeks (White Sticks): • • – Upper Creeks (Red Sticks): • • – middle and south Georgia, usually along the Flint and Chattahoochee Rivers Generally wanted to work with the white Americans. mostly in Alabama along the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers Generally wanted to preserve as much of their land as possible, and distrusted white Americans. Division: • Red Sticks were influenced by the Shawnee leader Tecumseh – wanted all tribes to join together to fight the settlers. Opposed “Americanization” • White sticks disagreed about organizing this way and preferred to work through treaty and agreements Were becoming more americanized. Tecumseh Creek War (Creek Civil War) cont. • CAUSES: – Creek War 1813 Upper (Red) Creeks attack settlers Split Creeks: Red and White Upper and Lower Creeks disagree over how close Creeks should be with white Americans. • Red Creeks were defeated • • Fort Mims Massacre – Fort Mims Massacre • • • – A group of Upper Creeks kill 2 families along Ohio River. Old Creek chiefs execute them themselves instead of handing them over to U.S. Indian Agent Ben Hawkins. Upper Creeks disagree over this decision and how Lower Creeks are so giving to whites. Upper Creek (Red Sticks) go after mixed bloods living at Fort Mims. 400-500 mixed and white settlers are killed. Further brings white Americans into the Creek Civil War. U.S. sends state militias to control the Red Sticks • • • War of 1812 demanding U.S. forces GA and Tenn. militias must fight Use Lower Creeks and Cherokee to help fight the Upper Creeks (Red Sticks) • The End: – Battle of Horseshoe Bend (1814) • Over 1000 Red Sticks VS Over 1000 troops led by General Andrew Jackson • Final defeating battle over the Red Sticks – Treaty of Fort Jackson • Despite protest of the Creek chiefs who had fought alongside Jackson, the Creek Nation ceded 23 million acres (93,000 km²)—half of Alabama and part of southern Georgia—to the United States government. • Even though the Creek War was largely a civil war among the Creeks, Andrew Jackson recognized no difference between the Creeks that had fought with him and the Red Sticks that fought against him, taking the lands of both. 1.9 million acres (7,700 km²) of the 23 million acres (93,000 km²) Jackson forced the Creeks to cede was claimed by the Cherokee Nation, who had also allied with the United States during the war. • With the Red Stick menace subdued, Andrew Jackson was able to focus on the Gulf coast region in the War of 1812. – Battle of New Orleans Treaty of Indian Springs • Division of Creeks: – – – Different views over how to relate to white Americans Fought a civil war within their own confederacy Tribes within Creeks are becoming separated • • • • Ceded land splitting them up Different views Becoming more distant Land Ceded Consequences: – – Treaties with whites were being made without consulting / without discussion between Creek tribes. Chief McIntosh (mixed blood) • • • Fought against Red Sticks Was a Lower Creek 1825 – ceded remaining Creek lands in GA in the Treaty of Indian Springs – – 8 of 56 Creek communities were present Creeks would receive $200,000 and land west of the Miss. River. McIntosh Inn Oconee Wars (1780s) Conflict between GA settlers and Creeks living along the Oconee River. Dispute over land. Treaty of New York (1790) Neither the Creeks nor GA settlers really got what they wanted from the treaty. Created more resentment between these two groups Treaty with U.S. Federal gov’t not with GA. Treaty determined what land did and did not belong to Creeks and to GA without bringing the GA gov’t to the discussion. GA gov’t felt the U.S. gov’t was violating GA’s state rights. Creek War (1813-1814) Treaty of Indian Springs (1825) Civil War within the Creek Confederacy pulls white Americans into conflict when Red Sticks attack mixed blood Creeks living with white settlers. Set up Creeks in GA for removal west of the Miss. River. Gave up remaining Creek land in GA. Most Lower Creeks did not agree and resented McIntosh and Georgians Indian Removal Not this. This… Andrew Jackson – in his own words • “I suggest for your consideration the propriety of setting apart an ample district west of the Mississippi, and without the limits of any State or Territory now formed, to be guaranteed to the Indian tribes as long as they shall occupy it, each tribe having a distinct control over the portion designated for its use. There they may be secured in the enjoyment of governments of their own choice, subject to no other control from the United States than such as may be necessary to preserve peace on the frontier and between the several tribes. There the benevolent may endeavor to teach them the arts of civilization..” • “It will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power. It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions…” Causes of Indian Removal • 1. White Americans wanted to use Indian land for economic gain – Expand cotton industry in the South • – – • New technologies helped make this a possibility Land companies and banks wanted to buy land cheap and sell it for a profit States wanted expand into new territories and distribute land to potential farmers 2. Much of Indian land in the Southeast had been ceded away. – Usually through treaties • • • • – Treaty of New York Treaty of Fort Jackson Treaty of Cusseta Treaty of Washington, etc. Split up Indians • • • • Creek Confederacy became fractured Cherokees were divided into East and West In various treaties U.S. gov’t offered to allow Indians to own sections of the land privately as individuals – this began to spoil the long held belief among the Indians that the land belonged to no one – created competition. Separate land deals began to be made by Indians without consulting others. Causes of Indian Removal cont. – Ceding their land meant giving up their claim to the land. • No claim to land meant that the tribe was not a legal unit – – – – – • No claim to land meant whites could move Indians out more easily – • Southern states passed laws to extend state rule over the land where Indians lived. Outlawed tribal meetings Took away chiefs’ powers Imposed state taxes BUT: denied right to vote » To sue » To testify in court Harsh state laws convinced many Indians to accept the land they were offered out west. 3. Andrew Jackson – Elected president in 1828 • • • – Famous for his victory in the Creek Wars Victory in the Battle of New Orleans (War of 1812) Fighting the Seminole Wars Indian Removal • • • • Not his original idea Would fulfill promise made by U.S. gov’t in 1802 Would benefit the economies of the southern states Would be good for him politically Causes of Indian Removal cont. • 4. Discovery of Gold in Dahlonega – – – – – – 1829 Northeast Georgia First major gold rush in U.S. Discovered on Cherokee land. Cherokees tried to “Americanize” in order to remain on land Georgia passed law that put Cherokee land under state law • • • Declared all Cherokee laws null and void (their laws don’t apply) An additional law made it illegal for Cherokees to mine any of the gold 5. Indian Removal Act (1830) – Purpose: • • • To support Indian removal to west of the Mississippi River To solve the problems created by whites and Indians living so close to each other. To open up territory for development by whites. – Terms: • • • Indians would receive land, some supplies, and protection in their new territory Indians would not be asked to move again If they don’t choose to move west then they will be subject to state laws. Consequences of Indian Removal • Split Tribes up – Issue of deciding to leave or stay fractured tribes • Cherokee – – – • Creek – – • Broke into 2 different factions One led by Chief John Ross was against removal The other called the Treaty Party, led by Chief Major Ridge – favored going west. Some like McIntosh favored going west. Others favored staying and fighting Trail of Tears (Late 1830s) – Between the late 1820s and late 1830s groups of both Creek and Cherokee moved west at different times. • • – 1838 – 17,000 Cherokees rounded up into stockades by General Winfield Scott • • • – Some went through Tenn. Some went through AL and Miss. All to the same general area – present day Oklahoma and Arkansas Moved westward Died of disease, attacks by whites, drought, approx. 1/3 died over the 700-800 mile trip. 645 wagons Between the Indian Removal Act (1830) and the Trail of Tears more than 100,000 Indians were displaced from 200,000,000 acres of their own land Gaining New Lands Leads to Increased Division Between the North and the South • Moving West and Manifest Destiny • Missouri Compromise • Dred Scott Decision • Compromise of 1850 • Kansas-Nebraska Act • Sectionalism Moving West and Manifest Destiny • Making Room: – Population Increase: • 1790 = 3,900,000 Americans. Most lived within 50 miles of the Atlantic Ocean. • 1830 = 13 million Americans and by 1840, 4,500,000 had crossed the Appalachian Mountains – 1803 Louisiana Purchase • Land purchased from France • Doubled size of U.S. • Mississippi River west to the Rocky Mountains – Native Americans cede land through numerous treaties • Indian Removal Act 1830 allows for the removal of Native Americans over the next 10 years. • Opened up land west to the Mississippi River for expansion of agriculture. A term coined in the 1840s to describe the belief that Americans were suppose to move westward and make room for future generations, and that it was part of God’s will or plan. • Slavery Rises as an Issue to Divide the North and South – Keeping Power • U.S. gained new land out west • New states would be carved from these territories • Economies in the North and South were increasing – Both N and S wanted to use the new lands to support their economies • Balance of power in the House of Representatives and Senate was threatened – 1819: 11 slave states and 11 free states. – Territory of Missouri applies for statehood (Would slavery be allowed?) – 1820 Missouri Compromise: Missouri enters as a slave state / Maine as a free state. » Slavery also prohibited north of 36* 20’ latitude » Balance of slave and free states in Congress » Unbalanced territory: more land north of compromise line Missouri Compromise 1820 – More land is gained out west. • Texas is annexed in 1845 – Texans – American immigrants in Mexico fight for independence – Becomes part of U.S. • Mexican American War (18461848) – Begins with disagreement over border between Texas and Mexico – President Polk uses it as a reason to fight for territory all the way to Pacific – includes California. – Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo gave the U.S. > 500,000 square miles » California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, most of New Mexico, and parts of Wyoming and Colorado. – Slavery issue resurfaces with this new land addition to the U.S. • Compromise of 1850 – Population of California booms – over 100,000 » Gold rush 1849 » Enough pop. for statehood – 1850: 15 slave states and 15 free states – California had established itself as free through its constitution – California was seeking to be a free state » Would upset balance in Congress – Undermines the Missouri Compromise of 1820 Benefits for North California enters Union free state Slave trading ends in D.C. Texas will not annex New Mexico – a slave state does not get to expand. Benefits for South New Mexico & Utah territories vote to be slave or free (popular sovereignty) Residents of D.C. could keep slaves they already had Fugitive Slave Law passed – escaped slaves would be returned to owners • Kansas-Nebraska Act further supports popular sovereignty – 1854: territories of Kansas and Nebraska are created – Stephen Douglas of Illinois pushed the act through Congress. – K/N Act allowed for slavery question to be decided by popular sovereignty » People of the territory vote to be slave or free » Further undermined Missouri Compromise: by allowing slavery north of Missouri’s southern boundary – Consequences: » People in territories divided. » Free soilers (antislavery) VS proslavery settlers » Fought each other over issue of slavery by attacking settlements – “Bleeding Kansas” • Dred Scott Decision (1857) – Dred Scott, a slave, with help of abolitionists sues for freedom – He argues living in free states (as he did for some time) made him free – Supreme Court Ruling » Could not sue b/c slaves aren’t citizens » Supreme Court has not right to stop slavery » Ruling upholds idea of popular sovereignty: Compromise of 1850 & Kansas-Nebraska Act • Northern States’ Advantage – Popular sovereignty seems to favor proslavery position – Dred Scott Decision upholds this – Northern states have more representatives in House of Representatives » Can deny statehood to territories that are proslavery: EX. Kansas • Georgia’s Position – Did not like all terms of the 1850 Compromise – Agreed to it to keep nation intact – BUT if North continues to be aggressive over slavery GA will undo its approval – Union cold possibly dissolve – Called “The Georgia Platform” Laws in the South about Slavery Become More Strict and Severe • Anti-Slavery Position and Actions Increase – 1820s religious revival called the “Great Awakening” • Increased support for abolitionism – Antislavery publications increase: • The Liberator – antislavery newspaper of William Lloyd Garrison • Uncle Tom’s Cabin – by Harriet Beecher Stowe – described life of slaves • North Star – by Frederick Douglas – Slave Revolts and Resistance • 1831 revolt by Nat Turner – Virginia – Bloodiest in American history • John Brown fights in Missouri, Kansas, and Virginia • John Brown (a white abolitionist) raids arsenal (1859) – Harpers Ferry, Virginia – Federal arsenal (weapons storehouse) – Purpose: » Get guns and ammunition for his fight to free slaves in the South – Brown Captured by Colonel Robert E. Lee: sentenced to hang. • Underground Railroad – Run by whites and blacks – Network of roads, houses, river crossings, boats, wagons, woods and streams, that helped slaves escape to certain states or to Canada – Helped thousands escape » James Fairfield » Harriet Tubman • Laws on slavery and slaves become more strict – Result of increase in antislavery feelings & revolts & rebellions Harpers Ferry – Increased Rules and Regulations • Laws against slave movements, meetings, efforts to learn to read and write • Had to be either escorted or have a pass when traveling off of plantation • Fugitive Slave Law • Teaching people of color would result in fines or public whippings • People of color prohibited from working in any job that involved reading or writing – To cut down on slaves forging papers as free blacks • Slave Codes – Could not testify against whites – No display of disrespect – No carrying weapons – Resistance and rebellions by slaves and abolitionists still occurred. Economic Differences Between the North and the South Intensifies • Economic Differences: New York 1850 – North • Industry – Soil too rocky for much large scale agriculture – except further west – Natural harbors for trade on Atlantic – Colder climate discouraged heavy agricultural industry – Lots of water power from rivers / waterfalls – South • Agriculture – Fertile soil – Warmer climate – Very suitable for cash crops: cotton, tobacco, and rice (on the coast) – Urban VS Rural • North = interdependent – Urban factories and manufacturing removed / decreased self-sufficiency of people – People moved from farms to cities Savannah 1850 • South = Independent – Lack of industry keeps people self-sufficient – Agriculture provided raw materials to make own goods – More isolated – Different views on government • North – more dependent on government services – More trust of them – More need for them » Fire departments » Police departments » Higher density of people • South – more independent on gov’t services – Less need for gov’t in daily life – Less experience with gov’t in daily life » More rural » Backcountry settlers had history of doing things their own way • Economic Success and Dependency Creates Sectionalism – Sectionalism > putting regional concerns above national concerns • North – Very successful harbors and industries – 1850 – 564 mills in New England. Employed 61,893 workers. Valued over $58 million dollars – In south 1850 – 166 mills with 10,043 workers. Valued $7.25 million. – North manufactured 90% of the nation’s goods • South – Large dependency on agriculture – In Georgia: Between 1839-1860 there was 115% increase in cotton production – Half of Georgia’s total wealth was in slaves ($400 million) – A Planter had to sell 16,500 pounds of processed cotton to buy a slave by 1860. – $ was in land and slaves – Only 1,890 factories by 1860 – Profit: » Made by cotton gin – increased production » Supplying Europe with cotton – Tariffs • Tax on imported goods to protect a nation’s own industries from foreign competition. • Good example of sectionalism • North – Favored tariffs on British goods to protect northern industries – Tariff of $20 made a $50 British suit cost $70 theoretically – made British goods more expensive • South – Opposed tariffs the protected northern industries – Had good relationship w/ Br. » Br. bought a lot of cotton » South imported manufactured goods (didn’t want goods to cost more) – Tariff would lower British demand of cotton (cotton suits would be harder to sell in Am.) – South did not have many industries to protect 1832- South Carolina threatens to secede because of a high tariff. SC arms itself and practices drills. Compromise tariff law is passed to prevent this. 1857 – Depression hit country. Northern businesses failing. Increase tariffs to encourage people to buy from northern businesses. Hurts South – few industries to protect.