Cold molecules Mike Tarbutt 1 Outline • • • • • • • Lecture 1 – The electronic, vibrational and rotational structure of molecules. Lecture 2 – Transitions in molecules. Lecture 3 – Direct laser cooling of molecules. Lecture 4 – Making cold molecules from cold atoms. Lecture 5 – Guest lecture on magneto-association from Simon Cornish. Lecture 6 – The Stark shift. Lecture 7 – Decelerating, storing and trapping molecules with electric fields. Review articles: • “Molecule formation in ultracold atomic gases”, J.M. Hutson and P Soldan, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, 25, 497 (2006) • “Production and application of translationally cold molecules”, H.L. Bethlem and G. Meijer, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, 22, 73 (2003) 2 Electronic, vibrational and rotational structure 3 Born-Oppenheimer approximation Nuclear mass ~104 times electronic mass Nuclei move very slowly compared to electrons Solve the electronic Schrodinger equation with “frozen nuclei” Do this for many different values of internuclear separation, R Obtain electronic energies as functions of R – potential energy curves Then solve the Schrodinger equation for the nuclear motion 4 The Hamiltonian for a diatomic molecule (*non-relativistic) H TN Kinetic energy of nuclei Te V Kinetic energy of electrons Coulomb potential between electrons and nuclei I’ll use subscripts A and B to denote the two nuclei, and the index i to label all the electrons 2 TN 2 MA N Te i 1 V A 2 2 2 MB 2 2m ZA ZB e2 4 0R i B 2 2 N e2 4 0 i 1 ZA riA ZB ri B N e2 4 0 i j 1 1 rij 5 Remove the centre-of-mass motion… Let’s immediately simplify the nuclear kinetic energy term using centre-of-mass coordinates and relative coordinates: RCM MA RA MB RB , R MA MB RA RB 2 This transforms the nuclear kinetic energy from TN 2 MA A 2 to TN 2M M MA 2 2 RCM 2 MB 2 2 2 MB B 2 R 2 MA MB MA MB We’re interested in the internal energy of the molecule, not the translation of the centre of mass 6 Need to solve: TN Te V R, ri E R, ri Let’s first solve a different problem! Clamp the nuclei in place at a fixed separation R,. The equation to solve is the same, except that the nuclear kinetic energy vanishes. Electronic Hamiltonian Electronic wave equation q R; ri and Eq R He He Te q V R; ri Eq R R; ri q are a set of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues, each corresponding to an electronic state This electronic wave equation can be solved using the same techniques as in the atomic case (e.g. Hartree-Fock) N.B. The eigenfunctions form a complete set at every value of R: q p pq 7 Potential curves… 8 Let’s now expand the complete wavefunction on the basis of the electronic eigenfunctions: R, ri R; ri q q Substitute this expansion into the full Schrodinger equation, …and use the result He TN He q R; ri Eq R TN Eq R E q Multiply by R Nuclear wavefunctions Electronic wavefunctions E q q q He R; ri q q TN q E R, ri 0 0 R R; ri R; ri q 0 R n , integrate over electronic coordinates, and use the orthonormality condition: En R E n q dri n TN q q 0 …an infinite set of coupled differential equations which determine the nuclear wavefunctions 9 Adiabatic approximation - the nuclear motion does not mix the electronic states – then the set of equations uncouple: Simplify... Neglect the 2nd and 3rd terms (it turns out they are very small)... Then we obtain a much simpler equation for the nuclear wavefunction: 2 2 R 2 En R E n R 0 Nuclear kinetic Effective potential energy for nuclear motion 10 Separate the nuclear wave equation… 2 R 2 2 En R E n R 0 Central potential – Separate into radial and angular parts: R, , R 1 f R g , As always for a central potential, the angular functions are spherical harmonics: g , YJM , They are eigenfunctions of J2 and Jz J2 YJM J J 1 YJM Jz YJM M YJM Then we’re left with a fairly simple looking radial equation… 2 2 2 R2 J J 1 2 R2 En R E f R 0 11 Solve the radial equation… 2 2 J J 1 2 R2 R2 2 En R E f R 0 Could solve this numerically, or find an approximate solution for R close to R0 1) Set R=R0 in the denominator of the second term. 2) Expand En(R) in a Taylor series about R0 En R En R En R0 En R En R0 1 k R 2 2 2 2 R2 R R0 R0 J J 1 2 R02 Er R0 2 ... En R0 2 1 2 En R2 R R0 R0 2 ... 2 En R2 k where 1 k R 2 Define Ev such that the total energy is R0 R0 2 E En R0 2 Ev f R E f R 0 Ev Er We’re left with a harmonic oscillator equation: 2 2 2 2 R 1 k R 2 R0 0 12 Summary Solve the electronic wave equation with fixed nuclei Repeat for many different R to obtain potential curves These appear as the potential in the nuclear wave equation Can separate and (approximately) solve this wave equation The total energy is E En R0 Ev Er The total wavefunctions are products of electronic, vibrational and rotational eigenstates 13 Energy scales Electronic frequencies ~ 1015 Hz Vibrational frequencies ~ 5 1013 Hz Rotational frequencies ~ 1010 - 1012 Hz 14 Things we’ve left out... Coupling terms neglected in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation Centrifugal distortion Spin-orbit interaction Spin-rotation interaction Spin-spin interaction Lambda doubling Magnetic hyperfine interactions Electric quadrupole interactions 15 Some molecular notation Remember how it goes for an atom: (configuration) 2S+1LJ e.g. Ground state of sodium: 1s22s22p63s 2S1/2 What are the “good quantum numbers” for a diatomic molecule (which operators commute with the Hamiltonian)? The lack of spherical symmetry in a diatomic molecule means that L2 does not commute with H. However, to a good approximation, Lz does commute with H when the z-axis is taken along the internuclear axis. Therefore, the projection of the total orbital angular momentum onto the internuclear axis is (approximately) a good quantum number – labelled by L, which can be S, P, D... X, A, B, C... The electronic states of a molecule are labelled: (unique letter) Spin multiplicity 2S+1L Projection of orbital angular momentum onto internuclear axis W Projection of total angular momentum onto internuclear axis Can also include the vibrational state v, and the total angular momentum J e.g. one of the excited states of CaF is written: A 2P3/2 (v=2, J=7/2) 16