University of Oklahoma Law, Courts, and Social Change Political Science 3023 Fall Semester 2014 Instructor: Office: Phone: Email: Office Hours: Class Meets: Ann-Marie Szymanski T.A.: Jamie Smith Dale Hall Tower 218 Office: Dale Hall Tower 307 325-6436 Email: jamiesmith@ou.edu ams@ou.edu Office Hours: TTh 10:30 – 11:30 am TTh 10:30 am – 12:30 pm TTh 1:30 pm – 2:45 pm, Zarrow Hall 115 Description: Courts in the United States have long been places where Americans seek to address and resolve contentious political issues. At the same time, the courts, and the American legal system itself, remain controversial institutions. The first half of this course will explore the workings of the courts at all levels of the American legal system. Its primary goal is to increase the student’s understanding of what happens in courts, why it happens, and how courts fit into the larger political system. The second half of this course will consider how courts interact with other political institutions and political actors to shape public policy. In doing so, it will illustrate how law and courts may impact political, policy and economic systems and have far-reaching effects on society. Texts: (Required) Carp, Robert A., et al. Judicial Process in America, 9th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2014. ISBN-13: 978-1-4522-2632-3. Silverstein, Gordon. Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN-13: 978-051-72108-0. Additional required readings, which have been posted on Desire 2 Learn (D2L). Course Requirements: One mid-term examination – 25% One research paper (10-12 pages) – 30% One comprehensive final examination – 30% Class participation (including quizzes, in-class assignments, and mandatory attendance) – 15% Examinations: The midterm examination will be held, in class, on Thursday, September 25. The final examination will be held on Friday, December 12 from 1:30 pm – 3:30 pm. Make-up exams will ONLY be given in documented cases of illness, death in the family, religious holidays, or other University-sanctioned excuses. In both exams, you will be expected to know the material covered in class, as well as that contained within the assigned readings. Exams will contain objective portions, which will test your mastery of basic knowledge. In addition, they will include an essay section, which will require you to analyze and synthesize the course material. To help you prepare for the essays, I will distribute study questions prior to the exams. Research Paper: You will be asked to write a 10 – 12 page research paper, which will permit you to argue on behalf of a specific reform to the American legal system. This paper assignment will involve outside research. Furthermore, as with any university-level paper, I expect you to write a well-reasoned essay which has a thesis statement and convincing evidence to support that thesis. While the substance of your essay will receive more weight than its mechanics, your paper should contain correct grammar and the proper documentation of all your sources. For help with grammar and the documentation of sources, please consult a writer’s manual or make an appointment to see a Writing Center tutor. (Students may make appointments with the Writing Center online. The Writing Center is located in Wagner Hall, Room 280 and can be reached at 3252936). ALL PAPERS MUST BE TYPED!!! They are due on OCTOBER 9. Attendance/Participation/Quizzes: Attendance is formally required for this course, and I will keep a written record of attendance. Students may miss five classes and receive full credit for class attendance; students who exceed five absences will receive an attendance grade equal to the percentage of classes attended. If a student misses more than twelve classes, her grade will automatically be lowered a full grade. Students are responsible for locating the sign-in sheet during class as this sheet will be the definitive record of attendance. Students are also responsible for keeping track of their absences and for using their five “free passes” wisely. Furthermore, it should be noted that this course will include periods of class discussion. No student will be forced to participate, but those students who consistently offer thoughtful remarks will be rewarded when I calculate their final grades. Finally, there will be a limited number of quizzes and in-class exercises in this course. Student performance on these quizzes and in-class exercises will be factored into the 15% of the grade that has been reserved for class participation. The Use of Technology in the Classroom: All cell phones must be either turned off or on mute during class. Phones are to be kept in backpacks or similar bags during class. Laptops and tablet computers can be used to take notes during class, but not for checking email, visiting social media sites, surfing the net, or other such activities. Cell phone rings and internet activity are distracting to the other students! Students who abuse technology in this class will be counted absent on the days they do so. Reasonable Accommodation Policy: Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate your educational opportunities. Course Reading Assignments: Week Day/Date Topic Read I. Overview of Legal Systems in the United States 1 2 3 Tuesday, 8/19 Introduction ------------- Thursday, 8/21 Lawyers and the Law in the United States Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapters 1 and 8. Tuesday, 8/26 The Federal Judicial System Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 2; Spreng and Tobias, “Should the Ninth Circuit Be Divided?” Thursday, 8/28 State Judicial Systems Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 3; Simpson, “The Search for Judicial Independence and Integrity”; articles from the Tulsa World and The Week regarding the politics of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Tuesday, 9/2 Jurisdiction and Policymaking Boundaries Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 4; Handley, “Why Crocodiles, Elephants, and American Citizens Should Prefer Foreign Courts.” Thursday, 9/4 State Judges Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 5; Gill, “Beyond High Hopes and Unmet Expectations.” Week Day/Date Topic Read 4 Tuesday, 9/9 Federal Judges Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 6; Melone, “The Senate’s Confirmation Role in Supreme Court Nominations…” Thursday, 9/11 Presidents and the Federal Judiciary Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 7; Binder and Maltzman, “New Wars of Advice and Consent.” II. Legal Procedures and Processes 5 Tuesday, 9/16 Criminal Law and Procedures Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 9; Stern, “Innocence and the Prosecutor’s Duty to ‘Do Justice.’” Thursday, 9/18 Criminal Law and Procedures Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 10; Miller, “How Emotion Affects the Trial Process.” MIDTERM STUDY QUESTIONS DISTRIBUTED 6 Tuesday, 9/23 Civil Law and Procedures Thursday, 9/25 MIDTERM EXAM Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 11; Murray, “The Privatization of Civil Justice.” III. Judicial Decision Making 7 Tuesday, 9/30 Decision Making by Trial Court Judges Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 12; From Frankel, “The Adversary Judge.” Week 8 Day/Date Topic Read Thursday, 10/2 Decision Making in Collegial Courts Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapter 13. Tuesday, 10/7 Decision Making in Collegial Courts (continued) Segal and Cover, “Ideological Values and the Votes of Supreme Court Justices”; Epstein and Knight, “A Strategic Account of Judicial Decisions”; Friedman, “Taking Law Seriously.” IV. Law and Public Policy Thursday, 10/9 Courts as Policymakers: The Supreme Court Dahl, “Decision Making in a Democracy”; Casper, “The Supreme Court and National Policymaking.” RESEARCH PAPERS DUE 9 10 11 Tuesday, 10/14 Judicial Policymaking and Impact Carp, et al., Judicial Process in America, Chapters 14 and 15. Thursday, 10/16 The Juridification of American Politics and Policy Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Introduction and Chapter 1. Tuesday, 10/21 The Juridification of American Politics and Policy Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Chapter 2; Rosenberg, “The Dynamic and the Constrained Court.” Thursday, 10/23 Courts as a Substitute for the Political Process Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Chapters 3 and 4. Tuesday, 10/28 Courts as Participants in a Constructive Pattern: Environmental Regulation Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Chapter 5; Rosenberg, “Cleaning House.” Week 12 Day/Date Topic Read Thursday, 10/30 Courts as Participants in a Deconstructive Pattern: Campaign Finance Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Chapter 6; Hasen, “Three Wrong Progressive Approaches (And One Right One) to Campaign Finance Reform.” Tuesday, 11/4 Trial Courts and Policy Change: The Tobacco Industry Silverstein, Law’s Allure, Chapter 9; Mather, “Theorizing About Trial Courts.” VI: Law and Public Policy: State Judiciary 13 Thursday, 11/6 Education Reform From Hanushek and Lindseth, Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses, Chapters 4 and 5. Tuesday, 11/11 Education Reform (continued) From Hanushek and Lindseth, Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses, Chapter 6. Thursday, 11/13 Education Reform (continued) Buszin, “Beyond School Finance”; Vergara v. California; Carey, “Why It’s Problematic to Fix Teacher Tenure Through the Courts.” VII. The Politics of Court Reform 14 Tuesday, 11/18 Tort Reform Daniels and Martin, “‘It is No Longer Viable from a Practical and Business Standpoint’”; Henley, “What Hope is There for Meaningful Tort Reform….” Week 15 16 Day/Date Topic Read Thursday, 11/20 Access to the Courts Rhode, “Access to Justice.” Tuesday, 11/25 The Death Penalty Walker, “How the Malfunctioning Death Penalty Challenges the Criminal Justice System”; Hawkins, “Capital Punishment and the Administration of Justice”; Steiker and Steiker, “The Effect of Capital Punishment on American Criminal Law and Policy.” Thursday, 11/27 NO CLASS – THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY. Tuesday, 12/2 Problem-Solving Courts Feinblatt and Denckla, “Prosecutors, Defenders, and Problem-Solving Courts”; Burke, “Just What Made Drug Courts Successful?”; Lurigio, et al., “Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Action.” FINAL EXAM STUDY QUESTIONS DISTRIBUTED Thursday, 12/4 Review ------------- Friday, 12/12 FINAL EXAM, 1:30 PM – 3:30 PM