Workshop Designing and Planning Learning Activities Content What is learning? Underpinning knowledge and theory for learning design Different learning methods Memory & the transfer of learning Pre-designing materials and being creative! Learning Before you can ‘design effective learning’ – you need to be clear about you mean by ‘learning’ ….. Definitions of learning A relatively permanent change in behaviour resulting from experience (Kimble, 1961) A relatively permanent change in an organism’s behaviour due to experience (Myers, 1995) Learning is the process by which a person acquires new knowledge, skills and capabilities (Reynolds et al., 2002) Research into what adults think learning is ….. 1. Quantitative increase in knowledge 2. Memorising – storing information that can be reproduced 3. Acquiring facts, skills and methods 4. Making sense of abstract meaning and understanding relationships in subjects 5. Interpreting and understanding reality (Saljo, 1979) ….. other meanings .. is it? An increase in factual knowledge? Being able to memorise & reproduce Applying and using knowledge Understanding abstract concepts Performing well in assessments? Learning to ‘do’ something – (e.g. presentations) Solving problems? Developing creativity? Developing an analytical approach? Change within oneself as a consequence of understanding the world differently? Something else? (Fry et al., 2009) Psychology subject domains relating to learning Behaviourist Psychology Social Learning Theory Cognitive Psychology Experiential Learning (Stewart , 1999) Underpinning knowledge & theory ….. to enable the effective design of learning Threshold Concepts Is there a ‘hierarchy in concepts’ – in what you are teaching …. i.e. the student must completely understand ‘A’ to be able to understand ‘B’ For example (in accountancy) must a student have an understanding of arithmetic BEFORE they can learn how to produce a company’s annual report and accounts ….? The relevance of threshold concepts in designing learning is ……. ? Student approaches to learning Surface Deep Strategic / achieving (Fry et al., 2009) VARK – Learning Styles Visual (V) Aural/Auditory (A) Read/Write (R) Kinesthetic (K) Comprehensive guide available http://www.varklearn.com/english/index.asp Learner Student Styles Honey & Mumford Kolb’s Learning Cycle Compare Kolb with Honey & Mumford Learning Cycle Individual Learner Styles If you were a ski or tennis instructor – how would you … Apply a different form of learning to best meet each of the Honey and Mumford Learning styles? Another individual styles model … Myers Briggs (based on Jungian Theory) EXTROVERT (E) or INTROVERT (I) drawing energy from outside or within INTUITIVE (N) or SENSING (S) drawing energy from holistic big picture thinking intuition or from the five other senses) FEELING (F) or THINKING (T) basing decisions on personal information or on logic/rules PERCEIVING or JUDGING (preferring ongoing development / spontaneity or organization & goal completion) So you can be an ENTJ or an ISFP or an ESTP etc (Swart et al., 2005) What are your Learning Objectives seeking for students learn – change in? (Cannon and Newble, 2000) Knowledge Attitude Skills Well written learning objectives govern all the design that follows …. Race, (2007: 23- 26) has a list of 24 tips on designing learning objectives The process of learning design Decide whether it is Knowledge and/or Skills and/or Attitude that is to be ‘learned’ Write the Learning Objectives (differentiate between Knowledge, Skills & Attitude) Decide on the mix of methods which will best deliver the most effective ‘change’ / learning in Knowledge / Skill and / or Attitude Decide on a mix of methods so that students of all learning styles have the chance to ‘be reached’ and the Kolb Learning Cycle can be applied Check the timing of the activities in your session (s), to see that it all fits and flows The process of learning design Consideration must also be given as to …… how you are going to check / assess whether what you intended to be learned has been learned – and when will you do this? The process of learning design Two slides above – the process was presented in a linear fashion – however it is an ongoing improvement cycle: Systematic approach to course / module planning Fry et al (2009) Consider the aspect of student motivation when you are designing learning See table 3.3 in Fry et al (2009: 35-36) How could you use this underpinning knowledge in making the design of Learning and Teaching effective? Write notes on this for 10 minutes Different learning methods Sample of Methods ‘Lecturing’ Listening to presentations Discussion Guided reading Case studies Informal skills / knowledge assessments – quizzes, tests, skills questionnaires Self reflection exercises Log books, diaries, PDP’s Sample of Methods Using technology – BB, pod casts, video’s, online learning tools, computer assisted learning Learning from feedback Group work Role plays Games & competitions Brainstorming Problem solving Sample of Methods Work experience Simulations Experiential learning Outdoor learning Carrying out experiments Discovery learning Vicarious learning Coaching / Mentoring Action learning Consider practical aspects Facilities available – rooms, text’s, online resources, technology required, materials (take or get students to bring) Timing and sequencing (mix more passive sections with more active sessions) Timing of assessment & feedback Activity Activity compare the learning design in each exercise on the next 5 slides For use following Stress Management Lecture Pairs exercise Aims of this exercise: •To aid students to consider what issues causes them most stress •To get students to reflect on what they have learned which might help them manage the stress situation better Exercise: Ask students to spend 2 minutes making a note of the 2 issues that currently cause them most stress. Spilt them into pairs and ask them to take a turn each at describing an issue – and discussing possible solutions for those – reflecting on what they learned from the book / lecture materials. For use following lecture on Conflict Management Group exercise Aims of this exercise: •To get students to consolidate their learning on types of ways of dealing with conflict. Exercise: Split students into groups of 5. Ask them to nominate one person to give the feedback. Ask them to complete the following table (taken from the points on P. 389 of 7th edn Whetton & Cameron) by: •Giving a definition for each type of approach to dealing with conflict. •Giving 1 advantage of that approach •Giving 1 disadvantage of that approach •Deciding on which approach might be a more usual ‘best’ approach Requires: •5 printed copies of the attached •This can be printed on acetate and acetate pens taken along if you want them to give their feedback in a more presentation from the front format. Brainstorming In groups of 10 – and appoint one person as ‘The police person’ who must make the others follow the rules of brainstorming – ie monitor the group (when they are doing the brainstorming) to make sure that the group does not break these rules: •Each person should take a turn – go round the group in clockwise direction – making sure each person has to contribute something when it gets to them •The ideas should be short •No one is allowed to evaluate it (say ‘oh that’s good / bad / the same as has already been said’) •You can build on an idea from before •When a person gets stuck – wait until that person comes up with something before moving on •‘Wild’ ideas are allowed The topic to be brainstormed is: ‘How to deal with a difficult boss’ Reflecting on group presentations Aims of this exercise: •To give Tutors an exercise where they can mix the students up, to get them to meet and work with other students •To give students an opportunity to get used to being a spokesperson in informal group work •To aid students to be reflective about how they can improve presentation skills •To encourage students to use a constructive feedback technique (ie to feedback what is done well and what could have been done better •To encourage students to reflect on the learning from the lecture / tutorial Exercise: After presentation •Invite students to go into your groups (possibly their own presentation groups A/B/C/D – or if you want to encourage them to work with others split them into groups of e.g. 5 students) Ask them to elect a spokesperson to give feedback (make sure that everyone takes this role over the 10 tutorials: •2 things that the group presenting did well •1 thing that they could improve on •The 3 main lessons learned from the case presentation / the chapter / the lecture •Ask each group to give the feedback For use following Power and Influence Lecture Aims of this exercise: •To get students to stop and reflect on how people can be more powerful than their position suggests. •To get them to plan how they could benefit from applying similar behaviour. Exercise: •Ask the students to think of someone who they respect as being more influential their position, some one ‘who punches above their weight’. (i.e. more influential than their position in natural hierarchies in the family / work place / friends group – hierarchies which can be based on position, financial wealth etc) The person can be a friend, work colleague, someone in their family, someone famous etc. •Then – ask them to write for 5 minutes on what it is that person does that makes them so influential. •Then ask them to spend 3 minutes making notes of 3 things they could do differently to benefit from observing the behaviour of this person who they respect. Learning, memory & the transfer of learning (Primary source for memory: Baddeley et al., 2009) Learning Conditioning & Reinforcement Classical (Pavlov) Operant Conditioning (Skinner) Positive /negative reinforcement Lesson – consciously consider what ‘reinforcement’ messages you are giving and how often (also relevant for ‘managing the learning environment’) Other useful concepts from the domain of psychology ‘Learned helplessness’ Cognitive mapping Insight Vicarious learning Discovery learning Behaviour modelling Source lecture handouts Dr Ian Bushnell – was Strathclyde University – now School of Psychology, Glasgow University Memory - two sides of the coin – is it what you have .... ? Remembered (retention) or what you have Forgotten (retrieval) Types of memory Knowledge Feelings Behaviour Skills (presentation / interpersonal / language / creativity) Motor skills (driving / cycling / skating) Student Learning and Memory IN OUT Effective Memory IN Getting things into the (long term) memory effectively OUT Time in between Getting things back out effectively i.e. ‘Retrieval’ The memory process – getting things ‘in’ and ‘out’ Memory Sensory memory: Echoic / Iconic Short term, ‘working memory’: Verbal / Spacial Long term: Explicit – Episodic / Semantic Implicit – Conditioning / Skills Attention Awareness Test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSQJP40PcGI From short term into long term memory Rehearsal Coding Decisions Retrieval strategies (Ebbinghaus, 1885, in Baddeley et al.2009) If you double the number of frequencies you rehearse / learn / practice – there is a complete positive correlation with what you remember AND ‘Distributed’ practice is more effective Encoding - organising what goes ‘in’ to memory can make it easier to retrieve Encoding - if some mentions ‘Spectrophotometer’ – do you relate it to ... Atomic absorption Mass spectometry Infra-red spectometry No? But a Chemistry student might ….. What does this tell us about (encoding) putting things IN to the memory? Depth of processing Craik and Tulving, 1975 in Badderley et al., 2009) A list of names of friends I have had: Sally Steve Anne Tiami Karen Can you remember … What was the first time you had a piece of clothing in the colour red? A list of names of friends I have had: What was the fourth name on the list? Which list of my friends is the correct one? Sally Sally Steve Steve Anne Anne Thomasina Tiami Karen Karen Different levels of remembering? Is the level of RETENTION / RETRIEVAL required to enable: Recognition .... and / or Recall .... and / or Repetition (in full) Theories related to forgetting Interference Theory Delay Theory Primary and Recency Effect The Kolb learning cycle has another use - ‘consolidation’ (to get things from the STM into the LTM) Cues Can help us access memories How could you use this information about the different levels of memory in Learning and Teaching design? Tips and techniques to improve memory http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/m emory/improve/ Transfer of Learning Perkins and Salomon (1992) Occurs when learning in one context enhances (positive transfer) or undermines (negative transfer) a related performance in another context. Includes near transfer (to closely related contexts and performances) and far transfer (to rather different contexts and performances). Transfer is crucial to education, which generally aspires to impact on contexts quite different from the context of learning. What about TRANSFER? IN OUT TRANSFER Transfer of Learning Perkins and Salomon (1992) Findings from various sources suggest that transfer happens by way of two rather different mechanisms: Reflexive or low road transfer involves the triggering of well- practiced routines by stimulus conditions similar to those in the learning context. Mindful or high road transfer involves deliberate effortful abstraction and a search for connections. Conventional educational practices often fail to establish the conditions either for reflexive or mindful transfer. Pre-design activities and be creative! Pre-design of activities Activity Be creative …… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b2xUb0VofQ Conclusions To design effective learning, we need to be clear about what we mean by ‘learning’ on each different occasion There is a range of underpinning theory which can help us to understand how to more effectively design learning There are different forms of learning, it is considered more effective to use a mixture Theories on ‘memory’ are useful when thinking about the ‘input’ and the ‘output’ of the learning process Consideration of how the learning is to transferred is essential Prepare activities ahead and be creative!! References Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page, London. Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M., Anderson, M. (2009). Memory. Psychology Press, Hove. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., Marshall, S., (2009). Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, (3rdEdn). Routledge, London. Cannon, R., Newble, D. (2000) A Handbook for Teachers in Universities and Colleges (4th edn). Kogan Page, London. Kimble, G. A. (1961). Cited in Catania A. Charles. (1998) Learning (4th edn). Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Myers (1995) cited in Stewart, J. (1999) Employee Development Practice. Prentice Hall, Harlow. Perkins, D., Salomon, G. (1992) Contribution to the International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd edn). Pergamon Press, Oxford Race, P (2007) The Lecturer’s Toolkit (3rd edn). Routledge, Abingdon. Reynolds et al. (2002) cited in Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page, London. Saljo (1979) cited in Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd edn). Routledge Farmer, London. Stewart, J. (1999) Employee Development Practice. Prentice Hall, Harlow. Swart, J., Mann, C., Brown, S., Price, A. (2005) Human Resource Development. Elsevier, Oxford. Extremely useful list …… under ‘Teaching for learning’ section Fry et al. (2009: 22-23)