Development of monolithic pixel sensors in Silicon On Insulator technology Serena Mattiazzo University of Padova (Italy) D. Bisello, P. Giubilato, D. Pantano INFN & University of Padova (Italy) M. Battaglia, UC Santa Cruz (USA) P. Denes, D. Contarato Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL (USA) Outline Review of Monolithic pixel sensors in Silicon On Insulator technology - The SOIPIX collaboration - SOI pixel detectors from LAPIS Recent results on the latest chip produced - Thinning and back-processing - Test on thin detector with soft X-rays - Test on thin detector with MIPs Conclusions TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 2 Monolithic Pixel Sensors in SOI technology • In the Silicon On Insulator (SOI) technology, the CMOS electronics is implanted on a thin silicon layer on top of a buried oxide (BOX) 40nm thin CMOS layer 200nm thick BOX 350m thick high resistivity substrate 200nm Al back-contact • In the SOI technology depleted monolithic pixel sensors can be built by using a high resistivity substrate and providing some vias to interconnect the substrate through the BOX; • Pixel implants can be created and a reverse bias can be applied; charge is collected by drift. Bonded SOI wafers provided by SOITEC Co with high resistivity “handle wafer” LAPIS Semiconductor (former OKI, Japan) provides a commercial 0.20µm Fully Depleted (FD) SOI process TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 3 SOIPIX collaboration •University of Hawaii •Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory •Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory • UC Santa Cruz •INP Krakow •University of Heidelberg •Louvain-la-Neuve University •Padova University & INFN •KEK •JAXA •RIKEN •AIST •Osaka University •Tohoku University •Tsukuba University •Kyoto University Japan •IHEP/IMECAS (China) Collaboration formed in 2005 by KEK Universities (Prof. Y. Arai representative) Regular Multi-Project Wafer (MPW) runs twice per year http://rd.kek.jp/project/soi/ TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 4 SOI pixel technology Monolithic approach • Low material budget • High density • Low cost SOI technology • Low power • High speed • Low SEL sensitivity Backgate effect • Limited depletion voltage • Limited depletion width Handle wafer resistivity low after CMOS process Small sensor chip size TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 • CZ(n) 400-cm • 21 mm × 21 mm mask size Serena Mattiazzo 5 Backgate effect The high field in the depleted substrate causes back-gating of the CMOS electronics on top of the BOX: the reverse bias, Vback, applied to the silicon substrate increases the potential at the surface, so that the buried oxide acts as a second gate for the CMOS circuitry on top • Test of single transistors vs. depletion voltage: shift in the threshold voltage with increasing substrate voltage BOX Buried P-Well (BPW) Implantation BOX Peripheral Pixel BPW • low dose implantation through the BOX and through the electronics • Suppress the back gate effect. • Less electric field in the BOX which may improve radiation hardness. TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 6 High Resistivity Substrates CZ(n) - 700 -cm - 260 µm FZ(n) - 7 k-cm - 500 µm FZ(p) - 25 k-cm - 500 µm [Y.Arai’s talk at PIXEL2012 Workshop] TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 7 Larger masks and stitching Larger reticule size • Previously 20.8mm × 20.8mm • Easier to make larger sensors and to reduce the cost per area 31 mm 24.8 mm Stitching • Special run for RIKEN in 2012 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 8 SOI pixel technology: recent progresses TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Limited Backgate effect • Buried P-Well proposed by KEK and now routinely used Higher Handle wafer resistivity • FZ(n) > 3 k-cm Larger sensors • 30 mm × 66 mm Serena Mattiazzo 9 Applications X-ray photons Synchrotron light XFEL X-ray astronomy Medical imaging … TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Ionizing particles Serena Mattiazzo Belle II ILC CLIC Electron microscopy … 10 A brief history of SOI pixel prototypes Within an international collaboration between the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, UC Santa Cruz, the University of Padova and the INFN of Padova, we are developing depleted monolithic pixel sensors in Silicon On Insulator technology LDRD-SOI series: technology demonstration with high momentum particles on analog and digital pixels. Limited reverse bias applied (back-gating effect) NIM A 583 (2007) 526 NIM A 604 (2009) 380 JINST 4 P04007 (2009) SOImager series: optimization of pixel layout, test of different substrates TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 11 2009-2012: SOI-Imager series Optimization of the pixel layout, more effective solution against back-gating, larger area SOImager-2 Row Selection Pixel cell layout LAPIS 0.20 µm FD-SOI process Reset Transistor 55 mm2 (active area is 3.5 3.5mm2) 256256 analog 3T pixels, 13.75 µm pitch, 1.8 V operational voltage Source Follower 4 parallel analog outputs (64256 pixels each) read out up to 25 MHz, 655 µs integration time (serial readout architecture) TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 12 SOImager-2: pixel layout study Guard-rings SOImager-2 Buried P-Well (BPW) Pixel Peripheral BPW Pixel layouts for the 8 sectors NIM A 650 (2011) 184 NIM A 654 (2011) 258 NIMA 658 (2011) 125 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 13 Photon detection Cross section view of an SOI device 9um • In our technology the total thickness of the top passivation, metalizations and the CMOS and the buried oxide layers is 9m • This is a “dead region”: all photons converting here are lost! < 10m Absorption length () in Silicon • In order to avoid photon absorption in nonsensitive regions of the device in the soft-Xrays and UV energy range, back-illumination is required • But this requires a fully depleted device! TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo N x N 0e x 14 Thinning and back-processing Breakdown at 130V (no full depletion) and need to minimize material budget for precision vertex tracking A set of sensors has been back-thinned to 70m using a commercial grinding technique The backplane is damaged after the thinning process Need good contact to extend electric field to detector back-plane Low energy Phosphor implantation followed by annealing at 500°C (windows thickness of 100-200nm) TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 15 X-rays characterization at the ALS • Quantum efficiency for X-rays on the SOImager-2 studied on data collected at the 5.3.1 beamline of the Advanced Light Source at LBNL • In-vacuum test capabilities, reference spectrometer and translation stages for sample and sensor positioning • Thin, back-processed SOI-Imager-2 sensor tested with fluorescence X-rays from metal foils in the energy range 2.1 keV< x E < 8.6 keV N x N 0e Element E (keV) (m) Au 2.12 1.7 Ag 2.98 4.1 Ti 4.50 13 Fe 6.40 37 Ni 7.47 56 Cu 8.08 70 Zn 8.60 86 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Reference spectrometer Sample holder with thin metal foilsMattiazzo Serena Vacuum test chamber DAQ Detector backplane 16 Results • Sensor operated in full depletion and overdepletion •Good pulse height linearity as a function of Xray energy • Quantum efficiency (continuous black line) measured by comparing hit rates on SOI sensor with reference spectrometer accounting for absorption in Si (dotted line) and transmission through thin entrance window (dashed line). Calibration and linearity Quantum efficiency NIM A 674 (2012) 51 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 17 Test on the thin SOImager-2 300 GeV - at CERN SPS • Detectors arranged in one cemented “doublet” (2 thick detectors, 9 mm spaced) and one “singlet” (1 thin detector, 33 mm spaced). • The doublet is optically aligned with a better than 50 µm precision easy and precise coincidence cuts in cluster recognition. • Temperature is maintained around 20° C by cool air flow and continuously monitored. TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 18 MIP detection: thick vs thin sensor 300GeV 70m SOImager-2 Vsub = 50V MPV: (191 ± 2) ADC cnt 300GeV 260m SOImager-2 Vsub = 50V • Ratio of Pulse height: 0.61 ± 0.01 MPV: (314 ± 3) ADC cnt • Ratio of estimated sensitive thicknesses: 0.62 ± 0.05 Perfect agreement • NIM A 676 (2012) 50 • NIM A 681 (2012) 61 SOI sensor Vsub (V) Cluster <S/N> Efficiency point (m) Thin 30 50 70 90 25.0 28.2 28.8 31.2 0.90 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.03 0.96 ± 0.03 0.98 ± 0.02 3.1 ± 0.80 1.7 ± 0.50 1.8 ± 0.60 1.9 ± 0.70 30 50 70 23.3 47.4 52.7 0.89 ± 0.03 1.36 ± 0.04 1.12 ± 0.03 1.07 ± 0.05 Over depletion Thick TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.98 0.99 Serena Mattiazzo 19 Summary & Outlook The SOIPIX collaboration is very active in the development of monolithic pixels in SOI technology; the process is improving and the collaboration is growing in size LBNL, Padova and UC Santa Cruz are involved in SOI monolithic pixels R&D in LAPIS deep-submicron FD-SOI technology since about 2007 (with more than 7 prototypes). We have developed thin sensors with very good performance both for X-ray imaging and for MIP tracking TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 20 Backup Slides TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 21 New test chips on High Resistivity substrates VRST VDD SF-n RST-p RS RST-n RS Vsub • 0.20 µm LAPIS process, Oct 2011 submission OUT-n OUT-p SF-p • VRST = 0 for n-type substrate • VRST = VDD for p-type substrate • 512 × 320 analog pixels, 13.75 µm pitch • Complementary architecture for both p-type and n-type substrates • Devices on CZ substrate (HR1, n-type) and FZ-p arrived in June (evaluation ongoing). HR3 (n-type) and FZ-n to arrive soon! TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 22 Energy resolution Vd = 70V Vd = 70V Fitted Gaussian width Fitted Gaussian width (0.70 ± 0.03) keV (0.99 ± 0.02) keV TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 23 Pixel multiplicity Pixel multiplicity in signal clusters as a function of Vdep for 980nm laser pulses (filled squares) and 5.9keV X-rays (open triangles). • Cluster size decreases with Vdep as expected • Signal is distributed among multiple pixels also for large voltages: capacitive coupling? TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 24 Response to inclined tracks Average pixel multiplicity along rows and columns for clusters associated to a pion track as a function of the detector angle for Vd = V. TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 25 Charge sharing distribution at different values of Vd for (left) 980nm laser pulses and (right) 200GeV . • Small variation of the distribution with Vd using the980nm laser and no significant variation with energetic pions. • Charge sharing among neighboring pixels is not dominated by the charge carrier cloud size: instead, the pixel capacitive coupling plays a significant role in determining the observed signal distribution TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 26 Depletion thickness TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 27 Radiation damage studies on the 0.20 µm process • X-ray irradiation (10 keV L-line photons.) on single transistors 0.20 µm FD process). Irradiations in air at room temperature. Dose rate: 165 rad(SiO2)/sec. For Vback = 0V the transistor is still working properly up to doses of ~100krad. • NMOS and PMOS transistors, each surrounded by 1µm PSUB guard ring • NMOS and PMOS Body of Body-Tie transistors at 0V. Drain and source at 0V, gate NMOS HIGH (1.8V), gate PMOS LOW (0V). • Vback = 0V, 5V, 10V with PSUB guard-ring floating; Vback = 10V with PSUB guard-ring at 0V TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 The PSUB guard-ring tied at GND during irradiation indeed limits the electrical field through the BOX and improves the radiation hardness of the device. Serena Mattiazzo 28 Y. Arai talk at PIXEL2012 (September 2012, Inawashiro) Double-SOI • Shield transistor from bottom electric field SEM View of Double SOI (Thickness of Si & SiO2 layer not yet optimized • Compensate electric field generated by the trapped hole in the BOX • Reduce crosstalk between sensors and circuits TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 29 LAPIS Semiconductor 0.2um FD-SOI Pixel Process TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 30 Larger mask New Mask Previous Mask 20.8 mm × 20.8 mm 31 mm Unit size 5 mm 6 mm Y. Arai talk at PIXEL2012 (September 2012, Inawashiro) TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 24.8 mm Serena Mattiazzo 31 Stitching 66 mm × 30 mm achieved 130mm × 130mm is possible Y. Arai talk at PIXEL2012 (September 2012, Inawashiro) TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 32 R&D on back-processing • Need 100 Å window thickness for an efficient O(100eV) X-ray sensitivity in back-illumination • Several processes under test at LBNL Process Window Thickness Status Low energy implantation + 500°C annealing 1000-2000 Å Process dependent, several SOI prototypes functional Low energy implantation + laser annealing 400-700 Å Several SOI prototypes functional a-Si (amorphous silicon) contact deposition by sputtering 300Å Prototypes functional after processing, high leakage Molecular Beam Epitaxy 50-75 Å Building in-house capability TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 33 Back-processing: LBNL low-temperature process Low temperature process developed at LBNL: phosphorus implant at 33keV using a cold process at -160°C to create amorphous layer, followed by annealing @ 500°C (10 minutes in Nitrogen atmosphere), compatible with CMOS devices; simple process and equipment needed Very promising results from tests on PIN diodes: good yield and low leakage current Process applied to 70 µm thin SOImager-2 chips, which are fully functional after processing Spreading Resistance Analysis (SRA) measurements show P contact extending to 0.3 – 0.4 μm depth Distance from back-plane (µm) SRA data for the implanted contact on a post-processed chip Expect detection threshold of 1.5 keV for 0.4 µm thick contact [from Craig Tindall, LBNL] TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 34 MBE • Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) system being acquired, expected to be operational by mid2013 • Conductive implants few atomic layers thin created by evaporation in ultra-high vacuum (“delta doping” approach first demonstrated by NASA/JPL); final contact thickness ~ 10nm • Low thermal budget (< 450°C) technique, applicable to full-processed devices TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 35 HEP requirement for radiation hardness Machine Luminosity [cm-2 s-1] Non Ionizing Fluence [neq cm-2 yr-1] Ionizing Fluence [krad yr-1] LHC 1034 1.4 × 1014 11300 HL-LHC 1035 1.4 × 1015 71400 CLIC 1034 1.0 × 1011 50 Super B > 1036 3.5 × 1012 3000 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 36 Lorentz angle • In the presence of an electric field (E) and a magnetic field (B), the charge carriers released by a charged particles in the detector drift along a direction at an angle L (Lorentz angle) with respect to the electric field direction B • The charge usually spreads over several pixels, depending on the angle of the incident particle • The spread is minimum for an incident angle equal to the Lorentz angle • Knowledge of this angle is needed to optimize the spatial resolution by tuning the angular orientation of the detectors TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 37 Lorentz angle measurement B=0T Measurement on a thick detector at Vsub = 70V B = 1.5T Measurement repeated at the end of July on a thin detector, but data analysis still ongoing B=0T B = 1.5 T Vsub = 70V 0.14 ± 0.14 1.71 ± 0.11 TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 38 Single Event Upset tests • We tested the technology for SEU sensitivity. • The periphery shift register for row-selection has been used to check for bit-flip through a dedicated test pad. • Mind: the design is not hardened in any special way against SEU! 256 flip flops, 13.75 µm pitch FLIP-FLOP layout TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 39 SEU cross section • A Single Event Upset (SEU) study was performed at the SIRAD irradiation facility, located at the 15MV Tandem XTU-Accelerator of the INFN Legnaro National Laboratory. • A known logical pattern is written in and read back from the row selection shift register through dedicated pads during irradiation. Differences between the loaded and read-back pattern highlight a SEU occurred in the cells Vback = 0 V • Irradiation performed with three different ion species and, for each ion beam, for two substrate bias conditions (Vback = 0V - 7V). Ion species Energy (MeV) LET0 in Si (MeV·cm2/mg) 19F 118 3.67 35Cl 170 12.5 79Br 240 38.6 No apparent difference with or without bias TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Vback = 7 V • LETthr 4 MeV·cm2/mg • sat 10-6 cm2 Serena Mattiazzo 40 Other applications: FemtoPix TREDI2013, 19/02/2013 Serena Mattiazzo 41