Deductive and Inductive Reasoning F.O.A. (Bellwork) Turn to page 11 in your blue book. Answer 12-15. Key Terms… Deductive- an argument whose conclusion is certain Inductive- an argument whose conclusion is likely Premise- a reason offered as support for a claim Syllogism- a form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – A type of logic in which one goes from a general statement to a specific instance. The classic example All men are mortal. (major premise) Socrates is a man. (minor premise) Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion) Deductive Reasoning Examples: 1. All students eat pizza. Claire is a student at ASU. Therefore, Claire eats pizza. 2. All athletes work out in the gym. Barry Bonds is an athlete. Therefore, Barry Bonds works out in the gym. Let’s try one… Smith owns only blue and brown pants. Smith is wearing a pair of his pants today. Therefore… This is a deductive argument because the first two premises prove the last sentence must be true. The soccer game is either on Thursday or Friday. I just found out that the game is not on Thursday. So the game must be on __________ Is this deductive? Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning, involves going from a series of specific cases to a general statement. The conclusion in an inductive argument is never guaranteed. Example All men are messy.(–premise) Mr. Southworth is a man.(– premise) Therefore Mr. Southworth must be messy. (--conclusion) BUT NOT NECESSARILY!!! The argument is valid, but certainly not true. It’s based on a false premise. Be careful with false premises when using logic January is cold in Siberia. Today is January 14. It will be another cold day in Siberia. This argument is inductive. It is likely but not guaranteed. The local branch of Wachovia Bank was robbed yesterday. Jenny needed money to pay off her debts. She just bought a gun two days ago, and I saw her hanging around the local Wachovia bank yesterday morning. Today the people she owed money to stopped looking for her. So Jenny must have robbed that bank. If you have ever seen an episode of Law & Order you know that they prove issues like this to be wrong so this is _______ reasoning. Deductive (based on laws, rules, & things known): All dogs are mammals. All mammals have kidneys. Therefore, all dogs have kidneys. Inductive (based on an observation): All dogs that we have seen are white; therefore the next dog we see will be white. Deductive (based on facts, laws, rules): All squares are rectangles and all rectangles have four sides. So all squares must have four sides. Inductive (based on observations): Since Chris is a good athlete, and there are good athletes in his family. His sister must be a good athlete, too. Emily’s shirt is red. My’kia is wearing a red shirt. Malik’s shirt is also red. Therefore, the next person I see will be wearing a red shirt. According to the LMS discipline policy, if a student is disrespectful to a teacher, they receive a dean referral. Anthony was disrespectful to his teacher, so he will receive a dean referral. Women hate sports. Mrs. Southworth is a woman. She must hate sports. Assignment Write down three inductive statements and three deductive statements. 2 5 4 7 9 9 8 5 7 7 3 6 2 8 4 5 6 9 5 7 7 8 6 4 2 3 5 2 6 5 4 6 1 2 5 8