The social dimension of globalization DIR Course: International Organisations, Autumn 2004 8th lecture Ole Busck, dep. of Planning and Development Karl Polanyi: ”The Great Transformation” (1944) Explored the socially disruptive and polarizing tendencies in world economy in the 20’s driven by a ’self-regulating’ market, ”the result of coercive power in the service of an utopian idea. Out of a breakdown in liberal economic structures the phenomena of depression, fascism, unemployment and resurgent nationalism were produced resulting in a negation of economic globalization, leading to world war A ’double movement’ traceable: market expansion entailing social dislocation & a sharp political reaction, i.e. society’s demands on the state to counteract the disastrous effects of the market The substance of globalization – its primary actors The global political economy, primarily embodied by TNCs (responsible of two thirds of world trade) States, although with dotted-line borders, and the interstate system still play a role Macroregions: EU, NAFTA, APEC etc. Subregional patterns; Asia’s ’Growth Triangle’, the Alpine Diamond etc. Microregions: ’Global cities’ Civil societies Lombardy, Quebec, Shenzen The dynamics of globalization the division of labour/organisation of production globally (labour creates value) Starting point: Focus: Causal factors: Facilitated through: How societies adjust to and try to influence changes in this organisation and its manifestations ’Hypercompetition’, in practice & ideology Structural changes in competition & production. New meaning of time & space Technological development Characteristics of the present ”accelerated” type of globalization (arguing against Hirst): 1. Strongly increased FDI in developing countries - 40% of total inflows in developing countries in 1993 2. Global capital flows at $ 1.5 trillion a day, from - debt payments - cross border mergers and acquisitions - tourism - foreign exchange transactions ($ 900 billion per day) 3. The volume of world trade grows at twice the rate of world output 4. The changing global division of labour. From Fordism to a flexible work force 5. The flows of remittances and their significance in the economy and social structuring of developing countries (50% of foreign income in Pakistan, 70% in El Salvador) The division of labour Theories of international division of labour IDL, International Division of Labour-theory of the classical political economists: The value-creating advantages from specialisation of work and coordinated production spread out internationally and enhanced through trade NIDL, New International Division of Labour-theory of 70s: Transfer of manufacturing from advanced capitalist to developing countries through fragmentation of production in management, R&D etc., kept in the heartland and lowskilled jobs abroad (ex: apparal, consumer-electronics) Sweat shop workers, Indonesia ZigZag, Ibis GDLP, The Global division of Labour and Power. ”What is new about the contemporary period is: 1. 2. 3. The manner and extent to which domestic political economies are penetrated by global phenomena Varied regional divisions of labour are emerging tethered in different ways to global structures, each one engaged in unequal transactions with world centers of productiuon & finance Within each region subglobal hierarchies have formed, with poles of economic growth, managerial and technological centers and security systems The global middle class ”The globalised rich” 80 % affluent North 20 % of w. population South 80 % of World pop.: (Z. Baumann) 20 % marginalised 20 % rich Share of ressource use: 80 % 20 % 80 % poor ”The localised poor” World Watch 2003-report: ”Global consumer class of 1.7 billion, while 2.8 billion live in absolute poverty” Chinese economic zone Characteristics of states in GDLP States not sidelined, but scope for state autonomy reduced Primarily:”accomodation of domestic policies to pressures generated by transnational capital” State-leaders held responsible to market forces, including debt payments, SAPs, credit rating agencies and US forreign policy” ”Courtesan” states – servicing foreign and national capital, open to regional solutions, coercive towards internal resisting actors ”Inherent disjuncture” between globalization and international institutions – as these were designed to cordinate a system of nation-states in which each state was sovereign over its own domestic economy Democratization? Identifying different historical and cultural forms of democracy – from Anglo-Saxon polyarchy to “guided democracy” Mittelman concentrates on the challenge to democracy as an ideology of domination from the mobilisation of social resistance movements, inclined to “participatory democracy” – cf. ecological resistance movement Civil society and its institutions and organisations become increasingly important as the state and social order disintegrates – and the environmental scars accelerate. Imported from the Western political culture, but now a key feature in resistance politics. Central aspects of GDLP: Migration ”Seeking to escape a marginalized existence and repression, population transfers within a stratified division of labour reflect a hierarchy among regions, countries and different rates of industrialization.” - 100 mill. workers staying outside their own country (-93) - trade unions’ historical international weakness - remittances by far surpassing int. aid - 30% of Africa’s skilled workforce in EU (1987) - Pressure from and conflicts over immigrants in USA & EU (the walls) The global division of labour expresses itself as a “distinctive territorial division of labour” Global commodity chains ”Networks of labour and production processes whose end result is a finished commodity” In business studies ’global value chains’ is the hottest theme Underpinning and connecting the global social and ecological distribution conflicts as well as reinforcing the power of TNCs (UN commission on TNCs?) Cultural networks (GDLP also linked to ethnicity), e.g.: the Chinese transnational division of labour in S.E.-Asia outside China (40 mill. person worth 250 bill. $) Chinese minorities globally linked to homebound ideoligies, traditions and capital Chinese banks and stakes actually upholding US- economy! Guangdong province – Hongkong – global capital Cultural networks ’lubricate’ the flows and chains of labour and capital globally and regionally as well as heighten tensions Goodman, Washington Post Conclusions: