K-12 SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 For School and System Leaders August 25-26 See today’s powerpoint @ http://sim.abel.yorku.ca Mary Jean Gallagher Chief Student Achievement Officer Assistant Deputy Minister of Student Achievement Division K-12 Summer Institute Goals Participants will: • Deepen understanding of change leadership through organizational analysis action planning and implementation and monitoring of system and school goals; • Apply this learning to system and school goals; • Reflect on individual and collective roles and the capacity needed to achieve shared goals; and • Enhance understanding of the leader’s role in nurturing a culture of learning. TWEET WITH US! SUMMERINSTITUTE15 CHANGELEADERSLEARN @LNSSIM Share your thoughts and questions. Pace of Change: Accelerating Messy and Getting Messier ... Technological Uncertainty ... Economic Uncertainty ... Social Uncertainty ... Political Uncertainty ... Environmental Uncertainty ... Implications ??? The Onrushing Wave Previous technological innovation has always delivered more long-run employment, not less. But things can change. The Economist, Jan. 18, 2014 Rise of the Robots and the Internet of Things The Economist, March 29, 2014 Driverless Trucks Could Mean ‘Game Over' for Thousands of Jobs The Globe and Mail, July 26, 2015 The Future of Work: There’s an App for That The Economist, Jan. 3, 2015 Hot New Jobs 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Social media/online community manager Mobile applications developer Search engine optimization specialist Sustainability manager Web content strategist and digital marketer Elder-care services coordinator Big data analyst and cloud computing architect Talent manager – in-house and open source User Experience Designer Emerging technology specialists (Nano materials, etc.) Drone operator http://www.workopolis.com/content/advice/article/emerging-opportunity-ten-in-demand-jobs-that-didnt-exist-ten-years-ago/ Task # 1: page 5 30 min. On what change do you want to focus during the next two days? Getting a Handle on the Change Challenge Two distinct aspects in any change management situation need to be addressed: • HOW to bring about that change • WHAT needs to change The “How“ of Change: The Change Path Model Awakening Mobilization Acceleration Institutionalization Change: Embracing Heads, Hearts and Hands HEAD The Head represents the cognitive function. Think about how you, as a leader, can use logic to influence others regarding the need to change. HEART The Heart is about affective function, emotions and feelings. Think about how you, as a leader, can use emotion to build buy-in and commitment to the change. HANDS The Hands are about practicality, action and physical effect. Think about how you can engage people through their active involvement. What to Change: Organizational Analysis Monitoring Measurement of a change needs to begin at its inception. Measures help change agents to: • Clarify expectations • Assess progress and make mid-course corrections • Assess the extent to which initiatives are being internalized and institutionalized • Assess what has ultimately been achieved • Set the stage for future change initiatives Monitoring What gets measured affects the direction, content and outcomes achieved by a change initiative. Measurements influence what people pay attention to and what they do. Each substep to a big change goal requires a ‘stop and take stock time’. As you work through the day, think about whether the substeps to your change goal are small enough to allow you to assess your impact. When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don’t adjust the goals, adjust the action steps. Confucius Nadler and Tushman’s Organizational Congruence Model Transformation Process Input Environment Resources Output Informal Organization (i.e. culture) Strategy System People Work School History / Culture Formal Organization (structures/ systems) Individual Nadler and Tushman’s Organizational Congruence Model Transformation Process Input Environment Resources Output Informal Organization (i.e. culture) Strategy System People Work School History / Culture Formal Organization (structures/ systems) Individual Develop Your Understanding of the Need for Change and Create Awareness and Legitimacy Seek Out and Make Sense of External Data Seek Out Seek Out and Assess and Make Seek Out Your Sense of the and Make Personal Perspectives Sense of Concerns of Other Internal Data and Stakeholders Perspectives Readying an Organization for Change • Need for change is identified in terms of the gap between the current state and the desired state • People must believe that the proposed change is the right change • People must believe they can accomplish the change • The change is supported by key individuals organizational members look to • “What’s in it for me?” has been addressed A Second Look at Readiness Followers viewed as trustworthy and able to dissent by leaders Have capable champions of change Involved middle management Innovative culture Accountable culture Effective communications Systems thinking Task # 2: page 6 Task # 3: page 7 75 min. Task #2: Apply your selected change initiative to Nadler and Tushman’s Organizational Congruence Model (pages 6-8). Task #3: Complete the “Rate Your Organization’s Readiness For Change” chart (pages 9-10). George Zegarac Deputy Minister of Education 12:15 -1:00 p.m. Need for Change and Vision for Change By definition, improvement requires change. Bryk et al. Creating a Need for Change • Develop a transformational vision for the change based on compelling values • Find a transformational leader to champion the change • Focus on common or shared goals and work out ways to achieve them • Create dissatisfaction with status quo through information and education Value of a Vision for Change What is a Vision Statement? It is an attempt to articulate what a desired future for an organization would look like… an organizational dream. Visions are big pictures. Organizational Vision and Change Vision • The approach to vision crafting remains the same but the focus shifts and becomes more specific around the particular change you have in mind. • The change leaders’ goals are advanced when they develop a compelling change vision that appeals to groups critical to the change initiative and are effectively communicated to them. Good Change Visions Good change visions are: • Clear, concise, and easily understandable • Memorable • Exciting and inspiring • Challenging • Excellence-centered • Stable but flexible • Implementable and tangible Tata’s Vision for the Nano • Create a $2,000 “people’s car.” It has to be safe, affordable, all weather transportation for a family. It should adhere to regulatory requirements, and • achieve performance targets such as fuel efficiency and acceleration. • The Result: The Nano gets 50 miles per gallon & seats five. At $2,500 - the least expensive car in the world. Why do Change Visions Fail? • Senior leaders’ walk doesn’t match the talk • Ignores needs of those putting it into practice • Unrealistic expectations develop that can’t be met • Lacks grounding in the reality of the present • Either too abstract or too concrete • Lack of creative input • Poor management of participation • Complacency – no sense of urgency • Existing mental models and past success Task # 4: page 12 50 min. 1. With your team, create your elevator pitch to communicate your desired change. 35 min. 2. Tweet the key ideas/words from your elevator pitch. 15 min. 3. After tweeting, share your pitch with someone from a different board. Navigating the Organization Navigating Organizational Politics and Culture Force Field Analysis Desired State Restraining Forces Current State Driving Forces Force Field Analysis • What are the forces for change? How strong and committed are these forces (Who will let it happen; who will help it happen; who will make it happen)? • How could these forces be augmented or increased? What forces could be added to those that exist? • What are the forces that oppose change? • How could these forces be weakened or removed? What things might create major resentment in these forces? • Can you identify any points of leverage you could employ to advance the change? Stakeholder Analysis A stakeholder is… anyone who is influenced or could influence the change you wish to make happen. A stakeholder analysis is… the process of understanding of the motives, power base, alliances, goals, etc. of all crucial stakeholders. Stakeholder Analysis • Who are the stakeholders? • What do they want? • Do they support you? Why? Why not? • What prevents them from supporting you? • Who influences these stakeholders? Can you influence the influencers? • Can stakeholders be co-opted or involved in a positive way? Is it Resistance... or is something else going on? • We often misinterpret impediments to change as caused by resistant recipients • Impediments are much more likely to come from problems related to the misalignment of structures and systems than from individuals engaged in resistance • Blaming individuals rather than addressing misaligned structures and systems will worsen the situation Ambivalence to Change is No Surprise • Mixed feelings are common as recipients try to make sense of the change • Ambivalence generates discomfort as they seek to resolve a multitude of issues about the change: People find it easier to voice concerns about conflicting beliefs than about conflicting emotions • Once they resolve their ambivalence, feelings solidify and subsequent change to attitudes become more difficult to change again Invest the time needed at the front end of the change to respond to ambivalence positively - or prepare to face a more difficult task later, when it turns to resistance Common Causes of Negative Reactions - Negative consequences are perceived to outweigh the benefits - Concern that the change has been ill-conceived - Lack of experience with change and/or being locked into old habits - Prior negative experience with a similar change - Prior negative experience with those advocating change - The negative reactions of others that recipients trust and/or with whom they will work with in the future - The change process is seen to lack procedural or distributive justice and breaches their “contract” - Fear that they lack skills they’ll need to perform well Responding to Mixed Feelings About the Change • Focus on helping people make sense of the proposed organizational change • Listen for information that may be helpful in achieving the change • Constructively reconcile their ambivalence • Sort out what actions are now needed Psychological Contract • The psychological contract represents the sum of the implicit and explicit agreements we believe we have with our organization • It defines our perceptions of the terms of our employment relationship and includes our expectations for ourselves and for the organization, including organizational norms, rights, rewards and obligations • Changes often disrupt recipients’ psychological contracts • When unilateral changes are made to psychological contracts, negative reactions can be expected Perceptions of Fairness and Justice Distributive Justice Was the end decision a fair one? Procedural Justice Was the process managed in a fair and equitable way? Interactional Justice How well was I treated? Leaders as Recipients • Supervisors, middle and even senior leaders are often recipients of the organizational change • Leaders often try to manage up, down and laterally to cope with change; they try to shape it and deal with implementation on their own terms • Coping with change while trying to link, influence and implement is difficult • If you are a change recipient in these middle roles, be aware of how this can affect your judgment Task # 5: page 13 Task # 6: page 14 70 min. Task #5: In relation to the change on which you are focusing, complete a force field analysis. Use the questions on page 13 as a guide. List the driving forces and the restraining forces for your change. Task #6: In relation to the change on which you are focusing, complete a stakeholder analysis. Use the questions on page 14 as a guide. Consolidate your thinking using the chart on page 15. The session tomorrow begins at 8:30 a.m. http://sim.abel.yorku.ca