The Gospel of Mark What Does It Mean to be a Disciple of Jesus? Characteristic Emphases The realism of the humanity of Jesus Emphasis on the messiahship of Jesus Son of Man “Messianic secret” motif A “safer” term than “messiah” Only 2 discourses (teaching material) 4; 13 Few parables Emphasis on miracles of Jesus Emphasis on suffering & the cross (8:31-) Half of the gospel is leading to the cross Book of action (“immediately”) Strong emphasis on the struggle of the disciples to understand Jesus’ ministry Emphasis on discipleship and the struggles of following Jesus Authorship of Mark No reference made in the book itself Papias – bishop of Hieropolis, Phrygia (near Colossae/Laodicea) (d. 130) Mark wrote down what Peter had taught that Jesus had said and done Many others agreed with Papias: Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Jerome, Muratorian Canon In fact no one questioned Mark as the author until modern times. Traditionally identified as John Mark, son of Mary, in Acts12:12ff. Cousin of Barnabas, traveled with Paul & Barnabas on 1st mission tour (left early) Traveled with Barnabas on his 2nd tour Identified by Peter as “my son” 1 P. 5:13. Paul said Mark was useful to him in his ministry 2 Tim. 4:11. Martin Hengel argues that it is unlikely that the Gospels would have circulated for up to 60 years with no titles and then uniformly be given titles with no evidence of any other traditions regarding authorship. So he claims the title must “go back to the time of the final redaction and first circulation of the Gospels themselves.” (Studies in Mark, p. 82) Date and Location of Mark Irenaeus (ca 115-202); associated with Polycarp (disciple of John) Matthew published his Gospel among the Hebrews in their own language, while Peter and Paul were preaching and founding the church in Rome. After their departure Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, also transmitted to us in writing those things which Peter had preached. Tradition located Mark in Rome soon after Peter’s death Tradition also indicated Peter (and Paul) was executed in Nero’s persecution in the mid 60’s. Some of the themes of Mark are consistent with such a setting (see later). Twice Mark uses Latin terms to explain Greek terms: quadrans, 12:42 (currency); praetorium, 15:16 (Roman administrative term). Consistent with Roman origin Date Related to the relationships among Matthew, Mark, and Luke Mark may be the earliest, or even the latest The tradition dates Mark around the mid to late 60’s at the earliest. Again, the themes of Mark support such a date. Possible Settings for Mark Rome – just before or during Nero’s persecution of Christians after the fire that destroyed much of Rome in AD 64. Palestine – during the mid 60’s the Jews were struggling with Roman occupation; in 66 a revolt broke out and war resulted in severe defeat, destruction of Jerusalem and the temple. Christians would have been caught in the middle Jews would have accused them of being traitors not joining the rebellion. The Romans would have viewed them as troublemakers as well Back home they had been persecuted for the fire a couple of years earlier). Viewed perhaps as a subgroup of the Jews. Another significant factor – second generation Christianity It had been 35-40 years since Jesus’ death. The level of commitment during the second generation did not seem as strong as it was for the first generation. The struggles had worn many down – they were tired of constant battle over faith. Gentiles and Jews were both causing problems for them. Mark is writing to encourage them; Jesus experienced a similar struggle with others. Jesus is presented as the model servant/disciple. Finding the Structure of Mark Different approaches to the structure: Focus on geographical movement Recognition of Jesus as the Messiah Movement from Galilee to Judea, Jerusalem, death Focuses on two confessions – Peter’s (8:29) and the Centurion’s (15:39) Discipleship Escalating conflict Follows the outline of the early preaching as presented in Acts (C. H. Dodd) Structure of Mark 1st half: 1:1-15 Introduction 1:16-3:12 The work of Jesus & diverse responses to it. 3:13-6:7a The tension between those ‘outside’ & those ‘with’ Jesus. 6:7b-8:26 The failure of the disciples to understand. 2nd half: 8:27-10:52 Describes discipleship Centers around three passion predictions 11:1-16:8 Illustrates discipleship After describing what discipleship involves, this section demonstrates that following God sometimes involves the supreme sacrifice. Conflict in Mark Mark presents an escalation of conflict in his presentation of Jesus’ ministry. Conflict between Jesus and the authorities Jesus and the evil spirits Jesus’ own disciples Jesus and the Authorities A series of conflicts in 2:1-3:6 Jesus heals a paralytic Jesus calls Levi & east with “sinners” Question about fasting Plucking grain on the Sabbath Healing on the Sabbath By the end of this section the “Pharisees went out and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.” (3:6) The Conflict Escalates The authorities begin to plot his death. They approach his disciples. They slander Jesus (Beelzebub). Leaders approach Jesus about his disciples not washing their hands. Pharisees challenge Jesus directly about tradition and the law. The authorities challenge Jesus about his own authority (cleansing of the temple). They take it to the Roman officials. Three Passion Predictions 8:31; 9:31; 10:33 Each time the disciples demonstrate they do not understand. Each prediction is accompanied by a call to follow and a description of true discipleship. The Disciples’ Progression Imperceptions 1:1-8:26 6:52 “They did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were hardened.” 7:18 “Are you without understanding?” 8:4 “How can one feed . . .?” (after the 5,000) 8:12-21 “Are your hearts hardened? Having eyes do you not see, and having ears do you not hear?” Misconceptions of Jesus’ messiahship 8:27-10:52 After each prediction of the passion, the disciples misunderstand. After two of the three predictions, the disciples are concerned about power and position (9:32; 10:35ff). They finally abandon and deny Jesus: 14:10 Judas 14:37-41 the three sleep while Jesus prays 14:15 all flee 14:66-72 Peter denies Jesus At the cross, only the women disciples “from a distance” Mark’s Pastoral Concerns The struggles that the disciples had were similar to those of Mark’s readers. Struggling to understand Jesus in the midst of negative reactions to their work. It was getting dangerous to be a disciple of Jesus. When things get this bad it is easy to be distracted from one’s focus. One’s focus easily becomes self preservation and maintaining your honor. The parallel experiences of Mark’s readers and Jesus’ disciples provided Mark an opportunity for telling his story of Jesus and his own struggle to be a servant to others. Even in the midst of threats of persecution one cannot afford to lose focus on service to others. Mark illustrates from Jesus’ own life what discipleship is all about. He seeks to motivate his readers toward a greater level of faithfulness. Messianic Secret Several times Jesus tells people not to tell others about what he had done, or to say that he was the Messiah 1:24-5, 34; 1:44; 3:1f.; 5:43; 7:36;8:29f; 9:9) Wilhelm Wrede suggested that Mark adds this to the tradition to explain why Jesus did not claim to be the Messiah in his own lifetime. Supposedly, only later did his followers realize this and they wrote it back into the stories. Reasons Jesus told people not to say he was the Messiah: The term was politically loaded. The general concept of Messiah was military. Jesus didn’t want people thinking incorrectly about his mission. There were enough barriers without this one. Jesus preferred the term “Son of Man.” The Ending of Mark In the manuscript tradition Mark has more than one ending: 16:9-20 (the longer ending); many of these indicate in some way that these verses may have been added (blank space, asterisk, etc.) Some mss add material after v. 15. 16:8 the oldest mss end here. One ms has the “shorter ending” Some mss have both the shorter and longer endings. 16:9-20 does not “fit in” very well into the context of Mk. 16. It appears to be constructed from the endings of the other gospels and Acts. What do we do with all this? Implications The original ending is probably lost. Scribes realized this very early. They tried to construct an ending that made sense to them. Which ending should we use? The safest thing to do, in my opinion, is to end with 16:8. The most important parts of 9-20 are found elsewhere in scripture; use those passages. Recent scholars have tried to make sense of Mark with 16:8 as the intended ending. This is certainly an awkward ending. If it was the original ending, it presents some interesting possibilities of reading the Gospel of Mark. New Understandings of How God Works Kingdom Not established with military force Submission to God as king, to Jesus as the leader of that Kingdom Has to do with God being in control – not us. Has to do with service – not (our) power. Yet it does initiate conflict. With the authorities, powers of darkness, culture – society, even his own disciples God does not work as traditionally thought. The authorities work from Jerusalem outward, Jesus started at the outer fringes of society and brought people into the Kingdom. Jesus was establishing a new understanding of God, power, temple, spirituality, purity 8:33 – thinking the things of man rather than of God 9:35 – first will be last – last will be first 10:45 – to serve rather than be served – there is power in serving (not “Lording it over”) – control. General Observations for Studying the Gospels Respect their individuality. Don’t try to harmonize everything. Cleansing the temple (2); Nazareth (2) Allow the authors to be authors – their thinking is important. Learn as much as possible about the cultural, political, religious and moral challenges facing the early Christians. Look for over-arching themes that provide a framework for large sections, perhaps the entire gospel. Find smaller themes within the larger sections. Use of Mark in the Early Church It was very popular for the first 3 – 4 centuries. Referred to in all the early discussions of the gospels and manuscripts. Used in the churches. Tatian used it in his Diatessaron. The tradition was that Mark wrote what Peter taught; Peter was very popular, so Mark was widely used. It spoke to those who were suffering. John Chrysostom (386-98) Mark reproduced the brevity of Peter; Luke reproduced the abundance of Paul. Augustine proposed a new idea. Said Mark had nothing in common with John and little with Luke. Mark is an abridgment of Matthew: “Mark followed him like a slave and seems [to be] his summarizer.” This contradicted the early theories that Mark was Peter’s interpreter. Thus far Mark had survived primarily on Peter’s authority. From then on, Mark was in Matthew’s shadow; until the 19th cen. With the proposal of the two document hypothesis, Mark once again became widely used (proposed to be the 1st gospel).