Performance
Management
Module 6
The most effective way to do Performance
Management…video cameras Video HERE
Leaders are Readers
• How to be a Star at Work 1999 Robert E Kelley
• “What average performers think it is: The talent for
brownnosing and schmoozing in the workplace to
help me get noticed by the right people. What star
performers know it to be: A work strategy that
enables me to navigate the competing interests in an
organization to promote cooperation, address
conflicts and get things done.”
Performance Management and
Execution
• Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance? (2003)
• Louis Gerstner
• “Fixing IBM was all about execution. We had to stop
looking for people to blame, stop tweaking the
internal structure and systems. I wanted no excuses.”
Exercise
• Performance Management for Dr. Avey
• Pick one of the following:
• Below Expectations
• Meets Expectations
• Exceeds Expectations
• What is your criteria?
• Write it down
• Discuss later
Measuring Individual Employee
Performance
• Individual Performance Factors
• Individual ability to do the work
• Effort level expended
• Organizational support
Performance (P) = Ability (A) x
Effort (E) x Support (S)
Components of Individual Performance
• Motivation
Individual Motivation
• The desire within a person causing that person to act to reach a goal. (Greek
“mohere” which means “to move”)
• Challenges in diagnosing a “motivation problem”
•
•
•
•
•
Inconsistency in organizational rewards
Organizational support for employee efforts
Accurate measurement of employee performance
Desirability of organizational rewards by employees
Equipment, training, product-market fit
• Need broad-based strategies and tactics to address all individuals.
Preface: Global Cultural Differences
in Performance Management
• Uncommon for managers in other cultures to rate employees or
to give direct feedback.
• Younger subordinates do not engage in joint discussions with
their managers due their high respect for authority and age.
• Criticism from superiors is viewed as personally devastating
rather than as useful feedback.
Jack Welch (Winning)
• Be a meritocracy through differentiation of people.
• “Categorize your people as the top 20, middle 70 and bottom 10
percent who turn over in 1 year or less. You manage the 70 by
identifying people who have the potential to move up and
cultivating them. You manage the top 20 by rewarding them like
crazy.”
• “Use a rigorous non-bureaucratic evaluation system, monitored
for integrity with the same intensity of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
compliance.”
Top Issues in Performance
Management
• 1. Bommer et al meta analysis results- Manager
performance ratings are TERRIBLE
• 2. Procedural Justice- need to know HOW decision was
made (examples of good and bad performance)
• 3. Standards are clear and communicated in advance
• 4. Rating instruments must be simple and easy for the
rater and ratee to understand
• 5. Ratees (employees) must have input into the process
Components of Effective
Performance Management
What is Performance Management
• Performance Management
• Processes used to identify, encourage, measure, evaluate, improve, and
reward employee performance
• Provide information to employees about their performance.
• Clarify organizational performance expectations.
• Identify the development steps that are needed to enhance employee
performance.
• Document performance for personnel actions.
• E.g., promotions (more appropriate than the promotion pit)
• Provide rewards for achieving performance objectives.
Performance appraisal
• The process of determining how well employees do
their jobs relative to a standard and communicating
that information to the employee.
What is Employee Performance
• Performance
• What an employee does and does not do.
• Quantity of output
• Quality of output
• Timeliness of output • Presence at work
• Cooperativeness
• Not usually ethics- why?
An effective performance
management system must
• Link organizational strategy to ultimate
results.
• Translate organizational strategies into
unit-level actions.
• Assign unit-level actions to individual
employees.
Types of Performance Information
Performance Standards
What are Performance Standards
 Expected levels of performance
 Benchmarks, goals, and targets
What are characteristics of well-defined standards
 Realistic
 Measurable
 Clearly understood
How do we ensure our system is legally defensible
 Legally Defensible PA System:
 Appraisal criteria based on job analysis
 Absence of disparate impact and evidence of validity
 Formal evaluation criterion that limit managerial discretion
 Formal rating instrument linked to job duties and
responsibilities
 Personal knowledge of and contact with ratee
 Training of supervisors in conducting appraisals
 Review process to prevent undue control of careers
 Counseling to help poor performers improve
Philosophical Challenges to Performance Appraisal
Who Conducts Appraisals
•
•
•
•
•
•
Supervisors who rate their subordinates
Employees who rate their supervisors
Team members who rate each other
Employees’ self-appraisal
Outside sources rating employees
Multisource (360° feedback) appraisal
Manager doesn’t mean bully
• Power and authority have a tendency to corrupt
people.
• “Because I said so”
• The majority of bully victims are women….and the
majority of bullies (68%) are women.
Employee Rating of Managers
• Advantages
• Helps in identifying
competent managers
• Serves to make
managers more
responsive to employees
• Can contribute to the
career development of
managers
• Disadvantages
• Negative reactions by
managers to employee
ratings
• Subordinates’ fear of
reprisals may inhibit
them from giving
realistic (negative)
ratings
Team/Peer Rating
• Advantages
• Helps improve the
performance of lowerrated individuals
• Peers have opportunity
• Disadvantages
• Can negatively affect
working relationships.
• Can create difficulties for
managers in determining
individual performance.
to observe other peers.
• Peer appraisals focus on
individual contributions
to teamwork and team
performance.
• Organizational use of
Has anyone evaluated a team member?
individual performance
appraisals can hinder the
development of
teamwork
Multisource Appraisal
Category Scaling Methods
• Graphic Rating Scale
• A scale that allows the rater to indicate an employee’s
performance on a continuum of job behaviors.
John has good customer service skills.
1 (Disagree), 3 (Neutral), 5 (Agree)
• Drawbacks
• Restrictions on the range of possible rater responses
• Differences in the interpretations of the meanings of scale
items and scale ranges by raters
Behavioral/Objective Methods
• Behavioral Rating Approach
• Assesses employees’ behaviors instead of other
characteristics
• Consists of a series of scales created by:
• Identifying important job dimensions
• Creating statements describing a range of desired and
undesirable behaviors (anchors)
• Example- Next Slide
Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale
for Customer Service Skills
Category Rating Methods
 Checklists
 A performance appraisal tool that uses a list of statements or work
behaviors that are checked by raters.
 Can be quantified by applying weights to individual checklist items.
 Ranking
 A listing of all employees from highest to lowest in performance.
 Drawbacks
 Does not show size of differences in performance between employees
 Implies that lowest-ranked employees are unsatisfactory performers.
 Becomes an unwieldy process if the group to be ranked is large.
Comparative Methods (cont’d)
Forced Distribution
 Performance appraisal method in which ratings of
employees are distributed along a bell-shaped curve.
 Drawbacks
 Assumes a normal distribution of performance.
 Resistance by managers to placing individuals in the lowest
or highest groups.
 Providing explanation for placement in a higher or lower
grouping can be difficult.
 Is not readily applicable to small groups of employees.
Forced Distribution on a Bell-Shaped Curve
Narrative Methods
 Critical Incident
 Manager keeps a written record of highly favorable and unfavorable
employee actions.
 Drawbacks
 Variations in how managers define a “critical incident”
 Time involved in documenting employee actions
 Most employee actions are not observed and may become different if
observed
 Employee concerns about manager’s “black books”
 Essay
 Manager writes a short essay describing an employee’s performance.
 Drawback- Depends on the managers’ writing skills and their ability to
express themselves.
 Teachers, BECU Corporate
Criticisms of Performance Appraisal
• Focus is too much on the individual contribution and
does little to develop employees.
• Employees and supervisors believe the appraisal process
is seriously flawed.
• Appraisals are inconsistent, short-term oriented,
subjective, and useful only at the extremes of
performance.
Management by Objectives (MBO)
 Management by Objectives
 Specifying the performance goals that an individual and his or
her manager agree the employee will to try to attain within an
appropriate length of time.
 Key MBO Ideas
 Employee involvement creates higher levels of commitment
and performance.
 Encourages employees to work effectively toward achieving
desired results.
 Performance measures should be measurable and should define
results.
What MBO Tries to Accomplish
• The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People Stephen R
Covey (2004)
• “#2 Begin with the End in Mind”
• The HP Way, David Packard (2005)
• “We thought if we could get everyone to agree on what
our objectives were and to understand what we were trying
to so, then we could turn them loose and they would move
in a common direction.“
• This is MBO
The MBO Process
This is transactional leadership- contingent reward
Job Review and Agreement
Development of Performance Standards
Objective Setting
Continuing Performance Discussions
Training of Managers and
Employees
• Appraisal Training Topics:
• Performance criteria and job standards that should be
considered
• How to communicate positive and negative feedback
• How to avoid common rating errors (Next Slide)
Common Rater Errors
Appraisal Interview Hints
Exercise
• Back to the exercise: What was your criteria for your decision?
• Would you use different criteria/different method?
• Given the importance of results, how SHOULD Dr. Avey be
evaluated?
WSJ 12/2009 Article