National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System (NVEAIS) David Nicholas, MPH New York State Department of Health Bureau of Community Environmental Health and Food Protection David.nicholas@health.ny.gov Original Presenters: Carol Selman, MPH Team Lead, Food Safety Team, Environmental Health Services Branch, Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services, NCEH Kristin Delea, MPH, REHS Health Scientist/Epidemiologist National Center for Environmental Health Environmental Health Services Branch Overview Background EHS-Net NVEAIS Environmental Assessments: A systems approach to foodborne illness outbreak investigations Systems Theory Contributing Factors Environmental Antecedents NVEAIS – Data Collection Information the data can provide How can we use the data Training/ E-learning BACKGROUND Environmental Health Specialist Network EHS-Net (pronounced S-Net) is a collaborative forum of environmental health specialists whose mission is to improve environmental health practice. These specialists collaborate with epidemiologists and laboratorians to identify and prevent environmental factors contributing to foodborne and waterborne illness outbreaks. EHS-Net Background Environmental Health Specialists Network Collaboration between: • US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention o National Center for Environmental Health o Environmental Health Services Branch • US Food and Drug Administration o Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition • US Department of Agriculture • 8 sites o California, Cerro Gordo Iowa, Minnesota, New York, New York City, Rhode Island, San Mateo California and Tennessee EHS-Net Background EHS-Net work is based on a system theory. EHS-Net assists state health departments in their efforts to improve the practice of environmental health service programs. EHS-Net conducts environmental assessments to determine why an agent was present in the environment in such a way that the host could be exposed. EHS-Net works to Identify environmental antecedents (underlying factors) to illness and disease outbreaks. Translate findings into improved prevention efforts using a systemsbased approach. Offer training opportunities to current and future environmental health specialists. Strengthen collaboration among epidemiology, laboratory, and environmental health programs. NVEAIS Background EHS-Net Foodborne Outbreak Study Objective: To identify contributing factors to foodborne illness outbreaks in food-service facilities and to describe the characteristics, policies and practices of those facilities. What we learned No consensus on what a foodborne illness environmental assessment was No standard methodology for conducting foodborne outbreak environmental assessments Need for training on how to conduct a foodborne outbreak environmental assessment using a systems approach The Need to Improve Reporting of Environmental Factors to Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Environmental factor data are key to To improve hazard surveillance . To inform foodborne disease prevention policies Understanding how and why outbreaks occur. Preventing future outbreaks. Limited environmental factor data are currently reported to CDC’s existing National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS). Inspectors (environmental health specialists) need training on collecting environmental factor data during outbreak investigations. 8 The Need to Improve Reporting of Environmental Factors to Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Environmental factors Contributing factors • Factors that caused the outbreak • How the outbreak occurred Environmental antecedents • Circumstances that led to the contributing factors • Why the outbreak occurred 9 The Need to Improve Reporting of Environmental Factors to Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Environmental antecedents • Worker in a hurry • Worker had not been trained on avoiding cross contamination Contributing factor • Cross contamination • Worker used same utensils on raw ground beef and salads Outbreaks • E. Coli • Outbreak caused by salads eaten at Restaurant A NCEH/EEHS Activities to Improve Reporting of Environmental Factors to Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Developed National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System (NVEAIS) e-Learning on Environmental Assessment of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Launched in April 2014 Purpose NVEAIS: Discover environmental factors that cause foodborne outbreaks to prevent next one e-Learning: Improve competency in collecting environmental factor data during foodborne outbreak investigations http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/NVEAIS/index.htm; http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/elearn/ea_fio/ NVEAIS Purpose Identify factors that can be routinely monitored by food control authorities to prevent or reduce the risk of foodborne outbreaks Characterize food vehicles and monitor trends Identify and monitor contributing factors and environmental antecedents Hypothesis generation Guide planning, implementation and evaluation of food safety programs Improving Surviellance NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INFORMAITON SYSTEM Definition Environmental Assessment The component of an outbreak investigation that fully describes how the environment contributed to the introduction and or transmission of agents that cause illness. Environment is everything external to the host, including air, food, water, animals, plants, climate, etc as well as people, social and built environments. • All aspects of the external environment can be listed as variables that, in relation to transmission, are neutral, conducive or protective. • From this description contributing factors and environmental antecedents to an outbreak can be determined. NOT an inspection Foodborne Outbreak Environmental Assessment Conducted as part of the foodborne illness outbreak team A reconstruction of past events in the context of the outbreak investigation Taking a systems approach Inputs - Are the items which feed into the system Process - Are the steps and methods to which the inputs are subjected Internal System Variables - Are the factors that exert positive, negative and neutral influences on all other aspects of the system Outputs - The immediate results of the system Outcomes -What happens as a result of the outputs External Feedback to System Contributing Factor Definition The factors likely to be conducive to the contamination and survival of the etiologic agent or suspected agent and/or to its growth or proliferation. Contamination Factors • Toxic substance part of the tissue , Contaminated raw product, Crosscontamination of ingredients, Bare-hand contact by a food handler/worker/preparer who is suspected to be infectious Proliferation Factors • Improper cold holding due to malfunctioning refrigeration equipment, Improper hot holding due to improper procedure or protocol, Prolonged cold storage Survival Factors • Insufficient time and/or temperature during cooking/heat processing, Insufficient time and/or temperature during reheating Contributing factors are NOT food code violations Environmental Antecedents Definition Root causes Supporting factor(s) to the contamination, survival or increase of biological or chemical agents in food They may be related to People Equipment Process Food Economics Behavior Other circumstances Environmental Antecedents Environmental Antecedents Related to Food System Variables People Food • Location of hand wash sinks Equipment • Availability of supplies for hand wash sinks • TrainingProcesses • Supervision • Water available for hand wash sinks • Availability of a supply of gloves Economics Environmental Antecedents Related to Food System Variables Equipment People • • • • • • Design Construction Cleanability Maintenance Food Placement Installation Processes Economics Environmental Antecedents Related to Food System Variables Equipment • • • Handling after kill step People No kill step where kill step is required Multiple- step processes Food Processes Economics Environmental Antecedents Related to Food System Variables Equipment • • • • People Food Source pH Processes Water activity (Aw) Viscosity Economics Environmental Antecedents Related to Food System Variables Equipment • Shifting food trends • Profit margins People • Operational costs such as • Cost of food • Cost of equipment • Cost of facilities Food • Cost of staffing and training Processes Economics The Food Establishment System Customer Health Ingredients Organisms Receive Chemicals Final Food Item Serve Customer Satisfaction Profit Store Internal System Variables People Assemble Processes Equipment External Feedback to System Prep Hold Food Economics Cook Reheat Cool Example Thorough understanding of the problem On the ground assessment by Environmental Health Specialist or Environmental Engineer Identification of underlying causes of problems (not just symptoms) Contributing Factors Environmental Antecedents DATA COLLECTION Data Collection Data collection for FBIO environmental assessments Standardized data collection instrument to report information FBIO environmental assessments Validated questions Identifying contributing factors Understanding how selected environmental antecedents are related to contributing factors, vehicles, and agents Is not a form or template for conducting a FBIO environmental assessment Data Collection Tool Part I General Characterization of Outbreak Part II Establishment Description Part III Manager Interview Part IV Establishment – Observation Part V Food Vehicle Part VI Sampling Part VII Contributing Factors (CF) Part VIII National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) INFORMATION THE DATA CAN PROVIDE Food Processing Characterization of the establishment (Part II) 81.6 % Complex 15.6 % Cook / Serve 2.9 % Prep / Serve Characterization of suspect food preparation (Part V) 25.3 % Complex 27.2 % Cook / Serve 47.5 % Prep / Serve 31.2% served raw or undercooked animal products (Part I) Of these, 61% did not have a customer advisory Part – III Establishment Characteristics Facilities 91% restaurants • Independent 68% Median meals/day 240 Busiest on weekends In 50% food handler to kitchen manager ratio ≤ 4:1 Part III- Busiest Day UNSURE / MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY MISSING SUNDAY THURSDAY SATURDAY FRIDAY Disposable Gloves Yes No Glove Policy* 193 (79.1) 48 (19.7) 3 (1.2) Glove Supply** 198 (81.1) 41 (16.8) 5 (0.4) Glove Use** 159 (65.2) 72 (29.5) 13 (5.3) *Part III **Part IV Missing Part V- Suspected Food Vehicles in Foodborne Disease Outbreaks TRAINING The Need for Training In 2001 Selman and Green surveyed local and state Environmental Health Specialists (EHS) and found EHS focus on pathogens during outbreaks instead of contributing factors and their environmental antecedents A lack of communication between epidemiologist and EHS was found to be a barrier to EHS active engagement in foodborne illness outbreak environmental assessments Local EHS staff require training because they are not involved in outbreaks often enough to attain competency in environmental assessments EHS were in need of a basic training in how to conduct foodborne illness outbreak environmental assessments Selman, CA and Green, LR (2001). Environmental health specialists’ self-reported foodborne illness outbreak investigation practices. Journal of Environmental Health, 20(6),16-21. Using Environmental Assessments to Investigate Illness Outbreaks Environmental Health Specialists are accustomed to look for violation of regulations not contributing factors and their environmental antecedents Performing an environmental assessment (EA) requires a different mindset than other environmental food safety activities No two outbreaks are alike No single ‘checklist’ applies to all environmental assessments Conducting an EA requires a complex set of knowledge and skills including the ability to apply ‘critical thinking’ Training must promote development of competency in the field and not just the acquisition of knowledge Goal of this Training Effort Use cutting-edge e-learning technologies to develop competency with Foodborne Illness Outbreak Environmental Assessments and deliver training free of charge over the Internet to enhance global food safety Incorporation of ‘Gaming’ Each virtual learning experience scenarios is framed as a forensic investigation mystery of an outbreak Participants decide Who to interview What topics to interview about Which actions to take What observations to perform and samples to collect At end, learners must identify contributing factors and environmental antecedents Actions and conclusions are tracked and evaluated Learners receive individual feedback on results Accompany the Worker The Cognitive Domain Involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills Includes 6 categories of behavior Knowledge (recall data or information) Comprehension (understanding the meaning) Application (use a concept in a new situation) Analysis (separate materials into component parts) Synthesis (build a pattern from diverse elements) Evaluation (make judgments) Analysis of Learner Performance Learner receives individualized feedback on: Interview effectiveness • Did the learner choose the correct questions? Interview efficiency • Did the learner choose the questions in the correct order? Observational skills • Did the learner find all the important embedded clues in the environment? Critical thinking • Did the learner correctly identify contributing factors and environmental antecedents E-Learning on Environmental Assessments of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks VIRTUAL WORLD TRAINING Promotional Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77w9aVeROiA&ind ex=1&list=PLvrp9iOILTQaRWTguYiBvPlVB7R-88Wbq PARTICIPATING IN THE TRAINING Information www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs Provides information about e-Learning on Environmental Assessments of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks and NVEAIS Registration information Complete the registration Take the pre-test Important Websites • More information on CDC EHS-Net: – http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/EHSNet/ • Information on National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System (NVEAIS): – http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/NVEAIS/index.htm • Additional information on e-Learning: – http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/eLearn/EA_FIO/index.htm • Register for the e-Learning course at: – https://ehseleafio.cdc.gov/ • National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Guidance: – http://www.cdc.gov/nors/pdf/NORS_Guidance_20130219_508c.pdf • National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Form: – http://www.cdc.gov/nors/pdf/NORS_CDC_5213.pdf Acknowledgements • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – – – – Carol Selman Kristin Delea Erik Coleman Laura Brown • EHS-Net Site Partners • Local Health Departments Thank You! Questions David C. Nicholas, MPH NYSDOH BCEHFP Ph:518-402-7600 Email: David.nicholas@health.ny.gov The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).