Week 7 - June 21

advertisement

Student Presentations

 1. Stephanie Bower

 2. Brendan Flynn

 3. Michael Giordano

 4. Kate Scarcella

 5. John Collins

 6. Sean Space

 7. Eddie Ebrahimi

 8. Beverly Peters

Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 8/e

Stephen P. Robbins

Chapter 6

Individual Decision

Making

The Leader’s Responsibility in Decision Making is...

1.

manage time

2.

accurately identify problems

3. consult with appropriate people

4.

produce effective solutions

5.

appropriately implement the solutions

6.

consider impact of decisions on morale of others

Decision-Style Model

High

Analytical Conceptual

Directive Behavioral

Low

Rational

Way of Thinking

Intuitive

The Six-Step Rational

Decision-Making Model

3)

4)

5)

6)

1)

2)

Define the problem

Identify decision criteria

Weight the criteria

Generate alternatives

Rate each alternative on each criterion

Compute the optimal decision

Assumptions of the Model

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

6)

Problem clarity

Known options

Clear preferences

Constant preferences

No time or cost constraints

Maximum payoff

Common Biases and Errors

 Overconfidence bias

 Anchoring bias

 Confirmation bias

 Availability bias

Common Biases and Errors

 Representative bias

 Escalation of commitment

 Randomness error

 Hindsight bias

Bounded Rationality

Due to the limited capacity of the mind to be fully rational; decision makers construct simplified models to extract the essential features from complex problems

Typical Use of Bounded Rationality

 Limited list of criteria based on most conspicuous choices

 Final solution represents a satisficing choice, not an optimum one

 Satisficing - first acceptable choice

Intuition

 Unconscious process created out of distilled experience; resulting in a rapid decision with what appears to be very limited information

When is Intuition Used?

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

When a high level of uncertainty exists

When there is little precedent to draw on

When variables are less scientifically predictable

When “facts” are limited

When facts don’t clearly point the way

When is Intuition Used?

6)

7)

8)

When analytical data are of little use

When there are several plausible alternative solutions from which to choose

When time is limited and there is pressure to come up with the right decision

Organizational Constraints

 Performance Evaluation

Reward Systems

Formal Regulations

 System-Imposed Time

Constraints

 Historical Precedents

Cultural Differences

 Cultural background can significantly influence

Selection of problems

Depth of analysis

Importance placed on logic and rationality

Whether decisions should be made

 Autocratically by individual manager

 Collectively in groups

Implications for Managers

Five suggestions to improve decision making:

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

Analyze the situation and adjust to the national culture and criteria of organization

Be aware of biases

Combine rational analysis with intuition

Do not assume your specific decision style is appropriate for every job

Use creativity-stimulation techniques

Creativity ability to produce novel and useful ideas

Helps decision maker identify all viable alternatives

The Three Components of Creativity

Creativity

Expertise

Task

Motivation

Creativity

Skills

Five Organizational Factors Impeding

Creativity

3)

4)

1)

2)

5)

Expected evaluation

Surveillance

External motivators

Competition

Constrained choice

Video

 Everyday Creativity

Gender Differences

 Evidence indicates that women analyze decisions more than men

 Reason is not clear

Decision Making Evaluation/ Training

Tool

 Decision Style Profile,

 Published by Discovery Learning, w ww.discoverylearning.com

 Standardized decision making assessment

 Training materials to use/ deliver training

 Also Multi-Rater version.

Decision Making Agenda

The Leader’s Responsibility...

 Quality –Acceptance–Time

 5 Decision Styles

 Compliance when... D1

 Acceptance when... D5

 7 Rules for using D1 – D5 (2 pp)

 Decision Making Task: (3 pp)

Student Presentations

 1. Stephanie Bower

 2. Brendan Flynn

 3. Michael Giordano

 4. Kate Scarcella

 5. John Collins

 6. Sean Space

 7. Eddie Ebrahimi

 8. Beverly Peters

Decision Making Agenda

 Models

Principles/Concepts/Styles/Rules

 Activity

Case Study Groups

 Application to your Workplace

 Reflection

Strengths and Development Needs

Decision Making Styles:

Factors to Consider

QUALITY

(effectiveness)

ACCEPTANCE

(effectiveness)

 technically optimum solution rational and realistic solves the problem, fits the criteria

 commitment for success

 creative ownership

 support to implement

 consider impact on morale

TIME

(efficiency)

 implement effectively avoid waste

5 Decision Styles

Type 1

= Leader depends on own knowledge & decides alone

* seek no extra information from staff

Type 2 = Leader seeks information, then decides alone

* seek some information from selected staff

Type 3 = Leader consults with individuals, then decides alone

* share problem, seek information and ask advice from selected staff

Type 4 = Leader consults whole team and then decides alone

* meet staff to discuss possible alternatives and use their feelings/opinions as input

Type 5

= Leader shares problem with whole team & they mutually decide

* define the problem, provide relevant information and participate in discussion

* accept group decision

Compliance When...

Task is routine

No extra effort is required

No special creativity is needed

Supervision or systems are in place

Acceptance When...

Creativity

High energy

Enthusiasm

Initiative or

Special effort is required

Close supervision is impossible

Decision Making Guide

Components D1 D2

Quality of

Information

Leader has all the information

Not all

Information

Available

Acceptance

Needed to

Implement

Not Necessary Not Necessary

D3 D4 D5

Not all

Information

Available

Not Available to

Leader

Not Available to

Leader

Some

Acceptance

Required

Some

Acceptance

Required

Consensus

Required

Time Available No Time No Time Some Time Time Available Time Available

Decision

Process

Leader decides alone

Decides alone after consulting one people

Decides alone after consulting a few

Decides alone after consulting most or all

Leader and group decide together

Decision Making Impact

Decision

Type

Type 5

Type 4

Type 3

Type 2

Type 1

High

Limited

Time

Manager

Expertise

*

**

*** *

***

**

Incongruent High

Goals Complexity

****

**** ***

*

** *

Commitment

Needed

****

**

Conflict

Over

Solutions

****

***

*

Multiple

Solutions

****

***

Decision Case 1

 You are the supervisor of a manufacturing operation that employees 12 workers. Due to a recent crisis, another manufacturing operation in a different part of the plant is shorthanded and cannot complete their current task. You have been asked to provide replacement workers for the next three days.

All of your workers are equally skilled at the tasks required and all are motivated workers. Further, you know each of them well and are aware of no problems which would interfere with any of your workers moving to this other operation for the time required.

You also know that demand on your unit is somewhat low at the moment and you can cover for the loss of three workers without significant overload for your current workers.

Decision Case 2

 You are the manager of a unit consisting of route delivery sales people (e.g.., beer, soda, or bakery delivery). Your sales/delivery force consistently produces good but not stellar results. Your boss has just stormed into your office for the 6th time this month to complain about seeing all the company trucks clustered around a donut shop in the east end of town. He has seen this same group of trucks, all from your unit, at the donut shop repeatedly and thinks it reflects badly on the company. He wants you to do something to change it.

Decision Case 3

 You are the Safety and Loss Control Manager for an underground mine. Your mine has had a long and celebrated history of a very low lost time accident rate and has recently completed 1.5 million man hours without a lost time accident.

However, in the past little while it has come to your attention that there were three close calls with rock bolts in one section of the mine. You believe this situation needs to be corrected before someone gets injured but there are too many alternatives for the right answer to be obvious. You are the safety person so you don’t understand either the geology or the mechanics of rock bolts. However, the Superintendent has identified you as the person to finalize the plan of response.

Decision Making Task, Group

• As a group...

4. Discuss examples from your experience of recent decisions. What style was used?

5. Choose one to report that was effective. Why did it work well?

6. Choose one to report that “bombed”. Why didn’t it work?

Decision Making and Expectations

 Decisions can be made in any style as long as expectations are clear

 Difficulty will arise if widely varying expectations

Natural practice of good leaders

Ask question, “Have I made my expectations clear.

Ethics

 What is ethics?

The right way to behave

The law

A set of rules

The truth

The greatest good for the most people

Ethical Decision Making

Moral Reasoning Capacity

Collaboration between moral philosophy and moral psychology and has been very influential in recent literature. Kohlberg’s six identifiable stages are classified into three levels of reasoning about moral dilemmas:

Pre-Conventional - reasoning based on self-interest. The individual aims to win rewards and avoid punishment.

Conventional - reasoning based on conformity to social norms and expectations such as family or peer-group pressures.

Post-conventional - reasoning based on universal ethical principles, centered on the notion of justice.

Outcome Based Ethical Principles

Beneficence - decisions should maximize potential benefits and minimize potential harm or risk to others.

Egoism – decisions should maximize benefits to oneself

Justice – decisions should result in a fair and equitable distribution of benefits as well as burdens

Utilitarianism – decisions should result in the greatest good for the greatest number

From Ethical Decision Challenge, Center for Applied

Research, 1998

Rule-Based Ethical Principles

Cultural Relativism – do what is consistent with the laws and norms of one’s own nation

Golden Rule – do unto others as you would have others do unto you

Kant’s Categorical Imperative – do what they would want anyone else to do who was facing the same set of circumstances

Organizational relativism – do what is consistent wit the goals and norms of one’s own organization

Professional ethic – do what would be condoned or supported by one’s professional colleagues and peers

Respect for persons – do what will maintain the autonomy of others

From Ethical Decision Challenge, Center for Applied

Research, 1998

Stages of Moral Development

Level Stage Description

Principled 6. Following self-chosen ethical principles, even if they violate the law

Conventional

Pre-conventional

5. Valuing rights of others; upholding non-relative values and rights regardless of the majority’s opinion

4. Maintaining conventional order by fulfilling obligations to which you have agreed

3. Living up to what is expected by people close to you

2. Following rules only when it’s in your immediate interest

1. Sticking to rules to avoid physical punishment

Organizational Constraints

 Performance Evaluation

Reward Systems

Formal Regulations

 System-Imposed Time

Constraints

 Historical Precedents

Cultural Differences

 Cultural background can significantly influence

Selection of problems

Depth of analysis

Importance placed on logic and rationality

Whether decisions should be made

 Autocratically by individual manager

 Collectively in groups

Outcome Based Ethical Principles

Beneficence - decisions should maximize potential benefits and minimize potential harm or risk to others.

Egoism – decisions should maximize benefits to oneself

Justice – decisions should result in a fair and equitable distribution of benefits as well as burdens

Utilitarianism – decisions should result in the greatest good for the greatest number

From Ethical Decision Challenge, Center for Applied

Research, 1998

Rule-Based Ethical Principles

Cultural Relativism – do what is consistent with the laws and norms of one’s own nation

Golden Rule – do unto others as you would have others do unto you

Kant’s Categorical Imperative – do what they would want anyone else to do who was facing the same set of circumstances

Organizational relativism – do what is consistent wit the goals and norms of one’s own organization

Professional ethic – do what would be condoned or supported by one’s professional colleagues and peers

Respect for persons – do what will maintain the autonomy of others

From Ethical Decision Challenge, Center for Applied

Research, 1998

Download