Budget Chapter 10 in Guthrie Dr. Len Elovitz Objectives TLWDTAT: Articulate a standard budget cycle Evaluate the merits of various budget models Discuss the impact of the political process on the budget process What’s a Budget A plan for acquiring and spending financial resources Revenue Balance & Expenditures “… the translation of educational needs into a financial plan which is interpreted to the public in such a way that when formally adopted it expresses the kind of educational program the community is willing to support, financially and morally, for a one year period.” William H. Roe Line Item Budget Groups appropriations under major headings Utilizes a cart of accounts Most school districts utilize Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) NJ accounting history Fund Accounting POB GAAP What does a budget look like Bloomfield Budget 2012-13 See other district budgets at http://www.state.nj.us/education/finance/fp/ufb/2012/01.ht ml Program Budget BUDGET CODES Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GAA vitz GAAP BUDGET CODES FUND PROGRAM/PROJECT XX XXX 11 190 CURRENT EXPENSE REGULAR BUDGET CODES FUNCTION OBJECT XXX XXX 100 610 INSTRUCTION SUPPLIES BUDGET CODES Location Program Area XX XX 41 28 MIDDLE SCHOOL SOCIAL STUDIES BUDGET CODES MIDDLE SCHOOL SOCIAL STUDIES SUPPLIES 11.190.100.610.41.28 Fund.Program.Function.Object.Location.Program Area Uniform Chart of Accounts Budgeting Basic Concepts: Assumptions, Power, and Methods Budgeting aligns resources with purposes Forges a link between planning and evaluation Shows more than how monies will be spent Involves political activity of give and take Peabody College Series. Copyright © Basic Budget Concepts An instrument of control The budget translates into who has the power and control It reflects the organization’s objectives and goals Peabody College Series. Copyright © The Budget Cycle Planning for the needs of the district Seeking Adequate Funding Receiving and spending funds Evaluating the process and results Planning The translation of educational needs into a financial plan A management function that involves systemic determination of future resource allocation Organizational Perspectives on planning, budgeting, and evaluation There are three contrasting perspectives on the budgetary process Rational: assumes stakeholders work in a logical fashion to improve student outcomes Bureaucratic: standard patterns of behaviors based on the rules and regulations of a “top-down” hierarchy Political: budgeting is a power play among actors seeking organizational rewards Peabody College Series. Copyright © Budget Planning Approaches Rational Assumptions: development of an educational plan and budget that logically improves student outcomes Planners have an appropriate knowledge and authority to develop a plan centered on student outcomes as a primary criterion Planners operate with technical efficiency, which requires that those involved strive to produce a maximum level of outcomes with financial, organizational, and legal constraints Bureaucratic Assumptions: planning focuses on sustaining or increasing previous year’s spending base School or school district’s educational goals and objectives are secondary Planners support existing organizational processes - status quo is maintained from one year to the next Political Assumptions: budgeting is bargaining among self-interested individuals and groups The development of the education plan and budget is a political activity. Student outcomes are seldom considered. Conflict is seen as normal Power players develop goals Plans are subjective without formal measures 19 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon Budget Planning Process First step is planning how to plan Who will be involved What is the planning time frame Planning may be centralized or decentralized, depending on leadership style, involvement of the BOE, relationships with the community and/or organizational history. Budget and Power: Budget control is organizational control Centralized Top down Superintendent and key district personnel Schools given a specific amount and must account for spending All students treated the same in the budget Decentralized Site-based budgeting Participatory budgeting process Lump sum given to schools according to sitedeveloped plan Attends to individual student In actuality there exists a continuum from centralized to decentralized Peabody College Series. Copyright © Fundamental Budgeting Assumptions: annularity, comprehensiveness, balance Annularity Comprehensiveness Balance An agreed upon span of time over which resource allocation and financial administration can occur Process encompasses all revenues received by and monies spent by an organization regardless of source or purpose Assumes explicit organizational knowledge of resources and obligations with the two matching Remains constant Can keep track of a variety of funds and accounts in a variety of ways Can borrow resources to construct long-lasting capacity Usually set for a year, but not usually a calendar year Tracks the input and output of resources to know where all monies are used If what is spent exceeds what is received, the organization is out of control Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon Budgeting Methods Each method provides structure for budget estimates and budget documents Considerations for choosing a method Individual needs of the school or the district Legal restrictions Size of the district District financal condition School governance structure Peabody College Series. Copyright © Incremental Budgeting Each budget line receives same increase or decrease Gives little attention to how budget fits education plan Incremental Budgeting at 4% KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE) Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 111,592 4,292 Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 30,160 1,160 Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188 Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160 Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 77,404 2,977 Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,408 900 Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549 $250,756.07 255,661 265,887 10,226 FUND 11 Sub-Total Fund 11 FUND 12 Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 19,148 736 Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 7,617 293 $20,330.50 25,736 26,765 1,029 $271,086.57 281,397 292,653 11,256 Sub-Total Fund 12 TOTAL Line-Item Budgeting Line-item is the basis for expenditure Uses workload and inflationary increases with last year’s numbers Line Item Budgeting at 4% + 2% for Increased Enrollment KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE) Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 108,373 1,073 Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 29,000 0 Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188 Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160 Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 78,893 4,466 Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,858 1,350 Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549 $250,756.07 255,661 263,447 7,786 FUND 11 Sub-Total Fund 11 FUND 12 Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 19,148 736 Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 7,617 293 $20,330.50 25,736 26,765 1,029 0 0 Sub-Total Fund 12 0 0 TOTAL $271,086.57 281,397 290,213 8,816 Formula Funding Major functions budgeted centrally Budget formula used for schools includes enrollment Principal is not the decision maker Formula Budgeting at 4% + 2% for Increased Enrollment - 10% for Equipment KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE) Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 108,373 1,073 Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 29,000 0 Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188 Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160 Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 78,893 4,466 Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,858 1,350 Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549 $250,756.07 255,661 263,447 7,786 FUND 11 Sub-Total Fund 11 FUND 12 Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 16,571 (1,841) Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 6,592 (732) $20,330.50 25,736 23,162 (2,574) 0 0 Sub-Total Fund 12 0 0 TOTAL $271,086.57 281,397 286,610 5,213 Programming, Planning & Budgeting Systems Builds a budget to execute the educational plan Budget reflects estimated costs of meeting objectives Alternatives investigated Last year’s numbers are only a guide Proposed Budget Zero-based Budgeting Builds a budget with little regard to the previous year No guarantees that an item continues from one year to the next Forces careful consideration of priorities and goals ZBB Steps Define decision units – school, dept., etc. Develop decision packages to include: Goals to be achieved Alternative means of meeting the goal Levels of effort needed to reach each alternative Cost & benefits of each alternative The technical & operational feasibility of each alternative The consequences of not funding each alternative Rank decision packets Approve and fund decision packets School Based Budgeting Decentralized process that involves various school personnel and the local community School makes choices on most things except capital projects Principal is given varying degrees of power over budget allocations The most important aspect is power over staffing Total Student Load and NYC Budgeting Methods Incremental Budgeting Line-Item Budgeting Formula Funding Programming, Planning & Budgeting Systems Zero-based Budgeting School Based Budgeting Most common approach previous year builds budget Commonly used with more specificity than incremental Used by large districts Perceived as fair and efficient Builds a budget to execute the educational plan Builds a budget with little regard to the previous year Decentralized process that involves various school personnel and the local community Each budget line receives same increase or decrease Line-item proper basis for expenditure Major functions budgeted centrally Resource allocation is more complex No guarantees that an item continues from one year to the next More consistent with current research on productivity Gives little attention to how budget fits ed. plan Uses workload and inflationary increases with last year’s numbers Budget formula used for schools includes enrollment Budget reflects estimated costs of objectives, alternatives investigated Forces careful consideration of priorities and goals School makes choices on most things except capital projects Method is time consuming and expensive Increased popularity with new accountability Used by large Principal is not systems with the decision capacity to use this maker in this method model Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon Focus on inputs Little attention to how budget fits ed plan Schroeder-Elovitz Method of Budgetingschools 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Determine approximate increase percentage that might fly Complete enrollment projections for each building and each course at HS & MS Develop Building budget base for each building by increasing this year’s base per student by the projected number of students Provide principals with their base amounts and projected enrollments Provide principals with program budget sheets Principals submit completed budget requests and decision packets for expenditures beyond the base 7. 8. 9. 10. Principals and other purchase center heads meet with supt, sba, asst. sups. To defend their budget requests (may bring dept heads) Items inside the BBB are reviewed and approved Decision packets are presented and approved or rejected Approved appropriations are folded into the district proposed budget Pesonnel 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Cost of guides are determined by moving each staff member up a step on the appropriate guide. If in negotiations, reasonable expected settlement is included Known retirees are deducted and replaced with step 3 on the guide Additions and RIF’s that are are determined at individual defenses are factored in SBA determines benefit costs Appropriations are folded into the budget Salaries Guides Increments Retirees Level Changes Don’t forget benefits Physical Plant Needs Principals and facilities director submit project requests to SBA SBA and facilities director tour the buildings with principals SBA and facilities director prioritize list SBA and facilities director present list and other building operation requests at budget defense Appropriations are folded into the budget Other CO administrators and supervisor present and defend program sheets 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Transportation Curriculum & Instruction Technology Special Education Approved appropriations are folded into the budget Preliminary budget 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Developed from totaling the program sheets into appropriate lines Presented to the Board per their request Modifications are made per Board direction Proposed budget presented at public hearing Board may modify again and approves for presentation to NJDOE. Election Budget Calendar July – Fiscal year begins – October closeout previous year Begin to administer current budget Enrollment projections Staff needs projection Facility needs projections November Current budget revision Central office input on needs and changes Maintenance & operations requests Budget Calendar January February Compile budget draft Prioritize and adjust to reach desired level March Principal and Purchase center requests Present Budget to the BOE Revise as necessary April Get state approval Budget hearing - Adoption Local approval or Appeal Budget Calendar May – Establish tax rate July – Start again Superintendents Role Evaluate economic climate - talk to the board Estimate other revenues Come up with an idea of what might fly in terms of percentage Translate into building budget base Consider enrollment projections Provide principals and other purchase center heads with their base and budget planning forms Personnel Principal defense Compile budget Make adjustments Present to Board Get Board approval “sell” the budget Election/Board of School Estimate Pass/Fail Selling the Budget Linden 2011-12 budget presentation Cutting the Budget Determine the amount to be cut Develop Decision Packets Prioritize Prepare list of cuts Budget Reduction Methods similar to Budget development Incremental – all lines reduced by same percentage Line Item – lines are reduced by determined amounts that add up to reduction Formula – budget reductions based on formula usually driven by enrollment PPBS – Objectives and their funding are delayed or eliminated ZBB – Decision packets are prioritized into proposed cuts SBB – Principal is given the amount and he/she determines what will be cut Line Budget Reduction Summary Although often considered as a concrete activity, budgeting is an area of school finance that is heavily influenced by the values and philosophies with which one approaches the endeavor. Peabody College Series. Copyright ©