1
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
Yesil
Is privacy
“I don’t feel that
being
[surveillance] is done
compromised with malice [to spy
with the use
on people]. I mean
of cameras
isn’t it great that
circulating
somebody is keeping
everywhere? an eye out to make
sure nothing goes
awry?” (103)
Yesil, had notes from
various people to
add to his book to
have their personal
input. This quote is
from a woman
named Jane who
briefly mentions that
she doesn’t see a
problem with
surveillance because
its put in place for
the good of the
people.
ACLU
“Powerful
surveillance tools
also create
temptations to
abuse them for
personal purposes.
An investigation by
the Detroit Free
Press for example,
showed that a
database available
to Michigan law
enforcement was
used by officers to
help their friends
or themselves stalk
women, threaten
motorists after
traffic altercations,
and track
estranged spouses.”
The people that
were watching the
videos were
“…Privacy and public abusing their right
interest are in
by interfering into
perpetual
people’s personal
competition, and that lives, which
Nieto
“Although no court
has directly
addressed this issue,
under current
interpretations of
the First and Fourth
Amendment and
California tort law,
video surveillance
appears to
represent a valid
use of the state's
power to protect its
citizens. In this
view, continuous
video surveillance is
analogous to a
mechanical police
officer. It does not
intrude upon an
individual's sphere
of privacy, but
rather records
events occurring in
public space for
which individuals
do not have
reasonable
expectations of
McCullagh
“Police are allowed
in some
circumstances to
install hidden
surveillance
cameras on private
property without
obtaining a search
warrant, a federal
judge said
yesterday.”
Bilton
“On one side of this
issue we have people
declaring that too
much surveillance,
especially in the form
of wearable cameras
and computers,
is detrimental and
leaves people without
any privacy.”
Increased surveillance
Privacy is
is leading to little or
compromised
no privacy at all.
significantly
because the cameras
are placed without
the person knowing
and apparently
that’s okay.
"Placing a video
camera in a location
that allows law
enforcement to
record activities
outside of a home
and beyond
protected curtilage
2
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
privacy is typically
portrayed as an
individual value that
can be relinquished
for the sake of
collective concerns
and the greater
good.” (103)
included stalking
women.
“When citizens are
being watched by
the authorities - or
aware they might
be watched at any
time - they are
Simply put, privacy is more selfseen as an individual conscious and less
preference that
free-wheeling.”
people just feel like
sit’s important to
People are less
have but does not
likely to act like
necessarily do any
their normal selves
good to the general
if they notice that
population.
people are
watching their
“If you are not doing every move
anything wrong, then because they may
who cares who’s
feel uncomfortable.
watching you? You
don’t think about it
after a while. You
don’t even know that
they’re there. You
just go about your
business.” (105)
privacy.”
does not violate the
Fourth
According to the
Amendment,"
amendments listed
Justice Department
below and California prosecutors James
law, video
Santelle and William
surveillance is not
Lipscomb told
invading anyone’s
Callahan.”
personal privacy. It
simply just a
“Advances in
recording of public
technology are
activity.
causing the legal
system to rethink
how Americans'
privacy rights are
protected by law.”
As technology is
advancing
tremendously,
privacy of
individuals in
society is being
compromised.
3
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
Some people are
overly concerned
with the privacy
fiasco. Police officers
argue that if you
don’t have anything
to hide why should
you be concerned if
anyone is watching
you. You are only
concerned about
who is watching you
if you are guilty of
something.
Is video
“… surveillance
“Video surveillance
“Several courts have
“Two defendants in
“On the other side
4
surveillance
effective in
society?
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
system in question is
not used to target a
specific person, but
rather to monitor the
given public space
and all the persons
within it.” (106)
Surveillance cameras
are not used to target
specific people or
discriminate against
certain individuals,
rather it is used to
protect and watch
public places and the
occupants at the time
being.
“Video surveillance
programs have also
been undertaken by
urban planners,
commercial interests
and public/private
partnerships seeking
to render public
places more secure
and thus more
profitable.” (33)
has not been
proven effective…
suicide attackers
are clearly not
deterred by video
cameras.”
There is an
argument that
video cameras are
used for protection
but it has not
shown that is
actually helpful in
preventing crime
because people are
still killing people.
“The implicit
justification for the
recent push to
increase video
surveillance is the
threat of terrorist
attacks.”
The main reason
why there is a
sudden push for
video surveillance
recognized video
surveillance as one
of the most mentally
disconcerting forms
of monitoring
performed by
government. For
example, the U.S.
Fifth Circuit Court
noted that "this type
of surveillance
provokes an
immediate negative
visceral reaction:
indiscriminate video
surveillance raises
the specter of the
Owellian State.”
It is not effective to
have video
surveillance
watching people
because it provokes
the people that are
being watched. It is
considered the
worst type of
monitoring.
the case, Manuel
Mendoza and Marco
Magana of Green
Bay, Wis., have been
charged with federal
drug crimes after
DEA agent Steven
Curran claimed to
have discovered
more than 1,000
marijuana plants
grown on the
property, and face
possible life
imprisonment and
fines of up to $10
million.”
It helped solved this
crime where two
brothers were
illegally growing
weed and are facing
charges of life in jail.
there are people who
argue that a society
with cameras
everywhere will make
the world safer and
hold criminals more
accountable for their
actions.”
If there are cameras
posted everywhere
the world will be a
better place because
there will be eyes
everywhere. People
who commit crimes
will not be able to get
away with it, which
will lead to fewer
crimes.
“Do we want to live in
a surveillance society
that might ensure
justice for all, yet
privacy for none?”
The question views
both sides and how
surveillance would be
5
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
Partnerships and
corporations are able
to make money from
homeowners if
people realize that
the place is secured
and they have people
watching/protecting
their surroundings.
is because of
terrorist attacks.
“There are at least
13 American cities
in which law
“put more thought
enforcement
into how they
officials are
dress, lest they look operating or
like terrorists, gang implementing CCTV
members, druggies video surveillance
or hookers.”
as a way to prevent
crime and promote
If people are being public safety. In
watched they may
some cities, the
want to look, act,
videos are passively
dress a certain way recorded and played
so they will not
back at certain
draw attention to
intervals, while
themselves and be other cities actively
accused of arousing monitor the
suspicion.
surveillance
images.”
The cameras in big
cities are used to aid
in crime prevention.
effective in society.
Because more
cameras will mean
justice for everyone
even though that will
also mean there is not
as much privacy.
“In the case of Mr.
Martin, an unarmed
black teenager who
was fatally shot
by George
Zimmerman, a
neighborhood watch
volunteer, the most
crucial evidence about
how an altercation
between the two
began — one that
ultimately led to Mr.
Martin’s death —
came down to Mr.
Zimmerman’s word.”
People boost about
cameras making the
world a better place
but when a camera
watch volunteer was
6
Pros of using
video
surveillance?
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
“Police departments N/A
around the nation, in
small towns and
large cities alike have
been using
surveillance cameras
to deter crime in
public spaces, most
prominently in
streets, parks, public
transportation areas
and housing
projects.” (33)
Video surveillance is
“If a continuous
video surveillance
device can intercept
sound, and the
surveillance
constitutes a search,
the police must first
obtain a warrant
prior to the
installation of the
device.”
Video surveillance
can not placed
without the
N/A
needed to help in
Trayvon Martin’s case
it all came down to
what the shooter said.
There was no help
with the video
surveillance that
should’ve helped the
case because
everything is on video
right? Then what
exactly is the point of
video surveillance if it
is not serving its
purpose.
“But if one of those
witnesses —
including Mr. Martin
or Mr. Zimmerman —
had been wearing
Google Glass or
another type of
personal recording
device, the facts of
that night might have
been much clearer.”
Personal video
surveillance will
better get a glimpse of
7
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
highly appreciated
by police
departments because
it helps them solve
cases and helps
toward crime
prevention if they
already know what’s
going on in the
streets.
knowledge of the
person if it contains
sound. Although the
video can be placed
up without the
consent of the
person it may not
have sound to it. So
what is being said is
at least private.
“In major cities such
as Boston, Chicago,
Washington D.C., and
New York City,
cameras are
primarily used to
prevent terrorist
attacks.” (33)
“Advocates of CCTV
video surveillance
emphasize the
technology's value
in quickly
apprehending
criminals.”
After 9/11 the
government has
been over protective
about suspicious
activity. In big cities
like the ones
mentioned it helps
prevent terrorist
from making attacks
that could affect the
Video surveillance
helps catch
criminals faster
compared to areas
that don’t have
cameras.
“CCTV video
surveillance as a
principal security
measure to reduce
situations that require
more detail and help
solve crime and also
figure out the truth.
“President Obama has
defended the
government’s spying
programs, saying
they help in the fight
against terrorists and
ensure that
Americans stay safe.”
The governments
video surveillance
“Prism” actually
protects the American
people and help keep
terrorists away
8
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
nation.
Cons of using
Video
surveillance?
“The second factor
that shapes
constructions of
privacy has to do
with the association
of privacy with
secrecy to hide some
sort of misconduct or
transgression.” (104)
“The real reason
cameras are
usually deployed is
to reduce much
pettier crimes. But
it has not even
been demonstrated
that they can do
that.”
The primary reason
why some people
feel like cameras is
taking away from
their privacy is
because they are
hiding something
they should not be
doing to begin with.
Video surveillance
is not doing the job
that it’s supposed
to do which is
fighting crime, etc.
It is used to fight
baby crimes, which
is not helping
anyone.
“…Video surveillance
in schools and public
places … has a
gender and race
bias.” (110)
“In addition, U.S.
government
experts on security
technology, noting
that monitoring
video screens is
campus violence
and prevent crimes
such as theft and
graffiti.”
“On many occasions,
police officials were
unable to use
remote video
cameras images to
prosecute criminals
because quick
movements by the
criminals resulted in
blurred pictures.”
“Yesterday
Griesbach adopted a
recommendation by
U.S. Magistrate
Judge William
Callahan dated
October 9. That
recommendation
said that the DEA's
warrantless
surveillance did not
In some occasions
violate the Fourth
video cameras do
Amendment, which
not really help
prohibits
because when the
unreasonable
video is looked at
searches and
the images are
requires that
blurry which defeats warrants describe
the purpose of the
the place that's
video surveillance.
being searched”
“
Cameras planted in
secrecy do not go
against the 4th
amendment, which
basically means that
“Data collection and
video surveillance are
only going to continue
to grow as technology
seeps into more areas
of our culture, either
strapped to our
bodies as wearable
computers or
hovering over cities as
inexpensive drones
that monitor people
from the sky.”
“In the hands of
an individual, the
video camera can be a
very empowering
thing, When it’s
employed by the
government to watch
over the citizens, it
has the opposite
effect.”
9
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]
Some individuals
believe that video
surveillance is a
negative because
they are bias and
lead to race issues.
both boring and
mesmerizing have
found in
experiments that
after only 20
minutes of
watching and
evaluating monitor
screens, the
attention of most
individuals has
degenerated to well
below acceptable
levels."
The people who are
forced to watch
these videos that
are suppose to help
society are not
even watching the
videos. There is so
much that goes on
but if they are
getting bored after
20 minutes of
watching then what
is the point of the
videos? Nobody is
watching them.
you need a search
warrant before
searching a specific
place.
“Justice
Department's
argument would
allow police to
install cameras on
private property
without court
oversight -- subject
only to budgetary
limits and political
pressure.”
10
[DOES VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROTECT US OR INVADE OUR PRIVACY?]