The Evolution of Art Art as a Human Universal Is human art an adaptation? Ubiquitous across cultures “Pleasurable” for both creator and viewer Great deal of effort involved The capacity to create art poses an evolutionary problem If it is costly to produce, how did it evolve and what function does it serve? Zahavian Handicaps In 1975, Amotz Zahavi published a fascinating theory Noting the excesses of many traits, he argued that, if the cost of signaling is greater than other means of conveying information, it is a credible signal The costs are thought of as “handicaps,” like in many sports This theory has been treated similarly in the literature to Hamilton’s theory of kin selection Costly Signaling Theory Signals between organisms should generally be costly Typically, only costly signals are reliable (and hence, trustworthy) Signals are also closely related to their messages Ex.: courage in the face of danger does not give any credible information regarding wealth, while spending money does “The hand of the chimpanzee is quasi-human, the hand of Jackson Pollock is almost animal” - Dali Non-Human Analogies The peacock’s tail Chimpanzee art Bowerbird bowers as extended phenotypes Theories of Art “Functional” theories Group cohesion Abstract perspectives/multiple worldviews Enabling a sense of harmony Evolutionary theories By-product of other adaptations (e.g., visual system) Sexual choice via handicap principle Artistic Ability as a Costly Signal Miller (2000) has proposed that the capacity to create art is a Zahavian handicap, in that it is costly and difficult to produce well Prior to industrialization, quality was often measured in the accuracy of the detail Since then, defects indicate quality! “From the moment that art ceases to be food that feeds the best minds, the artist can use his talents to perform all the tricks of the intellectual charlatan.” – Picasso Music & Honest Signaling Sluming & Manning (2000) 2D:4D in male musicians (British symphony orchestra) Lower than in controls Associated with rank Audience had a disproportionate number of women in front seats A Note on Sexual Functions A considerable amount of “traditional” art entails sexual content Details of sexual organs Exaggerated sexual characteristics It has often been proposed that artists were sublimating their sexual urges A distinction must be made between the sexual content and sexual function of art The Wrap-Up Art as a human universal Zahavian handicaps and costly signaling theory Art and aesthetics in non-human animals Functional and evolutionary theories of art Artistic ability as a costly signal Sexual functions vs. content Things to Come Course conclusion Course review Exam review