1
“It is the purpose of Keota Community
Schools to best prepare our young people
so that they may achieve the highest
quality of life that they possibly can.
It is our goal to continue to improve our
resources and methods to
best produce students
who are responsible,
clear thinking problem solvers.”
2
3
Vision, Mission and Goals
Strengths
Goals articulated & aligned w/CSIP
Active SIAC
Recommendations
Protocol for examining data
Mission statement visible
Be proactive re: educational change
4
Leadership
Strengths
Well distributed
Service to students w/disabilities
Collaboration
Communication
Leadership transition
Recommendations
Guidance for advisory committees
Continued work toward cohesive learning
environment
5
Collaborative Relationships
Strengths
Collaborations w/businesses/service groups
Teacher collaboration
AEA collaboration
Recommendations
Build in teacher collaboration time
6
Learning Environment
Strengths
Positive environment/”family atmosphere”
Efforts to update technology
Variety & involvement in extra-curriculars
Safe environment
Events to promote success
Recommendations
Full implementation of Olweus program
7
Curriculum & Instruction
Strengths
Cross-curricular/21st Century connections
Career and technical programs
High educational standards (Rigor)
Use of data in monitoring student progress
Well aligned curriculum (Curriculum Mapping)
Consultation between special and general education
teachers
Recommendations
Creative ways of providing foreign language
Avoid ability grouping at the secondary level
8
Professional Development
Strengths
District supportive
Professional Learning Committee
Recommendations
Adequate tech training
Support staff initiatives
Analyze impact on student achievement
9
Monitoring & Accountability
Strengths
Above the state average in 18/27 areas
No areas of special ed non-compliance
Highly Qualified Teachers component
Recommendations
Consistent evaluation plans non-teaching
Common program evaluation structure
10
Non-compliance…
 Physicals in staff files
 Original transcripts
 Health instruction
 Evidence of homeless education posting
Corrective Action Plan Submitted May 14, 2010
11
12
National Percentile Rank
4th Grade ITBS
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
91 92
65
67
91
88 90
86
71
97
96
88
68
53
43
Reading
Language
Math
Comp
Social
Science
Studies
2nd Grade
3rd Grade
4th Grade
13
National Percentile Rank
8th Grade ITBS
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
97 99
98 95
77 77
80
92
79
68
72
77
87
75
55
Reading
Language
Math
Comp
Social
Science
Studies
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
14
National Percentile Rank
11th Grade ITED
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
79 77
88
Reading
95
87
72
87
95
77
Language
Math
Comp
86
80
89
Social
98
94 93
Science
Studies
9th Grade
10th Grade
11th Grade
15
4th Grade
ITBS Proficiency
2009-2010
100%
Percent
Proficient
20
80%
32
88
84
37
92.5
60%
40%
68
52
55.5
20%
0%
12
Reading
Low
PROFICIENCY
16
7.5
Science
Math
Medium
(Medium + High)
High
16
8th Grade
ITBS Proficiency
2009-2010
100%
5.9
Percent
Proficient
23.5
80%
60%
82.3
47.1
94.1
88.2
76.4
64.7
40%
47
20%
17.6
0%
Reading
Low
PROFICIENCY
5.9
11.8
Math
Science
Medium
(Medium + High)
High
17
Percent Proficient
11th Grade
ITED Proficiency
2009-2010
100%
90%
80%
19.5
94.4
91.7
70%
60%
50%
72.2
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
8.4
Reading
Low
PROFICIENCY
27.8
30.5
89.7
63.9
61.2
5.6
Math
11.1
Medium
Science
High
(Medium + High)
18
Percent Proficient
4th Grade Proficiency
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92.5
88
86.9
78.2
84
78.2
75
66.7
37.5
Reading
2nd Grade
Math
3rd Grade
PROFICIENCY= 41% and Higher
Science
4th Grade
19
Percent Proficient
8th Grade Proficiency
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
88.9
94.4
94.1
88.9
88.8 88.2
77.9 82.3
66.7
Reading
6th Grade
Math
7th Grade
PROFICIENCY= 41% and Higher
Science
8th Grade
20
Percent Proficient
11th Grade Proficiency
3-Year Growth Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
89.2
83.8
94.6
91.7
91.9
83.8
Reading
9th Grade
94.4
Math
10th Grade
PROFICIENCY= 41% and Higher
89
Science
11th Grade
21
ACT Composite Scores
5 Year Trend
Composite Standard Scores
23.5
23
23.2
23
22.5
22.5
22.4
22
22.4
22.3
22.4
22.1
21.5
22
21.4
21
20.5
21.2
20.9
21.1
21.1
21
20
19.5
2005 (N=14) 2006 (N=24) 2007 (N=21) 2008 (N=18) 2009 (N=21)
State
National
Keota
22
Percent of ACT Students
Ready for College-Level Coursework
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
81 79
71
64
67
52 50
48
37
29
College
English
Composition
College
Algebra
College Social
Science
College
Biology
Meeting All 4
Keota
State 23
As of 5-6-10:
30 Keota students have taken ACT
10 seniors
19 juniors
1 sophomore
Results published mid July
24
#
Enrolled
Face-to
Face
Internet
Regional
Lab
Anatomy*
7



Calculus*
5

Chemistry*
28



Physics*
8



Spanish I
17

Spanish II
16

Spanish III
7

Spanish IV
4

Course
*Iowa Learning Online
25
Course
Begin
End
Health Occupations
9
8
Information Technology
4
2
Machining
0
0
Welding
4
4
Grades 11 &12
DUAL CREDIT
26
Course
Intro to Engineering
Begin
End
6
5
Grades 9-12
DUAL CREDIT
Course
Intro to Psychology
Microeconomics
# Students
6
4
27
Activity
Eagle’s Wing
Yearbook
Math Clubs
Model U.N.
Science Fair
FACS
FFA
Junior High High School
GPA
NA
6.5%
3.14
NA
17.3%
NA
13%
19%
15.7%
2.88
3.57
3.36
7%
74.4%
NA
12.8%
12.9%
34.3%
3.67
3.34
3.37
28
MATH CLUB
2nd Place-American Scholastic
Mathematics Association (ASMA)
National Contest
Highest accumulative score (ASMA)--Trevor Draisey
Model UN
Represented Keota High School @ UNI
29
SCIENCE FAIR
Regional: 2 Individual Division II Awards
State: Keota=Overall Division I Award
Shawna Sieren
Women in Science & Engineering Award
Heating & Cooling Award
Navy Award
4-H Award
Spenser Becker
Honorable Mention
$500 scholarship to ISU
Animal Science Category for FFA
Advanced to Nat’l Competition (Oct. ’10)30
FFA
CONTESTS
Tri-County:
--Soil Judging
Sub-District:
--Job Interview
--Extemporaneous Speaking
--Parliamentary Procedure
--Welding
District:
--Livestock Judging
--Soil Judging
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st (Gold award)
31
FFA
CONTESTS
State
--Ag Mechanics
--Farm Business Management
--Livestock Judging
--Nursery/Landscaping
1st
2nd (Gold award)
2nd
6th
National
--Ag Mechanics
5th
32
Activity
Junior High
High School
HS GPA
National Honor Society
NA
9.2%
3.8
Silver Cord (Seniors)
NA
20%
3.62
Student Council
NA
21.3%
3.6
Class Officers
18.6%
16.7%
3.59
KCSTAAR
NA
4.6%
3.79
33
Student Council
Blood Drive=$250 grant for TechQuest
Penny Drive=$350 for Haiti victims
Adopt-a-Highway
FFA
Corn Drive=$12,000 raised for TechQuest
$1,740 raised for Eagle Trail
34
Activity
Junior High
High School
Instrumental Music
67%
21%
Jazz Band
NA
56.5%
Marching Band
HS GPA
3.55
98%
Pep Band
NA
95.6%
Vocal Music
95%
37.9%
3.28
EagleRock
NA
82.9%
3.50
Drama
NA
26.8%
3.26
Speech
NA
39.8%
9th=
10th-12th=
3.37
35
3.63
Speech
5 State Division I ratings
2 All-State nominations
EagleRock!
Waukee Invitational
West Liberty Invitational
Central Lee Invitational
CR Jefferson
CR Washington
IHSMA Contest
1st Place
1st Place/People’s Choice
1st Place/People’s Choice
2nd Place
1st Place
Division II Rating
36
Activity
Junior High High School
HS GPA
Baseball
NA
37.7%
3.42
Basketball
65.1%
37%
3.47
Boys B-ball
28.6%
43.4%
3.38
Girls B-ball
61.5%
32.7%
3.60
Cheerleading
NA
8.3%
3.37
Cross Country
NA
10.1%
3.32
Football
37.2%
11.1%
3.30
Golf
NA
12.4%
3.40
37
Activity
Junior High High School
HS GPA
Softball
NA
28.8%
3.54
Track
65.1%
39%
3.38
Boys Track
68.7%
35.8%
3.30
Girls Track
61.5%
42.3%
3.46
Volleyball
51.2%
29.6%
3.4
Wrestling
2.3%
3.7%
3.21
38
Basketball (Boys)
SICL Championship (Back-to-Back)
Cross Country (Boys)
SICL Championship
Track (Boys)
SICL 2nd Place Title
Wrestling
SICL Championship
2nd Place in State---Kalen Greiner
TV 9 Athlete of the Week---Kalen Greiner
39
# of
Activities
0-2
% of Student Body
22%
Grade Point
Average
2.80
3-5
42%
3.19
6-8
19%
3.42
9-11
13%
3.70
12-14
4%
3.93
40
2nd Semester 2009----1st Semester 2010
12th Grade
23%
11th Grade
69%
10th Grade
53%
9th Grade
77%
8th Grade
83%
7th Grade
64%
41
98% Attendance Quarters 1-3
24% of 7th-12th grade students
12th Grade
11th Grade
10th Grade
9th Grade
8th Grade
7th Grade
24%
40%
27%
34%
47%
36%
42
Top 5 Average G.P.A.= 3.82
Class Average G.P.A.= 3.22
Joanna Hodder, Valedictorian named Top
10 in SE region on Des Moines Register
All State Academic Team
40% of seniors on Honor Roll 5 0f 7
semesters
43
13%
27%
57%
3%
4 yr. state university
4 yr. private university
Community college
Work force
44
Date
Amount
Requested
May
$35,298
$35,298
April
$64,248
$56,217
WCRF
Community April
Tech Ed.
$23,429
Pending
KCCEF
Technology Oct.
$6,000
$0
WCRF
Technology Oct.
$55,108.78
Source
State of Iowa
Purpose
Preschool
AIM
Preschool
Empowerment
Amount
Granted
$55,108.78
45
Iowa Core Curriculum
Curriculum Mapping
Book Studies
How Full Is Your Bucket?
Never Work Harder Than Your Students
Olweus
ADD/Dr. John Hartson
Crisis Prevention & Intervention (CPI)
Positive Behavioral Intervention Supports
(PBIS)
46
47
Respondents
#
%
17
57%
Students (3rd-12th )
173
72%
Parents
24
Teachers
48
21st Century Skills: Employability
4.35
3.88
Teachers help students learn how to work w/one another
3.29
4.18
Teachers help students learn how to be open to new ideas.
3.83
3.54
4.12
3.88
Teachers provide students opportunities to be leaders.
3.75
4.12
Teachers provide students opportunities to be responsible
for their own learning.
3.9
3.38
4.71
Teachers expect students to do high quality work
Teacher
Student
Parent
4.31
3.88
0
0.5 1
1.5
2
2.5 3
3.5
4 4.5
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
49
5
21st Century Skills: Technology Literacy
3.35
Teachers provide opportunities for students to use
technology to improve learning.
3.82
4.26
3.06
Teachers provide opportunities for students to use
interactive technology.
3.51
3.1
3.12
Teachers provide students opportunities to use
technology resources to solve problems.
3.54
3.5
3.76
Teachers help students use technology appropriately.
4.11
3.74
Teachers help students successfully use different
technology tools.
Teacher
Student
Parent
2.71
3.74
3.45
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
50
21st Century Skills: Health Literacy
3.94
3.71
Teachers help students understand healthy life-style
choices.
3.67
4.53
Teachers help students w/the social skills necessary to
create healthy life-style goals.
3.7
3.75
4.76
Teachers help students w/the thinking skills necessary to
set healthy life-style goals.
Teachers help students understand how other influences
can control decisions about healthy life-style choices.
Teachers help students make responsible health choices
that impact others.
Teacher
Student
Parent
3.93
3.58
3.18
3.49
3.6
4.53
3.89
3.68
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
51
21st Century Skills: Financial Literacy
2.82
hers help students understand how spending too
much money can cause future problems.
3.5
2.65
1.82
chers help students understand credit card debt.
2.22
1.85
chers help students understand how important it
is to save/invest money.
eachers help students understand how to protect
their identity.
Teachers help students set financial goals.
2.71
2.74
2.21
2.41
3.47
3
1.76
2.09
2.67
hers help students understand how their choices
about money affect others.
Teacher
Student
Parent
2.47
2.7
2.82
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
52
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
Student Learning
4.24
Teachers clearly
communicate to students
what it is they are
supposed to learn.
3.73
3.38
4.24
Teachers give students
work that is meaningful
and relevant.
3.55
3.58
4.36
If a student is not
learning, teachers try
different approaches.
Teacher
Student
Parent
3.1
3.3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
4
4.5
5
53
Culture/Climate
4.65
Students feel safe at
school.
4.17
4.38
4.41
All students are provided
he same opportunities at
school.
3.85
4.04
4.65
Adults at school truly
are about a show respect
for the students.
3.66
4
4.59
Students are not allowed
to disrespect/bully one
another at school..
Teacher
Student
Parent
3.82
3.58
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Reponse Averages/5 Point Scale
4
4.5
5
54
CSIP Revision
Due September 15
Preschool Program Changes
2 new elementary teachers
Increased sharing of personnel w/M-P
55