How GCB works in space crystallisation Juan Ma. Garcia-Ruiz Laboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos The Granada Crystallisation Box consists of three elements: A reservoir to introduce the gel capillary A guide holding the capillaries A cover gel Experimental design Use of GCB in space Implementation on-ground Implementation in space [Protein] = C [Precipitant] = P [Adittives] = A 0 % [Protein] = 0 0.1 % 0.1 % [Precipitant] = nP 0 % [Adittives] = A 0 % [Protein] = 0 1 % In yellow % of agarose [Precipitant] = P [Adittives] = A Capillary diameter : from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm 1 % How GCB works in Space During the waiting time for launch, the precipitating agent diffuse across the gel layer t = -8 h How GCB works in Space Vibrations during the launch are buffered by the gel where the capillaries are punched. The capillaries are oriented perpendicular to g. The precipitating agent continue to diffuse across the gel. t=0h How GCB works in Space The penetration length of the capillaries can be calculated so that the protein starts to cristalise into the capillaries once in the ISS After eight minutes and a half, the vehicle is under free fall. t 48 h How GCB works in Space During the stage at the International Space Station, the proteins crystals form inside the capillaries. 2d < t < 40d How GCB works in Space The GCF returns to the Earth. t = 40 d Simulation Use of GCB in space Fluid Dynamic Computer Simulation Fixed parameters: Capillary diameter = 0.7 mm H gel layer = 2.7 cm Length of the box = 3.3cm H salt layer = 5.3 cm Width of the box = 0.4 cm H punctuation = 1 cm Protein diffusion coefficient = 1.16 x 10-6 cm2/s Salt diffusion coefficient = 2.338 x 10-19 cm2/s Ratio Ksp/Ks = 3 Variables: [Lisozyme]i = 100 – 50 – 30 mg/mL [NaCl]i = 20 – 10- 15 % Protein height in the capillary = 4 – 5 – 6 cm Front of Growth Use of GCB in space Results GCB Validation as a Flight Facility None of the GCBs suffered any damage All the capillaries remained in position None of the gels were broken No leakage occured that could affect the physicochemical conditions of the experiment When there were no crystals from space there were none in the on-ground experiment, either, and vice versa Use of the GCB in space The dimensions of the GCF (13 cm x 13 cm x 8 cm), its weight on ground (1 kilogram), and the number of capillary experiments it can accommodate (138) make the GCF be the cheapest, simple and efficient instrument for applied protein crystallisation in space. Some crystals grown during the GCF test in the Andromede mission = 0.2 mm Catalase = 1.0 mm Thaumatin = 1.0 mm Dehydroquinase = 0.5 mm CabLys3*lysozyme = 0.4 mm Concanavalin A = 0.3 mm HEW Lysozyme Results Use of GCB in space X-ray Diffraction Dehydroquinase I/s Catalase Dehydroquinase Space Best crystals by other Space Best crystals by other techniques: 3.5 3.4 Å Å techniques: 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1,6 1,8 Space 2 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 Ground 3 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 4 Resolution (A) structural Dataset (ground) Catalase I/s(I) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1,4 1,6 Ground 1,8 2 2,2 Space 2,4 2,6 2,8 3 3,2 Structural Dataset 3,4 3,6 3,8 4 Resolution (A) Ground Ground Beam LineLine Beam BW7B BW7B X13 X13 EMBL-Hamburg EMBL-Hamburg Wave length (Å) (Å) 0.8463 0.8463 Wave length 0.801 0.801 Distance to detector (mm) 270 270 Distance to detector (mm) 150 / 240 150 / 240 Oscillation angle 0.3 0.6 0.30.6 Oscillation angle DataData collection collection 100 100 K K 100 KK 100 Temperature Temperature Space group Space group P222 P222 P3121 P3121 Unit cell a 129.09 128.72 Unit cell b a=b 142.2 142.3 131.33 131.25 175.0 175.1 cc 161.62 160.72 ===90 == 90= 120 Mosaicity by XDS 0.140 Mosaicity by XDS 0.10.145 0.11 Resolution range – 1.610.00 15.0– 1.6 Resolution range (Å) (Å) 10.0015.0 – 1.71 – 1.71 Completeness 80.2 Completeness 71.588.2 59.5 Multiplicity Multiplicity 1.6 2.4 2.02.7 Rmerge 2.7 Rsym 3.7 2.23.1 15.6 12.717.7 20.3 I/(I) I/(I) 1.71 – 1.71 Outer resolution shellshell (Å) (Å)1.80 –1.8 – 1.6 1.801.8 – 1.6 Outer resolution Completeness 66.272.2 59.4 Completeness 66.9 Structural Structural purposes purposes (Ground) BW7B X13 0.8463 0.801 150270 / 240 0.3 0.6 100 K K 100 P222 P3121 128.96 142.26 131.35 175.03 160.84 0.11 15.0 10.00 –– 1.6 1.71 91.5 98.2 4.7 5.1 3.7 3.5 21.5 27.8 1.80 1.71 1.8 – 1.6 96.0 78.5 Results Use of GCB in space X-ray Diffraction Lys_high I/s(I) Lysozyme Best crystals by other Techniques: 0.97 Å 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0.9 0.95 Space 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 ground Resolution (A) Beam Line EMBL-Hamburg Wave length (Å) Distance to detector (mm) Oscillation angle Data collection Temperature Space group Unit cell a=b c == Mosaicity by XDS Resolution range (Å) Completeness Multiplicity Rsym I/(I) Outer resolution shell (Å) Completeness Rsym Space Ground BW7B BW7B 0.8463 130 1 / 1.4 0.8463 130 1 / 1.3 100 K 100 K P43212 P43212 78.73 36.95 90.00 0.09 1.40 – 0.95 68.3 2.7 5.4 19.2 1.00 – 0.94 76.9 19.2 78.72 36.97 90.00 0.09 1.40 – 0.95 66.6 2.3 6 20.2 1.00 – 0.94 70.1 20.2 Results Use of GCB in space X-ray Diffraction Thaumatin room T I/sigma(I) Thaumatin 100 K I/sigma(I) 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 1 1.2 Space+Gel 1.4 1.6 1.8 Space 2 2.2 Ground+Gel 2.4 2.8 1 Resolution (A) Thaumatin Beam Line EMBL-Hamburg Wave length (Å) Detector distance (mm) Oscillation angle Data collection Temperature Space group Unit cell 2.6 a=b c == Mosaicity by XDS Resolution range (Å) Completeness Multiplicity Rsym I/(I) Outer resolution shell (Å) Completeness 1.2 1.4 Space+Gel 1.6 1.8 2 Space 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Resolution (A) Space+Gel Space Ground+Gel Space+Gel Space BW7B BW7B BW7B BW7B BW7B 0.8463 200 0.5 Room temperature 0.8463 200 0.5 Room temperature 0.8463 200 0.5 Room temperature 0.8463 200 1 0.8463 200 1 100 K 100 K P41212 P41212 P41212 P41212 P41212 58.612 151.690 90 0.09 15 - 1 69-33 2.0 3.0 10.6 1.1 – 1.0 39.9 58.655 151.644 90 0.095 15 –1 64.1 2.1 3.4 9.3 1.1 – 1.0 34.7 57.651 151.637 90 0.095 15 – 1 68.6 2.0 2.6 12.3 1.1 – 1.0 39.6 57.683 149.902 90 0.1 10 –1 84.1 2.6 5.1 12.0 1.1 – 1.0 57.2 57.693 149.963 90 0.1 10 –1 84 2.4 3.2 17.5 1.1 – 1.0 58.9 Use of GCB in space Conclusions 1. The results validate the GCB for space experiments as a passive, inexpensive and high-density crystallisation facility for growing protein crystals. 2. From the point of view of resolution limit, there are no obvious differences between crystals grown under reduced convective flow in space and crystals grown under convection free conditions on ground. 3. The crystals grown with the counter-diffusion technique global indicators of X-ray quality. share excellent The counter-diffusion technique can be implemented in two ways: One is in space, where the absence of gravity avoids convection and allows the diffusive environment required for our technique. The other way to get the same diffusive environment on ground is the use of gels, but obviously, the gel may interfere with the chemicals used in crystallisation. We are in the evaluation phase of both possible implementations. A cooperation philosophy: LEC (Granada) team, with NTE and Mars Center, supply: The facility (GCF) to be used in space The reactors (GCB) to perform the experiments The gel to be used in the experiments The preparation of the experiments at the launch site The help for properly preparing counter-diffusion experiments The participanting laboratories contribute by: supplying the proteins Performing preliminary experiments to tune the crystallisation conditions Evaluation the crystal quality of on-ground- and space grown crystals The obtained crystals and diffraction data remain the property of the participating laboratories. Use of GCB in space Andromede mission 1. Alliinase (Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, Jena, Germany) 2. CabLys3*lysozyme (Institute of Mol. Biol. Biotechn., Brussels, Belgium) 3. Caf1M (Institute of Inmunological Engineering, Chekhov District, Russia) 4. Catalase (A.V. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography RAS, Moscow, Russia) 5. Concanavalin A (Laboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos (LEC), Granada, Spain) 6. Cytochrome C (Institute of Chemical and Biological Tecnology, Oeiras, Portugal) 7. Dehydroquinase (DHQ) (Tibotec-Virco, Mechelen, Belgium) 8. Endo VII (European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany) 9. Factor XIII (Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, Jena, Germany) 10. Ferritin (Laboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos (LEC), Granada, Spain) 11. Gamma-E-crystallin (European Molecular Biology Lab. (EMBL), Grenoble, France) 12. HEW Lysozyme (Laboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos (LEC), Granada, Spain) 13. Leghemoglobin (A.V. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography RAS, Moscow, Russia) 14. Low density Lipoprotein (LDL) (University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany) 15. Lumazine synthase (Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Garching, Munich, Germany) 16. Propeptide of Cathepsin S (Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, Jena, Germany) 17. RNAse II (Institute of Chemical and Biological Technology, Oeiras, Portugal) 18. Saicar-synthase (A.V. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography RAS, Moscow, Russia) 19. Sm-like protein (European Molecular Biology Lab. (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany) 20. S-COMT (Institute of Chemical and Biological Technology, Oeiras, Portugal) 21. Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu (Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, Jena, Germany) 22. Thaumatin (Laboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos (LEC), Granada, Spain) GCB PROTEIN LABORATORY GCB-01 GCB-02 Pike Parvalbumin Prof. J. P. Declercq, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BELGIUM Triosephosphate isomerase Prof. Martial, Universite de Liege, Liege, BELGIUM (Pro-Pro-Gly)10 Prof. A. Zagari, University of Naples, Napoli, ITALY Camel VHH antibody fragment Prof. L. Wyns, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BELGIUM GCB-03 GCB-04 GCB-05 GCB-06 GCB-07 GCB-08 GCB-09 GCB-10 GCB-11 GCB-12 GCB-13 -Amylase GCB-14 Lysozyme GCB-15 Bacterial antiinfectivity protein GCB-16 AF-Sm1complexed with RNA GCB-17 Endonuclease VII from Phage T4 GCB-18 Hfq from E. Coli GCB-19 Gamma-C GCB-20 Gamma-E GCB-21 Low Density Lipoprotein GCB-22 Trypsin GCB-23 Lysozyme Prof. H. Komatsu, NASDA, Ibaraki, JAPAN Allan D’Arcy, Morphochem, Schwarzwaldallee, SWITZERLAND Prof. D. Suck, EMBL, Heidelberg, GERMANY Prof. D. Myles, EMBL, Grenoble, FRANCE Prof. M. Baumstark, Medizinische Univ. Freiburg, Freiburg, GERMANY Prof. J.M. Garcia-Ruiz, LEC, CSIC-UGR, Granada, SPAIN