Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Oral Surgery Complications June 28, 2015 David Salehani, D.D.S., M.D. Private Practice, West Hollywood, CA UCLA Reagan Medical Center Faculty at UCLA School of Dental Medicine Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Proper treatment planning and sound surgical principles should lower the incidence of complications. Incidence of complications associated with the removal of third molars, the most common dentoalveolar surgical procedure, is 7 to 10.8 percent. 2, 3 Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Think ahead and have all proper instruments and medications available. Proper surgical suction Hemostatic agents (gelfoam, collaplug, etc.) Sutures Surgical blades Surgical handpiece Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery To avoid complications: Have all necessary radiographs for proper diagnosis. Always have an unobstructed view and access in the presence of adequate light, proper soft tissue reflection, and adequate suction. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: Rare A more common adverse sequela: hematoma PSA: rapid posterior buccal swelling Pterygoid venous plexus: slower development Treatment: Direct pressure to the area Cold packs for 24 hrs Then heat to facilitate reabsorption Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: (Cont’d) More serious situation: IA artery hematoma Can compromise the airway Tx is directed at maintaining an airway, followed by local or systemic interventions if required. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: Facial ecchymosis and discoloration: Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: (Cont’d) Inadvertent posterior injection into the parotid capsule: Facial nerve palsy: Reassure patient of the transient nature Gauze patch over the affected eye Facial Nerve Palsy: Facial Nerve Palsy: Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: (Cont’d) Fracture of the needle within the tissues No attempt to palpate the needle Radiographs to orient the location in three planes Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: (Cont’d) It is reported that the needles do not frequently migrate through soft tissues to vital structures. However, an attempt to retrieve the needle may be made to alleviate patient anxiety regarding subsequent injury Weigh the risks and benefits of surgical exploration Refer to a surgeon Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Local anesthetics complications: (Cont’d) Nerve trauma: Rare Most common: IAN (1 in 400,000 to 1 in 750,000 cases) Epineural hematoma Direct needle trauma Avoid excessive firm needle contact with the bone to prevent a needle barb. Toxicity of local anesthetic Reported that if spontaneous recovery has not been achieved within 21 days, the odds of its return are approximately 33%. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Neurologic complications: Sensory nerve damage Usually associated with third molar surgery Typically IAN Less frequently lingual nerve Rarely long buccal nerve 0.6% to 5% of third molar cases Spontaneous recovery in 96% of IAN cases Spontaneous recovery in 87% of lingual nerve cases Mostly in the first 6-8 weeks, remaining within 9 months Total recovery after 9 months is rare. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Neurologic complications: (Cont’d) Patient Age: Higher morbidity in patients older than 25 years Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Neurologic complications: (Cont’d) Pre-op radiologic exam: (Panorex) Cortical outline and location of the canal Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Paresthesia is one of the leading causes of liability against OMFS and has been among the top four in dollars awarded. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to the lingual nerve: 1% of lower third molar extractions Most difficult for patients to accept because of altered taste sensation and reduced chance of recovery. The lingual nerve may course over onto the retromolar pad. It can be traumatized by incisions, retractions, flap elevation, tooth and follicle removal, and suturing. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to the lingual nerve: Unlike with IAN damage, reducing the incidence of lingual nerve injury is related to surgical technique. If indicated , mandibular third molar suturing should be limited to the superficial tissues of the lingual flap to reduce trauma to the lingual nerve. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to the lingual nerve: (Cont’d) The return of sensation with the first 4 weeks: Neuropraxia, excellent px Symptoms of recovery manifesting at 1 to 3 months indicate a less certain px Failure to exhibit recovery sypmtoms for 12 or more weeks indicates neurotmesis, poor px for spontaneous recovery Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent teeth and structures: Iatrogenic luxation of adjacent tooth: Assess the mobility of the tooth Reposition the tooth Take out of traumatic occlusion Stabilize for 10-14 days Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent teeth and structures: The use of exuberant force when extracting teeth is unnecessary. Force must always be applied in a controlled manner, using surgical finesse. The most common damage: fracture of the crown or the existing restoration (mostly with elevators while luxating) Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent teeth and structures (Cont’d): During luxation with the elevator Consider carious teeth or large restorations of adjacent teeth pre-op as potential risks. Discuss with the patient as part of the informed consent form pre-op. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Inadvertent removal of the wrong tooth: Attention to detail (Time-Out) Atraumatic removal of a wrong tooth: (if immediately identified) Reimplant and stabilize All other extractions should be delayed 4 to 6 weeks to allow assessment and prognosis of the reimplanted tooth Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to the opposing dentition: Result of excessive traction forces and sudden release of the tooth Can cause chipped or fractured tooth Minimize tractional forces, use proper elevation Inform the patient Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Pain and swelling: Associated with all surgical procedures Normal physiologic responses to surgical treatment However, this does not preclude the surgeon from taking all necessary actions to lessen their severity. Factors that may increase these complications: Excessive operating time Poor management of soft tissue Inappropriate use of irrigation Ignoring other basic surgical principles Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Swelling: Steroid therapy should have maximal anti-inflammatory effects and minimal glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid activity. Two steroids, dexamethasone and betamethasone are the most popular. Pre-op IV steroids and post-op oral steroids have the greatest effect in decreasing swelling. The use of ice, which is a routine recommendation, was not demonstrated to be a considerable factor in decreasing post-op swelling. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Pain: An inevitable sequela of dentoalveolar surgery Peak pain: early post-op period 3-5 hrs after surgery Study: 97% of patients suffered their highest level of pain on the day of surgery Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Pain (Cont’d): Associated with increased concentration of prostaglandins Prostaglandin antagonists such as NSAIDs would be the most effective means of pain management. Use longer-acting local anesthetics Proper surgical technique: Reflection of flaps Management of soft tissue Copious irrigation when using drills Use of controlled forces Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Temporomandibular joint injury: If mandible is placed in an open position for extended periods, certain degree of force will be transmitted to the TMJ. Use bite blocks, support the mandible. Most successfully managed by conservative measures (soft diet, moist heat, jaw rest, muscle relaxants, NSAIDs, and on rare occasions splint therapy. Further work-up: if symptoms persist beyond two weeks Discuss as part of the informed consent Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement of teeth into anatomical spaces: Can occur with excessive force Use: Adequate access and visualization Controlled force Removal of sufficient bone Placement of finger or instruments as distal stop Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement into infratemporal fossa: Distoangular maxillary third molar Excessive force, poor visualization, lack of distal stop First locate the tooth (lateral and PA cephs) Possible locations: 1) infratemporal fossa 2) maxillary sinus 3) in the mouth /aspirated/ throat pack Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement into infratemporal fossa: Attempt to recover Extend incision distally for better access and visualization Subperiosteal dissection to avoid the pterygoid venous plexus Visualize the tooth: place a curette behind the tooth to retrieve Unable to visualize the tooth: close incision, notify the patient, antibiotics for one week or longer Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement into infratemporal fossa: Attempt to recover (Cont’d) Complete exam on follow-up: check for infection and limitation of function At this point refer to specialist. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement into submandibular space: Less common More common in third molar region The most common factor: excessive apical force while attempting removal of mandibular molar roots. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement into submandibular space: In the event the root or tooth is lost from the visual field: Initial attempt: palpation of the lingual aspect of the mandible If identified, attempt to guide it back into the surgical field Attempt to locate fails: closure, antibiotics, refer to specialist. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Foreign Body Aspiration: Any dentoalveolar surgery or dental procedure is associated with the risk of foreign body aspiration. The risk is increased with the use of sedation or GA. The clinical presentation is usually, but not always, associated with coughing or gagging. In this case the patient should be allowed to attempt to expel the object. Premature intervention may hinder the patient and actually facilitate aspiration. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Foreign body aspiration: Use throat/pharyngeal drape Have suction available Instruct the patient not to swallow before you start Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Foreign Body Aspiration: (Cont’d) If true airway obstruction occurs, a BLS protocol should be in place, which may include the Heimlich maneuver, back blows, or abdominal thrusts. No acute respiratory distress: Refer patient for immediate chest and abdominal radiographs. If the foreign body is determined to have entered the GI tract, it is usually of little consequence, as it will generally pass with no ill effects. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Foreign Body Aspiration: (Cont’d) If displaced in trachea or bronchial tree Pt requires admission to the hospital for its retrieval Consult a physician to perform bronchoscopy Keep in a monitored setting after retrieval IV antibiotics to cover oral flora and prevent aspiration pneumonia Once patient is stabilized and follow up chest x-rays are negative , the pt may be discharged and followed on an outpatient basis. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Hemorrhage: Refer to PMH regarding bleeding d/o’s If bleeding persists post-op Reassure, instruct direct gauze pressure Persistent bleeding examine the patient Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Exam for persistent bleeding: Review PMH Patient's status Remove gauze gently, not to disturb the clot Active bleeding vs. oozing Oozing: Direct gauze pressure 30-45 min Oozing continues: local anesthesia (block preferably), remove clot?, place hemostatic agent, suture (figure-of-eight), direct pressure, observe Consider electrocautery on wound margins (conservative) If oozing continues, treat as active bleeding Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Active bleeding: Is it due to anticoagulants, bleeding d/o’s, liver disease, chronic antibiotics? First approach conservatively as above If active bleeding persists: REFER to specialist or ER (call PMD, ER, or specialist to report) Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Alveolar Osteitis (dry socket): Etx: Incidence following the routine extraction of erupted teeth: 1-3 % Impacted mandibular third molars: 1-65 % Oral contraceptives Smoking Difficulty of extraction Experience of the surgeon Bacterial contamination Poor OH, pericoronitis, gingivitis?? Exact pathophysiology remains unclear. Possibly due to breakdown of the normal clot Alveolar Osteitis Symptoms: Presents fourth to fifth day post-op Constant moderate to severe pain Foul taste and odor May be differentiated from a post-op infection: Absence of fever No localized edema No lymphadenopathy No erythema Alveolar Osteitis Treatment: Conservative Primary goal: relieve pain during the healing phase Curettage of the socket is not necessary. Gentle saline irrigation Dry-socket dressing Change dressing everyday or every other day until the pain subsides Alveolar Osteitis Numerous studies have examined measures to prevent alveolar osteitis: Preop PCN? Mixed results Interestingly metronidazole given prophylactically decreases the incidence of dry socket, indicating a possible role of anaerobic bacteria. Topical tetracycline placed in the extraction site by itself or with Gelfoam has been shown to decrease the incidence of dry socket. Alveolar Osteitis Resolves 3-5 days, sometimes 10-14 days post-op If symptoms persist longer, look for other causes of persistent pain: DDX: Osteomyelitis or post-op infection Fracture Drug dependence? Adjacent teeth? Alveolar Osteitis Persistent pain: Thinking osteomyelitis? Dry socket dressing doesn’t relieve pain Panorex: new radiolucency Clinically: purulent drainage, swelling, severe pain Tx: Refer to specialist Debridement to bleeding bone Long-term antibiotics (oral or IV) Osteomyelitis Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Soft tissue complications: Most commonly a result of failing to protect the soft tissue Most frequent: tearing of the mucosal flap Unintentional penetration of the soft tissues Soft tissue burns and abrasions Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent osseous tissues: Atraumatic exodontia requires the expansion of alveolar bone Inadvertent use of excessive force often results in fracture of the maxilla or mandible. The most common areas for traumatic bony fractures are the buccal cortical plate of the canines, premolars, and molars; the floor of the maxillary sinus, tuberosity, and the buccal cortical plate of mandibular incisors and canines. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent osseous tissues: Prevention: 1) 2) - Thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation Patient’s age and associated osseous elasticity High risk: - Consider a surgical extraction technique Provides more controlled bone removal, sectioning of roots, and direct visualization of the degree of alveolar expansion during luxation and elevation. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Injuries to adjacent osseous tissues: Use finger support on alveolar process Bone that is knowingly fractured and removed with the delivery of the tooth should not be replaced. Smooth out the sharp bony edges with bone file Reposition the soft tissue Mandible fracture: atrophic mandible, impacted third molar, significant odontogenic pathology, use of excessive force Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Maxillary sinus complication: Pre-op radiograph: Pneumatized maxillary sinus Chronic or acute periapical infection Periapical pathology Extruded endo fill Adjacent edentulous spaces Traumatic extraction Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Maxillary sinus complication: A small 1-4 mm sinus perforation is often covered by the post-op blood clot and usually heals without complications. Can use hemostatic agents Larger perforations, 5 mm or greater, requires more aggressive action. Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Maxillary sinus perforation: An attempt should be made to attain primary closure May need a buccal flap Post-op sinus precautions, antibiotics, nasal decongestant, and antihistamine No nose blowing for 3 weeks Sneeze or cough with mouth open (3 weeks) Closure of Fistulous Tract Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement of root tips into the maxillary sinus: Decision to leave the root tip: Take a radiograph to confirm Rule out displacement under the palatal or buccal soft tissue Root tip between 1-3 mm No infection/ pathology Decision to remove: Root tip> 2mm Demonstrates evidence of infection or pathology Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Displacement of root tips into the maxillary sinus: Attempts to retrieve: Conservative first (suction and proper lighting) Access through the socket Caldwell-Luc procedure Sinus Perforation: Pre-op consultation, informed consent Document in detail Explained risks pre-op Consent read and signed Size of perforation Any radiographs What was performed Post-op instructions Meds prescribed Follow-up appt Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery Complications in dentoalveolar surgery are to be expected. Timely dx and tx are important parts of comprehensive surgical management. Avoiding complications is best achieved by designing an appropriate treatment plan, using sound surgical techniques, and obtaining thorough written informed consent. Odontogenic Infections Objectives: Understand the microbiology of odontogenic infections Understand the signs, symptoms and findings in patients with odontogenic infections Review the various pathways of spread with odontogenic infections Understand the medical and surgical management of odontogenic infections Odontogenic Infections Source of the bacteria that cause most odontogenic infections: Mostly indigenous bacteria that normally live on or in the host. These bacteria gain access to deeper tissues and cause infection. Odontogenic Infections Which species of bacteria cause odontogenic infections? Almost all odontogenic infections are caused by multiple bacteria (an average of five species) Mostly gram-negative rods (fusobacteria, bacteroides) Some are gram-positive cocci (streptococci and peptostreptococci) 25% are aerobic, mostly gram-positive cocci About 60% are anaerobic bacteria Fusobactrium spp. is associated with severe infections. Odontogenic Infections What is Gram staining? Each specimen obtained from a patient with an infectious process initially should be stained. Staining Decolorizing Restaining with a different stain Then categorize the organisms into four groups based on their stain retention and morphology: G+ cocci G- cocci G+ rods G- rods Odontogenic Infections What is the clinical significance of gram stain? Because gram staining can be completed within a few minutes, it usually narrows the list of likely causative organisms immediately, whereas culture and sensitivity testing and biochemical identification may take 1-5 days to complete. Odontogenic Infections Progression of odontogenic infections; Early infection is often initiated by high-virulence aerobic organisms (commonly streptococci), which cause cellulitis. Followed by mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Abscess stage: anaerobic bacteria predominate Eventually exclusively anaerobic. Odontogenic Infections What is cellulitis? Warm, diffuse, erythematous, indurated, and painful swelling of the tissue in an infected area. Easy to treat, but can also be severe and life threatening. Antibiotics and removal of the cause are usually sufficient. Surgical incision and drainage are indicated if no improvement is seen in 2-3 days, or if evidence of purulent collection is identified. Odontogenic Infections What is an abscess? A pocket of tissue containing necrotic tissue, bacterial colonies, and dead white cells. May or may not be fluctuant. The patient is often febrile at this stage. Odontogenic Infections CELLULITIS ABSCESS Acute Chronic Pain Severe and generalized Localized Size Large Small Diffuse borders Well circumscribed Doughy to indurated Fluctuant No Yes Degree of seriousness Greater Less Bacteria Aerobic Anaerobic Duration Localization Palpation Presence of pus Odontogenic Infections Signs of infection: Swelling Erythema Heat Pain Fever Purulent drainage Odontogenic Infections Signs and symptoms of serious orofacial infections: Airway compromise Fever Fatigue Malaise Dehydration Trismus Dysphagia Odynophagia Drooling Pathways of Odontogenic Infection Submandibular Abscess Sublingual Abscess Buccal Space Abscess Lateral Pharyngeal Space Abscess Odontogenic Infections Factors that influence the spread of odontogenic infections: Thickness of bone adjacent to the offending tooth Position of muscle attachment in relation to root tip Virulence of the organism Status of patient’s immune system Pathways of Odontogenic Infection - Pulp necrosis results from deep decay in tooth, (inflammatory reaction) Usual cause of odontogenic infection: necrosis of tooth pulp and bacterial invasion through the pulp chamber into deeper tissues Further progression leads to medullary space infection More commonly, get fistulous tracts through alveolar bone Fistulous tract may penetrate oral mucosa or facial skin Odontogenic Infections Principles of therapy for odontogenic infections: Determining the severity of infection Cellulitis vs. abscess Status of host’s immune system Treatment: Removing the source of infection Incision and drainage Antibiotics Analgesics Fluids Nutritional support Odontogenic Infections Different methods of drainage: Endodontic treatment Extraction of the offending tooth Incision and drainage of soft tissue collection Odontogenic Infections Surgical principles of incision and drainage: Prior to incision, obtain fluid for culture + sensitivity Incision in healthy skin or mucosa Cosmetically and functionally acceptable place Blunt dissection Placement of a drain Drain removal Odontogenic Infections Antimicrobial spectrum of the most common antibiotics used in treatments for oral and maxillofacial infections: Penicillin: Streptococcus (except group D) Staphylococcus(non-beta-lactamase producing) Treponema Actinomyces Oral anaerobes Oxacillin and dicloxicillin: Beta-lactamase-producing staphylococci Criteria For Immediate Treatment Dysphonia Dyspnea (airway embarrassment) Dysphagia High fever Medically compromised patient Location of infection Rapidly progressing cellulitis Odontogenic Infections Amoxicillin: Same as penicillin plus: E. coli H. Influenza Proteus Mirabilis Amoxicillin plus clavulanate: Above plus: Klebsiella Staph. Aureus Staph epidermidis Enterocci gonococci Odontogenic Infections Cephalexin: Streptococcus (except group D) Staphylococcus E. coli P. mirabilis Klebsiella Erythromycin: Streptococcus Staphylococcus Mycoplasma H. influenza Legionella Oral anaerobes Odontogenic Infections Clindamycin: Streptococcus Staphylococcus Actinomyces Bacteroides fragilis Oral anaerobes Metronidazole: Oral anaerobes Odontogenic Infections Antibiotic of choice: Empiric therapy: Allergic to penicillin: Penicillin or penicillin plus metronidazole, if the patient is not allergic to these and not immunocompromised. Clindamycin is an excellent alternative Definitive antibiotic treatment should be based on culture and sensitivity. Odontogenic Infections Indications for prophylactic antibiotics: To prevent local wound infection To prevent metastatic wound infection (SBE, prosthetic joints) Odontogenic Infections Indications for prophylactic antibiotics to prevent local wound infection: Procedures associated with a high incidence of infection When infections may have grave consequences. Immunocompromised patient Long surgical procedure Surgical procedure with high degree of contamination Odontogenic Infections Possible causes of failure of antibiotic therapy: Inadequate surgical treatment Depressed host defenses Presence of foreign body Problems associated with use of antibiotics: patient compliance, inadequate dose, antibiotic-related infection, use of wrong antibiotics. Odontogenic Infections What to look for at the follow-up appointment? Response to treatment Recurrence of infection Presence of allergic reactions Toxicity reactions to antibiotics Secondary infection (e.g. Candida) Odontogenic Infections Pseudomembranous colitis: A toxin reaction associated with the use of an antibiotic that causes alteration of colonic flora leading to the overgrowth of Clostridium difficile. Profuse watery diarrhea that may be bloody Cramping Abdominal pain Fever Leukocytosis Odontogenic Infections Risk factors associated with pseudomembranous colitis are related to the type of antibiotic and patient-related factors. Type of antibiotics: Clindamycin (originally thought to be the main antibiotic, only one third of cases) Ampicillin (one third) Cephalosporins (one third) Odontogenic Infections Patient-related factors for pseudomembranous colitis: Previous GI procedures Medically compromised patients Advanced age Female gender Inflammatory bowel disease Cancer chemotherapy Renal disease Odontogenic Infections Diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis: Signs and symptoms Culture Sigmoidoscopy to confirm the dx Treatment: Discontinue the causative antibiotics Use alternate antibiotic if necessary Restoration of fluid and electrolytes balance Anticlostridia antibiotics (oral vancomycin or metronidazole) Antibiotics For Odontogenic Infections: Penicillin (Pfizerpen, Pen-Vee K, Beepen-VK) Drug of choice; effective against most aerobes and anaerobes. Bactericidal against sensitive organisms when adequate concentrations are reached and most effective during the stage of active multiplication. Inadequate concentrations may produce only bacteriostatic effects. Penicillin V (phenoxymethyl penicillin) is administered orally, whereas aqueous penicillin G is administered IV or IM. Pen Vee K Adult Dose: Pediatric Dose: Probenecid can increase effects of penicillin; coadministration of tetracyclines can decrease effects of penicillin Pregnancy: Documented hypersensitivity Interactions: Penicillin V: 15-62.5 mg/kg/d PO divided q4-8h Contraindication: Penicillin V: 250-500 mg PO q6h B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks. Precautions: Caution in impaired renal function Antibiotics For Odontogenic Infections: Amoxicillin and clavulanate (Augmentin): Amoxicillin inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins. Addition of clavulanate inhibits beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Good alternative antibiotic for patients allergic or intolerant to the macrolide class. Is usually well tolerated and provides good coverage to most infectious agents. The half-life of oral dosage form is 1-1.3 h. For children aged 3 mo or older, base dosing protocol on amoxicillin content. Because of different amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid ratios in 250-mg tab (250/125) vs. 250-mg chewable tab (250/62.5), do not use 250-mg tab until child weighs >40 kg. Augmentin Adult dose: 500 mg PO tid for 7-10 d Pediatric Dose<3 months: 125 mg/5mL PO susp; 30 mg/kg/d (based on amoxicillin component) PO divided bid for 7-10 d >3 months: if using 200 mg/5 mL or 400 mg/5 mL susp, 45 mg/kg/d PO q12h; if using 125 mg/5 mL or 250 mg/5 mL susp, 40 mg/kg/d PO q8h for 7-10 d >40 kg: Administer as in adults Augmentin Contraindications: Interactions: Documented hypersensitivity Coadministration with warfarin or heparin increases risk of bleeding; Pregnancy B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks. Precautions: Adjust dose in renal impairment; diarrhea may occur; cross-allergy may occur with other beta-lactams and cephalosporins Antibiotics For Odontogenic Infections: Clindamycin (Cleocin): Considered by many as first-line therapy because of emergent penicillin resistance. Excellent activity against oral aerobes and anaerobes; penetrates bone and abscess cavities, but its use is limited because of the danger of inducing pseudomembranous colitis; Use in patients who are allergic to penicillin. Clindamycin Adult Dose: Pediatric Dose: erythromycin may antagonize effects of clindamycin; antidiarrheals may delay absorption of clindamycin Pregnancy B: Documented hypersensitivity; regional enteritis; ulcerative colitis; hepatic impairment; antibiotic-associated colitis Interactions: 20-30 mg/kg/d PO divided q6h; not to exceed 1.8 g/d Contraindications: 150-450 mg PO q6-8h; not to exceed 1.8 g/d Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks. Precautions Adjust dose in severe hepatic dysfunction; no adjustment necessary in renal insufficiency; associated with severe and possibly fatal colitis Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw www.aaoms.org (health professional section, lower right hand corner) MRONJ The Special Committee recommends changing the nomenclature of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). The Committee favors the term medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The change is justified to accommodate the growing number of osteonecrosis cases involving the maxilla and mandible associated with other antiresorptive (denosumab) and antiangiogenic therapies. Antiresorptive Preparations Commonly Used in the U.S. Primary Indication Nitrogen Containing Dose Route Alendronate (Fosamax) Osteoporosis Yes 10 mg/day; 70 mg/wk Oral Residronate (Actonel) Osteoporosis Yes 5 mg/day; 35mg/wk Oral Ibandronate (Boniva) Osteoporosis Yes 2.5 mg/day; 150mg/ month Oral Pamidronate (Aredia) Bone metastasis Yes 90 mg/ 3 wks Intravenous Zoledronate (Zometa) (Reclast) Denosumab (Xgeva) (Prolia) Bone metastasis 4 mg/ 3 wks Yes Osteopororsis Bone metastasis Osteoporosis Intravenous 5mg/yr NO Humanized monoclonal Ab 120 mg/4 weeks 60mg/6 months SQ SQ MRONJ Oral bisphosphonates are approved for treatment of: Osteoporosis Osteopenia They are also used for a variety of less common conditions such as Paget’s disease of bone, and osteogenesis imperfecta. The most common use, however, is for osteopenia and osteoporosis. MRONJ Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates (BPs) are antiresorptive medications used to manage: Cancer-related conditions including hypercalcemia of malignancy, Skeletal-related events (SRE) associated with bone metastases in the context of solid tumors such as breast cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancers, and For management of lytic lesions in the setting of multiple myeloma. MRONJ IV BPs once yearly infusion of zolendronate (Reclast) and a parenteral formulation of ibandronate (Boniva) administered every three months, have FDA approval for management of osteoporosis. MRONJ RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab): is an antiresorptive agent fully humanized antibody against RANK ligand (RANK-L) and inhibits osteoclast function and associated bone resorption. When denosumab (Prolia) is administered subcutaneously every 6 months; reduction in the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip fractures in osteoporotic patients. Denosumab (Xgeva) is also effective in reducing SRE related to metastatic bone disease from solid tumors when administered monthly. Denosumab therapy is not indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Interestingly, in contrast to bisphosphonates, RANK ligand inhibitors do not bind to bone and their effects on bone remodeling are mostly diminished within 6 months of treatment cessation. MRONJ Angiogenesis inhibitors: interfere with the formation of new blood vessels. These novel medications have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors, renal cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors and others. MRONJ Oral and maxillofacial surgeons first recognized and reported cases of non-healing exposed bone in the maxillofacial region in patients treated with IV bisphosphonates. In September 2004, Novartis, the manufacturer of the IV bisphosphonates pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronic acid (Zometa), notified healthcare professionals of additions to the labeling of these products, which provided cautionary language related to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaws. MRONJ This was followed in 2005 by a broader drug class warning of this complication for all bisphosphonates including the oral preparations. More recently, other antiresorptive agents and novel anti-cancer drugs have been linked to the development of jaw necrosis. MRONJ Patients may be considered to have MRONJ if all of the following characteristics are present: 1. Current or previous treatment with antiresorptive or antiangiogenic agents; 2. Exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula(e) in the maxillofacial region that has persisted for more than eight weeks; and 3. No history of radiation therapy to the jaws or obvious metastatic disease to the jaws. MRONJ It is important to understand that patients at risk for or with established MRONJ can also present with other common clinical conditions not to be confused with MRONJ. MRONJ Commonly misdiagnosed conditions may include, but are not limited to: alveolar osteitis, sinusitis, gingivitis/periodontitis, caries, periapical pathology, fibro-osseous lesion, sarcoma, chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis, and TMJ disorders. It is also important to remember that ONJ occurs in patients not exposed to antiresorptive or antiangiogenic agents. Pathophysiology A. Inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption and remodeling Bisphosphonates (BP), and other antiresorptives such as denosumab, inhibit osteoclast differentiation and function, and increase apoptosis, all leading to decreased bone resorption and remodeling. Osteoclast differentiation and function plays a vital role in bone healing and remodeling in all skeletal sites, but osteonecrosis of the jaws only occurs primarily within the alveolar bone of the maxilla and mandible. An increased remodeling rate in the jaws may explain the differential predisposition to ONJ compared to other bones in the axial or appendicular skeleton. Pathophysiology B. Inflammation/Infection Both systemic and local oral risk factors have been implicated in ONJ. From these clinical studies, several animal models have been developed to demonstrate that both inflammation or bacterial infection and systemic antiresorptives are sufficient to induce ONJ. Pathophysiology C. Inhibition of Angiogenesis Angiogenesis is a process that involves growth, migration and differentiation of endothelial cells to form new blood vessels. Angiogenesis favorably influences tumor growth and also influences tumor invasion of vessels, resulting in tumor metastasis. Angiogenesis requires binding of signaling molecules such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to receptors on the endothelial cells. This signaling promotes new blood vessel growth. Pathophysiology Osteonecrosis is classically considered an interruption in vascular supply or avascular necrosis, and therefore, it is not surprising that inhibition of angiogenesis is a leading hypothesis in ONJ. Risk Factors for MRONJ A) Medication related risk factors: 1) MRONJ risk among cancer patients: The risk for ONJ among cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials and assigned to placebo groups ranges from 0% to 0.019% (01.9 cases per 10,000 cancer patients) The risk of ONJ among cancer patients exposed to zolendronate ranges between 50-100 times higher than cancer patients treated with placebo. Risk Factors for MRONJ 2. MRONJ risk among osteoporosis patients Most dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons see patients in their practices who have been exposed to antiresorptive therapy, eg oral BPs, for management of osteoporosis. When evaluated by age, 5.1 million patients over the age of 55 years received a prescription for a bisphosphonate in year 2008. Risk Factors for MRONJ Based on the current review of data, the risk of developing ONJ among osteoporotic patients exposed to oral, IV BPs, or denosumab is real but remains very low. Risk Factors for MRONJ 3. Duration of medication therapy as a risk factor for MRONJ: Regardless of indications for therapy, the duration of BP or antiresorptive therapy continues to be a risk factor for developing ONJ. When compared to cancer patients receiving antiresorptive treatment, the risk of ONJ for patients with osteoporosis exposed to antiresorptive medications is about 100 times smaller. Risk Factors for MRONJ B) Local Factors: 1) Operative Treatments: Dentoalveolar surgery is considered a major risk factor for developing MRONJ. Most clinicians and patients want to know: “Among patients exposed to antiresorptive medications, what is the risk for developing ONJ following tooth extraction (or other dentoalveolar procedures such as implant placement or periodontal procedures)?” Risk Factors for MRONJ The best current estimate for the risk of ONJ among patients exposed to oral bisphosphonates following tooth extraction is 0.5%. Absent data, the committee considers the risk for ONJ after dental implant placement and endodontic or periodontal procedures that require exposure and manipulation of bone to comparable to the risk associated with tooth extraction. Risk Factors for MRONJ 2. Anatomic factors: MRONJ is more likely to appear in the mandible (73%) than the maxilla (22.5%) but can appear in both jaws (4.5%). Denture use was associated with an increased risk for ONJ among cancer patients exposed to zolendronate. Risk Factors for MRONJ C. Demographic and systemic factors and other medication factors: Age and sex are variably reported as risk factors for MRONJ. The higher prevalence of this complication in the female population is likely a reflection of the underlying disease for which the agents are being prescribed (i.e. osteoporosis, breast cancer). Corticosteroids are associated with an increased risk for MRONJ. Co-morbid conditions among cancer patients: include anemia (hemoglobin < 10g/dL) and diabetes. Tobacco use has been inconsistently reported as a risk factor for MRONJ. Risk Factors for MRONJ D. Genetic factors: Collectively, studies suggest that a germ line sensitivity to bisphosphonates may exist. Risk Factors for MRONJ In summary, the current literature reaffirms that the risk of MRONJ is significantly greater in cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy as compared to treatment regimens for osteoporosis. Moreover, the risk of MRONJ in osteoporosis patients receiving antiresorptive therapy continues to be very low regardless of drug type (bisphosphonates, denosumab) or dosing schedule. Management Strategies for Patients Treated with Antiresorptives or Antiangiogenics 1. Prevention of MRONJ: Early screening and initiation of appropriate dental care 2. Cessation of at-risk medication therapy prior to tooth extraction or other procedures, which involve osseous injury (eg dental implant placement, periodontal or apical endodontic treatment): DRUG HOLIDAY?? Management Strategies for Patients Treated with Antiresorptives or Antiangiogenics Drug Holiday?? a. Antiresorptive Therapy for Osteoporosis/Osteopenia : Damm and Jones note that since 50% of serum BP undergoes renal excretion the major reservoir of BP is the osteoclast whose life span is 2 weeks. Thus the majority of free BP within the serum would be extremely low 2 months following the last dose of an oral bisphosphonate and a 2-month drug free period should be adequate prior to an invasive dental procedure. Management Strategies for Patients Treated with Antiresorptives or Antiangiogenics Drug Holiday?? b. Oncology Patients Receiving Monthly Antiresorptive Therapy: There are no data to support or refute the cessation of antiangiogenic therapy in the prevention or management of MRONJ and therefore continued research in the area is indicated. Management Strategies A. Patients about to initiate intravenous antiresorptive or antiangiogenic treatment for cancer therapy : The treatment objective: minimize the risk of developing MRONJ. Non-restorable teeth and those with a poor prognosis should be extracted. Other necessary elective dentoalveolar surgery should also be completed at this time. Based on experience with osteoradionecrosis, it appears advisable that antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy should be delayed, if systemic conditions permit, until the extraction site has mucosalized (14-21 days) or until there is adequate osseous healing. Management Strategies B. Patients about to initiate antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis: At the initiation of treatment, patients should be educated as to the potential risks of MRONJ as the antiresorptive therapy is likely to exceed beyond 4 years treatment. The importance of optimizing dental health throughout this treatment period and beyond should be stressed. Management Strategies C. Asymptomatic patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates or antiangiogenic drugs for cancer : Maintaining good oral hygiene Procedures that involve direct osseous injury should be avoided. Non-restorable teeth may be treated by removal of the crown and endodontic treatment of the remaining roots. Placement of dental implants should be avoided in the oncology patient receiving intravenous antiresorptive therapy or antiangiogenic medications. Endodontically Treated IV Meds Management Strategies The risk of developing MRONJ associated with oral bisphosphonates, while exceedingly small, appears to increase when the duration of therapy exceeds 4 years. Management Strategies The efficacy of utilizing a systemic marker of bone turnover to assess the risk of developing jaw necrosis in patients at risk has not been validated. Therefore the use of systemic markers of bone turnover as a measure of MRONJ risk is not recommended although the Committee supports continued research in this area. Management Strategies For individuals who have taken an oral bisphosphonate for less than four years and have no clinical risk factors, no alteration or delay in the planned surgery is necessary. This includes any and all procedures common to oral and maxillofacial surgeons, periodontists and other dental providers. Management Strategies For those patients who have taken an oral bisphosphonate for less than four years and have also taken corticosteroids or antiangiogenic medications concomitantly: the prescribing provider should be contacted to consider discontinuation of the oral bisphosphonate (drug holiday) for at least two months prior to oral surgery, if systemic conditions permit. Management Strategies For those patients who have taken an oral bisphosphonate for more than four years with or without any concomitant medical therapy: the prescribing provider should be contacted to consider discontinuation of the antiresorptive for two months prior to oral surgery, if systemic conditions permit. The bisphosphonate should not be restarted until osseous healing has occurred. Staging and Treatment Strategies At risk category: No apparent necrotic bone in patients who have been treated with either oral or IV bisphosphonates Management: No treatment indicated Patient education Staging and Treatment Strategies Stage 0: No clinical evidence of necrotic bone, But non-specific clinical findings radiographic changes and symptoms Systemic management, including the use of pain medication and antibiotics Staging and Treatment Strategies Stage 1: Exposed and necrotic bone, or fistula that probes to bone, - in patients who are asymptomatic and have no evidence of infection Management: Antimicrobial mouthrinse Clinical follow-up on a quarterly basis Patient education and review of indications for continued bisphosphonate therapy Staging and Treatment Strategies Stage 2: Exposed and necrotic bone, or fistula that probes to bone, associated with infection as evidenced by pain and erythema in the region of the exposed bone with or without purulent drainage. Management: Symptomatic treatment with oral antibiotics Oral antibacterial mouth rinse Pain control Debridement to relieve soft tissue irritation and infection control Staging and Treatment Strategies Stage 3: Exposed and necrotic bone, or a fistula that probes to bone in patients with pain, infection, and one or more of the following: exposed and necrotic bone extending beyond the region of alveolar bone,(i.e., inferior border and ramus in the mandible, maxillary sinus and zygoma in the maxilla) resulting in pathologic fracture, extra-oral fistula, oral antral/oral nasal communication, or osteolysis extending to the inferior border of the mandible of sinus floor Staging and Treatment Strategies Stage 3 management: Antibacterial mouth rinse Antibiotic therapy and pain control Surgical debridement/resection for longer term palliation of infection and pain Management Strategies Regardless of the disease stage, mobile segments of bony sequestrum should be removed without exposing uninvolved bone. The extraction of symptomatic teeth within exposed, necrotic bone should be considered since it is unlikely that the extraction will exacerbate the established necrotic process. Oral BP Oral BP After Debridement IV BP April 2013 IV BP IV BP August 2013 IV BP After Debridement