The Author's Primary Leadership Frame of Reference, per Bolman

advertisement
Running head: PRIMARY LEADERSHIP FRAME PER BOLMAN AND DEAL
The Author’s Primary Leadership Frame of Reference, per Bolman and Deal
Philip W. Holmes
Virginia Commonwealth University EdD in Leadership Cohort 4
1
PRIMARY LEADERSHIP FRAME PER BOLMAN AND DEAL
2
The Author’s Primary Leadership Frame of Reference, per Bolman and Deal
Bolman and Deal (2008) posited four frames of reference through which leaders perceive
their roles and make sense of challenges. Each of these four frames – structural, human
resource, political, and symbolic – is “… a mental model – a set of ideas and assumptions – that
you carry in your head…” (Bolman & Deal, 2008, p. 11).
While these models are internal, they are not idiosyncratic. One’s primary leadership
frame is driven not by preference, but by the prevailing conditions in one’s organization or
environment. Various factors may push a leader to embrace one or another leadership frame,
depending on the leader’s awareness and ability to shift perspective (i.e., reframe) (Bolman and
Deal, 2008).
The author’s primary leadership frame of reference is political. This frame, with its focus
on conflict and jockeying for power and resources, is arguably the least attractive of the four
frames in Bolman and Deal’s model; however, an honest assessment of the author’s work
environment leads to no other conclusion.
The Author’s Work Environment
Bank of America, the author’s employer, has been starving its divisions ever since the
eruption of the last financial crisis. Banks are particularly sensitive to economic downturns.
When people and companies borrow and spend less, banks make less money, and they must
reduce expenses to remain profitable and satisfy shareholders. In addition, in a move to reduce
the risk of future financial crises, federal regulators are now demanding higher levels of
capitalization. These capital requirements put more pressure on banks to cut costs and move
those savings to their reserves. The scarcity of resources in this environment makes a political
frame of reference almost unavoidable.
PRIMARY LEADERSHIP FRAME PER BOLMAN AND DEAL
3
Competing for Scarce Resources
The Global Learning Organization (GLO), the division in which the author works, has
insufficient resources to address the bank’s learning needs. The company’s attempts to move
past its “legacy issues” (shorthand for problems related to the last recession) are forcing many of
its divisions to create and adopt new ways of doing business, most of which entail training.
Thus, while GLO has fewer resources than ever, it is facing its greatest ever demand for learning
solutions. Competition for scarce resources is a hallmark of the political environment (Bolman
& Deal, 2008), and no phrase describes the bank’s environment better.
Advocating on Behalf of Clients
The author represents the learning needs of the bank’s Global Risk Management division,
which lobbies constantly for GLO resources. The author must package his client’s needs in such
a way that they meet the definition of “essential learning” that GLO enforces. At the same time,
the author is expected to be a zealous steward of GLO’s own resources. This stewardship
sometimes forces him to shift the direction of his advocacy and deny client requests on behalf of
GLO and its own needs. Advocating for a team’s goals is another hallmark of the political
environment (Bolman and Deal, 2008), and the author’s job entails constant and competing
advocacy efforts.
Creating and Managing Networks of Allies
To counter shifting priorities and processes, the author must nurture a network of allies,
including managers, executives, and peers. In some cases, he must reach up two levels in the
organization for leverage. In other cases, he relies on peers to help secure resources or maneuver
around rigid processes. For example, if a project requires that a step be completed immediately,
and the service level agreement is three business days, he must tap supportive colleagues for
PRIMARY LEADERSHIP FRAME PER BOLMAN AND DEAL
4
help, and be sure to be flexible on their behalf when it is their turn to reach out to him. Nurturing
networks of allies is another key aspect of the political frame (Bolman & Deal, 2008).
Cautionary Note
The author acknowledges that all four leadership frames of reference come into play
throughout his workday. Optimal leaders must master each of the four frames and hone their
diagnostic skills, so that they can quickly move from one frame to the other, as the situation
requires. This ability to frame and reframe is a key distinction between successful and
unsuccessful leaders (Bolman & Deal, 2008).
However, the ability to reframe is not the sole indicator of leadership success. Examining
the failure of Penn State’s leadership team to respond appropriately to allegations that former
assistant coach Jerry Sandusky was sexually abusing children, Albino (2013) warned that
decisions to reframe must not be simply tactical. Leaders must always be grounded in sound
ethics, no matter which frame they choose.
If we manage to hang on to the values and beliefs that helped us grow as professionals, or
simply as human beings, then we have the foundation for our personal model of strong
and ethical leadership. Our understanding of who we are as leaders should rest on those
simple foundations – not on our ability to change our perspective, or to become more and
more skillful at working within a specific frame. If, on the other hand, we do not know
who we are as leaders, and if we do not listen to the voices of our respective identities,
then regardless of the frame in which we are functioning, and no matter how appropriate
it may be to the setting, we can become totally lost. We can follow the rules of the frame
and still lose our bearings completely. (Albino, 2013, p. 145)
PRIMARY LEADERSHIP FRAME PER BOLMAN AND DEAL
References
Albino, J. (2013). Personal leadership identity and leadership frames: Understanding what
happened at Penn State. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 16(3), 130-146.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5
Download