Organizational Structure

advertisement
Organizational
Structure, Design &
Culture
Organizational Structure


How job tasks are formally divided,
grouped, & coordinated
Why?
– Meet goals & objectives of organization
– Efficiency & effectiveness
Organizational Structure

6 elements to address for a proper
organizational structure
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Work specialization
Departmentalization
Chain of command
Span of Control
Centralization or decentralization
Formalization
Organizational Structure
 1.
Work specialization
– Division of labor
 Tasks
are subdivided into separate jobs
– Jobs broken into steps with multiple
people doing their individual part to
make the entire product
– Assembly lines, McDonald’s
Organizational Structure
 1.
Work specialization
– Advantages
 Used
to increase productivity
 Allows skill building on the job
– Disadvantages
 Good
to a point & then diminishing returns
 Boredom, absenteeism, stress, high
turnover
Organizational Structure
 2.
Departmentalization
– Grouping of jobs according to (4):
 Function/process
 Product
 Geography
 Customer
Organizational Structure
 2.
Departmentalization
– Grouping of jobs according to (4):
 Function/process
– Northwest SRA Managers:
 Inclusion, cultural arts, special events
– Pocono Family YMCA
Organizational Structure
 2.
Departmentalization
– Grouping of jobs according to (4):
 Product
– Nike: Golf, shoes, clothing
– REI: Clothing & footwear, snow gear, water gear,
land gear
 Geography
– NRPA regions; NPS
– Gametime – 18 independent U.S. Reps
– NWSRA – 2 area (by city) inclusion coordinators
Organizational Structure
 2.
Departmentalization
– Grouping of jobs according to (4):
 Customer
– retail, wholesale, government
– corporate vs. individual clients
– NRPA (Aquatics, L & A, CBM, NTRS)
Organizational Structure
 3.
Chain of command
– Unbroken line of authority
 the
right to exercise influence, give
directives or make certain decisions
within the organization
Organizational Structure
 3.
Chain of command
– Key issues
 Unity of Command
– 1 supervisor ee is responsible to
 Seeing
less chain of command with
empowerment
– More access to company wide info via technology
– Don’t need to have your boss talk to the boss of
maintenance to get the grass mowed!
Organizational Structure
 4.
Span of Control
– # of people, units, & operations a mgr
can control effectively & efficiently
– Small span of control – supervise
smaller number of people
– Larger span of control – supervise larger
number of people
Organizational Structure
 4.
Span of Control
– # of people, units, & operations a mgr
can control effectively & efficiently
– Small span of control – supervise
smaller number of people
– Larger span of control – supervise larger
number of people
Organizational Structure
 4.
Span of Control
– See smaller span of control at top &
larger at bottom of org.
– 7 is optimal but depends on work done
– Which is better? Smaller or larger?
Organizational Structure
 4.
Span of Control
– Wider – fewer managers, more ee’s
reporting to them
Reduces cost, speeds decision making
Get closer to the customer
Empower employees
Fewer layers of employees
Invest in training staff
– Easier to supervise a lot of good staff
than bad ones
Organizational Structure
 4.
Span of Control
– Smaller – more managers with fewer
ee’s
Tight managerial control
Increase cost of managers
Added managers slows
communication
Encourages micro-managing &
discourages ee autonomy
Organizational Structure
 5.
Centralization or decentralization
– Degree to which decision making is
concentrated at a single point in the
organization
Organizational Structure
 Centralization
– Top managers make all the decisions
– Consistency in decision making
– Slow process…move up the chain of
command
Organizational Structure

Decentralization
– Decision making is pushed down to mgrs
closest to the action
– Quicker actions taken
– More people provide input
– EE’s less likely to feel alienated from decision
makers
– Mgrs closer to situation
Organizational Structure
 5.
Centralization or decentralization
– ????
– Which one is better?
– Is there a place for both?
Organizational Structure
 6.
Formalization
– Degree to which jobs are standardized
– EE has minimal discretion in how, what
& when to do things
– Policies are strictly followed
– Explicit job descriptions
– Less formalization increases freedom
Organizational Design
Simple Structure
Bureaucracy
Team Based Structure
Matrix Structure
Organizational Design
 How
organizational structures are
arranged and incorporated
 Designs
change as people come & go
in the organization
Organizational Design
 Simple
structure
– Low degree of departmentalization, wide
span of control, centralized authority,
little formalization
– “Flat” organization
Organizational Design
 Simple
structure
– Fast, flexible, inexpensive, clear
accountability
– Info overload at the top
– Difficult to use in a large organization
KNR Director
Athletic Training Faculty
Exercise Physiology Faculty
PETE Faculty
RPA Faculty
Organizational Design
 Bureacracy
– Highly standardized operating tasks
achieved through specialization
– Formalized rules
– Tasks grouped by function
– Centralized authority
– Narrow span of control
– Decision making follows the chain of
command
Organizational Design
 Bureacracy
– Strength – ability to perform
standardized activities efficiently
– Functions well with less talented & less
costly ee’s
– Resistant to change
– Close adherence to rules, minimizes
decision making
– Put like minds together
Bureaucracy
Organizational Design
 Team
Based Structures
– Breaks down dept barriers
– Org is more horizontal
– Decentralizes decision making to team
level
– Requires ee’s be generalists vs.
specialists
– Naperville Park District
Organizational Design
 Team
Based Structures
– Self managed teams
 Work
together to accomplish goals & obj.
 Marketing team
 Treatment team
– Problem solving teams
 Short
term to solve problems
Groups vs. Teams
Organizational Design

Matrix Structure (cross functional teams)
– Combines functional & product
departmentalization
– Assigns specialists to specific functional
departments to work with interdisciplinary
groups led by project leaders
– Breaks unity of command concept
2
bosses – functional dept manager & product
managers
Home
Departments:
Marketing
Accounting
Registration
Human resources
Arts
Events
Sports
Recreation
Maintenance
Reading Org Charts
 Lines
show chain of command
 Levels
should be similar
 Determine
distinction between titles:
– Manager, supervisor, coordinator,
specialist, leader
Download