QRIS

advertisement
1
OREGON’S QUALITY RATING AND IMPROVEMENT
SYSTEM AND SUPPORTING CHILDREN WITH
DISABILITIES AND THEIR FAMILIES: IMPLICATIONS
FOR EI/ECSE PERSONNEL
Gary Glasenapp
Teaching Research Institute
Center on Early Learning
Western Oregon University
Session Objectives
2

Participants will:
 Have
a general understanding of Oregon’s QRIS.
 Understand
how Oregon’s QRIS addresses supporting
children with disabilities and their families.
 Understand
the implications of Oregon’s QRIS for
EI/ECSE personnel.
 Identify
what EI/ECSE administrators can do to enhance
collaboration with QRIS, CCR&Rs and Early Learning
Hubs to support young children with disabilities.
3
Oregon’s Early Childhood Inclusion
Collaborative (OECIC)
OECIC
4


Subgrant from Oregon Department of Education
Provide support to Oregon Counties
 Increase
number of community placement sites
 Increase quality of community placement sites
 Increase collaboration

Different levels of TA/support
 Universal
 Targeted
 Intensive
5
What is Oregon’s QRIS?
What is QRIS?
6
Quality
What is QRIS?
7
Rating
What is QRIS?
8
Improvement
What is QRIS?
9
System
What is QRIS?
10
Quality for Better
Outcomes for
Children in Oregon
11
State and National Focus On Early
Childhood Care and Education
In the spotlight
Oregon’s Focus on Early Childhood
12

Governor Kitzhaber’s focus on Education

Oregon Educational Investment Board

40-40-20
Oregon’s 40-40-20
13
100% of Oregonians by
2025
40% will hold a
bachelor’s
degree or
higher
40% will hold
an associate’s
degree or postsecondary
credential
Remaining 20%
will hold a high
school diploma
or equivalent
1. Ensure all children are
EARLY
LEARNING
DIVISION’S
VISION
ready for kindergarten and
reading at grade-level in 3rd
grade.
2. Children are raised in
stable and attached families.
3. Integrate resources and
services statewide.
14
Early Learning in Oregon
15

Early Learning Council and Early Learning Division
Initiatives to meet the vision
 QRIS
 Kindergarten
 Universal
 Early
Entry Assessment
Screening
Learning HUBS
http://oregonearlylearning.com
Early Learning in Oregon
16

Successful Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge
federal grant
 Systems
building money for early childhood in Oregon
 $30 million over 4 years
National Focus on Early Learning
17


President Obama is also focusing on and investing
in the future through young children
Short video can be found at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNZJ0BaNaoI
In November 2013 Senator Harkin introduced the
Strong Start for America’s Children Act that has
bipartisan sponsorship and support
http://www.naeyc.org/policy/federal/strong-startfor-children
18
19
Oregon’s QRIS History and Field
Test
Why QRIS?
Oregon’s QRIS is Not New
20
National QRIS
Oregon’s
QRIS
Quality Indicators
Oregon’s Programs of
Quality
Targeted Research
Oregon Registry
Partners
21
Teaching
Research
Institute at
WOU
Child Care
Resource and
Referral
Oregon
Center for
Career
Development
Oregon’s
QRIS
Oregon State
University/
Portland State
University
Office of
Child Care
Oregon’s QRIS Field Test
22
January
2013
• Multnomah
• Deschutes/Crook/Jefferson
• Linn/Benton
• Lane/Douglas
Fall
2013
• Teen Parent
Programs
• NAEYC, NAFCC,
ACSI, OPQ
• Head Start
March
2014
• Field test available
statewide
23
Oregon’s QRIS Overview
So, what is it?
QRIS Components
Building
Block with
5 Tiers
5 Domains
Quality Improvement
Quality
Improvement
Plans
SelfAssessments
2 Versions
of
Materials
24
Supports
Quality Rating
Portfolio
System of
Documentation
Incentives
Oregon’s QRIS 5 Tier Building Block
System
25
QRIS Standards Structure
26
Domains
Standards
Indicators
Evidence
• Overall categories of quality
• 5 total
• Program standards, organized by domain
• 33 total
• Star levels of standards
• Usually 3 per standard
• Some standards only have 1 or 2 indicators
• Found in portfolio only
• Measurable structural indicators that standard
is present in program
QRIS Materials Structure
27
Self-Assessment
• Domains
• Standards
• Indicators
Quality Improvement Plan
• Domains
• Standards
• Indicators
Portfolio
• Domains
• Standards
• Indicators
• Evidence
QRIS Domains and Standards
28
Children’s
Learning and
Development
• 12 Standards
Health and
Safety
• 6 Standards
Personnel
Qualifications
• 5 Standards
Family
Partnerships
• 4 Standards
Administration
and Business
Practices
• 6 Standards
Star Level Indicators: Building Block
29
5-Star
5-Star
4-Star
4-Star
3-Star
Basics of the QRIS Process
Commit
• QRIS
Increasing
Quality
Training
• Application
• Self
Assessment
Participate
• Quality
Improvement
Plan
• Quality
Improvement
supports
• Technical
Assistance with
portfolio
• Financial
Supports of
$1000-$2000
Achieve
• Submit
portfolio to
Western
Oregon
University
• Portfolio
reviewed by
experts
• Receive a
rating and
financial
incentive
• Incentives
between
$500-$2500
31
Oregon’s QRIS and Supporting Children
with Disabilities and Their Families
How Oregon’s QRIS Addresses Children
with Disabilities and Their Families
32


Based on premise that inclusion of children with
disabilities should be part of Oregon’s QRIS
Oregon’s QRIS addresses the needs of ALL children
and families

No separate Domain for children with disabilities

Woven throughout Domains and Standards
Examples from Oregon’s QRIS
33



LD1- 4 Star: The program’s philosophy explicitly ensures the inclusion of all children.
LD3 – 3 Star: The program uses a basic indoor environmental arrangement that
supports children’s learning and development that includes including space that:

is accessible to all children enrolled in the program

has enough room for equipment needed by children with disabilities
LD7 – 3 Star: The program uses basic curriculum activities that support children’s
learning and development that include:




adaptations that allow all children, including those with disabilities to participate
HS5 – 3 &4 Star: Including children with special health needs.
FP1: Program uses family input and feedback to guide program planning and
policy decisions.
FP2: Program meets individual needs of children through mutually respectful, twoway communication with families.
34
Implications of Oregon’s QRIS for
EI/ECSE Personnel
Implications of Oregon’s QRIS for
EI/ECSE Personnel
More choices to
place children
with disabilities
Oregon’s QRIS
identifies quality
ELDP programs
35
More children
with disabilities
placed in
community
settings
Better
services for
ALL
children
and
families
Increased
collaboration
between ECE
programs,
EI/ECSE, CCR&Rs
Implications of Oregon’s QRIS for
Supporting Children with Disabilities in
Community Programs
Recognize quality
of program
Increased quality
of program
36
Provide services
to more children
and families
Better
services for
ALL children
and families
Increased
collaboration
between EI/ECSE,
CCR&Rs, other
agencies
37
Activity
What can EI/ECSE administrators do to enhance
collaboration with QRIS, CCR&Rs and Early
Learning Hubs to support young children with
disabilities?
Questions?
38
Contact Information
39

Gary Glasenapp
 glaseng@wou.edu

Tom Udell
 udellt@wou.edu

Mandy Stanley
 stanleya@wou.edu
40
OREGON’S QUALITY RATING
AND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM
http://teachingresearchinstitute.org/projects/qris
41
OREGON’S EARLY
CHILDHOOD INCLUSION
COLLABORATIVE
http://teachingresearchinstitute.org/projects/oecic
Download