File - Hurta knows sociology

advertisement

Sociology

NOTES: III, IV, V

Applying the Social

Perspective

THE WAY YOU VIEW REALITY

PART III

Social Marginality

Being excluded

Becoming or living as an “outsider”

Social Crisis

Living through a rough period: Great

Depression

Having to deal with specific situations affected by your place in society

Benefits

Helps us assess the truth of “common sense”

Helps us assess both opportunities and constraints in our lives

Empowers us to be active participants in our society

Helps us to live in diversity

It plays a role in:

Shaping public policy & law

Personal growth and expanded awareness

Preparation for the working world

Origins

WHERE IT ALL BEGAN!

PART IV

17 th & 18 th Centuries

Rise of factory based industrial economy

Emergence of great cities in

Europe

Political changes including democratic ideas

Rise of factory based industrial economy

Before the Middle Ages

◦ Worked in homes and small scale manufacturing

New sources of energy led to larger machines/factories

◦ Hydroelectric power

◦ Steam power

Changed how communities were originally established

Now people were anonymous and worked for strangers instead of in a close-knit community of families

Emergence of great cities in

Europe

Enclosure movement

More and more land was being

“fenced off”

This enabled easier control over grazing animals

Sheep were important to the wool needed in the factories

This led to more tenant farmers searching for work elsewhere – factories in the cities

Cities grew with this influx of workers and their families.

Social problems also grew:

◦ Pollution

◦ Crime

◦ Homelessness

The world became very impersonal

Political changes including democratic ideas

Enlightenment ideals grew

Locke, Hobbes and Smith – brought up new ideas that differed from the old theological view of society

Before (Middle Ages) – Everyone played a part in the “holy plan”

Royalty to serfs – everyone had an obligation

Enlightenment brought ideas:

Pursuit of self-interest

Individual liberties and freedoms

Individual rights

Resulting ideas:

“Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” – Thomas Jefferson

French Revolution

Alexis de Tocqueville – “nothing short of the regeneration of the whole human race”

Leaders of Sociology

August Comte

Karl Marx

Herbert Spencer

Emile Durkheim

Max Weber

August Comte

French philosopher

Founder of sociology

Coined the term “sociology”

Favors positivism – understand sociology through science

Tried to find solutions to the chaos caused by the French Revolution

Influenced by the scientific method

Believed that sociologists should concern themselves with the problems of order and change

Never completed college

Suffered from depression

Karl Marx

Born in Germany to middle-class parents

Received doctorate from the University of Berlin

Worked as a writer and editor for a racial newspaper

Believed that overall structure of a society is influenced by how the economy is organized

Thought that people who own the means of production control society

Stated that imbalance of power leads to conflict between owners and laborers

Was deeply troubled by social conditions produced by capitalist systems

Believe that the task of social scientists was to transform society

Emphasized that conflict is the primary cause of social change

Herbert Spencer

English

Worked as a civil engineer for a railway

Received large inheritance in his thirties

Was influenced by views of Charles Darwin

Viewed society as a system of interdependent parts that work together to maintain system

Believed that social change and unrest were natural occurrences in society’s evolution towards stability and perfection

Asserted that the fittest societies would survive over time

Believed in “Social Darwinism”

Emile Durkheim

French

Taught philosophy

Taught first social science course in

France

Systematically applied methods of science to the study of society

Developed the idea of a function – positive consequence that an element of society has for the maintenance of a social system

Study only aspects of society that are directly observable

First sociologist to test theories through statistical analysis

Max Weber

German with middle class parents

Received doctorate from University of

Berlin

Founded the German sociological society in 1910

Was interested in groups within a society more than in society as a whole

Believed that sociologists should uncover the feelings and thoughts of the individuals

Verstehen – sociologist places himself in the place of others and attempts to see things through their eyes

Used concept of idea type – essential characteristic of some aspect of society

Major goal

Goals of sociologists – especially

Comte

Understand society as it operates

Use positivism – the “science behind it”

Sociology is a product of three main stages of historical development

3 stages of historical development

Theological stage (religious)

Metaphysical stage

(transitional)

Scientific stage

Theological Stage

Religious – all people took their

“signals” from “God’s will”.

From beginning of human history to the Middle Ages

Society expresses God’s will

Confucius, Plato, Aristotle, etc

Metaphysical Stage

This is a transitional stage

Renaissance affected this change – forced people to look at the world differently

Saw society as a natural rather than a supernatural system

Hobbes, Locke, etc

Scientific Stage

Starting with Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton

Positivism

◦ Understanding society based on science

◦ Society operates according to its own laws just like the physical world operates according to gravity and laws of nature

Sociological Theory

“ITS ALL THEORETICAL!”

PART V

Theory

Statement of how and why specific facts are related.

Sociological Theory – explain social behavior in the real world

Theoretical Paradigms

Sets of assumptions that guide thinking and research

Two basic questions:

◦ What issues should we study?

◦ How should we connect the facts?

Theoretical Approach

Think of these as “road maps”

Basic images of society that guides thinking and research

◦ Structural-functional approach

(paradigm)

◦ Social-conflict approach (paradigm)

◦ Symbolic-interaction approach

(paradigm)

Structural-Functional paradigm

Framework for building theory that see society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.

Our lives are guided by social structures (relatively stable patterns of social behavior)

Each social structure has social functions (consequences) for the operation of society as a whole.

Shares a macro-level orientation with the social-conflict paradigm (focus is on broad social structures that shape society as a whole)

Key figures

Auguste Comte

Emile Durkheim

Herbert Spencer

Talcott Parsons

Three concepts (by Robert Merton):

Manifest functions – the recognized and intended consequences of any social pattern

Latent Functions – Largely unrecognized and unintended consequences

Social dysfuntions – undesirable consequences of a social pattern for the operation of society

Critical Evaluation

it focuses on stability – which ignores the inequalities of social class, race and gender.

Social – Conflict Paradigm

Framework for building theory that sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change.

It helps you understand society but help to reduce social inequality.

Shares a macro-level orientation with the structuralfunctional paradigm

Example: the rich in relation to the poor (dominant vs disadvantaged)

◦ People on top trying to protect “what is theirs” while the people on the bottom are trying to gain “what the believe is theirs too”.

Gender OR Race-Conflict

Paradigm

A point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between:

◦ Men and women

◦ Racial and ethnic categories

Key Figures

Karl Marx

W.E.B. DuBois

Ida Wells Barnett

Jane Addams

Critical Evaluation

Several Weaknesses:

◦ Ignores social unity based on mutual independence and shared values

◦ Because it is explicitly political, it cannot claim scientific objectivity

◦ Looks at society with broad abstractions

Symbolic-Interaction Paradigm

Framework for building theory that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals.

Micro-level orientation – focuses on patterns of social interaction in specific settings

Key Figures

Max Weber

George Herbert Mead

Erving Goffman

George Homans

Peter Blau

Critical Evaluation

Attempts to explain more clearly how individuals actually experience society

Two weaknesses:

◦ By focusing on a patterns, one loses sight of the influence by the larger social structures

◦ By emphasizing the unique, it risks overlooking the effects of culture, class, gender, and race.

Applying the Paradigms

SPORTS

Functions of sports

A structural-functional approach directs attention to the ways sports help society to operate

Sports and conflicts

A social-conflict analysis points out that sports are closely linked to social inequality

Sports as interactions

The symbolic-interaction paradigm sees sports less as a system than as an ongoing process.

Download