Southwood School – A Case Study
Performance Management Systems
By Fiona Robson
Areas covered in this presentation
• What is performance management (PM)?
• The differences between PM and performance
appraisal.
• The benefits of PM:
> To the organization.
> To managers.
> To employees.
• An introduction to the case study organization.
• Best practices in PM.
• Practical issues surrounding PM
© 2008 SHRM
2
Differences between performance management
and performance appraisal
Armstrong (2006) defines performance
management as:
“the formal assessment and rating of individuals by their
managers”
The same author defines performance appraisal
as:
“a continuous and much wider, more comprehensive
process… which clarifies mutual expectations and
emphasizes the support role of managers”
© 2008 SHRM
3
Overview of differences
Performance Appraisal
Performance Management
Top down-assessment
Joint process through dialogue
Annual appraisal meeting
Continuous review with one or more
formal reviews
Use of ratings
Ratings less common
Monolithic system
Flexible process
Focus on quantified objectives
Focus on values and behaviors as
well as objectives
Often linked to pay
Less likely to be directly linked to pay
Owned by the HR department
Owned by line managers
Source: Armstrong and Baron (2005)
© 2008 SHRM
4
Benefits to the organization
• Demonstrates the organization’s commitment
to the development of its staff.
• Contributes to meeting accreditations
standards, such as Investors in People in the
UK.
• Provides the opportunity to ensure all
employees are aware of the goals and
objectives of the organization and the role that
they have to play in this process.
© 2008 SHRM
5
Benefits to managers
• Facilitates a two-way dialogue with their staff.
• Identifies any potential issues.
• Enables managers to gain a greater
understanding of the motivation and future
plans of their staff.
• Provides an opportunity to disseminate goals
and objectives to employees.
• May lead to a more motivated and
communicative workforce.
© 2008 SHRM
6
Benefits to employees
• Clarifies their expectations.
• Enhances their understanding of the
contribution they make to the organization.
• Provides an opportunity to have a discussion
with their manager and talk about any issues: a
two-way process.
• Provides recognition of strengths and
achievements.
• Helps identify development opportunities.
© 2008 SHRM
7
Southwood School: Contextual information
•
•
•
•
High School in the UK (state school)
Established nearly 40 years ago
800 students aged 13-18
120 staff
> 80 teachers
> 40 support staff (nonteaching staff)
• Average staff retention rate: 72%
• Average length of service: 5+ years
© 2008 SHRM
8
Southwood School:
History of performance management
• The teachers are required by law to follow the
government-mandated performance
management process.
• In the past, the support staff have used the
same process.
• Support staff are unhappy at taking part in a
process, which is largely inappropriate.
• Performance management is perceived quite
negatively by the majority of support staff.
© 2008 SHRM
9
Best practices for PM
• Both parties should be prepared for meetings
and dedicate their time.
• Appraisers must show their commitment to the
process to engage appraisees.
• It should be a two-way process where issues
are discussed.
• Effective training must be provided to meet the
needs of appraisers and appraisees.
• There should be no surprises at the review
meetings; any prior incidents should have been
dealt with after the event.
© 2008 SHRM
10
Practical issues: An overview
• Who should carry out performance
management interviews?
• How often should they be carried out?
• When should they be reviewed?
• What is the focus and purpose?
• How structured should they be?
• How can they be monitored?
© 2008 SHRM
11
Terminology used in this case study
Appraiser—the manager who is taking part in the
performance management process by reviewing
past performance and looking to the future with
the appraisee (employee).
Appraisee—the employee who is the ‘subject’ of
the performance management process. He or she
will take part in the discussions with the appraiser
(usually the line manager).
© 2008 SHRM
12
Now you are ready to read the Southwood
School Case Study
• When you have read the case study, there are
a number of activities to help develop your
understanding of performance management.
© 2008 SHRM
13
References
Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing
Performance: Performance Management in
Action. London: CIPD
Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human
Resource Management Practice. 10th edition.
London: Kogan Page.
© 2008 SHRM
14