Success Image. Gain respect by being positive, upbeat, committed etc. 1 Power Authority Ability to influence others behaviour in a desirable way without compromising own behaviour Characteristics: Relationship based Dependance factor Can be learned Omnidirectional Types of Power Reward 2 Right to order. Hierarchal in nature. Flows downward. Granted by organization. Ex set goals, evaluate personnel, assign work. Ethics Considerations: Punishment should be consitent, uniform, and private. Communications and respect are fundamental. Does the power behaviour: Influence Process of affecting thoughts, feelings and behaviours of others. Zone of indifference is range by which employee percieves influence as legitimate, and will not evaluate. If employee percieves illegitimate, only managers power can expand the zone. Authority is not as effective at expanding the zone. 1. Produce a good outcome for internal/external stakeholders? The greatest good for the greatest number of people. 2. Respect the rights of all stakeholders? 3. Treat all stakeholders fairly and equitably? Procedural fairness & equity theory. Creating Obligation. “you owe me!” Power relationship/identification. Mentorship allows fast track to expert power and power by association. Excellent performance. Related to image of success. Become multi-talented and indespensible. Volunteer for undesirable tasks, etc. Limit access to information. Knowledge is power. Information is valued, if you control it you affect DM process. Controlling resources. You have what others want. Resource dependancy. Budgets are an example. Aspiration based. Supplements legitmate power. Ex: granting authority, recognition, compenstation, etc Developing a network. This may lead to informaion, resource and influence power. Coercive Disincentives. Punishment and threat. Supplements legitimate power. Ex. Assign undesirable tasks, negative feedback. 3 How Employees Gain Power Reorganize job. Empire building. New responsibilities. Be creative. Risk taking is rare. Use entrepreneural methods. Legitimate Referent Authority. Based on position within hierarchy. Personal vice postional power. Admiration. Very personal, anyone can have it. Charisma Knowledge worker. Acquire specialized expertise in given field(s). Expert Power. Manipulate rules. Embrace those that help you, change those that do not. If writing procedures you have power. Control personnel decisions. Training and development, human resources etc. You affect people. Expert Personal vice positional power. People defer due to expert knowledge. Manage your boss. ID his DM style, level of fromalization, his goals and objectives. Influence the boss. Ways To Manage Your Boss (upward mobility) Assumptions: The boss does not have all the alternatives The boss does not have all the information So… 1. Know thyself: 2. Know thy boss: Strengths/weaknesses Preferred DM style Level of desired independance Strengths/weaknesses Preferred DM/work style Goals & objectives Pressures on him 3. Reconcile above in a relationship that: Fits both needs and styles Has understood goals and expectations Has effective communication Is based on respect and performance Tip: Always offer solutions not problems!! 4 How Subunits Gain Power Subunits difer in: Employee number Budget size Facilities DM impact 5 Organizational Politics Unit ability to control strategic management outcomes through: Determined by: Defn: influence to obtain non-sanctioned ends or sanctioned ends through non-sanctioned means Granting of permission Provision of resources Work completion Provision of critical information Results Conditions for: Process Approved Scarcity of resources: If there is plenty to go around then there is no power in having them. Non-Approved Uncertainty: subunits that can help reduce uncertainty have power. We do not like uncertainty. Ex. A unit in a merger that provides information on who will now be doing what has power. Effect most notable in Bounday spanner units, those that tie organization to external environment (that is where most uncertainty probably comes from) Sales & marketing, legal, R&D. Crentrality. Units performaing tasks on critical path. This units play a critical role such as authority (budget allocation) or process such as Q&A in industry where quality is important Absence of Substitutes. Dependancy under another name. Basically you have a monopolistic power within the organization. If there are alternatives you lose power. Approved Non-Approved Sanctioned work that is efficient/effective (based on 3 questions under Ethics) Rules followed but achieve undesirable results Cause of whistle blowing, inequity perception Pursue valued results with questionable methods Worst case. Insider trading is an example. Whistle blowing: Belief that the organization is violating his/her instrumental/terminal values, or the law. Bypasses organizational hierarchy to go external. Based on high ethical standards, often best interest of the organization in mind. 6 How Managers Play Politics Political Strategies Line vs. Staff conflict: Staff measures put in place to enhance organization, yet both staff & line practice: 1) witholding info 2) gaining access to powerful execs 3) image enhancement 4) increasing centrality. This must be managed or else org suffers. Sponsorship/coalition building: gaining of politicalpower through association (interpersonal power bases of sponsor). Rules. 1) loyalty 2) follow orders 3) let sponsor take the credit 4) show gratitude (sounds like brown nosing) Insurgency/Resisting Authority: Going too far, following the rules in a manner not desired by management. Work to rule is an exam,ple. 9 Research on Leadership Traits 8 Leadership Vs. Management Situational Leadership 3 approaches Managers ‘handle things’ (Latin root for hand) Status Quo Leaders instigate change (go in new directions hence, the name) Managerial Categories (Mintzberg) Interpersonal – establish working relationships Informational – collection and distribution of information Decision roles – setting, implementing and monitoring progress towards goals. Good interpersonal and information aspects needed for good DM roles. Mintzberg’s Role of the Manager 3 Categories 10 Roles Interpersonal Figurehead* Leader * Liaison (performs ceremonies) (motivates employees) (builds networks) Informational Monitor Disseminator Spokesperson* (information scanning) (information sharing – internal) (information sharing – external) Entrepreneur Disturbance handler Resource allocator Negotiator (seeks change) (responds to pressures) (provides resources) (reaches agreements) Decisional Note: 48% of time spent with subordinates. 7% with superiors. 44% with peers and outsiders. Managers spend very little time alone without being interrupted. Leadership Challenge cites 9 minutes. * These roles have disappeared to a large extent in fully decentralized organizations Trait Approach Behaviour Approach Non-observable Core assumption – leaders possess traits that allow them to rise above the crowd (physical, social, intellectual etc.) Result of early research disappointing (bogus theory) Bennis & Nanus refined theory: Logical thinking Persistence Empowerment Self control Observable Core assumption - Leaders exhibit behaviour that Theory fails to take into account the situation in which leadership occurs (does the leader make the situation or does the situation make the leader? If latter can be the case then ‘trait’ approach is futile) Situation is important as Churchill was not considered a great leader until wartime. Condition IS C o Time pressure, ambiguity, threat Up it ---- o Interesting & challenging work Reduce Reduce o Goals certain, task clarity Lwr it Up it o Lack job knowledge, job vague Up it ---- influences subordinate performance and satisfaction Two fundamental behaviours: Initiating Structure (the process): o Work procedures o Planning assigning tasks o Clarifying work roles 10 o Supervising workers o Asking for results Consideration (the people): o Approachability o Supportiveness o Maintenance of high morale in work unit o Concern for group welfare o Maintenance of collaborative atmosphere "One Best" style is where leader rates high in both aspects Improvement over Trait approach since it concentrates on what a leader does, rather than what they are like. It therefore implies that leadership can be learned. Theory fails to address the issue of leadership as a cause or effect. I.e. if a team is highly successful, it may bring out consideration behaviour in the coach. (Chicken or egg dilemma). 11 Situational Leadership Theories Called contingency since it is contingent on the situation as to what type of leader to use (high/low LPC) Fiedler's Contingency Theory Based on orientation of leader to LPC (least preferred Coworker) LPC Use working thoughts about LPC to determine if Leader is task or relationship oriented. Leader behaviour interacts with favorableness of situation High LPC will empathize with LPC and have feelings (he is not so bad) Low LPC will look primarily at results and not the person (He sucks and doesn’t get the job done) 3 Components to Favourableness of Situation Leader/member relations Most important component Quality of atmosphere Examples are loyalty and trust If absent, insubordination, absenteeism etc may be present Task structure Position Power Clarity of work and goals Easier to influence people with clear Note: The leaders orientation cannot be easily changed. It is preferred to match the leader to the situation. If situation changes then change leaders.. This is awkward and practically leaders may have to remain constant, in which case the leader must try to adapt. If so follow below: Leaders legitimate authourity The more of this the more performance measures when present If not present there is ambiguity and members question leader favourable the situation. Modify leader-member relations: Spend more leisure time Request certain people/eliminate certain people Supervise troublesome employees Improve morale with rewards Situational Favourableness When situation is highly favourable, there is little stress and the task oriented leader can behave in a relationship based way. If the situation is highly unfavourable then there is stress and the team needs a leader to help them focus on the task. In between, the leader must shore up leader member relations which is the strength of the high LPC relationship oriented leader. High Low Leader – member Relations Good Task structure Structured Modify Task structure: Create less structured tasks by giving the group new problems to solve Create more structured tasks by organizing tasks into structured, standardized, smaller, more controlled pieces Poor Unstructured Structured Unstructured Position Power S W Task S W S Relationship Most effective leadership orientation W S W Task Modifying Position Power: To raise position power: show group who’s boss (use legitimate power) and ensure all information channeled through the leader To reduce position power: invite members to participate in planning and decision making, delegate increased power and authority. 12 Leader Reward & Punishment House’s Path-Goal Theory Leaders main job is clarification of pathways between workers performance to rewards. Therefore a transactional theory of leadership. LEADERSHIP Based on BM principles: Positive, negative re-inforcers, punishment & extinction Performance Contingent Reward Behaviour. Extent to which leader provides rewards based on performance. Associated with high levels of job performance and satisfaction. Stresses perception of leader fairness. Pathway = effort to performance; performance to rewards Performance Contingent Punishment Behaviour. Punishments based on performance. Mixed results for job performance and job satisfaction. Based on 2 situational factors Non-Contingent Reward Behaviour. Worker task ability and need for achievement Environmental factors: task clarity, routineness and challenge Power Politics Influence Extent to which a leader provides reward regardless of performance. If leader provides rewards in arbitrary fashion (favouritism), then there is immediate negetive reaction magnified by kick in of the equity theory. Good performs will leave or work less to achieve equity. 13 Neutralizers/Substitutes Neutralizers: reduce effect of influence attempts. Substitutes: reduce need for influence attempts. Neutralizers can become substitutes. All based on dependency. If worker has other means to achieve rewards or goals then these other means become neutralizers. If however these other means still support the leaders goal, they become substitutes. Ex. Team highly cohesive may have a lot of intrinsic rewards in work. External influence may not be as powerful (neutralizer) but also may not be necessary (substitute) as the team has its own governance mechanisms. Non-Contingent Punishment Behaviour. Therefore leader must develop following behaviours: (dependant on situation) Provision of punishment regardless of performance. This has a strong negative reaction on job performance and satisfaction. Directive: work planning, setting standards, giving instructions, clarifying work expectations. Direct them. Good for workers who prefer high work structure that provides feedback. Also good when workers question their own task ability-tell them what to do. Supportive: friendly, supportive, caring, considerate. Support them. Participative: Using workers ideas in problem solving. Get them to participate. Achievement-oriented: Setting goals and expecting achievement. Keep them focused on the goal. Good for subordinates with strong achievement drive. If tasks are clear and procedures are routine, any leadership behaviour may be seen as intrusive. If there is ambiguity and challenge the directive and participative works best. How to use rewards/punishment (recap of module3) Ensure rewards are based on clear, well understood and measurable performance standards Use recognition Create as much variety in reward system as possible Avoid punishment unless necessary, then fo it in private Avoid delays in use of both reward and punishment 1. Power, authority, influence. 2. Sources of interpersonal power 3. Methods used be employees to gain power 4. How subunits become powerful 5. Conditions that make political behaviour more likely 6. How managers play politics 7. Effective methods for upwards management 8. Leadership v.s. behaviour 9. Difference between leadership research 10. Consideration and initiating structure 11. Situational leadership 12. Leader reward and punishment behaviours 13. Neutralizers and substitutes 14. The entrepreneural profile 15. Entrapreneural vs administrative behaviour 16. Organizational factors encouraging entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship Defn: a process of opportunity recognition followed by a plan to exploit the opportunity. Entrepreneural traits are acquired not inherited 15 Entrepreneur v.s others 14 Entrepreneural Profile (flawed) Behaviour Dimension Suffers from the same problems as the trait approach to leadership. You can only partly understand a phenomenon if it is removed from its context. Entrepreneurs: Are stubborn (tenacious, make sacrifices, handle failures) don’t give up. Are driven (seeks accomplishment, strong desire, master of own destiny, clear vision of goals). Exercise ownership (assume responsibility, problem solving) Are novel (in approach to things, catch things others miss) Are focused. Even in face of ambiguity can be productive, lower risk with careful planning Strategy Opportunity Exploitation DM Resource Allocation Reward practices Entrepreneur Administrators Spot opportunities Effectiveness through change Control resources Efficiency through status quo Welcomes change, believes always room for improvement, org structure that is flexible Minimize risk by renting, leasing (more flexibility, money not tied up in assets) Salaries high to retain high value workers, creative reward sys (proactive) Change and opportunity not linked, believes in heirarchy for sake of tight control Own stuff (more conservative) expand when market is right (reactive) Periodic salary surveys to keep competitive (reactive-keep up with others) Dissatisfied with the status quo Start off in similar way as small business owners, but outgrow that classification Exploit opportunities others miss 16 Organizational Encouragement of Entrepreneurship Idea Champion (me) – recognizes a problem and generates a solution Sponsor (boss) – lends positional power to the cause. Nutures the idea and allocates resources. Godfather (Commander) – authority to say “make it happen – this is the way it is going to be!” In addition the organization must allow for horizontal coordiantion to protect the innovation teams from outside interference. Gailbraith call these Islands for unecumbered thinking or ‘greenhouses’. They are different from other parts of the firm. They are often physically removed, and take on unique charactieristics that reflect the work habits of the team members.