Chapter 14
The workforce of tomorrow
Individual dimensions of change:
Emotions, Adaptability, Genetic influences
Work dimensions of change:
Technology, Temporary workforce, Lifelong learning
Societal dimensions of change:
Economic competition, Values,
Time
The Workforce of Tomorrow
Fastest growing occupations:
Registered nurses
Postsecondary teachers
Retail salespersons
Medical assistants
Network systems and data communications analysts
Physician assistants
Between 2002 and 2012, based on the Bureau Labor Statistics
Civilian labor force will grow by 12%
Fastest growing group will be seniors
Number of workers 55 and older is projected to increase by 49.3%.
They will account for 19.1% of the workforce, up from 14.3%
Women will also account for a larger share of the working population, up
1% to 47.5% by 2012.
Men’s share of the workforce is expected to decline by 1% to 52.5%
Between 2002 and 2012, based on the Bureau Labor Statistics
Emotional Labor: how employees behave when they are required to feel, or at least appear to feel, certain emotions that facilitate their job performance
“…..those who work in customer service may encourage repeat business by showing smiles and good humor, whereas those who work as bill collectors or in law enforcement may find that an angry demeanor results in the best “customer” response (Hochschild,
1983; Sutton, 1991; VanMaanen & Kunda, 1989). For therapists or judges, a lack of emotional responding may be needed when listening to clients. In each case, the emotional expression (or suppression) results in more effective workplace interaction. “
(Grandey, 2000)
Emotions vs. moods
Characteristics of emotions in the workplace
Common at work
Produce positive and negative work outcomes
Individual differences affect emotions
Adaptability: willingness to embrace new situations.
Relational skills:
Communication
Interpersonal relating
Conflict resolution
Influencing capabilities
Important with shift to work teams
Adaptable employees must:
Handle emergencies or crises
Handle work stress
Solve problems creatively
Deal with uncertain/unpredictable work situations
Learn work tasks, technologies, and procedures
Demonstrate interpersonal adaptability
Demonstrate physically oriented adaptability
Genetic differences are hypothesized to influence job factors such as job choice, performance, how we feel about our work, length of time on a job, and level of income
One main areas of research concerns the heritability of stress
Genetic assessment/measurement:
Krumm (2002) suggests that genetic assessment should be illegal because it could lead to genetic discrimination.
Genetic discrimination can be defined as the discrimination that results
"against an individual or a member of an individual's family solely on the basis of that individual's genotype."
(Krumm, 2002)
Individual Dimensions: Genetic
Influences —Discrimination
“A 24 year old woman excelled at her social work job. She attends a conference on Huntington’s
Disease and discloses that she is at risk for developing it. Shortly thereafter, she is fired”.
“During his first job interview, a 53-year old man discloses that he has hemochromatosis, but notes that he is asymptomatic. During his second interview, the employer tells him that he is concerned about his disease. The employer asks if the man would be willing to accept the job without medical insurance. Anxious to procure employment, the man agrees. During his 3 rd interview, the employer informs him that, although the employer would like to hire him, it cannot do so because of his disease”.
Individual Dimensions: Genetic
Influences —Consequences
Krumm (2002) suggests the following consequences of genetic testing:
Creation of a genetic underclass
The violation of individual privacy rights
Use of genetic discrimination as a pretext for other forms of discrimination
Advances in information technology are the driving forces behind major changes in how we work
(Van der Spiegel, 1995)
Issues:
More complex jobs
Different types of training
Enhancing the sharing of information
Creating “virtual offices” for workers on the go
In 1990, there were approximately 100 temporary employment agencies and
470,000 temporary employees in US. In 2000, there were approximately 1,500 agencies and 1.6 million employees.
These numbers are likely to increase.
Why use temporary workers?
Less cost for employer
Sources of temporary workers:
Women with children
Downsized workers
Retired workers
Recent college graduates
Temporary work pays less, has little or no job security, offers few opportunities for growth. So, many temporary workers are unsatisfied
Work Dimensions: Temporary
Workforce
Outcomes of temporary workers depend on the situation:
Employees who held temporary jobs voluntarily , with jobs consistent with their prior education , had more positive attitudes toward their jobs
Employees looking for permanent jobs were less satisfied with their pay and their agencies
Employees using their temporary agencies to obtain full-time jobs and those who were temporary-topermanent had more positive job attitudes
New idea is that workers will learn throughout their lifetime and career.
Rise of certificate programs
Organizations as “vendors of employment”
Global competition is the single most powerful economic fact of life in the
1990s
In the 1960s, only 7% of the U.S. economy was exposed to international competition. In the 1980s 70% was exposed
Today, one in five American jobs are tied directly or indirectly to international trade
Merchandise exports are up more than
40% since 1986, and every $1 billion in
U.S. merchandise exports generates approximately 20,000 new jobs
Fairness
Equity vs. equality
Impact on group differences
Gender
Physical strength
The Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicate:
10.8 million U.S. managers work
49 or more hours per week
Top executives work 50 –70 hours per week
An early 1990s poll of 1,344 middle managers reported that:
• 33% of managers work 40 –49
•
• hours per week,
57% work 51 –60 hours per week
6% work more than 60 hours per week
“American workers work 137 hours more per year than do Japanese workers, 260 hours per year more than do British workers, and 499 hours per year more than do French workers.”
Why do American workers do this?
Economists suggested that
American work hours have a lot to do “with the American psyche, with American culture”
Cultural differences:
Past-oriented cultures focus on tradition
Future-oriented cultures emphasize goals, aspirations, future risks
Time as a personality construct:
Serial monochronicity : doing one task at a time, start to finish
Polychronicity : doing multiple tasks at once.
Time-based issues are leading cause of stress
The future may look very different from the past
Old axiom “the past is the best predictor of the future” may have to be modified