- Gabriele Köhler

advertisement

Evolution of the

„development architecture“

Gabriele Köhler

Development economist, Munich

Visiting Fellow, IDS, Sussex office@gabrielekoehler.net

G.Koehler@ids.ac.uk

www.gabrielekoehler.net

Ludwig Maximilians University

PhD-Program International Health

Module I

Munich, 12 December 2011

1)

Overview:

Human development and poverty

2)

Evolution of the development cooperation architecture

3)

The case for a bold vision: rights-based, universalist, transformative

1) Human development & poverty

Human development at aggregate level: slow but steady improvement

Human Development Index, trends 1970-2010

Working poverty

Malnutrition

Economic, fiscal, climate crises

 at least 100 million more people hungry and undernourished

 an estimated 64 million more people in income poverty

205 million people unemployed at least 55,000 more children likely to die each year from 2009 to 2015

175 million children affected by climate change

Reducing child mortality – a moral and environmental imperative

Hans Rosling Tedtalk

 http://www.gapminder.org/videos/r educing-child-mortality-a-moraland-environmental-imperative/

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase I: Colonial administration

(1900s – 1950s)

Predominant ideology:

Spreading „progress“ and „civilisation“

Driving forces:

Colonial regimes for economic gain

Colonial regimes for resources

Colonial regimes for power

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase II: Independence movements &

„development aid“

(1960-1980)

Predominant ideology:

Transfer capital and technology to the capitaldeficient South – economistic approach to development

Keynesian economics

State led growth

Driving forces:

• independence movements in the South

• post-war recovery, affluence, guilt in the North –

Re- nascent globalisation

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase III: structural adjustment

(1980s – 1989/1990 and beyond)

Predominant ideology:

Overstating role of marktes, downplaying the role of the state, intervening in developing country governments‘ policy space

Driving forces:

Economic and political strength of the developed countries

Interest in „South“ for markets, production – global value chains

Debt crisis in the South

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase IV: Cooperation as “partnerships”

(1990s – 2000)

Predominant ideology:

End of the „cold war“ : rebalancing of power

Seeming collapse of state-led development

Series of UN global summits -

Social development theme

Driving forces:

• greater economic dependence of the North on the South

Emerging South North trade and investment

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase V: MDGs; Aid Effectiveness

(2000 – 2008)

Predominant ideologies:

push for human development

focus on social development – different from economistic approaches of the 1960s

development onus on the South

the „bad governance“ discourse

Driving forces: economic & political polarisation

Stalled progress on human development;

Slow economic growth – or jobless growth;

Multiple social exclusions;

Accelerating domestic conflicts;

Climate change and accelerating frequency of disasters

2.) Evolution of development architecture

Phase VI: Multi-polar development since 2008

Drivers

G-20, pushing „G-192“ aside

Emerging economies: BRIC(S) and BASIC with export success, outward investment, sovereign funds

New bilateral donors changing the donor landscape

Private foundations - more grants available

Predominant ideologies

“Pluri-pragmatism”

One size fits all versus national ownership & policy space

Growth and human development

Overemphasis on evidence based policy-making versus grand design and visions of social justice

The new geography of growth and poverty

Source: Authors' elaboration based on World Bank (2011), World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC

The new geography of growth and poverty

Source: Authors' elaboration based on World Bank (2011), World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC

Countries of the world estimated GDP in purchasing power parity, 2010 s

G 20 countries:

 Circa 90 per cent of global GNP

 80 per cent of world trade

 Two-thirds of the world's population.

( Source: http://www.g20.org/about_what_is_g20.aspx

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

G20 Seoul development consensus action points

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

6) infrastructure, private investment and job creation, human resource development, trade, financial inclusion, growth with resilience,

7)

8)

 food security, domestic resource mobilization,

9) knowledge sharing

Principles: highlight human rights but reliance on economic growth

Country level innovations:

Progressive, rights-based, universalistic policies

Rights to education, health, school meals, food,

Right to work – employment – decent work

Right to information

Right to social protection

Rediscovery of the role of the state

Social protection policy environment

Some South Asian policy responses

Direct food transfers

Social

Assistance

Job

Creation

Affirmative action

Human rights

Cooked school meals (IND)

Subsidized PDS

(IND, NPL, BGD)

Subsidized grain prices

Universal old age pension (NPL)

Benazir Income

Support Program

(PAK)

Child benefit (NPL)

Unorganized sector health insurance

(IND)

National Rural

Employment

Guarantee (IND)

Employment

Generation for hard core poor (BGD)

Karnali Employment

Program (NPL)

Employment generation for rural unskilled workers (PAK)

Secondary school stipend for girls

(BGD)

Education for all

(NPL)

Child grants for girls

(IND)

Rural development and community based interventions

(IND)

Right to food/National

Food Security Act (IND)

Mid-day meal (IND)

Right to education (all)

Right to work (IND)

Right to health services

(all)

(IND, BGD, NPL)

New economic realities – poverty and vulnerability in South and North

Losers of globalisation – the informal economy, the poor, migrants, the socially excluded, children, women, people with disabilities

Winners: high growth economies, successful private sector, emerging economies, private donors taking on the development agenda

New colonialism

MICs – landgrab, collusion with corrupt governments – social and environmental sell-outs, ODA driven by security or commercial interests

G20 replacing “G192”, undermining the

UN

Converging North and South

MDG outcomes worst among socially excluded groups – in

North and South

Income gap widening

Human development gap widening within countries

3. The case for a bold vision

The case for a bold vision

Improve – enhance - transform human development outcomes o o

Social justice –

Equitable inclusive human development

clearer conceptual basis

more explicitly policy-oriented

bolder, more openly progressive policy stance

Beyond 2015: deepening the MDGs

 human rights dimensions, human dignity, and choice income and and wealth inequalities social exclusion and poverty in multidimensional mode applicable to all societies all MDGs– food, employment, poverty, education, child & maternal health, HIV-

Aids etc, gender equality, environment

 violence and conflict ecological destruction and climate change subjective perceptions political and personal security

“bottom up” participatory decision making

 employment/decent work and asset access/social protection policy focus+ : ”heterodox”; from the South good governance solidarity universalism/social contracts domestic resource mobilisation

Universality and inclusiveness

Building resilience and reducing vulnerability

Building national economies/subnational/nationa l/global coherence

The case for a bold vision: Next steps?

Normative umbrella of international development cooperation: Universal

Declaration of Human Rights

Recapture UN’s lead role in advocating for universal human rights and social justic e

Influence the discussions on “post 2015”

The 99% movement

References

Jonnathan Glennie, 2011, The OECD should give up control of the aid agenda. Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/apr/29/oecd-control-aid-agenda .

28 April 2011

Richard Jolly, Louis Emmerij, Thomas Weiss 2001, Ahead of the Curve? UN ideas and global challenges.

Indiana University Press

Joseph Hanlon, Armando Barrientos, David Hulme, 2010, Just give money to the poor. The development revolution from the global South. Kumarian Press

Naila Kabeer, Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice. The challenge of intersecting inequalities. IDS and UN MDG Achievement Fund. 2010. www.ids.ac.uk

Gabriele Köhler, Development interventions: A parade of paradigms. In: Gabriele Köhler, Charles Gore et al,

Questioning development. Essays in the theory, policies and practice of development interventions.

Metropolis Verlag: Marburg 1996

Gabriele Köhler, Policies towards social inclusion. Global Social Policy. April 2009: pp. 24-29, Sage publications

Robert Marten, Jan Martin Witte 2008, Transforming Development? The role of philanthropic foundations in international development cooperation. Global Public Policy Institute. GPPi Research Paper Series No. 10

(2008) www.gppi.net

. Accessed 25 Nov 2010

Dane Rowlands 2008. Emerging Donors in International Development Assistance: A Synthesis Report. Norman

Paterson School of International Affairs. Carleton University. http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/user-

S/12447280141Synthesis_Report.pdf

. Accessed 25 Nov 2010

Andy Sumner 2010. GLOBAL POVERTY AND THE NEW BOTTOM BILLION: WHAT IF THREE-Quarters of the poor live in MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES? WORKING PAPERIDS. www.ids.ac.uk

References

Gabriele Köhler, Development interventions: A parade of paradigms. In: Gabriele Köhler, Charles Gore et al, Questioning development. Essays in the theory, policies and practice of development interventions.

Metropolis Verlag: Marburg 1996 (for period up to 1995) (can be made available as a pdf)

UN General Assembly, 2010, Outcome document of the High-level Plenary Meeting of the 65 th session of the General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals. September 2010. A/64/L-72. www.un.org/MDGs

Jens Martens, 2011, Thinking ahead. Development Models and Indicators of Well-being Beyond the MDGs.

Friedrich Ebert Foundation and Global Policy Forum Europe.www.fes-globalization.

UNDP. Human Development Report 2010. www.undp.org

UNRISD, Combating Poverty and Inequality: Structural Change, Social Policy and Politics 2010. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpPublications)/BBA20D83E347DBAFC125778200440A

A7?OpenDocument

UN General Assembly, Outcome document of the High-level Plenary Meeting of the 65 th session of the

General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals. September 2010. A/64/L-72. www.un.org/MDGs

WHO, World Health Report 2008. Primary health care, now more than ever. www.who.int/whr/en http://geography.about.com/od/lists/a/independenceday.htm

, accessed 22 Nov 2010 www.worldmapper.org/posters/worldmapper_map213_ver5.pd

, accessed 22 Nov 2010 http://www.g20.org/about_what_is_g20.aspx

, accessd 23 Nov 2010

Download