Performance Management: Focus on Performance Appraisals facilitated by: Aaron Greenberg and Maureen Simunek-Appelt Office of Human Resources Nova Southeastern University Course Objectives After completing this workshop, the learner will be able to: Understand NSU’s performance rating scale Fill out a Performance Appraisal Form Conduct meaningful performance appraisal discussions Be prepared for some common challenges of the appraisal process Set effective goals with employees Your Experience Think about your last review: What thoughts come to mind? What went right, what went wrong? Performance Management An iterative process of goal-setting, communication, observation and evaluation to support, retain and develop exceptional employees for organizational success. Set Goals Communicate Evaluate Observe Why Manage Performance? To reach organizational mission and goals Encourage and reward behaviors aligned with organizational mission and goals Curb or redirect non-productive activities What do Employees Expect? Clear expectations Positive/constructive feedback on a regular basis Involvement in goal setting Be treated fairly and consistently Sharing of information and resources Job/career enrichment opportunities Planning for the Process Review employee’s job description Understand the performance measurement system Review notes from the year Understand employee expectations Types of Appraisal Forms Exempt Exempt Managerial Non-Exempt Senior Administrator Forms are available online at: http://www.nova.edu/cwis/hrd/ohrforms.html Rating Scale 4 - Excellent (Exceeds Standards) 3 - Good (Fully Meets Standards) 2 – Acceptable (Usually Meets Standards) 1 – Unsatisfactory (Fails to Meet Standards) Excellent (Exceeds Standards) Clearly considered to be exceptional performers. Consistently exceed the communicated expectations of the job function, responsibility or goal. Demonstrate unique understanding of work beyond assigned area of responsibility. Identify needs and provide unique, innovative and workable solutions to problems. Achievements and abilities are obvious to subordinates, peers, managers and customers. Good (Fully Meets Standards) These employees are “on track” and fully achieve expectations. Independently and competently perform all aspects of the job function, responsibility, or goal. Performance consistently meets the requirements, standards, or objectives of the job. Occasionally exceeds requirements. Recognizes, participates in, and adjusts to changing situations and work assignments. Acceptable (Usually Meets Standards) Generally meet expectations required for the position. Competently perform most aspects of the job function, responsibility or goal. May require improvement in one or two areas of consistent weakness. Employee requires coaching in a weak area or may need additional resources or training to meet expectations. Unsatisfactory (Fails to Meet Standards) Employees with this rating fail to satisfactorily perform most aspects of the position (or function). Performance levels are below established requirements for the job. Employee requires close guidance and direction in order to perform routine job duties. Performance may impede the work of others and the unit. A performance improvement plan must be submitted to OHR. Scheduling the Meeting Notice Location Self-evaluation Appropriate form Comments Supervisory approval Filling out the Form Review notes Behaviors vs. value judgments Align categories on form with employee’s job responsibilities Optional categories Set goals Setting Effective Goals Quick Tips S.M.A.R.T. Goals Specific Measurable Achievable/Agreed Upon Relevant Time-bound Aligned Adjustable Set Goals Communicate Evaluate Observe Common Mistakes Labeling Recency Central Tendency Leniency Horns/Halo Effect Constancy Similarity Performance Appraisal Practice Review Performance Appraisal for items that are: Under-rated Over-rated Poorly stated Refer to employee background Rewrite Performance Appraisal using tools reviewed today Make sure to fill out the form completely including the Goals section Common Performance Appraisal Challenges Conducting the Meeting Review rating system Discuss employee’s self review Let employee talk Be aware of all three parts of the messages you send: Words Tone Body Language Stay focused on performance Dates to Remember Appraisals due to your HR contact before May 1, 2009 Review form with HR contact before meeting with employee No reclassifications between April 1 and July 31, 2009