WB CCS Conference - Sandton
Tim I. B. Lund
Royal Norwegian Embassy - Pretoria
Two perspectives
• The view from Norway
• The view from SACCSC
Norwegian CCS policy
– Ambitious goals for broad deployment of CCS;
– All new gas fired power plants with CCS;
– Facilitates R&D on CCS, cooperates closely with
industrial actors and provides public funding;
– Public CCS spending 2009+2010: 800 million USD;
– International CCS activities
(but small compared to Renewables support)
Storage
• The Sleipner field (North Sea): 1 million
tons/CO2stored annually since 1996 (due to
CO2 tax);
• The SnøhvitField: 700.000 tons/CO2 stored
annually (Barents Sea);
• In Salah (with Statoil).
Capture
• Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) to develop, test and
qualify CCS technologies;
• World’s largest demo plant of this kind;
• Partners so far: The Norwegian State (Gassnova), Statoil,
Shell and Sasol;
• Two sources of flue gas and two technologies being tested:
Amine and Chilled Ammonia technologies + others?
• Capture capacity: 100,000 tons CO2;
• Start-up 2011/2012;
• To be followed by large scale capture plant;
• Final decision in 2016.
Strong CCS cluster
•
•
•
•
Oil and Gas companies;
Universities;
Research institutions;
Consultants and third party service providers;
Many learning and cooperation opportunities.
SACCSC Persepctive
After 2,5 years:
• CCS firmly on the agenda in SA (DoE but also other departments);
•
Key projects under way;
•
Capacity building needed at all levels;
•
Public engagement not started. Must be done early and right.
But:
• Regional work important (ref. energy system). Key role for WB.
•
•
•
•
Geology (no storage – no project);
Regulatory and institutional;
Cross border issues;
Financing;
SACCSC Persepctive, Cont.
• SACCSC is the CCS competence Centre in SA:
 Use the SACCSC network, competence and systems to support key SA
priorities;
 Create synergies regionally and South-South;
 Avoid duplication of efforts.
• SACCSC seeks to leverage international financial support:
 Avoid duplication of efforts;
 Financing needs will increase as we move from studies to testing.
Conclusion
• WB involvement in CCS in SA and the region very welcome;
• We look forward to the results of WB work.
Thank you
tim.lund@mfa.no
Key messages
DG Magubane:
•
IRP confirms CCS role in SA Energy system and CC ambitions;
•
SANEDI now listed as a new company – Key role on CCS
•
2011 DoE strategic plan: CCS Regulatory framework
•
DoE-WB list of activities presently being discussed (?)
•
2nd CCS Week in October 2011. CCS will figure prominently at COP17 in Durban (Energy pavillion?)
WB, Ruth Kagia:
•
Bold CC promise in Copenhagen based on LTMS;
•
Issue is not Why but How.
•
15% of electricity for light;
•
•
•
•
WB, Natalia K:
WB Energy financing BUSD 13 last year
CSP increasingly important for WB;
CCS Regional study:
•
•
•
•
Legal and institutional framework
Techno-economic ass. Of CCS in Power system
Climate finance
Finance of CCS project
Key messages, Cont.
SAPP, Musara Beta:
•
Hydro in North; Thermal in South. Demand in South (SA). SAPP est. in 1995;
•
SAPP: 74,3% Coal. 20,1% Hydro (SA is 82,5% of installed capacity).
•
New Plans, 2025: 42% Coal, 32% Hydro, 22% Diesel (excl. Grand Inga).
•
EE: 2010, 750MW (target was 1400MW);
•
Cannot evacuate power from North to the South (bottleneck);
•
Coal: 74%56%; Hydro: 20%26; Wind&Solar:0%0,5% (needs power-pooling and interconnectors)
•
SAPP pt focuses on RE; SA is looking at biomass for coal fired power stations.
EA, Sean McCoy: CCS Technology Road Map (2009)
•
pt not on target – non OECD countries must be involved (2020, need 50-50);
•
CCS not just clean coal: Synfuel (Coal fired power 40%);
•
5 trillion USD needed 2010-2050! (125 BUSD/year). 11% of Blue map incremental investment.
•
Sleipner, Snøhvit, In Salah, Rangely, Weyburn
•
50% of planned projects are EOR;
Key messages, Cont.
GCCSI, Alice Gibson:
•
Asset lifecycle model;
•
Slides on status of CCS projects globally:
•
Cost estimates are now 20-30% higher than 2-3 years ago;
•
Public engagement is key!
DECC: James Godber
•
CEM, Abu Dhabi-April 2011 COP17;
SACCSC, BB
•
SA needs tech and fin support (COP15);
•
“We want a complete and legally binding agreement”
•
2016 Test injection (10,000t)
•
SA #13 in CO2 globally; Synfuel (SASOL / PetroSA app. 30 mt CO2/yr);
Eskom, B.McColl
Key messages, Cont.
•
•
•
Regional aspects key (ref. SAPP, RERA, etc.);
Leverage internal (+ int. funds) for int. cooperation. Need money and decide on its use!
Public engagement. Key in SA.
•
Norway RE support 10x that of CCS (2011 1,600 MNOK?)
•
Zuma signing: Sasol, Eskom, SANBI or DEA, SARI