Two dimensional (2D) System Ideas for Industrial Processes Peter Wellstead MAP lecture, 2003 1 Hamilton Institute Examples of Practical 2D Processes Paper making Plastic film extrusion Coating processes (adhesives on paper sheets) Steel rolling and continuous casting Spray MAP lecture, 2003 actuation systems 2 Hamilton Institute Motivation: Personal Experience 1970-72: real-time image processing for bubble chamber photographs 1975-85: self-tuning control 1980’s: self-tuning filters for 2D images 1980’s: modeling and control of polymer film extruders 1990’s: algorithms for practical 2D systems MAP lecture, 2003 3 Hamilton Institute Motivation: Practical (e.g. Paper Making) Technical - product quality and plant flexibility – 1% reduction in waste produces a 300,000 Euro saving per year per machine Economics Environment MAP lecture, 2003 - EU plant efficiency requirements 4 Hamilton Institute Motivation: Research A generic class of 2-D dynamic systems - paper, plastic film, sheet forming, coating and converting Opportunity for innovation - 2-D concepts not previously used in sheet forming. Applications driven research - real 2-D systems as motivation for appropriate 2-D theory. MAP lecture, 2003 5 Hamilton Institute Idealised Plastic Film Extruder System: Aspects of the Control Problem CD actu ator a rray m aterial w eb Cross d irection, (CD) gau ge p ath Machine d irection, (MD) Delivery m echanism MAP lecture, 2003 scann ing gau ge 6 Hamilton Institute CD actu ator a rray sensors m aterial w eb Cross d irection, (CD) gau ge p ath Machine d irection, (MD) Delivery m echanism sensor signal processing scann ing gau ge actuation 1 0.8 controllers B estimates 0.6 estimators 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 actuator position MAP lecture, 2003 7 Hamilton Institute Control Issues: Practical 2D Systems Models and identification Sensors and sensor signal processing Control MAP lecture, 2003 8 Hamilton Institute Models u(i,n) u(1,n) u(2,n) u(MU,n) CD actuation points Two Dimensional Manufacturing Process CD output measurement points y(i,n) y(MY,n) y(1,n) y(2,n) MAP lecture, 2003 9 Hamilton Institute Models Model for identification: 2D-ARMAX 1 1 1 1 ˜ A(w , z )y(m, n) z B(w ,z )u CD (m, n) 1 1 C(w , z )e(m, n) where w 1 horizontal shift operator z 1 vertical shift operator MAP lecture, 2003 11 Hamilton Institute Future Data Models Current measurement direction of scan j=0 j=1 j=2 j=3 Two dimensional data structures for sheet processes i = -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Past Data NSHP support for M=4 and N=3 Future Data Curr ent mea sure ment dir ection of sc an j=0 j=1 j=2 j=3 Structures used in image processing i = -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Past Data QP support f or M =4 and N=3 Future Data Current measurement direction of scan This structure for 2-D control j=0 j=1 j=2 j=3 i = -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Past Data SHP support for M=4 and N=3 MAP lecture, 2003 12 Hamilton Institute Identification 2-D identification: 2D-ARMAX estimation 2-D adaptive memory methods non causal model estimation methods edge effects MAP lecture, 2003 13 Hamilton Institute Identification Future Data non causal model estimation methods uses row-recursive methods for FIR 2-D filter implementation to generate prediction errors and simulate Current data Past Data MAP lecture, 2003 14 Hamilton Institute Identification 2-D adaptive memory methods 2-D forgetting factors give selected weights to information from all directions (m ,n ) j (m -i,n -j) MAP lecture, 2003 i i 15 (m +i,n -j) Hamilton Institute Identification Structure estimation Future Data Example shows a method for QP support size estimation Current m easurement layer 1 layer 2 layer 3 layer 4 layer 5 increasing model order layer 6 Past Data MAP lecture, 2003 16 Hamilton Institute Control Issues: Practical 2D Systems Models and identification Sensors and sensor signal processing Control MAP lecture, 2003 17 Hamilton Institute Sensors: the requirement Extrusion line speeds move at 300m/min. Paper machines move at 1000m/min (~30miles/h) Less than 0.002% of a paper roll is measured Need for increased density of measurement MAP lecture, 2003 18 Hamilton Institute Scanning gauge data collection But what is happening to the product here? And here And here Data collected on this path MAP lecture, 2003 19 Hamilton Institute How do we get full sheet information? Hardware for Full Sheet Sensing – sensor arrays Software for Full Sheet Sensing – Generalised Sampling Theory MAP lecture, 2003 20 Hamilton Institute Distortion of sheet data using scanning gauges Collecting data along a zig-zag path scanning gauges are performing a 2-D SAMPLING PROCESS. 2-D spectral analysis shows that the two scans (left scan and right scan) collect sheet data in different ways. MAP lecture, 2003 21 Hamilton Institute Sampling theory reminder One dimension Two dimensions time/space domain time domain t 0 T 2T 3T 4T 5T 6T 7T 0 T 2T 3T 4T 5T 2-D frequency domain frequency domain f1 Data spectrum 1/T f2 f -2/T -1/T MAP lecture, 2003 0 1/T Data spectrum 2/T 22 -1/T Hamilton Institute Spectra of scanning gauges Frequency Domain f1 Time Domain left scan The scans are NOT in the CD, Alternate scans are in opposite directions f2 f1 2T right scan f2 RESULT: the two sets of spectra are distorted and in different ways MAP lecture, 2003 23 Hamilton Institute Scan averaging interpretation In a basic scanner the results of adjacent scans are averaged MAP lecture, 2003 24 Hamilton Institute Result of basic gauge signal processing Data spectrum left scan MAP lecture, 2003 Right scan spectrum added 25 Hamilton Institute How to avoid distortion and get full sheet information Use Generalised Sampling to reconstruct the MD signal. Get the full sheet information by assembling the reconstructed MD signals MAP lecture, 2003 26 Hamilton Institute Generalised Sampling a By considering reconstruction along an MD line, the Generalised Sampling Theorem can be used to reconstruct the full 2-D sheet and double the bandwidth. T a MAP lecture, 2003 27 a 5T 3T a a a a Hamilton Institute a Signal processing interpretation 2T Sampling along the MD as a generalised sampling process Signal processing block diagram MAP lecture, 2003 28 Hamilton Institute MD reconstruction results Reconstruction of MD data using generalised sampling Actual MD data Reconstruction of MD using conventional signal processing Results using conventional methods MAP lecture, 2003 29 Hamilton Institute Summary Conventional averaging of scanner data gives a distorted view of the sheet variations, and has an aliassing bandwidth of 1/2T. Generalised sampling reconstructs full sheet data by compensating for the scanning geometry. The bandwidth is DOUBLED to 1/T. MAP lecture, 2003 31 Hamilton Institute How do we get full sheet information? Hardware for Full Sheet Sensing – sensor arrays. Software for Full Sheet Sensing – use 2-D sampling theory find out how and under what conditions full sheet information can be reconstructed from scanning gauge data. MAP lecture, 2003 32 Hamilton Institute Multi-gauge scanning array MAP lecture, 2003 34 Hamilton Institute Practical 2D Systems: Scanning Sensor Array Research System MAP lecture, 2003 35 Hamilton Institute Multi-gauge scanning arrays Calibration of sensors across the web/sheet done by special ‘calibration transfer’ trick Only one expensive gauge is required Gauge technologies can be mixed (e.g. beta gauge and infrared) Generalised sampling is applicable to multiple gauges MAP lecture, 2003 36 Hamilton Institute Control Issues: Practical 2D Systems Models and identification Sensors Control MAP lecture, 2003 and sensor signal processing (Courtesy of Honeywell) 37 Hamilton Institute CD Profile Control Loop CD Controller CD Process The pursuit of better paper quality has placed new demands on Cross Directional (CD) control systems – smaller zone sizes – faster response – lower CD spreads MAP lecture, 2003 38 Hamilton Institute Tuning: just right!!! smooth paper! active, but not picketing MAP lecture, 2003 40 Hamilton Institute CD actu ator a rray sensors m aterial w eb Cross d irection, (CD) gau ge p ath Machine d irection, (MD) Delivery m echanism sensor signal processing scann ing gau ge actuation 1 0.8 controllers B estimates 0.6 estimators 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 actuator position MAP lecture, 2003 41 Hamilton Institute NEW DIRECTIONS: 2D Scanning Actuators Consider Mass Deposition Processes – eg spray painting Source of mass is spray gun that is moved over surface – manipulation usually done by robot Aim to deposit specific mass profile on surface – for most applications, desired profile is uniform (ie flat) MAP lecture, 2003 42 Hamilton Institute Scanning Actuators Given “footprint” of mass flow rate from gun What track should the gun follow over the surface to achieve desired mass profile? Scanning actuator is “dual” of scanning sensor MAP lecture, 2003 43 Hamilton Institute Part being Sprayed Raster Pattern Results from 2D scanning theory tell you: – how close to put the tracks – how far off edges you need to scan to avoid edge effects Robot Path MAP lecture, 2003 44 Hamilton Institute More Complex Paths Generalised Scanning Theory also shows that this path is also valid Path is suitable for thermal spray processes – aim to achieve specific temperature profile – more difficult problem because heat flows Robot Path MAP lecture, 2003 45 Hamilton Institute Example of 2D Spray Actuation SPRAY FORMATION OF METAL – Spray forming of metal as an alternative to casting – 2D generalised sampling ideas from sensing are DUALISED to get dual results for actuation. – Metal is sprayed in a special pattern to optimise spray cast metal quality MAP lecture, 2003 46 Hamilton Institute Benefits of spray-forming Reduced cost Costs US$ 100Million to provide tooling for new car model Reduced time Takes >18 months to produce tooling for big parts (bumpers, bonnets, door panels etc) Freeze design long before production MAP lecture, 2003 47 Hamilton Institute MAP lecture, 2003 48 Hamilton Institute MAP lecture, 2003 49 Hamilton Institute MAP lecture, 2003 50 Hamilton Institute MAP lecture, 2003 51 Hamilton Institute Typical sprayed steel “flat” MAP lecture, 2003 52 Hamilton Institute 2D Spray Actuation Painting. Spray coating Metal deposition And many more For example……….. MAP lecture, 2003 53 Hamilton Institute And 2D Sensing again: Sub-sea profiling MAP lecture, 2003 54 Hamilton Institute Acknowledgements Greg Stuart of Honeywell: Greg supplied the information and slides of his profile control system. Steven Duncan of Oxford University: Steven supplied slides of his 2D actuation systems Final photograph from ‘CropDusters’ MAP lecture, 2003 55 Hamilton Institute