Measuring the electron EDM with Cold Molecules E.A. Hinds Imperial College London Warwick, 25 May, 2006 How the electron gets structure point electron + + - + + polarisable vacuum with increasingly rich structure at shorter distances: (anti)leptons, (anti)quarks, Higgs (standard model) beyond that: supersymmetric particles ………? Electric dipole moment (EDM) electron spin beyond std model: edm + - T + - If the electron has an EDM, nature has chosen one of these, breaking T symmetry. Two motivations to measure EDM EDM is effectively zero in standard model but big enough to measure in non-standard models direct test of physics beyond the standard model (Q: is there a unified theory of all particle interactions?) EDM violates T symmetry Deeply connected to CP violation and the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe (Q: why is there more matter than antimatter?) eEDM (e.cm) 10-22 10-24 10-26 10-28 Multi Higgs MSSM f~1 Left MSSM Right f ~ a/p 10-30 10-32 10-34 10-36 Standard Model Excluded region (Tl atomic beam) Commins (2002) de < 1.6 x 10-27 e.cm Our experiment (YbF molecules) is starting to explore this region CP from particles to atoms (main connections) field theory CP model electron/quark level nucleon level nuclear level Tl, YbF de Higgs SUSY Left/Right dq atom/molecule level neutron dcq Strong CP ~ qGG NNNN Schiff moment mercury Theoretical consequences of electron EDM de < 1.6 x 10-27 e.cm - a direct window onto new physics selectron e gaugino g e naturally ~ a/p CP phase from soft breaking naturally O(1) me de ~ (loop) 2 sin CP L scale of SUSY breaking naturally ~200 GeV SUSY electron edm ~ 5 1025 cm naturally The “natural” SUSY EDM is too big by 300 CP < 310-3 ?? L > 4 TeV ?? The magnetic moment problem Suppose de = 5 x 10-28 e.cm (just below current limit) In a field of 100kV/cm de.E ~_ 10-8 Hz When does mB.B equal this ? B ~_ 10-18 T ! It seems impossible to control B at this level especially when applying a large E field A clever solution For more details, see E. A. H. Physica Scripta T70, 34 (1997) amplification (Sandars) E de electric field Interaction energy -de E• FP atom or molecule containing electron Polarization factor Structure-dependent relativistic factor ~ 10 (Z/80)3 GV/cm 18 GV/cm Effective field E (GV/cm) Our experiment uses a molecule – YbF 20 15 10 Amplification in YbF 5 0 0 10 20 30 Applied field E (kV/cm) EDM interaction energy is a million times larger (10-2 Hz) mHz energy now “only” requires pT stray field control Insensitive to B perpendicular to E (suppressed by 1010) Hence insensitive to motional B (vxE/c2=104 pT) The lowest two levels of YbF X2S+ (N = 0,v = 0) +deE F=1 + | -1 > | +1 > + E -deE 170 MHz F=0 |0> Goal: measure the splitting 2deE to ~1mHz Interferometer to measure 2deE | +1 | -1 |0 E |+1 Source B 0 ? 0 Split Pump A-X Q(0) F=1 | -1 170 MHz p pulse Recombine 170 MHz p pulse Phase difference = 2 (m B + deE)T/h Probe A-X Q(0) F=1 How we make the YbF beam A pulsed supersonic jet source Yb Target Pulsed Valve 2% SF6 in 4 bar Ar YAG laser (25mJ, 10ns) Skimmer Pulsed YbF beam The YbF gas pulses are cold (3K), but move rapidly (600 m/s) The whole experiment PMT rf recombine rf split Pulsed YbF beam Probe A-X Q(0) F=1 Pump A-X Q(0) F=1 Fluorescence | +1 | -1 Scanning Scanning the the B-field rf-frequency Time-of-flight profile |0 rfTime frequency (MHz) B of (nT) flight (ms) Interference signal (kpps) Fit to YbF interferometer fringes Phase difference = 2(mB+deE)T/h 40 30 20 10 0 -60 -30 0 30 Magnetic field B (nT) 60 fringe pattern versus time of flight arrival time (ms) experimental data 2.7 narrower fringes 2.6 slower molecules 2.5 faster molecules 2.4 2.3 -200 -100 0 100 200 Magnetic field B (nT) Measuring the edm Detector count rate -E 4deET/h E df = 4deET/h -B0 B0 Applied magnetic field EDM data taken de (10-25 e.cm) 100 hrs at 13 kV/cm 3 2 1 -1 -2 -3 3 2 1 -1 -2 -3 80 hrs at 20 kV/cm EDM Data summary Each dataset has a statistical sensitivity to de of 7 x 10-28 e.cm No result yet - the experiment is incomplete In particular, measurements of systematic effects Systematic tests 16 internal machine states – linear combinations flag undesirable asymmetries 4 external machine states Simultaneous measurement of magnetic fields inside the machine Simultaneous measurement of leakage currents Measurements at low electric field in progress Battery runs etc, etc in progress Repeat using a control molecule in preparation Upgrades in progress Improvement Factor Comment Normalization detector 1.5 Normalize shot-to-shot variations Higher repetition rate 2 From 10Hz to 50Hz 2nd pump laser-beam 1.5 Access N=2 population Rb-cell magnetometry 1 Higher sensitivity to magnetic fields Fiber laser 1 Low maintenance, more stable/reliable Simultaneous YbF/CaF 1 Better measurement technique Sensitivity level: 2 x 10-28 e.cm Decelerated molecules 10 Much longer coherence time Sensitivity level: ~10-29 e.cm Deceleration and trapping We are building a Stark decelerator for YbF and CaF molecules Aim to bring molecules to rest and load them into a trap Perform the edm experiment with slow, trapped molecules: coherence times > 100ms The eEDM roadmap Principle of deceleration For a review see arXiv:physics/0604020 Apr 2006 2.5 Energy B 0 (1,0) 2.5 5 (0,0) 7.5 10 12.5 0 5 10 Electric Field B 15 e 20 Our alternating gradient decelerator design 21 stages macor insulators high voltage electrodes AG focussing in other contexts Optical guiding Ion Trapping First YbF decelerator result Decelerator off Signal Decelerator on 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Time of flight (ms) Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 173002 (2004) 1.7 1.8 Now also CaF Vision of experiment with trapped molecules trap t ~ 1s supersonic source E B decelerator prepare split recombine probe interferometer Other electron EDM searches Cs atoms Fountain (LBL), Trapped (Penn State), Trapped (Texas) Long coherence time Gadolinium Garnets GGG (LANL), GIG (Amherst) Huge number of electrons Molecules Metastable PbO in cell (Yale) Large effective E field Trapped PbF (Oklahoma) Large effective E field & long coherence time Trapped HBr+ ions (JILA) Neutron EDM expt Room-temperature experiment finished polarised neutrons in a bottle Hg atom co-magnetometer laser beam Measurement: dnxE spin precession New limit: 3.0 x 10-26 e. cm hep-ex/0602020 Electric field 10kV/cm CryoEDM starts in October Ultimately 100x more sensitive polarised neutrons moderated in superfluid helium Several other neutron EDM experiments also starting Current status of EDMs d(muon) 7×10-19 neutron: electron: d e.cm 10-20 Electromagnetic 10-22 d(proton) 6×10-23 YbF expt 10-24 Multi Higgs 10-28 10-29 d(neutron) 3×10-26 SUSY f~1 Left-Right d(electron) 1.6×10-27 f ~ a/p 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 trapped molecules Conclusion Measuring the electron EDM has great potential to elucidate • particle physics beyond the standard model • CP violation • matter/antimatter asymmetry of the universe Some of the most fundamental questions in physics Current Group Members Collaborators Richard Darnley Henry Ashworth Manu Kerrinckx Jony Hudson Mike Tarbutt Ben Sauer Ed Hinds Rick Bethlem Gerard Meijer Antoine Weis