PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
Integrated Transformation Program
Performance Governance System
ADVANCE COPY
PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD
MEASURE PROFILE
MEASURE PROFILES
Annexes
A
B
C
D
D1
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Regional Economic Development Index
PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval Rating
% of Pol Stns compliant with HRD Component
% of Pol Stns compliant with Process & System Component
% of Pol Stns compliant with Facilities Development Component
% of Pol Stns compliant with Citizen’s Empowerment Component
Ratio of Human Rights violations/cases reported against Police personnel
Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency
Regional Crime Solution Efficiency
% reduction of incidence of armed insurgents Activities and No. of Barangay Affected
Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants
% of personnel completed mandatory courses
% of personnel completed competency/specialized courses
% of personnel assigned to positions according to their Competency & skills
Grievance Ratio
% of personnel provided with housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance and Health care
% of policies implemented
% of required audits conducted
PRO-3 Resolution Rate of complaints on Corruption
Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme
Maintenance Management System
% of LGUs whose support to PPOs/CPOs/Stn Institutionalized with POCs
Ratio of internally and externally sourced funding
% of LGUs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNP
% of Police Station with LGU,s Anti-Criminality Action Plan
Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with the Interest Groups
Number of regular interactions with other pillars of the CJS
Regional Economic Development Index
Objective:
A safer place to live, work and do business
Rationale:
Improvement of per capita income of Region 3 is
indicative of a progressive socio-economic situation for a
more stable peace and order situation.
Is information about the measure available?
Still to be determined from NEDA data
When will this information be available?
As obtained from source
How is the measure calculated?
Per capita income of Region 3
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
A
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Yearly
What is the unit of measure used?
Regional Economic Development index
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Per capita income of Region 3
Where/How is it acquired?
Through liaisoning with NEDA
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
TBD
2011
TBD
2013
TBD
2016
TBD
PRO3 Performance Approval Percentage Rating
Objective:
Effectively enforce laws
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
As determined by source yearly
Rationale:
By effectively enforcing laws, perception and
impression performance will result in the community’s
positive public perception.
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of overall performance approval index
Is information about the measure available?
Yes, as obtained from source
When will this information be available?
What data is required in calculating the measure?
As determined by source
Where/How is it acquired?
Data from Pulse Asia, Asia Pacific Center for
Research
TARGET
As obtained from source
How is the measure calculated?
As determined by source
Who is responsible for setting targets?
NGAs
Who is accountable for targets?
NGAs
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
B
BASELINE
2009
67%
(NHQ figure)
2011
2013
2016
Percentage of Police Stations Compliant with HRD Component of a Model Police Station
Objective:
All PRO3 Police Stations shall be comparable to the
Model Police Stations.
Who is the responsible for setting the targets?
RPHRDD.
Rationale:
In line with the Model Police Stations project.
Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting
the targets?
PPOs/CPOs and RPHRDD.
Quarterly
How is the measure calculated?
MR – Moral Recovery , SVF – Spiritual Values Formation, CB - Capacity Building
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
6%
20%
60%
100%
A. Individual Compliance to HRD component = (MR /SVF*45) + (CB * 55)
Note: Maximum of 1 MR/SVF for the last 2 years, and 1 CB training
appropriate to designation.
B. Police Station Compliant =
to HRD component
Table of CB Appropriate Training for Designation
Sum of Individual Compliance of
of all Personnel
---------------------------------------------Total Nr of Personnel
C. Percentage of Police Stations =
Compliant with HRD component
Designation Class
Nr of Police Stations Compliant
to HRD component
----------------------------------------------Total Nr of PRO Police Stations
(
)*100
What data is required in calculating the measure?
A. Police Station Training Profile, Police Station List.
B. Table of CB appropriate training for designation.
Where /How is it acquired ?
PPOs/CPOs.
Minimum Training Required
Admin
Human Resources Mgmt Crs
Intel
Intel Orientation, Intel Analysis, PIC
Operation
Specialized Planning Crs
Invest
Basic Criminalistics, CIDC, SOCO,
CRIDEC
PCR
PCR Specialists Course, Psy Ops Crs
Logistic
Basic Logistic, Logistic Mgmt , Supply &
Property Mgmt Crs, Logistics Mgmt Seminar
Finance
Comptrollership, Finance Crs
Patrol
Police Responders Crs, SCOUT
Consolidated Quarterly Reports submitted by
Is the information about measure available?
C
TARGET
Yes, currently available
Note: Or other related Seminars
conducted at least at the PPO Level.
Percentage of Police Stations compliant with process and system component
Objective
To establish QSL in all police stations.
Rationale
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
To better serve the community
How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of
formula.
No. of police stations established within the region
Is information about the measure available?
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used?
Number of Police Stations complied
Available with minor changes
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where
/How is it acquired?
When will this information be available?
Monthly.
Summation of number of police stations compliant with the
establishment of QSL.
TARGET
D
Base line
2010
2011
2013
2016
6%
25%
50%
75%
Percentage of Police Stations compliant with Facilities Development
Objective
To establish Model Police Station within the entire
region.
Rationale
Who is responsible for setting targets?
PNP NHQ
Who is accountable for targets?
ORLDD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
ORLRDD
For the PNP to have a decent Police Station to better
serve the community.
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Quarterly
How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of
formula.
What is the unit of measure used?
Number of Police Stations constructed
No. of police stations established within the region
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where
/How is it acquired?
Is information about the measure available?
No. of Model Police Stations constructed / total number of
Police Station x 100
Currently available
TARGET
D1
Base line
2010
2011
2013
2016
33.59%
36.7%
44.53%
57.81%
Percentage of Police Station Compliant w/ Citizen’s Empowerment Component
Objective
Adopt the best practices in the community and rights
based policing supported by appropriate information and
communication technology.
Rationale:
It is an established component of model police station.
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
How is the measure calculated?
Numbers of Police Stations that displayed the service
standard and flowcharts of PNP Citizen’s Charter / Total No.
Of Police Stations X 100
Is information about the measure available?
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where
/How is it acquired?
Summation of the numbers of police stations that are
compliant with the displaying of service standard and flowchart
of PNP Citizen’s Charter.
Available with minor changes
TARGET
When will this information be available?
Monthly
Base line
2010
2011
2013
2016
100%
maintained
100%
maintained
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Number of Police Stn complied
E
100%
100%
maintained maintained
Ratio of human rights violations/cases filed in court against PNP personnel over population
Objective:
Adopt the best practices in community and rightsbased policing supported by appropriate information
and communication technology.
Rationale:
Reduction of human rights violation/cases are
best indicator for human rights compliance.
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available based on CHR Data
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
The measure will be updated/calculated on a
quarterly and annual basis.
What is the unit of measure used?
No. of cases of HRV per period.
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Where/How is it acquired?
The data is acquired through liaisoning with
CHR from PPOs/CPOs.
When will this information be available?
As soon the data is available at CHR
How is the measure calculated?
No. of human rights violations compared with
previous data covering the same period.
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
F
BASE
LINE
2010
0: 9,679
(Total No.
of PRO3
PNP
personnel )
TARGET
2011
0
2013
0
2016
0
Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency
Objective:
To improve the partial solution rate of criminal incidence.
To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis the number
of crime incidence reported to PRO3.
Rationale:
To reflect the true crime rate and come up with generation
of a timely and accurate crime statistics.
How is the measure calculated?
Crime Clearance Efficiency = Crime Cleared x 100%
Crime volume
Crime Volume – number of crime incidents committed in a
given area over a period of time which includes index and nonindex crimes.
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
When will this information be available?
Monthly
* CCE targeted at .5% increase per annum based on DIDM
G
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RIDMD
Who is accountable for targets?
RIDMD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting
targets?
RIDMD
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
% of total crime cleared and total crime
volume
What data is required in calculating the measure?
UCPER
Where/How is it acquired?
Through the reports from the different police
stations.
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
15.77
16.27
17.27
18.77
Regional Crime Solution Efficiency
Objective:
To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis number of crime
incident reported
When will this information be available?
Anytime
Rationale:
To reflect the law enforcement agencies investigative capability
or efficiency in the process of solving crime.
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Monthly
How is the measure calculated?
Crime Solution Efficiency = Solved Cases x 100
Crime Volume
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Solved cases out of the total crime
volume.
Crime Volume – No. of crime incidents committed in a given area
over a period of time which includes Index and Non- Index crimes
reported to the PNP.
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Total Cases Solved and Crime Volume
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RIDMD – RAD
Where/How is it acquired?
Through the reports from the different police
stations.
Who is accountable for targets?
RIDMD – RAD
BASE-LINE
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RIDMD - RAD
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
H
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
8.76%
9.26%
10.26%
2016
11.76%
Percentage reduction of incidence of armed insurgent activities and of no. of barangays affected
Objective:
Achieve excellence in performing the integrated QUAD
operation to overcome the insurgency problem
Rationale:
Insurgent activities constitute a major threat to peace and
order and hinder the socio economic-political stability of an area
Who is responsible for setting targets?
Regional QUAD staff
Who is accountable for targets?
Regional QUAD staff
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
Regional QUAD staff
How is the measure calculated?
No. of incidents in Current Yr – No. of incidents in Previous Yr
No. of incidents of Previous Yr
No. of brgys affected in Current Yr – No. of brgys affected in Previous Yr
No. of brgys affected of Previous Yr
How often is the measure updates / calculated?
Daily/monthly
When will this information be available?
Monthly
What is the unit of measures used?
Percentage reduction
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
What data is required in calculating the measure?
No. of armed incidents and of no. barangays affected
Where/How is it acquired?
Daily Intelligence Brief (DIB)
I
Baseline
2010
No. of Insurgent
Armed Activities
2011
2013
2016
15%
less 4
incidents
18%
Less 3
incidents
21%
Less 4
incidents
20%
Less 8
affected
barangays
25%
Less 8
affected
barangays
30%
Less 7
affected
barangays
21
No. of affected
barangays
39
Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants
Objective:
To entice at least 250% number of PNP recruitment quota to have a
better basis in determining the most qualified applicants.
What data is required in calculating the
measure?
Number of Recruit and Sum of Final Grade
of all Recruit and Allotted Quota for PRO3
Rationale:
Applicant is given corresponding points for the following in reference with NHQ
PNP Circular No. 2005-008 dated June 29, 2005 (Rationalization of the Qualified
Standards for the Initial appointments to the rank of Police Officer I):
Where /How is it acquired ?
Worksheets and Table evaluations of
documents submitted by the applicants.
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Every Recruitment Program/Quota
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Number of Recruits and Average Rating obtained by the recruits.
How is the measure calculated?
Nr . of Applicants
Nr. of Quota
X 100
Final Grade of an applicant is computed as follows: Education (Minimum 21 pts,
Maximum 30 pts), Eligibility (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Agility Test
(Minimum 11.25 pts, Maximum 15 pts), Interview (Minimum 16.75 pts, Maximum 25
pts) , Board Passers of their courses are given higher points in Education. Plus bonus
points for honor graduates and those with LLB units.
Rating on board exam/PNP Entrance or CSC Prof is the basis for Eligibility points.
Plus 1 pt for any additional eligibility. The top ranking applicants will be selected for
appointment.
J
Who is the responsible for Setting the
Targets? RPHRDD.
Who is accountable for targets?
RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RPHRDD
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
173%
250%
250%
250%
1,612
applicants
vis-à-vis
930 quota
Percentage of Personnel Completed Mandatory Courses
Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force
committed to serve and protect the people
Is the information about measure available?
Yes, currently available.
Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force
committed to serve and protect the people. All PRO3 should have
undergone the mandatory course required to their rank to enable them to
discharge the responsibilities tasked to them
Who is the responsible for Setting the
Targets?
DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 with
mandatory training/ schooling required for the current rank.
How is the measure calculated?
Total Nr of Personnel with mandatory
training/schooling required for the current rank
(
Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3
)
Who is accountable for targets?
DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB
X 100
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Updated Training Profile and Updated Strength Profile of PRO3
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
85%
90%
95%
100%
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Consolidated Training Profile and Strength profile from
RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB
K
Percentage of personnel completed competency /specialized courses
Objective:
Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police
force committed to serve and protect the people
Rationale:
Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police
force committed to serve and protect the people.
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3
completed competency/ specialized course.
How is the measure calculated?
(
)
Total Nr of Personnel w/ competency/specialized crse
Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3
X 100
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Nr. of PNP Personnel with competency/specialized course
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Report of Personnel with competency /specialized course
from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
L
Who is accountable for targets?
DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RPHRDD/RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd
RPSB
Is the information about measure
available?
Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the
Targets?
DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
60%
65%
85%
100%
Percentage of all personnel assigned to positions according to their competency and skills
Objective:
Uphold and promote the principles of meritocracy and fitness
in the PNP career ladder
Rationale:
Required Placement for Police Superintendent Based on the
Updated Provisional List of Position for PSUPT as of June 29, 2010
and Police Chief Inspector Based on the Updated Provisional List
of Position for PCINSP as of January 2009
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Total Number PSUPT and PCINSP occupying
T.O. Positions
How is the measure calculated?
(
Total No. of PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions
Allocated PSUPTs and PCINSP Positions
Is the information about measure available?
Yes, currently available
M
)
X 100
What data is required in calculating the
measure?
Nr. of PNP Personnel without
competency /specialized course
Where /How is it acquired?
Monthly Report of Placement of
PSUPT and PCINSP from the
PPOs/CPOs/ RPSB3
Who is accountable for targets?
RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RPHRDD
Who is the responsible for Setting
the Targets?
RPHRDD.
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
54%
70%
100%
100%
Grievance Ratio
Objective:
To address immediately any valid complaint by member(s) of
the PNP
Is the information about measure
available?
Yes, currently available
Rationale:
Promote the Grievance System of the PNP where they can
voice out their grievances and not in other venues. Speedy
disposition of these Grievances will result to the PNP personnel’s
trust in the System.
Who is the responsible for Setting the
Targets?
RPHRDD
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Quarterly and Annual Basis
Who is accountable for targets?
Immediate Superior or Chief of
office
What is the unit of measure used?
Ratio of grievances resolved to the total number of grievances filed.
How is the measure calculated?
Nr of Grievances Resolved : Nr of Grievances filed
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Nr. of grievances filed and resolved
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Report from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
N
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RPHRDD
and
Immediate
Superior or Chief of Office
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
0:0
1:1
1:1
1:1
Percentage of Personnel provided with Housing, Quartering, Educational assistance and Healthcare
Objective:
Institutionalize adequate package of benefits and remuneration
Rationale:
To determine the nr of Personnel who availed of housing,
Quartering, educational assistance and healthcare .
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Quarterly and Semi Annually
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of Personnel with
Assistance, Healthcare
Housing,
Quartering,
Educational
How is the measure calculated?
HOUSING= Total Nr of Personnel provided with housing by the PNP X 100
Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot
EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE =
Total Nr of Scholars
X 100
Total Nr of entitled dependents
Quartering =
Total Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters X 100
Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot
Health Care = No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE X 100
Total Nr of PRO Personnel
Is the information about measure available?
Housing - Yes, currently available
Educational Assistance - Yes, currently available
Quartering - Yes, currently available
RHE - No, Still to be formulated
O
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets?
RPHRDD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting
the targets?
RPHRDD
What data is required in calculating the
measure?
Nr. of PNP Personnel provided with
house and Lot., Nr of personnel without house
and lot, Nr. of PNP Personnel who were KIA.
Nr of entitled dependents of all KIA personnel,
Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters, No.
of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE, and
No of PRO3 Personnel Reported Confined
and Discharged from Confinement
Where /How is it acquired?
Reports from RPHRDD, RESPO,
RLRDD, RHS3
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
Housing 3%
6%
9%
12%
Quartering 5%
10%
15%
20%
Educational
Assistance 62.5%
100%
100%
100%
Healthcare
1.5%
1.75%
2.78%
4.33%
Percentage of policies implemented
Objective:
Ensure an enabling environment for Organizational
Development
Is the information about
available?
Yes, currently available
Rationale:
Determine whether all of the policies are implemented.
Who is the responsible for Setting the
Targets?
RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Quarterly and Annual Basis
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of policies implemented
(
)
X 100
What data is required in calculating the measure?
List of Existing Policies and Action taken / reports from units
on their implementation of policies.
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Reports from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
P
Who is accountable for targets?
RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Who is Responsible for tracking and
reporting the targets?
RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
How is the measure calculated?
Total Nr of Policies in the organization
Actual number of policies implemented
measure
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
100%
100%
100%
100%
Percentage of required audits conducted
Objective:
Ensure transparency and accountability in all
financial and logistical transactions
Rationale:
To optimize the proper utilization of funds and
management of logistical resources
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
Who is responsible for setting targets?
D-Staff
Who is accountable for targets?
D-Staff
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RCD
How are the measures calculated?
MOOE: 15 % 85% scheme
Personal Services: NCA received x 100
Fund released
Capital Outlay: Fund Released - NCA Received
Fund Utilization
Q
Note:
Computation of PS
312,120,355.45 x 100 = 100%
312,120,355.45
Computation of CO
3,729,000 – 559,350 = 85%
3,729,000
How are the units of measures used?
MOOE = Report of utilization
Personal Services = Report of Disbursement
Capital Outlay = Inventory reports of plants,
properties and equipment
What data are required in calculating the
measures? Where/how are they acquired?
MOOE = RAOMO (Registry of Allotment &
Obligation on MOOE)
Personal Services = RAOPS (Registry
Allotment & Obligation on Personal
Services)
Capital Outlay = RAOCO (Registry Allotment
& Obligation on Capital Outlay)
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
MOOE = 100%
100%
100%
100%
Personal
Services=100%
100%
100%
100%
Capital Outlay=100%
100%
100%
100%
PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CORRUPTION
Objective:
Ensure transparency and accountability in all
financial and logistical transactions
Rationale:
This will determine the rate of corruption in the
PNP
Is information about the measure available?
Still to be formulated
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of resolved cases
corruption
on
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/how is it required?
Monthly Report s submitted by PPOs and
CPOs
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RCD
Who is accountable for targets?
RCD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RCD
How is the measures calculated?
No. of complaints – No. Of unresolved X 100
No. of complaints
R
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
Zero
complaint
100%
100%
100%
Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme 15% - 85% (PROs/Field Units)
Objective:
Optimize utilization of financial and logistical
resources to support administrative, operational and
other priority programs of the PNP
Rationale:
This will put the operations of the PNP within the
context of a well defined, integrated and synchronized
planning and budgeting
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
Who is responsible for setting targets?
Program Directors (D-Staff)
Who is accountable for targets?
Program Directors (D-Staff)
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
All D-Staff, PROs, DILG/NAPOLCOM, COA, DBM
& NEDA
S
How is the measures calculated?
Per capita = Programmable amount
No. of personnel
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Sub-allotments
issued
to
Directors (D-Staff)
Program
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/how is it required?
Registry allotment of MOOE
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
100%
100%
100%
100%
Maintenance Management System
Objective:
To optimize utilization of financial and logistical
resources to support administrative, operational and other
priority programs of PRO3
Rationale:
An antiquated and dilapidated building for police
stations and PNP equipments put the lives of our personnel
in danger and continually undermines the capability of the
PNP to combat crime efficiently and effectively.
How is the measure calculated?
Police stations owned and constructed:
X + YX 100 = % of PS in good conditions
X – Total Nr. of PS presently in good condition
(Repaired/renovated and newly constructed)
Y – Nr. of PS for the year (Repaired/renovated and newly
constructed)
Z – Total Nr. of PS region wide
Mobility: No. of serviceable vehicles X 100
Total no. of issued vehicles
Firearms: No. of serviceable firearms X 100
Total no. of issued firearms
Inves Eqmt: No. of serviceable Inves Eqmt X 100
Total no. of issued Inves Eqmt
Commo Eqmt: No. of serviceable Commo Eqmt X 100
Total no. of issued Commo Eqmt
T
Who is responsible for setting targets?
ORLRDD
Who is accountable for targets?
ORLRDD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
ORLRDD
Is information about the measure available?
Available with minor changes
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage
of
serviceable
equipments
police
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/How is it acquired?
Data on status of police station buildings
renovated and the status of PNP equipment
regionwide which can be obtained from the
quarterly inventory reports submitted by the
PPOs/CPOs.
Baseline Data of Maintenance Management System
Police Station
Firearms :
Mobility
Investigative Equipment
Communications
BASELINE
2010
31%
92%
87%
90%
87%
2011
38%
93%
88%
91%
89%
TARGET
2013
50%
95%
90%
93%
93%
2016
66%
98%
93%
96%
98%
Note:
Police Station :
As of 2009 PRO3 has 51 total no. of Police Station owned and constructed vis-a-vis the 128 total no. of Police Station in the
region.
Targets indicated above are based on the submitted 15 years program for the construction of Police Station Buildings of the
Regional Engineering office3 to TDL dated June 21, 2009.
Completion of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the release of funds from the National Headquarters.
Firearms:
To attain the 1 is to 1 ratio issuance of short firearms to PNP personnel.
Filled-up of long firearms by 50% of all Police Stations and 100% on RPSB/PPSC/CPSC.
Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of firearms from the National Headquarters.
Mobility:
Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of mobility from the National Headquarters.
All Police Station will have at least 2 patrol cars/jeeps and 2 motorcycles
Investigative Equipment:
Every Police station shall have investigative equipments which contains finger print kit, tape recorder, security line, finger print
card and camera.
T
Communications equipment
The table represents the parameters needed
for a unit(PRO,PPO,CPO.MPS) to be
considered filled-up according to its
classification whether type A,B or C . At
present the region has total 1590 hand held
radio, 228 base radio and 209 mobile radios
with general average of 39.27 % filled-up.
UNIT
TYPE
Authorized Requirement
Hand
Held
BASE
MOBILE
PRO3
A
20
5
3
3RD RPSB
C
20
2
3
A
20
2
3
B
16
1
2
C
9
1
1
A
21
2
3
B
16
1
2
C
9
1
1
A
16
2
3
B
9
1
1
C
5
1
0
A
10
2
3
CPOs
MPs
PPSC
B
T
Percentage of LGU whose support to PPOs/CPOs is institutionalized with POCs
Objective:
Attain financial and logistical adequacy consistent
with law
Rationale:
To institutionalize the support of the LGU in anticriminal campaign of the PPOs/CPOs
How is the measure calculated?
Program Review and Analysis
Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS)
with support of POC / Total No. of unit
(PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) X 100
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Semi-Annually
Is information about the measure available?
Available with minor changes
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RCD
What is the unit of measure used?
Percentage of LGU’s support to PPOs and
CPOs
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/how is it required?
Reports submitted by PPOs and CPOs
Who is accountable for targets?
RCD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RCD
Note:
TBD: To Be Determined
U
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Ratio of internally and externally sourced funding
Objective:
Attain financial and logistical adequacy consistent
with law
How is the measures calculated?
Externally sourced funds
Internally sourced funds
Rationale:
This will put the operations of the PNP within the
context of a well defined, integrated and synchronized
planning and budgeting
What is the unit of measure used?
Externally sourced fund – Report of
collection
Internally sourced fund – GAA
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
What data is required in calculating the
measure/
Externally sourced fund – RFSO
Internally sourced fund – RCD
Who is responsible for setting targets?
D-Staff
Who is accountable for targets?
D-Staff
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
D-Staff
TARGET
BASELINE
2010
2011
2013
2016
1:12
1:12
1:11
1:10
Note:
Externally sourced fund (GAA)
154,023,250.00 = 12.47 or 12
Internally sourced fund (Fees from FAs) 12,350,618.00
V
Ratio= 1:12
Percentage of LGUs & LCEs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNP
(Percentage of Barangays with BPATs Organized and Mobilized)
Objective:
Achieving excellence in performing the Integrated
“QUAD +” Operations.
Rationale:
This would indicate the extent of the nationwide
implementation of LOI Bayanihan.
How is the measure calculated?
Number of Barangays with BPATs established divided
by the total number of barangays, especially in CT-cleared
areas multiplied by 100
Is the information about
the measure available?
Available with minor
changes
When will this
information be available?
As soon as regular
updates are done
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
W
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
By the number of barangays where BPATs are established.
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/
How is it required?
Number of BPATs mobilized and the names of supervisors.
Data are acquired through reports submitted through mail, e-mail
or fax
BASELINE
TARGET
2010
2011
2013
2016
95%
or
2,934
(BPATs
Organized)
3%
2%
100%
Percentage of Police Stations w/ LGU’s Anti-Criminality Action Plan
Objective:
Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the
stakeholders.
Rationale:
Holistic approach in addressing
the participation of LGUs.
% of PS with ACAP = # of Pol Stn with ACAP X 100
total # of Pol Station
Is information about the measure available?
Available with minor changes
X
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/How is it acquired?
ACAP of MPS/CPS
crimes involving
How is the measure calculated? Percentage Total Score
Gathered from Points Allocated
When will this information be available?
As submitted by CPS/MPS
How often is the measure updated?
Yearly updated
Who is responsible for setting targets?
ROPD
Who is accountable for targets?
ROPD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting
targets?
ROPD
BASELINE
2010
42%
(The figure
represents only
the updated
ACAP)
TARGET
2011
2013
100%
100%
2016
100%
Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with interest group.
Objective:
Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the
stakeholders through public information campaign.
Rationale:
To gain the support of stakeholders as partners for
a genuine transformation in the PNP.
How often is the measure updated?
Monthly basis.
What data is required in calculating the
measure? Where/How is it acquired?
Number of sustained ITP
lectures/Information campaign
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
How is the measure calculated?
Total number of ITP lectures conducted
Is information about the measure available?
Yes
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting
targets?
RPCRD
BASELINE
When will this information be available?
As submitted by PPOs and CPOs
2011
151
(InfoCamPaign)
Y
1 info
Campaign/
month/
station
TARGET
2013
1 info
campaign/
month
/station
2016
1 info
campaign/month/
station
Number of regular interactions with other pillars of CJS
Objective:
Sustain public information and
stakeholders and other pillars of CJS
dialogue
with
the
Rationale:
The number of interactions would indicate a sustained
public information and dialogue. This would also indicate the
effects of Information Operations efforts of the PNP.
How is the measure calculated?
Summation of the interactions with other pillars of CJS
conducted /initiated by various PNP offices/units.
Is the information about the
measure available?
Current Available
How often is the measure updated/calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Number of interactions conducted.
What data is required in calculating the measure?
Where/How is it required?
Summation of the number of ugnayans, dialogues
conducted and information operations media lines crafted.
Available through reports submitted via e-mail or fax.
When will this information
be available?
Available after monthly
consolidation of reports.
TARGET
BASELINE
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
Z
2010
2011
2013
2016
1/month/
station/
office
(100%)
6,720- activities
1/month/
station/
office
1/month/
station/
office
1/month/
station/
office