The National Congress lacks: Confidence, Respect, and Affection of the People •Brutus No. 1: “A free republic . . . must depend upon the support of its citizens. But when a government is to receive its support from the aid of the citizens, it must be so constructed as to have the confidence, respect, and affection of the people.” •Brutus No. 1: “ . . . the government must rest for its support upon the confidence and respect which the people have for their government and laws.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government A Republic can only exist in small territory: Fact • Brutus No. 1: “ . . . the people will not be likely to have such confidence in their rulers, in a republic so extensive as the United States, as necessary for these purposes. The confidence which the people have in their rulers, in a free republic, arises from their knowing them, from their being responsible to them for their conduct, and from the power they have of displacing them when they misbehave: but in a republic of the extent of this continent, the people in general would be acquainted with very few of their rulers; the people at large would know little of their proceedings, and it would be extremely difficult to change them.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Brutus No. 1: “The different parts of so extensive a country could not possibly be made acquainted with the conduct of their representatives, nor be informed of the reasons upon which measures were founded. The consequence will be, they will have no confidence in their legislature, suspect them of ambitious views, be jealous of every measure they adopt, and will not support the laws they pass. Hence the government will be nerveless and inefficient, . . .” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Brutus No. 1: “In so extensive a republic, the great officers of government would soon become above the controul of the people, and abuse their power to the purpose of aggrandizing themselves, and oppressing them. . . . They will use the power, when they have acquired it, to the purposes of gratifying their own interest and ambition, and it is scarcely possible, in a very large republic, to call them to account for their misconduct, or to prevent their abuse of power.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Cato No. 3: “But whoever seriously considers the immense extent of territory comprehended within the limits of the United States, together with the variety of its climates, productions, and commerce, the difference of extent, and number of inhabitants in all; the dissimilitude of interest, morals, and policies, in almost every one, will receive it as an intuitive truth, that a consolidated republican form of government therein, can never form a perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to you and your posterity, for to these objects it must be directed: this unkindred legislature therefore, composed of interests opposite and dissimilar in their nature, will in its exercise, emphatically be, like a house divided against itself.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government The culprit? Federalist No. 10 The ruse? “New Science of Politics” The scheme? • Extended Republic • Hierarchical Elections •Lengthy Terms of Office Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government The result? Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Oppose The proposed constitution is not sufficiently democratic or representative How so? (1) 65 men, with lengthy terms of office, could not possibly represent the multiplicity of interests spread throughout so extensive a country. Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Brutus No. 1: “ . . . a legislature, formed of representatives from the respective parts, would not only be too numerous to act with any care or decision, but would be composed of such heterogenous and discordant principles, as would constantly be contending with each other.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 11: “we must, after all, trust a vast deal to a few men, who, far removed from their constituents, will administer the federal government; there is but little danger these men will feel too great a degree of dependance: the necessary and important object to be attended to, is to make them feel dependant enough. Men elected for several years, several hundred miles distant from their states, possessed of very extensive powers, and the means of paying themselves, will not, probably, be oppressed with a sense of dependance and responsibility.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 11: “But in a government consisting of but a few members, elected for long periods, and far removed from the observation of the people, but few changes in the ordinary course of elections take place among the members; they become in some measure a fixed body, and often inattentive to the public good, callous, selfish, and the fountain of corruption.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 7: “ . . . a small representation can never be well informed as to the circumstances of the people, the members of it must be too far removed from the people, in general, to sympathize with them, and too few to communicate with them: a representation must be extremely imperfect where the representatives are not circumstanced to make the proper communications to their constituents, and where the constituents in turn cannot, with tolerable convenience, make known their wants, circumstances, and opinions, to their representatives; . . .” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Oppose The proposed constitution is not sufficiently democratic or representative How so? (2) Those most likely to be unrepresented would be the “middling” elements of society, and, instead, congress will be filled with aristocrats – consequently, those of the middle class would never run for congress, and if they did run, would be defeated for office. Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 9: “The true idea is, so to open and enlarge the representation as to let in due proportion of the third class with those of the first. Now, my opinion is, that the representation proposed is so small as that ordinarily very few or none of them can be elected; and, therefore, after all the parade of words and forms the government must possess the soul of aristocracy, or something worse, the spirit of popular leaders.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Melancton Smith: “The great easily form associations; the poor and middling class form them with difficulty. . . . A substantial yeoman of sense and discernment, will hardly ever be chosen. From these remarks it appears that the government will fall into the hands of the few and the great. This will be a government of oppression. . . . the substantial yeomanry of the country are more temperate, of better morals and less ambition than the great. The latter do not feel for the poor and middling class; . . . . They feel not the inconveniences arising from the payment of small sums. The great consider themselves above the common people--entitled to more respect--do not associate with them--they fancy themselves to have a right of pre-eminence in every thing. . . . We ought to guard against the government being placed in the hands of this class--They cannot have that sympathy with their constituents which is necessary to connect them closely to their interest: Being in the habit of profuse living, they will be profuse in the public expences. They find no difficulty in paying their taxes, and therefore do not feel public burthens: . . .” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government Average net worth of U. S. Senator: $8.9 million Median personal income of all individuals above age of 18: $25,149 Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government Federal Farmer No. 7: “In the representative branch we must expect chiefly to collect the confidence of the people, and in it to find almost entirely the force of persuasion. In forming this branch, therefore, several important considerations must be attended to. It must possess abilities to discern the situation of the people and of public affairs, a disposition to sympathize with the people, and a capacity and inclination to make laws congenial to their circumstances and condition: it must afford security against interested combinations, corruption and influence; it must possess the confidence, and have the voluntary support of the people.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government Melancton Smith: “ . . . when we speak of representatives is, that they resemble those they represent; they should be a true picture of the people; possess the knowledge of their circumstances and their wants; sympathize in all their distresses, and be disposed to seek their true interests. . . . it should also comprehend that kind of acquaintance with the common concerns and occupations of the people, which men of the middling class of life are in general much better competent to, than those of a superior class. . . . It calls for a knowledge of the circumstances and ability of the people in general, a discernment how the burdens imposed will bear upon the different classes.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government (1) Representatives sharing same interests as the people they represent Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government Brutus No. 1: “If the people are to give their assent to the laws, by persons chosen and appointed by them, the manner of the choice and the number chosen, must be such, as to possess, be disposed, and consequently qualified to declare the sentiments of the people; for if they do not know, or are not disposed to speak the sentiments of the people, the people do not govern, but the sovereignty is in a few. Now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people, without having it so numerous and unwieldly, as to be subject in great measure to the inconveniency of a democratic government.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government Brutus No. 1: “In a republic, the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar. If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions; and the representatives of one part will be continually striving, against those of the other. This will retard the operations of government, and prevent such conclusions as will promote the public good.” Federal Farmer No. 2: “a full and equal representation, is that which possesses the same interests, feelings, opinions, and views the people themselves would were they all assembled” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government (2) Frequent elections to ensure rotation in office Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 11: “It will generally be expedient for a man who has served four years in congress to return home, mix with the people, and reside some time with them: this will tend to reinstate him in the interests, feelings, and views similar to theirs, and thereby confirm in him the essential qualifications of a legislator. Even in point of information, it may be observed, the useful information of legislators is not acquired merely in studies in offices, and in meeting to make laws from day to day; they must learn the actual situation of the people, by being among them, and when they have made laws, return home, and observe how they operate. Thus occasionally to be among the people, is not only necessary to prevent or banish the callous habits and self interested views of office in legislators, but to afford them necessary information, and to render them useful: another valuable end is answered by it, sympathy, and the means of communication between them and their constituents, is substantially promoted; so that on every principle legislators, at certain periods, ought to live among their constituents.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Federal Farmer No. 11: “Even good men in office, in time, imperceptibly lose sight of the people, and gradually fall into measures prejudicial to them.” •Federal Farmer No. 11: “ . . . the knowledge, generally, necessary for men who make laws, is a knowledge of the common concerns, and particular circumstances of the people. . . . and surely none ought to consider them as places of profit and permanent support. Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government (3) Recall Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government Federal Farmer, in No. 11, agreed with Federalist No. 10 that “it is interested combinations and factions we are particularly to guard against in the federal government,” but Madison in Federalist No. 10 wants us to be removed from our representatives in order to stave off faction and secure the general good – but the Antifederalists proposed a far more efficient and effective recourse for doing this: recall their corrupt, ambitious, cheating, lazy, unrepresentative, aristocratic, etc. asses! Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government (4) Large number of representatives and small districts •Federal Farmer No. 7: “. . . a fair and equal representation is that in which the interests, feelings, opinions and views of the people are collected, in such manner as they would be were the people all assembled.” Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government What the Antifederalists Support Democratic and Representative Government (5) Actual Representation Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •George Mason: “To make representation real and actual, the number of Representatives ought to be adequate; they ought to mix with the people, think as they think, feel as they feel, ought to be perfectly amenable to them, and thoroughly acquainted with their interest and condition . . . .” Federalist No. 10 argues against actual representation It instead promotes virtual representation – and we fought a revolution against such an odious and unworkable concept. Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Opposed to virtual representation as espoused by Parliament during the Revolutionary period, and as by Hamilton in Federalist No. 35, in which he argues that there is a natural tendency for those of the lower social standing to defer to, and to rely upon, those of higher social standing – but the Age of Deference ended long ago, A[ss] H[ole]! Hamilton also argues that the feelings of the people are apt to be ones of inadequacy, inferiority, and incompetence Antifederalists on Representation and Republican Government •Basic fear of the Antifederalists: the loss of personal, direct contact with and knowledge of their representatives •They sensed quite accurately that an enlargement of the area of republican government would lead to a more impersonal system, and that the immediate, individual influence of each voter over his representative would be lessened. •The result would be that the central government will lack the confidence, respect, and affections of the people, and the government will instead become aristocratic, corrupt, inefficient, deadlocked, mysterious, callous, self-interested, distant, removed, and unrepresentative – in the end, no longer a free republic.