Digital Democracy,Communication Rights and the Media Rhetoric and Reality on the Internet Ideology of the Internet The Right to Communication The Call to Citizens CMNS 130 Rhetoric and Reality of the Internet A David and Goliath story Internet enables consumers to download the music they want, to break the power of the multinational recording labels Plus: Internet opens up choice: alternative news sources, alternative venues for distribution of new artists Minus: enables pornography to spread, rapidly being commercialised CMNS 130 Ideology 2 Why have countries around the world failed to see the Internet as offering a revolutionary technology with as broad a social impact as the radio in the 20s and the 30s? Why have they not protected and invested in a public space? Why do they frame the Internet as a right for consumers, and not a right for citizens? CMNS 130 The Right to Communicate Birdsall et al refrain from a full articulation. Why? Citizens should be involved in defining it Yet 1991 Canadian Act in Broadcasting did not involve Citizens….1996 US Act involved citizens, but the civic agenda lost CMNS 130 Communication Rights 1. 2. 3. 4. Right to inform and be informed Right of active participation in communication process Right of equitable access to communication resources and information Right to privacy: individual and collective source: Birdsall et al in courseware. CMNS 130 Constitutional Framework Stipulates “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of speech and the press and other media” In legal interpretation, both a shield and a sword ( unstable history) since may be subject to ‘reasonable limits’ Need more affirmation of a Right to Communicate A charter amendment A new judicial discourse A public internet/New Media policy( Birdsall et al) CMNS 130 Responsibilities to Communicate Democracy thrives on creation of a culture of citizenship Individuals have to assume responsibility to keep informed, participate in the political process, and direct their communication rights The issue: if these responsibilities honoured, does the State have to ensure there is noncommercial space for communication alternatives? Intervene to ensure choice Fund alternative news sources Support the CBC But also support indie/grassroots media more CMNS 130 Review What is the theoretical framework for this class? What do people say are the effects of the media? What are some of the central problematics in the study of the media in Canada and around the world? CMNS 130 The Overall Framework Cultural Model of Communication How do the media and communication processes construct a map of meaning in which people travel over time? Explores the predominant democratic values, constitutional frameworks and ideologies about what the media ‘ought’ to do Also implies point of view in evaluating how well they do Explores lack of ‘culture of citizenship in the media’ Introduces a ‘propaganda’ framework, in CMNS 130 Assumptions of the “Cultural Model” Both market , state and citizen decisions about the media create our cultural worlds Systems and structures of ownership and control create professional environments and values which promote a certain capitalist world view “cultivation” of world views, consequences on social stability, political cohesion and democracy are profound The effects are cumulative: long term: still only in second generation of their effects If you are a liberal/pro democracy, this is not fundamentally disturbing If you are critical of capitalism or seeking to restrain its rapacious excesses, you explore the operation of hegemony working to suppress minorities, workers and the dispossessed. CMNS 130 The Impact of Television: A Canadian Natural Experiment Communities like Igloolik twice voted against having TV in the North Eventually conceded A study by Tannis McBeth Williams looked at a natural experiment: before and after introduction in 1970s. There was ‘notel’ ‘mulitel’ and a control A multi part study CMNS 130 Impact of TV on Creativity ( Key to Culture of Citizenship) Does TV facilitate or inhibit creative thinking or imagination? Looked at the alternate uses task (e.g. tell me the different ways you can use a newspaper) Total number and originality scored CMNS 130 Findings: Creativity Notel scored higher before TV A drop in length people would try to solve problems Other dimensions: vocabulary use, spatial ability, reading IQ followed similar trends Particularly marked among children Why? TV displaced other activities where creativity is valued: displaced deeper information processing, encouraged convergent, not divergent thinking TV suppresses a culture of creativity, intrinsic to a culture of citizenship CMNS 130 Findings: Aggression/Civility ( Key to Culture of Citizenship) Looked at patterns of children’s play Aggression used in place of a social solution more often Stereotyping and other expectations more prevalent. Emotion, not Rational problem solving during conflict promoted Rejection of any effects not logically tenable TV cultivates a ‘mean world’ syndrome which saps a culture of citizenship, a sense of community empowerment Clearly, proven to displace other leisure pursuits CMNS 130 What are the Cultural Effects? Media now predominantly commercially driven ( less than 3% of TV viewing is now non commercial) Exist to sell ideas, products values Promote consumerism, individualism, will to gratify individual choice Promote ‘lifestyle’ politics: branding of self and identities “post” modern valorization of choice, diversity, difference All as superficial style Promote an ethical relativism: CMNS 130 What are the Political Effects? Media set the agenda for what the public thinks is important Public opinion polls repeatedly find what people say is the top problem facing the nation is what the media are covering ‘Frame’ news in a certain way So that elections are about the “horserace” and not the issues : Mayor DaVinci So that there is a “war on terrorism” which legitimates almost total suspension of civil liberties Guilty of war, not peacemongering? CMNS 130 The Conflict of Values in News Manufacture: Democracy’s Oxygen What sells What is ‘hot’ recent What is close and relevant Reports stars Involves conflict Easily labels: reductionist CMNS 130 What the society thinks it values What matters: What is not ambulance chasing Reports broad newsmakers and NGOs Features conflict resolution Complex Context: history, a What are the social effects? Fleras: media express dominant culture, contain minority cultures, establish hierarchy, exclusion or inclusion Promote social tolerance/intolerance or empathy/ indifference to ethnocultural or other difference Now, media interaction requires higher and higher access to money for the technology and literacy: creating a wider digital divide: a middle class gated community? The sociology of community is white, middle class and gated CMNS 130 Several Core Dichotomies to 130 Citizen versus consumer Market versus state Regulation versus deregulation Censorship versus freedom of expression Liberal versus reform responsibility Democracy versus Propaganda Cultural Democracy versus Cultural Industries CMNS 130 Citizen versus Consumer The audience is the commodity in commercial media: access to them is bought and sold to advertisers Their individual purchase/protest/switch off power is limited Consumer can veto in the marketplace ( Napster) and win partial victory Teeth of the self-regulatory bodies are weak Consumer Sovereignty not all that is supposed As citizens, they control the lawmakers Are shareholders in the CBC: their only non commercial ( and largest news source outside of Canada and in Canada) CMNS 130 Citizen versus Consumer CITIZENS See a right to communicate is central Maximize collective public goods Concerned about digital divide and growing gap rich and poor Focus on public CONSUMERS See freedom of choice Maximize individual wants See media as mostly entertainment, and a luxury, for those who can afford Focus on right to CMNS 130 Censorship versus Freedom of Expression There is no absolute right to freedom of expression in the Canadian constitution There are unique protections for minority expression, the consideration of when, in certain cases, social good may outweigh individual or corporate freedom of expression Canada has some of the most progressive standards in the world ( Gendersetting, Violence in Media etc) But every case is different: there is a superordinate freedom of expression, and some communities value it more highly than others: but citizens must be aware of how to influence community standards in its interpretation and CMNS 130 Censorship Versus Freedom of Expression Censorship May override basic freedoms when limits are ‘reasonable’, ‘democratic’( that is, prescribed by law) and demonstrably justified in a free, democratic and multicultural society Censorship is social CMNS 130 Freedom of Expression Fundamental to the individual, includes the media Should therefore be absolute Censorship is by an elite/control oriented and often misdirected at symptom, not underlying cause of social problems Democracy Versus Propaganda Historically, State’s have used propaganda against their enemies in war, and certain techniques on their own troops/citizens to mobilize in a ‘just’, democratically constituted war Propaganda involves censorship: it requires it to work Traditional propaganda during war has now expanded into ‘war on terrorism’ with no clear time horizon or clear enemy Democratic regimes now use political marketing, techniques of persuasion widely Sole protections: Ethics Commissioner, Access to Information Acts, vigilant public press and CMNS 130 Traditional Theories of Persuasion Appeals based on ethos ( character and credibility) Pathos ( emotion or feeling) Logos ( argument) The psychosocial dimension: Totalitarian propaganda plays on fear of other, will to security, uncertainty, tendency to conformity Democratic Propaganda plays on desire for well being, happiness. Sense of belongingness CMNS 130 Democracy Versus Propaganda Democracy Appeals to Ethos: egalltarianism, individualism We-ness Decentralised Lives on myth of rule of the people Indirect censorship Propaganda Appeal to Pathos: fear Other Centralised Lives on myth of ruler CMNS 130 Direct censorship Democratic Propaganda We are taught this is an oxymoron Since it is in aid of the ‘good’ it is not propaganda But it is not: democracies have become markets based on persuasion When is the continuum of persuasion antithetical to democracy, to civil rights and to justice? When it perpetuates hate Leads to Subjugation, dehumanization When it uses the big lie When it censors, before after and during CMNS 130 Democratic Propaganda See the Fleras piece in the courseware(53-54) How does he define it? Central argument: media work as discourses in defence of ideology Reference to media as democratic propaganda provides a fresh and unconventional way of understanding mainstream media in terms of what they do and how But: Do not underestimate the gap between CMNS 130 Propaganda Methods - Black art: Name calling and demonization of the other Glittering Generality Transference: Testimonials Card Stacking: Lie by omission: Quote out of context Bold assertion Twisting or Distortion Logical Fallacies Manipulation of Language CMNS 130 Media in a Time of Crisis Aftermath of 9-11 proves civil liberties are vulnerable State control of military intelligence information is now very tight Press not able to find out: about interned prisoners ( importance of Arar case) Canada not able to challenge US military intelligence or find out about detained citizens CMNS 130 Crisis Cont’d US now threatening video surveillance cameras at the border: ‘dictating’ 3 fold increase in military expenditures ( Rumsfeld); a new Canadian identity card; “surveillance society” of George Orwell’s 1984 that threatens spillover In the US, dissent is unpatriotic, “soft” or worse, terrorist A return to propaganda, racial profiling, risk of McCarthy era in Cold War: and which press is writing about this? The story is only beginning CMNS 130 The Media, Politics, Marketplace and Democracy We have been and will continue to be involved in major global transformations of economies, democracies, cultures and societies The best way to monitor the impact of such change is through a vigorous news media, committed artistic community, and impassioned debates over ethical and democratic issues CMNS 130 Media Reform Movements in Canada Social movements emerging ( Mediawatch, CRARR, Impacs, Fraser Institute) Observatories: global media monitoring lab Anti war,and pro citizen and pro privacy Calls for increasing support for CBC: Increasing $ to alternative media Federal investigation into mainstream oligopolies: a pressure which is rising now that Minister Rock wants to deregulate the restriction on 20% foreign ownership More teeth– and supreme court challenges—on complaints on the quality of media coverage to do with equity, or fairness CMNS 130 The Public Opportunity Venues like the World Information Summit ( sponsored by the UN) The International Cultural Accord which calls for fair trade in Culture ( UNESCO) led by Canada and supported by over 50 countries WTO: challenging again and again the economism of their world view In Canada: Senate Inquiry, Next Election, Child Pornography Bill, Proposed change to Foreign Investment laws etc. a Big Agenda CMNS 130 Recommendations for Democratic Communication CULTURAL DEMOCRACY Support public, alternative, noncommercial space for the media Build media literacy and awareness Monitor and critique mainstream media Increase the quality and coordination of self-regulation CMNS 130 CULTURAL INDUSTRIES Protect the Freedom of the Press Support private media outlets against unfair competition from the US Build audiences for Canadian media Monitor and critique alternative media De regulation: there is sufficient CMNS 130 Bottom Line Media Politics Matter Citizens must be aware of the democratic consequences of the media worlds they swim in The best counsel for media tyranny is indifference: beware of the Brave New World CMNS 130