Cyberbullying on College Campuses: Exploring the Ethical

advertisement
Cyberbullying on College Campuses:
Exploring the Ethical Response to a Case Study
Between Staff and Students
KATE CURLEY
4/24/13
Outline
 Case study
 Analysis



Legal Considerations
Ethic of Justice
Ethic of Critique
 Decision making process



Reflection
Themes
Resolution
 Limitations and concerns


Ethic of Care
Ethic of the Profession
Fictional Case Study
 Student makes fake Facebook page of a staff member
 Response to a disciplinary decision
 Sexist and racist comments and pictures
 Key Players
 Staff member


Student


Dr. Amy Winters
Mark
“Your role”
Vice President of Student Affairs
 Amy’s supervisor

Legal Considerations
 J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District and Layshock
ex. rel. Layshock v. Hermitage School District

Inconsistent rulings
 “Substantive disruption” vs. First Amendment.
 Goal: avoid a lawsuit
(Davis, 2011; Hinduja & Patchin, 2011)
Ethic of Justice
 Kant (2004): people as ends in themselves, not
means to end

Mark using Winters as means

Winter using Mark as means
 Goal: to get all parties to see people as ends
Ethic of Critique
 vs. “banking system” of education (Freire, 2009)

Mark: feels powerless

Vs. “because I said so”
 Education as practice of freedom (hooks, 1994) and
learning partnerships (Baxter-Magolda, 2003)

Meaning-Making process (Baxter-Magolda, 2003, 2009;
Kegan, 1982)

Winters: acknowledge ethical freedom and marginalization
Ethic of Care
 “Step into another’s shoes” to encourage growth
(Beck, 1994; Dalai Llama, 1999; Noddings, 1999)
 In the scenario:
 Mark:


understand the hurt and the disciplinary action
Winters

Understand Mark developmentally
Ethic of the Profession
 The field of student affairs

Allegiance to the University

“Small:” want no blemishes or lawsuits

Intentionality (Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher
Education, 2012)
 Role of a supervisor

Incl. Winters

Have “contextual intelligence” (Terenzini, 1993)
Final Considerations
 These types of dilemmas:
“they reveal, they test, and they
shape” (Badaracco, 1997, p.6-7)
 Deliberation through reflection

Critical component of ethics (Aurelias,
1964)

Meaning-making process (Baxter-Magolda,
2003, 2009; Kegan, 1982, 1998)
Four patterns
1.
Respecting personhood
2. Accountability vs. Free Speech
3. Importance of Fostering Functional Relationships
4. Centrality of Education
Recommended Solutions
Collect all information
2. Transparency regarding the disciplinary action
3. The educational moment:
1.
1.
2.
3.
Online citizenship
Diversity training
Student Development training for staff
4. Rebuild relationships
1.
Between students and staff
2.
Between students and Dr. Winters
3.
Between staff and Mark
Limitations, Concerns, & Future Implications
 Concerns:

Can you keep up with technology?

Idealistic

My personal lens
 Future implications

Importance of problem

Generalizability of the framework
Any Questions?
THANK YOU.
References
Aristotle. (350 BCE). Nicomachean ethics. (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html
Aurelias, M. (1964). Meditations. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2003). Identity and learning: Student Affairs’ role in transforming higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 44(2), 231-247.
Baxter-Magolda, M. (2009). Authoring your own life: Developing an internal voice to face life’s challenges. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Beck, Lynn G. (1994). Caring defined. In Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession (pp.5-20). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bentham, J. (1948). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
Bodaccaro, J. L. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right and right. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (2012). CAS professional standards for higher education (8th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Dalai Lama. (1999) Supreme Emotion. In Ethics for the new millennium (pp.63-77). New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Davis, M. R. (2011). CyberBullying: High-profile incidents put legal, policy issues in the spotlight but lack of clarity remains. Education Week's Digital Directions, 4, 2833. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/852930996?accountid=13158
Evans, N. J., & Reason, R. D. (2001). Guiding principles: A review and analysis of student affairs philosophical statements. Journal of College Student Development.
42(4), 359-377.
Friere, P. (2009). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2011). Cyberbullying: A review of the legal issues facing educators. Preventing School Failure, 55(2), 71–78.
doi:10.1080/1045988X.2011.539433
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2004). Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. (T. K. Abott, Trans.). (Original work published 1785). Retrieved from
http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5682/pg5682.html
Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kegan, R. (1998). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In
T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp.31-53). New York, NY: Holt.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers Publishing.
MacDonald, C. D., & Roberts-Pittman, B. (2010). Cyberbullying among college students: prevalence and demographic differences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 9, 2003-2009. doi: 1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.436.
Mill, J. S. (1978). On liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Miller, J. (2013, Feb. 19). Cyberbullying law shields teachers from student tormenters. National Public Radio. Podcast retrieved from
http://www.npr.org/2013/02/19/172329526/cyber-bulling-law-shields-teachers-from-student-tormentors
Noddings, Nel. (1999). Care, justice, and equity. In Justice and caring (pp.7-19). New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
Shapiro, J. P. & Stefkovich, J. P. (2010). Ethical leadership and decision making in education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schuh, J., Jones, S., Harper, S, and Associates (Eds.). (2011). Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed.) . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Starratt, R. J. (1994). A multidimensional ethical framework. In Building an ethical school: a practical response to the moral crisis in schools (pp.45-58). Washington,
D.C.: Falmer Press.
Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 1-10.
Willard, N. E. (2007). The authority and responsibility of school officials in responding to cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S64–S65.
Download