Manifest Destiny America Looks West (& Up) Not East Trying to get something done around here is like . . . Three Branches of Federal Government Executive/”Commander-in-Chief” Applies & enforces laws, has veto power Appoints judges Legislative/Senators & Representatives Passes laws, can override veto Declares war (?) Powers of confirmation & impeachment Judicial Interprets law, Constitution Which branch is most powerful? Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Separation of powers a check on ambition Constitution for the Rich? Permits slavery and, until 1808, slave trade Slaves, in effect, to count as “silent voters” for southern states Voting rights left up to states’ definition No democracy, no “power to the people”? Federal government reserves power & rights Only groups recognized are states & individuals – no church, parties, cities or other associations No way for states or individuals to override federal decisions except through long judicial process Depends too much on enforcement rather than persuasion? OK, OK, you can have a “Bill of [individual] Rights” Granted as amendments, not in “established & ordained” body of Constitution Can be overturned Worded in general terms Ideology more “American”? Framers’ Assumptions Rights based in social/political existence, not in individual life – whose argument is that? Large is better; small is weaker and less just BUT people feel closer to small, local community? Government necessary to preserve Union Regulation of interstate & foreign commerce Anti-feds distrusted foreign commerce; preferred austere self-government to affluent dependence on intl. trade War not regulated – President & Congress free Unequal people allowed to co-exist Class differences not reflected (unlike Britain) Nor are geographical differences “Interest-Based Government” National identity based on two bottom lines of individual (private) existence Commerce – money, well-being (whose?) War – safety, emotional ties to warriors NOT on loyalty to “laws”? Or to “land”? What if total of private interests do not add up to national interest? Most 19th c. Americans willing to tolerate slavery? Full shelves vs. child labor in Asia, future war What if store shelves turn up empty? Jefferson the Federalist? Louisiana Purchase (1803) Jefferson wants more land for farmers BUT Assures that federal government will create most of the states (a dozen more to start) AND Precipitates sectional crisis of slavery extension Along with Constitution, does this “federal statehood” help create “American” identity? Civil War – 40% of military fights for “the colors” (North) even if they come from Southern states 1957 – Arkansas National Guard enforces segregation in Little Rock; nationalized 24 hours later, enforces desegregation – NO QUESTION Are Americans primarily divided by political or by sectional differences? War of 1812 Both sides half-hearted Burning institutions Further creates feeling of US nationality (heroes! anthems! campaign slogans!) BUT New York, New England merchants freely sell supplies to British troops Finally settles territorial disputes with Britain Gives US more international respect Monroe Doctrine (1823) Further wipes out Indian tribes on western frontier Tecumseh & “the Prophet” Erstwhile British allies Another Peaceful Revolution Federalists (Adams, Madison, Adams) replaced by Jacksonian Democracy “King Andrew” (1828-1836) First “non-elitist” president, from West War hero, Indian fighter, slaveowner, land speculator States given freer hand by executive Voting rights extended to poorer whites Vetoes Bank of United States Ignores judiciary Encourages removal or slaughter of Creeks, Seminoles, Cherokee et al. (Indian Removal Act of 1830) Jackson & allies prosper “Organization of American Space” US defines itself by (westward) expansion “Let us bind the republic . . . with roads and canals . . . let us conquer space” – Rep. John Calhoun, 1816 New territories organized in rectangles Defined in effect as “real estate” No attention to distinctive ecological, cultural features – land is squared off “blank slate” Speculators reap huge profits, at expense of infrastructure Conflicting visions inscribed on this “empty space” Thomas Cole, “Daniel Boone at His Cabin”(1826) Small independent farmers? Market for manufactures? Huge cotton & tobacco farms based on slavery? Cities? Metaphysical Space? Aggressive imperialism justified by unofficial doctrine of “Manifest Destiny” “the continent allotted by Providence” Innate belief in American superiority “spreading republican values” The “blessings of industry” Capitalism on the heels of agrarianism Technological orderliness vs. Indian mysticism Missionary/crusader zeal Despite Deism, Protestantism vs. Catholics & heathens American space as “white space” Missouri Compromise (1820) Political & economic borders “American Progress” John Gast (1872)