Social Psychology Chapter 14 Helping Theories Helping behavior: act intended to benefit another Altruism: unselfish concern for another’s welfare Helping Theories Arousal Theory: sight of victim produces anxiety so you act Cost-Reward Theory: Cost of helping low & cost of not helping high - help Cost of helping high & cost of not helping low - no Empathy-Altruism Theory: feeling empathy for other increases chances of helping Evolutionary Theory: contributed to our survival in the past Kitty Genovese Bystander effect: as number of bystanders increases, the likelihood of any one by-stander helping decreases Diffusion of responsibility: Dilution or weakening of each group member’s obligation to act when responsibility is perceived to be shared with all group members Bystander Intervention Problem: Latane and Darley; Best predictor of bystander intervention was group size 100 2-person groups Percentage helping 80 3-person groups 60 6-person groups 40 20 0 20 80 120 160 200 240 280 Seconds from beginning of emergency The Bad Samaritan – What influences helping behavior? Bystander Effect/Diffusion of Responsibility Fake seizure Social Cues Frisbee girls Hurt worker Smoke in room Appearance/background Lover’s quarrel Drunk or old guy Race Why don’t people help??? Diffusion of Responsibility; Bystander effect Conformity – when we don’t know what to do, we take our cues from others More likely to help if… How does the social situation affect our behavior? Situationism: The view that environmental conditions influence people’s behavior as much or more than their personal dispositions do Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo and Craig Haney (1971) Created a new social reality Called off after 6 days (planned 2 weeks) Never underestimate the power of a bad situation to overwhelm the good. Social Norms Socially based rules that prescribe what is acceptable and what is not Taught by family, friends, teachers, culture Often not verbalized Reciprocity: candy = bigger tip Examples? Why do people conform??? Conformity: change behaviors or beliefs to match those of others Asch Effect: group majority influences individual judgments Asch identifies three factors that influence whether a person will yield to pressure: The size of the majority The presence of a partner who dissented from the majority The size of the discrepancy between the correct answer and the majority position Cognitive Dissonance A highly motivating state in which people have conflicting cognitions, especially when their voluntary actions conflict with their attitudes – Leon Festinger Must change either behavior or thoughts Inducing Compliance Foot-in-the-door technique: get one to agree to small request and then gradually present larger ones Drive Carefully sign & charities Door-in-the-face technique: ask for large favor likely to be denied and then ask for something less Political groups and labor/management Low-ball approach: oral commitment made and then cost of fulfilling it raised Car salesmen Other Topics in Social Psychology Social facilitation: Presence of other people or working with others can improve performance Social loafing: People exert less effort when performing a group task than when performing the same task alone Deindividuation: When group members lose individuality and tend to do things not normally done when alone lose sense of personal responsibility group “assumes” responsibility Group polarization: tendency of people to make decisions that are more extreme when they are in a group as opposed to a decision made alone or independently. Groupthink Conform opinions to what you believe is the consensus; increases when… Isolation of the group High group cohesiveness Directive leadership Homogeneity of members’ social background and ideology High stress from external threats with low hope of a better solution than that of the group leader Vietnam, Bay of Pigs, space shuttles Making Cognitive Attributions Fundamental attribution error: Tendency to emphasize internal causes and ignore external pressures (looking at others) Focus on dispositional factors Self-serving bias: One takes credit for success but denies responsibility for failure (looking within you) Focus on situational factors Interpersonal Attraction Reward theory of attraction: A social learning view that says we like best those who give us maximum rewards at minimum cost – combo of Proximity Similarity Self-disclosure Physical attractiveness Expectations and the Influence of Self-Esteem Matching hypothesis: Prediction that most people will find friends/mates that are about their same level of attractiveness Expectancy-value theory: People decide whether or not to pursue a relationship by weighing the potential value of the relationship against their expectations of success in establishing the relationship Loving Relationships Romantic love: A temporary and highly emotional condition based on sexual desire and some intimacy Americans often believe that this is the basis for long-term commitment What do you think? Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love Passion Intimacy Commitment Triangular Theory of Love Passion: erotic, physical attraction Intimacy: sharing feelings & confidences; emotional, not physical Commitment: putting the relationship first in your life Liking/friendship: high intimacy, zero passion, zero commitment Romantic love: high passion, high intimacy, low commitment Infatuation: high passion, low intimacy, low commitment Complete love: balance of all three Prejudice and Discrimination Prejudice: A negative attitude toward an individual based solely on his or her membership in a particular group Discrimination: A negative action taken against an individual as a result of his or her group membership Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components Stereotyped thinking Hatred/anger Discrimination Prejudice and Discrimination In-group: The group with which an individual identifies Out-group: Those outside the group with which an individual identifies Social distance: The perceived difference or similarity between oneself and another person – easier it is to feel differently Causes of Prejudice Dissimilarity and Social Distance Causes of Prejudice Dissimilarity and Social Distance Economic Competition Causes of Prejudice Dissimilarity and Social Distance Economic Competition Scapegoating Causes of Prejudice Dissimilarity and Social Distance Economic Competition Scapegoating Conformity to Social Norms Causes of Prejudice Dissimilarity and Social Distance Economic Competition Scapegoating Conformity to Social Norms Media Stereotypes Combating Prejudice Research suggests that the possible tools for combating prejudice include: Equal status contact Legislation New role models